F1 World Championship 2008 Thread



Recommended Posts

you mean only pulling <5s gap in a lighter car? as for lewis' tyre problem, if it was a driving problem, don't you think it would have happened in the first stint or the on the softer tyres?

hamilton didn't have an extra stop, the reason he lost a lot of time was due to having the tyre problem early in a lap so had to do most of a lap with a failed tyre

I thought he had to make a extra stop, (I nodded off for a few minutes) until I heard the announcers going crazy.

you mean only pulling <5s gap in a lighter car?

Lewis was supposed to enter the pit stop in the very same lap as Massa, but they decided to postpone it for the next lap (why did McLaren do it? beats me). Massa's car wasn't lighter at all and I hope you're not making such an assumption just because he entered the pits one lap earlier. It had to do with getting ahead of Alonso so he wouldn't slow him down, not the fuel itself. He would easily be able to drive a couple of more laps if he had to.

I think it is a fair assumption that Massa was lighter and I believe McLaren made Lewis' first stop early in an attempt to pass Massa later on, except they never got the opportunity to play it through. I'll explain.

Throughout the weekend, McLaren appeared a good 0.5s quicker than Ferrari, particularly in Q1 and Q2. This indicates a stronger car. Then in Q3 the gap was only about 0.2s-0.3s. This indicates more fuel on board the McLaren's than Ferrari for Q3.

Now Massa made a great start and put a good move on Lewis. We all know how difficult it is for the cars to follow through long fast corners (which Hungary has plenty of) without losing a load of time. Massa had the lighter car, was in front and started to pull away. No chance for Lewis to get close enough to pass, so the move had to be in the pits. But the gap was 3s...

What I think McLaren did with Lewis was pit him early the first time round, filling him with a few laps more fuel than Massa. They could have run him 2-3 laps more on the first stop, but 3 seconds in 3 laps? No way. They added more fuel than Massa in the first stop (about 3-4 laps), on top of the 2-3 laps remaining fuel. Then if Lewis could stay within 3 seconds for the second stop, he'd have had about 6-8 laps in which to make up the time before his stop. Entirely possible, more so with Massa on the super-soft.

Lewis was supposed to enter the pit stop in the very same lap as Massa, but they decided to postpone it for the next lap (why did McLaren do it? beats me). Massa's car wasn't lighter at all and I hope you're not making such an assumption just because he entered the pits one lap earlier. It had to do with getting ahead of Alonso so he wouldn't slow him down, not the fuel itself. He would easily be able to drive a couple of more laps if he had to.

he was going faster than alonso so bringing him in earlier would mean less of a gap...

If Massa was running a substantially lighter fuel load, why did Hamilton only stay out extra lap? You'd think he'd push for a few more laps to narrow the gap and then go lighter on the fuel.

What's the word on Massa's blow up? Looked like an oil problem. And what about Kimmi? His front suspension looked woobly the last 3-4 laps of the race.

If Massa was running a substantially lighter fuel load, why did Hamilton only stay out extra lap? You'd think he'd push for a few more laps to narrow the gap and then go lighter on the fuel.

It was pointless staying out only 2-3 laps more because no matter how hard Hamilton pushed, he would only get it down from 3s to 1.5s at most. Then he'd be stuck in turbulent air again, on a lighter fuel load than Massa for the second stop. Then the same would happen at the next stop - down to 1.5s, back into turbulent air probably 5 seconds behind because of an earlier stop. The lighter fuel load would not let him get within 3s and even if it did, passing would be near impossible.

By pitting early and fuelling heavy, he would not only have the extra 3-4 laps of fuel from fuelling heavy, but the 2-3 left in the tank from his first stop. Totalling around 7 laps of extra fuel. Now if he could keep within 3 seconds, he'd have 7 laps in which to make up the 3s gap. Still not quite enough, but then there is a second important factor that during these 7 laps, Massa would have a heavy tank of fuel AND the much slower super soft tyres. So not only could Hamilton close the 3s, but gain another 2s or 3s over Massa.

And if it didn't work he'd still be in 2nd... tyres permitting. :p

I know the super softs were slow but the harder set weren't much faster for Mr Hamilton at the end of the day :p

True. :laugh: I'm amazed the set of super softs lasted 28 laps.

Valencia next. :D Always like to see new tracks.

  • 3 weeks later...

I noticed he purposely went off-track through one corner. Will be interesting to see if more do it. Not sure there is a rule against "going wide through a corner to gain time".

The next practice will probably be a little more representative. I think the first is very much a case of learning the track - the fastest times were changing quite frequently.

without seeing i dont know fully but, there has to be at least 1 (or maybe 2) wheel on the designated track area at all times, back in france, raikkonen seemingly went too straight over a chicane and did an extra lap as he wasn't sure if his lap was ok due to having almost all 4 wheels off the track area

I expect Massa to be one of the lighter cars there, judging by their Q1 and Q2 times. Despite that, if temperatures are warmer tomorrow, Ferrari will be strong. If they remain cool, I expect them to struggle a little bit like Hockenheim.

Should be a good race though. The start should be interesting as the pole position side are not on the grippy part of the track.

Regards the track itself - from a racing perspective it looks great, but the surrounding atmosphere is pretty dismal. Far from a "modern Monaco".

I expect Massa to be one of the lighter cars there, judging by their Q1 and Q2 times. Despite that, if temperatures are warmer tomorrow, Ferrari will be strong. If they remain cool, I expect them to struggle a little bit like Hockenheim.

Should be a good race though. The start should be interesting as the pole position side are not on the grippy part of the track.

Regards the track itself - from a racing perspective it looks great, but the surrounding atmosphere is pretty dismal. Far from a "modern Monaco".

it's known ferrari's struggle heating their tyres in quali but more fuel = more work into the tyres = easier to heat up = faster car so he may not be that light.

agree on the other parts, pole position isn't on the grippy side which seems wrong really and there is a lot of blind corners and unforgiving barriers so any crash and the SC will be out

it's known ferrari's struggle heating their tyres in quali but more fuel = more work into the tyres = easier to heat up = faster car so he may not be that light.

You're right about Ferrari not getting up to temperature quick enough, but that wasn't really what I was referring to.

It was pretty much discovered after Hockenheim that Ferrari and McLaren use the tyres most effectively at different temperatures. Ferrari need track temperatures in the 30s, like they were yesterday, for the tyres to work properly. At those temperatures, the McLaren starts overheating and wears the tyres quickly. McLaren needs track temperatures in the 20s, like today. This is too low for Ferrari and they don't get maximum grip from the tyre, however it's perfect for the McLaren.

I believe it's completely accidental for McLaren, but it seems to have worked out in their favour a couple of times so far.

I think regards pole position placement, that it is decided on which gives the most direct line into the first turn, rather than which is actually quickest. There are a few races where 2nd is the better starting slot.

nice to see the ferrari engine not blowing up always on the same car. :)

massa in his own world today. impressive and mistake free.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Happens to the best of us, bro. 😛 
    • Thanks to some of the other recent Windows improvements, I'm optimistic about this one. My quick wishlist would be: perf like the older menu, merge both menus or at the very least, the older menu should be a flyout, not a simulated click to the old menu, and lastly, a customization window to let users move items from one menu to another, so I could bring Send To back to the main menu, and the OneDrive settings to the older.
    • This Gigabyte AMD RX 9070 XT is very good deal despite the launch of 9070 GRE by Sayan Sen Recently we reviewed AMD's latest 1440p gaming card, the Radeon RX 9070 GRE 12GB, for $549. The card is in stock too at that price, though if you want significantly better performance and don't mind spending a bit more, the Gigabyte Gaming model of RX 9070 XT is currently on sale for just $650 (purchase link under the specs table down below). The card employs Gigabyte's WINDFORCE cooling system which combines multiple design elements such as alternate-spinning Hawk fans, a vapor chamber, and composite heat pipes to manage heat dissipation. The Server-grade Thermal conductive gel further helps in this department. The inclusion of a semi-passive cooling mode allows the fans to remain inactive under low workloads, which allows for reduced noise operation during lighter usage. There is dual BIOS switch that allows toggling between performance and silent modes. The technical specifications of the Gigabyte Radeon RX 9070 XT GAMING OC 16G are given in the table below: Specification Value Core Clock Boost Clock: up to 3060 MHz Game Clock: up to 2520 MHz Stream Processors 4096 Memory Clock 20 Gbps Memory Size 16GB Memory Type GDDR6 Memory Bus 256-bit Card Bus Interface PCI Express 5.0 Maximum Resolution 7680 × 4320 Multi-View Support 4 displays Card Dimensions L=288 mm, W=132 mm, H=56 mm Recommended Power Supply 750W Power Connectors 3 × 8-pin Video Outputs 2 × DisplayPort 2.1a 2 × HDMI 2.1b Get it at the link below: GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC 16GB Graphics Card, GV-R9070XTGAMING OC: $649.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $740) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Why does this kind of tactic not surprise me?
    • They used AI based TOOLS to convert the JavaScript engine (the main rendering engine is still C++) and it was not fully automated but was human reviewed. Other subsystems will be looked into to also be converted to Rust in the future. I have no problem with any of that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      80
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      63
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!