National Hockey League 2007-08 Stanley Cup Playoffs


Recommended Posts

I understand what you're saying, the reason why I thought they were overrated is because Montreal is a good example of a great regular season team. They weren't on top for the majority of the regular season but their players were playing really well, perhaps better than they should be playing. If you were into pre-season analytics the Habs weren't even slated to make the playoffs, or around 7-8th in the East.

They have a rookie goalie, I really don't think they have a very strong set of forwards, and they aren't big and physical enough as a team to win the cup. When you live in the West, everyone is always talking about TO or MTL in the East, and they get way more press coverage and the general population of Canada lives in those two areas and it gets tiring because they believe that their team is better than they are. (Note TO thought they had a chance to make the playoffs with around 12 games left, LOL)

Montreal is a great team, I just thought even before the playoffs they'd have a tough time in a playoff series because I don't feel they are physical enough. The hit counts may be in their favour, but I believe Philly has been more physical in this series, perhaps why you view them as bullies.

I predicted they'd go out in round 2 because of these reasons.

Edited by Matrix XII

Hey guys, long time huh?

What can I say, Detroit/Colorado... I almost feel bad for the Avs, it was like watching a reply of the 7-0 playoff massacre a few years back...

Now the Wings just need to hold things together and keep their intensity level up for the finals, and then bring the Cup back to Hockeytown!

Montreal IS outplaying and outchancing Philly. We're winning in goalposts about 8-2. :p

I'm not liking the style of hockey played by the Flyers. They have a couple of great players who are doing their scoring, but the rest seem like a team of thugs. Boston played with far more class in that series. In the end of course, it all boils down to who wins. Philly is winning and will most likely go on to win the series, unless the Habs can pull off a repeat of 4 years ago.

How is the team with the most GA, the best PP and the almost best PK overrated? Seems like a silly thing to say. Anything can happen in the playoffs to make the regular season stats look out of place; why would this now seem odd to any of you?

*yawn*... 3-1...

The style of play by the Flyers is the way hockey was meant to be played. This is why the Caps/Flyers series was the most exciting in the first round out of all the 8 series. It was a series of inches, battles on the boards, puck battles, very hard fought and physical. Flyers had just enough to outmuscle the Caps and win in game 7.

I dont think the Habs are overrated like the other poster had said, but I do agree with the notion that Montreal lives and dies by the PP. I watch all the postgame stuff on TSN.ca website and the one guy keeps saying "The Habs strength has become their weakness. Yes, they scored those 2 PP goals on that 5 min major, but overall their PP is just abysmal."

They are getting outmuscled and outplayed when it matters most to them - while on their PP. Flyers seem to block their shots, Biron is on his game, and the defense never lets a rebound really kill them...they are always at the puck to clear it.

On the other end, Montreal's PK has been poor as well. Flyers are 4 for 11 on the power play this series (36.3%)...Habs therefore are 63.7% on the PK - that is rather bad. 4 power play goes are not many in four games, but its four goals on just 11 PP's.

Considering that Montreal has an advantage in the PP department (15, with two 5-3's and a 5min major, to 11, with only one 5-3), you would expect them to be doing better. Yes, the math shows 4 PP goals in 15 chances for a 26.7% efficiency rate, but take out the 5min major and the 2 goals from that single powerplay (had it been a 4 min double minor, the Habs would have only scored a single PP goal since the Flyers killed off the first two and a half mins of the major before the first goal) and it becomes 2 goals in 14 chances, or 13.3% (or 3 in 15, for 20.0%, if you look at it from a double minor standpoint). Not exactly something to write home about.

... What the hell happened to my Avs? Seriously, it was like they were sleeping the whole time.

/me cries.

What can I say, the Wings are back. :)

About time they play like the champions that they are.

*yawn*... 3-1...

The style of play by the Flyers is the way hockey was meant to be played. This is why the Caps/Flyers series was the most exciting in the first round out of all the 8 series. It was a series of inches, battles on the boards, puck battles, very hard fought and physical. Flyers had just enough to outmuscle the Caps and win in game 7.

I dont think the Habs are overrated like the other poster had said, but I do agree with the notion that Montreal lives and dies by the PP. I watch all the postgame stuff on TSN.ca website and the one guy keeps saying "The Habs strength has become their weakness. Yes, they scored those 2 PP goals on that 5 min major, but overall their PP is just abysmal."

They are getting outmuscled and outplayed when it matters most to them - while on their PP. Flyers seem to block their shots, Biron is on his game, and the defense never lets a rebound really kill them...they are always at the puck to clear it.

On the other end, Montreal's PK has been poor as well. Flyers are 4 for 11 on the power play this series (36.3%)...Habs therefore are 63.7% on the PK - that is rather bad. 4 power play goes are not many in four games, but its four goals on just 11 PP's.

Considering that Montreal has an advantage in the PP department (15, with two 5-3's and a 5min major, to 11, with only one 5-3), you would expect them to be doing better. Yes, the math shows 4 PP goals in 15 chances for a 26.7% efficiency rate, but take out the 5min major and the 2 goals from that single powerplay (had it been a 4 min double minor, the Habs would have only scored a single PP goal since the Flyers killed off the first two and a half mins of the major before the first goal) and it becomes 2 goals in 14 chances, or 13.3% (or 3 in 15, for 20.0%, if you look at it from a double minor standpoint). Not exactly something to write home about.

That's a pretty fair assessment. Despite Montreal getting a lot more scoring chances, shots on goal and puck possession time, Philly has done a great job of keeping Montreal to the perimeter, playing strong on the puck and the boards, clogging up the front of the net to sweep away rebounds and pressuring the pointmen. Now what Philly has done with the little chances it has had is what Montreal isn't doing: capitalizing on opportunities. Ya, it seems like Philly got at least 1 freebie goal a game, but Montreal needs to take advantage of opportunities given to them. All those posts simply means Montreal didn't score. How many open nets did guys like Higgins and Kovalev flake on? If you can't do that in the playoffs, you don't belong. Our defense has been awful in the playoffs and other than Koivu I don't see many players playing with determination, heart and urgency in their game.

As for Philly being built for the playoffs, I wouldn't agree with that statement. They're playing alright, but they need to do better in limiting the opposition presence in their zone. They're not nearly as physical as they should be. Don't use Montreal as an example because Montreal is not that tough either. I've been keeping a close eye on the Penguins and I feel that they're the most "built for the playoffs" in the East. They fight non stop for territory and puck possession, they seldom play soft on the puck, their defense has really picked it up in the playoffs as has their goaltending, and of course you got all offense that can expose you like no other. I wouldn't want to give ateam like Pittsburgh 38 SOG like you did Montreal.

The style of play by the Flyers is the way hockey was meant to be played. This is why the Caps/Flyers series was the most exciting in the first round out of all the 8 series. It was a series of inches, battles on the boards, puck battles, very hard fought and physical. Flyers had just enough to outmuscle the Caps and win in game 7.

I'm not exactly saying they're winning something by being cheap, because that would take away from the way Biron has played. But there's something else in the mix that IS about HOW they play that's bugging me. I don't know what it is, and it very well may be just that they've worked out how to stifle Montreal's offense, I don't know. The uncalled-for hits by a bunch of guys that look like they were drafted in a bar doesn't appeal to me though, and the officiating has stunk it up the last 2 games for sure. It will be interesting to see what happens tomorrow night.

When you live in the West, everyone is always talking about TO or MTL in the East, and they get way more press coverage and the general population of Canada lives in those two areas and it gets tiring because they believe that their team is better than they are. (Note TO thought they had a chance to make the playoffs with around 12 games left, LOL)

That's because the CBC count on the Maple Laughs as their primary market team. Montreal is their sloppy seconds when the Leafs choke.

If the teams in the East aren't better, where are the teams in Western Canada right now that should be on the news? They should be winning their series, no? Nope, they're playing golf already. Yes, we may join them in a few days, but that's longer than the other so-called "stronger" teams from the mighty West spent in the playoffs this year. ;)

That's because the CBC count on the Maple Laughs as their primary market team. Montreal is their sloppy seconds when the Leafs choke.

If the teams in the East aren't better, where are the teams in Western Canada right now that should be on the news? They should be winning their series, no? Nope, they're playing golf already. Yes, we may join them in a few days, but that's longer than the other so-called "stronger" teams from the mighty West spent in the playoffs this year. ;)

absolutely, you are spot on!

See you next season, Habs.

Habs are done, anyone listen to Don Cherry after the game? Said Montreal got worn down because of their size.

I guess you guys still don't think your team is overrated. :p

The Habs aren't overrated, although I can't say the same about your crybaby goalie Luongo.

It was a much better game tonight by both teams, much more actual hockey. They wwnt over 6 minutes without a whistle at one point. I can't believe they allowed the goal that was deflected from the hand, but it wasn't the factor in the win. They also missed a blatant high stick call. Biron wasn't as solid as he's been but he was still pretty damn good.

Why would they be overrated? Underrated teams can win too. And they just did. Pittsburgh will eat them up (well, they should, anyway). Stop being bitter about the Canucks being eliminated from the playoffs already. ;)

It was a much better game tonight by both teams, much more actual hockey. They wwnt over 6 minutes without a whistle at one point. I can't believe they allowed the goal that was deflected from the hand, but it wasn't the factor in the win. They also missed a blatant high stick call. Biron wasn't as solid as he's been but he was still pretty damn good.

I still don't understand that goal either, really. I mean, they were debating it for about 5 minutes, then they come to the conclusion that he didn't deflect the puck, yet the give him the goal anyways?? :| And yeah, that miss on the high-sticking kinda grinds my gears a little. Either way though, you are right that they didn't really contribute to the outcome of the game.

See ya next year Habs :(

(I still blame part of this on Begin's pointless foul in the final minutes of the previous game on Thursday. Had he not done that, Philly wouldn't have gotten a power play and most likely would not have gotten that goal in the end, bringing the game into OT, owel.)

It was a much better game tonight by both teams, much more actual hockey. They wwnt over 6 minutes without a whistle at one point. I can't believe they allowed the goal that was deflected from the hand, but it wasn't the factor in the win. They also missed a blatant high stick call. Biron wasn't as solid as he's been but he was still pretty damn good.

Why would they be overrated? Underrated teams can win too. And they just did. Pittsburgh will eat them up (well, they should, anyway). Stop being bitter about the Canucks being eliminated from the playoffs already. ;)

I'm not the least bit bitter about the Canucks not making the playoffs, we needed that for a shakeup. I'm just talking hockey and giving my opinions, that's all :p

Yay Pens! I've been cheering for them all playoffs, hopefully they win the cup :)

I think Crosby's ankle is acting up though, he doesn't look the same.

Anyone else have the feeling this could be shaping up to be a Wings / Pens cup round?

I really don't want the Wings to win the cup, but I think they have the best chance right now. The Pens are probably 2nd to them right now. I really like watching them play, they're very entertaining and have such explosive forwards :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!