Recommended Posts

Quote

According to WZ Radio regular Ryan Satin of ProWrestlingSheet.com, former WWE NXT star Solomon Crowe, known on the indy scene as Sami Callihan, has signed a deal to appear on season three of Lucha Underground.

 

Multiple sources say Sami began negotiations to join the roster not long after appearing in a dark match during a season 2 taping, and he’s expected to debut at the Temple this weekend.

 

Callihan was released from WWE NXT last year.

http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/688479-former-wwe-nxt-star-signs-deal-to-appear-on-season-3-of-lucha-underground

 

Speaking of Lucha Underground, tonight's episode is Aztec Warfare 2 (and Rey Mysterio makes his debut)!

14 hours ago, MightyJordan said:

http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/688479-former-wwe-nxt-star-signs-deal-to-appear-on-season-3-of-lucha-underground

 

Speaking of Lucha Underground, tonight's episode is Aztec Warfare 2 (and Rey Mysterio makes his debut)!

Crap.  I missed that last night.

TNA's announced five new signings: Jesse Guilmette (Pepper Parks), Laura Dennis (Cherry Bomb), Marshe Rockett (Mr. M80) Thomas LaRuffa and Mikael Viege (Sylvester Lefort and Marcus Louis from NXT).

Welp, TNA's gone and ######ed up again.

Quote

It saddens me to announce that TNA have issued the withdrawal of EC3/Ethan Carter from our April 3rd PCW show. The other international talent booked being Ken Anderson, Jade, Eddie Kingston, Cedric Alexander are all still confirmed to appear.

 

WrestleMania weekend is the hardest time of the year to secure a replacement talent but I have worked hard to secure somebody and subject to him finding his passport we may have another guest from the USA.

 

I did reach out to TNA management but was told ''Unfortunately nothing can be done. This is a network commitment and something he had no control over''.

 

Considering TNA was publicly vocal about not being happy when AJ Styles pulled out of an agreed deal with them, it does seem double standards to me that the company would ask talent to back out of a deal that has been in place for many weeks. I have lost out financially having paid for an extensive promotional campaign with EC3 clearly front and centre promoting his appearance but most of all I feel for fans who have used their hard earned money and booked travel to see/meet EC3. We have gone above and beyond to try source a replacement in tough times for those fans but it is a shame that when asked for assistance TNA told us ''nothing can be done''.

 

I will in future be thinking twice about using TNA talent to avoid repeat scenarios as even WWE respect that when a date is agreed it is agreed and do not try to pull talent from it. I try give my fans more than value for money and will continue to do so but even though I do take full responsibility for the change in the lineup, you know I will always be honest with you all.

 

The show will still be amazing and tickets are available from www.prestoncitywrestling.com

 

PCW owner - Steven Fludder

http://prestoncitywrestling.com/news/2016/03/26/tna-pull-ec3

 

They better not pull Drew Galloway from next month's PWA show; he's the main reason I'm going.

1 minute ago, LOC said:

So wait, they had Shane and Undertaker fight (even for one move) on RAW before WM? Yeesh.

Yep, and for god only knows why, we got "treated" to two Authority promos, both of which ended in HHH and reigns brawling (and one of them ended the show).

39 minutes ago, MightyJordan said:

Yep, and for god only knows why, we got "treated" to two Authority promos, both of which ended in HHH and reigns brawling (and one of them ended the show).

Meh. I mean, I think I'd watch WM just for that match alone but come on WWE. They only did this because the WM is so weak compared to past years (which isn't their fault of course). But the Reigns thing boggles my mind. Is Vince really that blind, or that gleefully arrogant to let him win at WM when literally EVERYONE hates Reigns right now? Probably both.

5 minutes ago, LOC said:

Meh. I mean, I think I'd watch WM just for that match alone but come on WWE. They only did this because the WM is so weak compared to past years (which isn't their fault of course). But the Reigns thing boggles my mind. Is Vince really that blind, or that gleefully arrogant to let him win at WM when literally EVERYONE hates Reigns right now? Probably both.

Apparently, they expected Eva Marie to get a babyface reaction last night, so they (or at least Vince) are just completely delusional.

1 hour ago, LOC said:

Meh. I mean, I think I'd watch WM just for that match alone but come on WWE. They only did this because the WM is so weak compared to past years (which isn't their fault of course). But the Reigns thing boggles my mind. Is Vince really that blind, or that gleefully arrogant to let him win at WM when literally EVERYONE hates Reigns right now? Probably both.

I had a weird idea about the HHH/Reigns fight- Let HHH win, then "retire" with the belt.  That way, tournament for the new top 2 contenders to battle for it at another PPV.  Or, Shane wins, strips HHH of the belt (HHH retains via DQ or something).  Then, something else to figure out who gets the belt.

But, this being WWE, that would NEVER happen. 

 

Thoughts?

They wouldn't do a HHH retiring with the belt story, that's to much even for them (maybe.....?!). Shane isn't going to win, and even if he does win, and HHH does win I doubt they would strip him of the belt. They would have to have a reason other than "I hate you, prick" lol Still, either of those options you came up with are still better than whatever dreck WWE will give us this weekend.

1 hour ago, episode said:

Apparently, they expected Eva Marie to get a babyface reaction last night, so they (or at least Vince) are just completely delusional.

Yeah, I saw Meltzer say that. Assuming it's true, they really are just delusional. They were in Brooklyn, FFS! Brooklyn hosted an NXT TakeOver event last year that had one of the best matches of the year in Bayley vs. Sasha Banks (oh yeah, they were also chanting "We want Sasha!" throughout Charlotte vs. Becky Lynch on Raw last night); they have standards! What Meltzer also said was that they reckoned behind-the-scenes that all the booing Eva Marie got in NXT would stay in NXT...

 

o7XDuD8.gif

 

Even (The) Brian Kendrick can't work miracles.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft explains how it made Teams so much faster in 2026 by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is Redmond's flagship online communication and collaboration tool, primarily used in enterprise, government, and school environments. It regularly receives updates, with Microsoft frequently revealing features currently in development as well, such as Efficiency Mode and a dedicated app for meeting recaps. Now, the company has shed some light on the backend enhancements it has made to its popular software in 2026. During the first half of 2026, switching between chats has become 20% faster on desktop and web, which is especially great for less powerful devices or hardware on weak networks. Microsoft explains that it tracks two types of chat switches. The first is a warm switch, which relates to returning to a recent chat, in which case it is most likely already present in memory and should load extremely fast. The other is a cold switch where a chat that hasn't been opened recently is now opened. Naturally, the second type of chat switch was causing the most notable latency spikes. Microsoft realized that this was happening because of three reasons. First, the query to fetch conversation data was being fired too late. Next, queries were being sent sequentially, increasing the overall round-trip time. Finally, there was no handling of response priority, which meant that non-critical responses would sometimes block the main thread. Microsoft solved all of these problems by firing the data query immediately, bundling queries to be sent together so that they wouldn't create a "waterfall" effect, and enabling faster painting of the frame. As a result, warm and cold switches now have almost the same latency, and the only distinguishable difference between them is due to the data layer response time. Next, Microsoft focused on reducing app hangs and freezes on macOS and iOS by 35%. On macOS, the company has a health monitor thread running in the background that does exactly what it says on the tin. The tech firm built a dedicated StackDecoder tool to analyze health monitor's output at scale. Through this combination, it decided to move several error reporting and monitoring threads either to the background or treated them as an asynchronous call so that they wouldn't block the main thread, causing Teams to freeze. On iOS, the same result was accomplished through optimization of computations, caching, offloading operations from the main thread, refactoring database access behaviors, deferring non-critical tasks, and more. On a related note, it also made people search 25% on iOS by optimizing the query pipeline, and efficient database task queuing and scheduling. However, Microsoft has emphasized that improving Teams' performance is an ongoing endeavor, and that it hopes that these efforts will continue to make the software a reliable partner in online communication scenarios. On a related note, Microsoft recently unveiled some upcoming performance upgrades for OneDrive on macOS too, and you can check those out here.
    • Let Apple have its way, as customers will eschew Apple in favor of more open solutions--which is what they should be doing anyway!... I'm not a fan of Apple at all, but when the lawyers in the EUC start dictating to companies how their software should be made, I think the companies should just drop the EU altogether as a market. EUC lawyers make a mint every time they levy a fine on a successful American software company. What a racket. The EU consumer should be the final word on what products he buys and which ones he doesn't, but the EUC seeks to put itself into the position of the EU customer, and make those decisions for him, under the guise of "helping him." Q. What do you do when the person at your door says, "Hi! I'm from the government, and I'm here to help you make intelligent buying decisions!" A. Grab your possessions and run for the hills...
    • Just another show from my childhood ruined by wokeness 'politically correct' BS. They should let some things just die out gracefully.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      lamborghiniv10 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      X-No-file earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      210
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!