Got bored, Come watch OS X own all :D


Recommended Posts

Why use something quick and easy like notepad?

post-248102-1210553315_thumb.jpg

Every window after the first isn't a big deal - it's orders of magnitude less memory/cpu usage because it's sharing code that's already loaded.

To do something harder open several hundred instances of firefox and navigate to different sites. While the core code is still shared, you'll have unique data to draw for every window.

That being said, it is impressive that the underlying memory management and GUI subsystems are robust enough to handle this meany open applications.

It's nothing of the sort.

A good memory benchmark would be something like performing a traveling salesman over a multi-gigabyte data set and displaying the results as text on dozens (yes, only dozens) of rapidly scrolling text views.

This does absolutely nothing to stress the memory management or graphics systems. You could cause more stress on both just by tinkering in Quartz Composer or Core Image Funhouse for 20 minutes.

Can someone tell me how to/or make a script/automation that will open 10,000 textedit windows?

display dialog "How many Text Edit windows?" default answer "10"
set limit to text returned of result
tell application "TextEdit"
	launch
	repeat limit times
		make new document
	end repeat
end tell

To you guys who wants to test an needs a script for Windows. Here is a easy one:

Dim open, WshShell

set open = CreateObject("WScript.Shell")

numWindows = 1000 'Number of windows to open

timeBe = 200 'Time between each open window in milliseconds

For i = 1 To numWindows

open.Run("notepad.exe")

WScript.sleep timeBe

Next

Copy and save as whateveryouwant.vbs

If you want to impress someone, then open 1000 Photoshop windows on a Mac. TextEdit windows dont take up a lot of memory and are low on system resources. I can open 1000+ notepad windows on a PC and it would work the same way.

Opening numerous [empty] Photoshop documents would be more of a stability test on Photoshop than the operating system.

Just tried running the following C# program which opens 1000 notepad windows, in Windows Vista, with 2GB of ram :

namespace CSharpTest {
	class Program {
		static void Main(string[] args) {
			string path = "C:\\Windows\\System32\\notepad.exe";
			for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
				System.Diagnostics.Process.Start(path);
			}
		}
	}
}

The system went unresponsive for a minute, then Aero was disabled and a warning appeared that it had been disabled. After maybe 2 minutes, the interface became responsive again, and according to Windows there were 988 notepad windows open (weird). Each notepad window was usable. I hit printscreen and opened Paint.NET, but it crashed. I tried to open MSPaint, but it gave an error message and quit. Then the taskbar became unresponsive again, so I had no way of closing the whole group together. I couldn't close them individually either because the task manager was messed up. I ended up CTRL-ALT-DELeting out and restarting the system.

I'm a bit disappointed.

well I can open only 8 psd (+20layers) at a time (because of the openGL) but I've got only 1GB RAM and a 256MB GC ;)

Number of layer's open isn't a very useful figure.

Look at the size of document in memory. I've got a 6 layer document open that's over 3gb (billboard resolution images). I've also got a 50-ish layer document that's under 300mb (screen resolution images/vectors/text).

EDIT: also, photoshops use of the graphics accelerator is absolutely trivial when compared with the capabilities of Quartz or WDM.

start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe 
start notepad.exe && start notepad.exe

... and so forth. Tested with Windows Vista SP1 32-bit on a P4 2.8GHz/1GB RAM/Intel Graphics. I got up to ~800 total processes before I stopped it.

Tested on Windows 7, = BSOD after 60 processes :D

I didn't go through the thread but have you tried pressing expose?

Some guy did, there is a screenshot back a little.

Opening numerous [empty] Photoshop documents would be more of a stability test on Photoshop than the operating system.

Photoshop takes up a lot more memory that a simple text screen like notepad. Loading 1000 Photoshop will use a lot of system memory and I would be curious to see how the system performs then.

Photoshop takes up a lot more memory that a simple text screen like notepad. Loading 1000 Photoshop will use a lot of system memory and I would be curious to see how the system performs then.

Photoshop itself consumes more memory than a text editor, but continual empty Photoshop documents do not.

Upon launch, it used 100mb of ram. And after 50 new empty Photoshop documents (default size):

Picture%202-1236715033.png

Here is a simple batch script i wrote to open 10,000 instances of Notepad. Copy the code and save it as <something>.bat

<code>

@echo off

echo Mission: Open 10000 instances of notepad - and survive.

echo.

pause

set i=0;

:loop

if %i%==10000 goto end

set /a i+=1

start notepad.exe

goto loop

:end

echo Status: Achieved

echo %i% instances of notepad are running

echo.

echo Press any key to exit . . .

pause>nul

exit

<\code>

Hopefully your system can survive. Mine is a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo with 4GB of RAM running the Windows 7 beta and it froze after running this script for about 5 minutes.

Wow, I had to log off to make it stop. The fans in my laptop went into overdrive. I've never heard my laptop sound like a small jet engine, seriously. In Windows Vista, you can't see the animation for opening a program after 90-100 instances of notepad.

Well I guess this puts this to rest then.

Windows XP can open millions of sessions of notepad.exe

Windows Vista can barely open 100 before getting slow and bulkey

Windows 7 just plain BSODs

Mac OS X is 1000 the record so far, maybe it's time for somebody with a Mac Pro to do an apple script for 10,000?

For the record, we should state whether or not these tests are run on Vista RTM, SP1, or SP2, along with architecture. The reason why I believe this is important is because GDI limits were raised in x86 SP1 (havent checked SP2) and x64 has an even higher ceiling.

Well I guess this puts this to rest then.

Windows XP can open millions of sessions of notepad.exe

Windows Vista can barely open 100 before getting slow and bulkey

Windows 7 just plain BSODs

Mac OS X is 1000 the record so far, maybe it's time for somebody with a Mac Pro to do an apple script for 10,000?

Just got Windows 7 (build 7000) to open and run 1000 notepad.exe sessions.

:)

Screenshot please ;)

I was running XP on my MacBook and managed to get 190 open before windows citied, OUT OF MEMORY, 190 using 2GB of RAM, thats stupid :D.

Can somebody post up an applescript for doing this on OS X, I wana see how far I can push my MacBook, we'll try for 5000 this time.

Screenshot please ;)

I was running XP on my MacBook and managed to get 190 open before windows citied, OUT OF MEMORY, 190 using 2GB of RAM, thats stupid :D .

Can somebody post up an applescript for doing this on OS X, I wana see how far I can push my MacBook, we'll try for 5000 this time.

Look up.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!