Mozilla Firefox 3.0 RC1


Recommended Posts

That's because of all the changes they've made to the code. You will need to use a different bit of code to hide the favicons for sites. I can't tell you unfortunately, as I don't know exactly what it is, but just thought I'd let you know there is some code out there somewhere which will do it :p

Installed it last night and first thing I've noticed is that I can't seem to disable Site Icons / Bookmark Icons using browser.chrome.site_icons and browser.chrome.favicons. Any one else?

"Go into your profile and delete the file places.sqlite. Restart FF, the file will be recreated and the favicons will be gone. "

http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/r203...remove-favicons

I echo the comments about Firefox 3 being a nice release.

I was about to pop into about:config to turn on that boolean value to stop Firefox from checking extension compatibility... and ROFL at the warning :laugh:

how long does each RC usually last for before they release the next one/go final?

I don't know for sure, but there will be an RC2, as some "showstopper" bugs have been found in RC1. The idea, though, is that if RC2 doesn't produce any major bugs, it will be branded the final release. Mozilla is slating the final release for next month, so each RC will last maybe a couple weeks or so?

"Go into your profile and delete the file places.sqlite. Restart FF, the file will be recreated and the favicons will be gone. "

http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/r203...remove-favicons

That just deletes all my Bookmarks forcing me to import them again from a backup :/

That just deletes all my Bookmarks forcing me to import them again from a backup :/

The way I deleted them was to download SQLite Manager extension from https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5817 and then go into Tools > SQLite Manager, then Database > Connect, open up places.sqlite. Under tables, theres a table called moz_favicons. Go into this one, and on the Browse & Search tab delete any records that are present. That will remove the favicons stored.

Hopefully they fix the bug in a future version since it's a rather long process to go to just to delete them...

Hopefully they fix the bug in a future version since it's a rather long process to go to just to delete them...

Looks like it's a confirmed bug with Places: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331228. Seems quite a trivial bug so hopefully they'll get it fixed before final.

I was able to get around it by exporting my bookmarks to a HTML file and editing the exported HTML to remove the ICON attributes from the individual bookmarks before importing the file back into FireFox.

Now all I need is an updated RefSpoof. It works with Nightly Tester Tools but for some reason it adds some invalid character place-holders (diamond with question mark) above the menu bar in FireFox when installed, which looks unsightly. I've scanned through the code to try and work out why but I can't see anything that might be causing it and the developer seems to have abandoned the project so I don't know if it'll get fixed.

I wonder if there's the other default themes (or themes looking like them) for download, ie. Firelight and Tango looking themes for Windows?

when Opera starts rendering pages properly, I might consider using it for more than 5 minutes :D

Judging from all those web standards test out there (and I'm not talking about Acid3), Opera renders pages much more properly than Firefox.

Or if you think rendering pages in non-standard quirky ways is "properly", then IE owns Firefox in rendering pages "properly". Firefox can't even do ActiveX!!! :D /sarcasm

Does Opera have Adblock (an adblocker as good as Adblock in fact) ? no.

Enough said.

You are wrong here, Opera has a very customizable content filtering mechanism built-in, you can edit Opera config manually to make its content filtering as good as you wish. Opera is very customizable by itself, just that you need to go deeper than the GUI at surface. I do agree that's a disadvantage for new-comers.

It's on topic because it's a feature firefox is able to utilise properly as opposed to only half of what other browsers can do even with addons installed. This makes Firefox the safer browser as well because of the subscribed adblock lists available to block out risky ads and also a cleaner browsing experience.

I'm sick of people talking about the "safety" of browsers like it's some security software. They are not. Opera/Firefox/Safari won't be much safer than IE if you don't have proper AV/Firewall installed. And they won't be much safer when you have proper AV/Firewall installed.

If you really want to talk about "safety" of browsers, then an adblocker definitely has little to do with "safety", since they can't fix the browser vulnerabilities. So far Opera is "safer" than Firefox in all those security reports out there, albeit like I said, that's mostly insignificant and irrelevant when compared to having proper real security apps like AV/Firewall software. Not to mention the add-ons can get infected themselves as shown by a recent event.

To think having a different browser can save you from all those virus and trojans out there is just too naive.

On another hand despite Opera is my personal favorite browser, I do think the RC1 quite a solid release for Firefox, albeit the way they moved the "default browser" setting from a clear prompt to a corner of the "Setup Type" installation step shortly after they accused Apple for being too pushy for Safari is... a bit hypocritical at least.

And if the "Awesome Bar" can have in-page history keyword search like the newer Opera 9.5 builds.

Judging from all those web standards test out there (and I'm not talking about Acid3), Opera renders pages much more properly than Firefox.
Opera does better with current standards, but Firefox is leading in future recommendations (which nobody really use yet). But I've seen basic basic rendering bugs from both of them, so I wouldn't claim any of these two to be definitely superior because they're so close together on average. Especially with Gecko 1.9, it's too early to get a good estimate of its quality just yet.
I'm sick of people talking about the "safety" of browsers like it's some security software. They are not. Opera/Firefox/Safari won't be much safer than IE if you don't have proper AV/Firewall installed. And they won't be much safer when you have proper AV/Firewall installed.

If you really want to talk about "safety" of browsers, then an adblocker definitely has little to do with "safety", since they can't fix the browser vulnerabilities. So far Opera is "safer" than Firefox in all those security reports out there, albeit like I said, that's mostly insignificant and irrelevant when compared to having proper real security apps like AV/Firewall software. Not to mention the add-ons can get infected themselves as shown by a recent event.

To think having a different browser can save you from all those virus and trojans out there is just too naive.

I pretty much agree but there's just one reservation: I have yet to see NoScript's functionalities duplicated on any of the other browsers, and the convenience it brings makes it feasible to disable scripting by default, and that prevents almost all web-based malicious code from running. It could be that I just haven't looked hard enough, and if that's the case I'd appreciate a link :)
On another hand despite Opera is my personal favorite browser, I do think the RC1 quite a solid release for Firefox, albeit the way they moved the "default browser" setting from a clear prompt to a corner of the "Setup Type" installation step shortly after they accused Apple for being too pushy for Safari is... a bit hypocritical at least.

And if the "Awesome Bar" can have in-page history keyword search like the newer Opera 9.5 builds.

There's a huge difference between using an update function to push brand new software and having a clearly visible checkbox for making default in an user-initiated installation. And it's not like it was presented in a deceptive manner either.

I echo the comments about Firefox 3 being a nice release.

I was about to pop into about:config to turn on that boolean value to stop Firefox from checking extension compatibility... and ROFL at the warning :laugh:

post-17647-1211525174.png

No idea if this is an extension I've got or what.

...

Judging from all those web standards test out there (and I'm not talking about Acid3), Opera renders pages much more properly than Firefox.

Or if you think rendering pages in non-standard quirky ways is "properly", then IE owns Firefox in rendering pages "properly". Firefox can't even do ActiveX!!! :D /sarcasm

...

Opera adds scrollbars where it shouldn't and messes up sizing with things. Firefox misrenders positioned generated content.

All browsers have bugs, what matters is how they treat those bugs (i.e. do the bugs become features like IE, or do they get fixed like Firefox, Opera, Safari, etc.)

There's only one extension that I'm missing, and that's the must have FLST. Focus Last Selected Tab. There doesn't appear to be a newer version that works with RC1 and it won't even allow you to install it, so you can't use the Nightly Tools to force it to work. So does anyone know of a similar extension that works with RC1? Old extension-https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/32 Nevermind, I found what I was looking for. Apparently there is a newer version that works with 3.0-http://gorgias.de/mfe/#flst

There's only one extension that I'm missing, and that's the must have FLST. Focus Last Selected Tab. There doesn't appear to be a newer version that works with RC1 and it won't even allow you to install it, so you can't use the Nightly Tools to force it to work. So does anyone know of a similar extension that works with RC1? Old extension-https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/32 Nevermind, I found what I was looking for. Apparently there is a newer version that works with 3.0-http://gorgias.de/mfe/#flst

Tab Mix Plus does that and much more.

firefox 3.0rc1 is totally awesome

still some crashes with binary plugins like my logmein and the occasional java site/app

its specific external plugins that are causing crashes for me otherwise its totally solid, fast, awesome

the killer robot is almost ready!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If I ever get that issue I will let you know how I fix it
    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      540
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!