Mozilla Firefox 3.0 RC1


Recommended Posts

That's because of all the changes they've made to the code. You will need to use a different bit of code to hide the favicons for sites. I can't tell you unfortunately, as I don't know exactly what it is, but just thought I'd let you know there is some code out there somewhere which will do it :p

Installed it last night and first thing I've noticed is that I can't seem to disable Site Icons / Bookmark Icons using browser.chrome.site_icons and browser.chrome.favicons. Any one else?

"Go into your profile and delete the file places.sqlite. Restart FF, the file will be recreated and the favicons will be gone. "

http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/r203...remove-favicons

I echo the comments about Firefox 3 being a nice release.

I was about to pop into about:config to turn on that boolean value to stop Firefox from checking extension compatibility... and ROFL at the warning :laugh:

how long does each RC usually last for before they release the next one/go final?

I don't know for sure, but there will be an RC2, as some "showstopper" bugs have been found in RC1. The idea, though, is that if RC2 doesn't produce any major bugs, it will be branded the final release. Mozilla is slating the final release for next month, so each RC will last maybe a couple weeks or so?

"Go into your profile and delete the file places.sqlite. Restart FF, the file will be recreated and the favicons will be gone. "

http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/r203...remove-favicons

That just deletes all my Bookmarks forcing me to import them again from a backup :/

That just deletes all my Bookmarks forcing me to import them again from a backup :/

The way I deleted them was to download SQLite Manager extension from https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5817 and then go into Tools > SQLite Manager, then Database > Connect, open up places.sqlite. Under tables, theres a table called moz_favicons. Go into this one, and on the Browse & Search tab delete any records that are present. That will remove the favicons stored.

Hopefully they fix the bug in a future version since it's a rather long process to go to just to delete them...

Hopefully they fix the bug in a future version since it's a rather long process to go to just to delete them...

Looks like it's a confirmed bug with Places: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331228. Seems quite a trivial bug so hopefully they'll get it fixed before final.

I was able to get around it by exporting my bookmarks to a HTML file and editing the exported HTML to remove the ICON attributes from the individual bookmarks before importing the file back into FireFox.

Now all I need is an updated RefSpoof. It works with Nightly Tester Tools but for some reason it adds some invalid character place-holders (diamond with question mark) above the menu bar in FireFox when installed, which looks unsightly. I've scanned through the code to try and work out why but I can't see anything that might be causing it and the developer seems to have abandoned the project so I don't know if it'll get fixed.

I wonder if there's the other default themes (or themes looking like them) for download, ie. Firelight and Tango looking themes for Windows?

when Opera starts rendering pages properly, I might consider using it for more than 5 minutes :D

Judging from all those web standards test out there (and I'm not talking about Acid3), Opera renders pages much more properly than Firefox.

Or if you think rendering pages in non-standard quirky ways is "properly", then IE owns Firefox in rendering pages "properly". Firefox can't even do ActiveX!!! :D /sarcasm

Does Opera have Adblock (an adblocker as good as Adblock in fact) ? no.

Enough said.

You are wrong here, Opera has a very customizable content filtering mechanism built-in, you can edit Opera config manually to make its content filtering as good as you wish. Opera is very customizable by itself, just that you need to go deeper than the GUI at surface. I do agree that's a disadvantage for new-comers.

It's on topic because it's a feature firefox is able to utilise properly as opposed to only half of what other browsers can do even with addons installed. This makes Firefox the safer browser as well because of the subscribed adblock lists available to block out risky ads and also a cleaner browsing experience.

I'm sick of people talking about the "safety" of browsers like it's some security software. They are not. Opera/Firefox/Safari won't be much safer than IE if you don't have proper AV/Firewall installed. And they won't be much safer when you have proper AV/Firewall installed.

If you really want to talk about "safety" of browsers, then an adblocker definitely has little to do with "safety", since they can't fix the browser vulnerabilities. So far Opera is "safer" than Firefox in all those security reports out there, albeit like I said, that's mostly insignificant and irrelevant when compared to having proper real security apps like AV/Firewall software. Not to mention the add-ons can get infected themselves as shown by a recent event.

To think having a different browser can save you from all those virus and trojans out there is just too naive.

On another hand despite Opera is my personal favorite browser, I do think the RC1 quite a solid release for Firefox, albeit the way they moved the "default browser" setting from a clear prompt to a corner of the "Setup Type" installation step shortly after they accused Apple for being too pushy for Safari is... a bit hypocritical at least.

And if the "Awesome Bar" can have in-page history keyword search like the newer Opera 9.5 builds.

Judging from all those web standards test out there (and I'm not talking about Acid3), Opera renders pages much more properly than Firefox.
Opera does better with current standards, but Firefox is leading in future recommendations (which nobody really use yet). But I've seen basic basic rendering bugs from both of them, so I wouldn't claim any of these two to be definitely superior because they're so close together on average. Especially with Gecko 1.9, it's too early to get a good estimate of its quality just yet.
I'm sick of people talking about the "safety" of browsers like it's some security software. They are not. Opera/Firefox/Safari won't be much safer than IE if you don't have proper AV/Firewall installed. And they won't be much safer when you have proper AV/Firewall installed.

If you really want to talk about "safety" of browsers, then an adblocker definitely has little to do with "safety", since they can't fix the browser vulnerabilities. So far Opera is "safer" than Firefox in all those security reports out there, albeit like I said, that's mostly insignificant and irrelevant when compared to having proper real security apps like AV/Firewall software. Not to mention the add-ons can get infected themselves as shown by a recent event.

To think having a different browser can save you from all those virus and trojans out there is just too naive.

I pretty much agree but there's just one reservation: I have yet to see NoScript's functionalities duplicated on any of the other browsers, and the convenience it brings makes it feasible to disable scripting by default, and that prevents almost all web-based malicious code from running. It could be that I just haven't looked hard enough, and if that's the case I'd appreciate a link :)
On another hand despite Opera is my personal favorite browser, I do think the RC1 quite a solid release for Firefox, albeit the way they moved the "default browser" setting from a clear prompt to a corner of the "Setup Type" installation step shortly after they accused Apple for being too pushy for Safari is... a bit hypocritical at least.

And if the "Awesome Bar" can have in-page history keyword search like the newer Opera 9.5 builds.

There's a huge difference between using an update function to push brand new software and having a clearly visible checkbox for making default in an user-initiated installation. And it's not like it was presented in a deceptive manner either.

I echo the comments about Firefox 3 being a nice release.

I was about to pop into about:config to turn on that boolean value to stop Firefox from checking extension compatibility... and ROFL at the warning :laugh:

post-17647-1211525174.png

No idea if this is an extension I've got or what.

...

Judging from all those web standards test out there (and I'm not talking about Acid3), Opera renders pages much more properly than Firefox.

Or if you think rendering pages in non-standard quirky ways is "properly", then IE owns Firefox in rendering pages "properly". Firefox can't even do ActiveX!!! :D /sarcasm

...

Opera adds scrollbars where it shouldn't and messes up sizing with things. Firefox misrenders positioned generated content.

All browsers have bugs, what matters is how they treat those bugs (i.e. do the bugs become features like IE, or do they get fixed like Firefox, Opera, Safari, etc.)

There's only one extension that I'm missing, and that's the must have FLST. Focus Last Selected Tab. There doesn't appear to be a newer version that works with RC1 and it won't even allow you to install it, so you can't use the Nightly Tools to force it to work. So does anyone know of a similar extension that works with RC1? Old extension-https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/32 Nevermind, I found what I was looking for. Apparently there is a newer version that works with 3.0-http://gorgias.de/mfe/#flst

There's only one extension that I'm missing, and that's the must have FLST. Focus Last Selected Tab. There doesn't appear to be a newer version that works with RC1 and it won't even allow you to install it, so you can't use the Nightly Tools to force it to work. So does anyone know of a similar extension that works with RC1? Old extension-https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/32 Nevermind, I found what I was looking for. Apparently there is a newer version that works with 3.0-http://gorgias.de/mfe/#flst

Tab Mix Plus does that and much more.

firefox 3.0rc1 is totally awesome

still some crashes with binary plugins like my logmein and the occasional java site/app

its specific external plugins that are causing crashes for me otherwise its totally solid, fast, awesome

the killer robot is almost ready!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build by Taras Buria Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. There are no new features, but Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2. In addition, Microsoft is improving the copy dialog in File Explorer, the Start menu reliability, and fixing virtualization issues. Here is the changelog: [General] With today’s build, Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel will see the versioning updated under Settings > System > About (and winver) to version 26H2. For more information, see the Windows Insiders blog. [File Explorer] We’ve improved the visual consistency and reliability of the Copy dialog in Dark mode, including its launch experience and the expanded progress view. [Start menu] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Start menu reflecting newly installed or removed apps without requiring sign-out or restart. [Taskbar] Fixed an issue for Insiders using the new smaller taskbar option, where the system tray might get cut off or pushed off screen. [Settings] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Settings > Apps > Startup. [Virtualization] - Also available in Beta This update addresses an issue that could result in bugchecks citing HYPERVISOR_ERROR (0x20001) and KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (0x1E) errors after installing the latest flights on some devices during system restarts, virtual machine operations, or while running some gaming applications. You can find the official changelog for the Experimental build here and for the Beta build here.
    • I've always preferred this possibility. There is something that feels good about the idea that all matter in the universe will eventually come back together and maybe even result in another big bang. The idea that the universe would fizzle out over the eons and forever drift apart is a little depressing. I realize it is not logical to let a basic human desire for life to have a grand everlasting meaning change the way I feel about a scientific theory, but I am human, so that is how I feel :-).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!