Recommended Posts

Snipping Tool - A cool intuitive app included with Win7 that lets you easily take screenshots (lets you select which portion of the screen you want to take a screenshot of).

It's included in Vista too but yeah, love that tool, especially for blogging

It's included in Vista too but yeah, love that tool, especially for blogging

Oh I didn't even notice that. It showed up in the start menu in Windows 7 so tried it out but never noticed it in Vista or just never took the time to check it out. Ya learn something new everyday!

Yeah I mean why not give Mozilla some flak for charging us an inane amount of money for a browser only for it to be a bloated resource hog....oh wait

Hogging resources and utilizing resources are two different things, but being a user of XP, you wouldn't know this.

I think Microsoft's changing the way they display free RAM in Windows 7 - in Vista, cached RAM was shown as being used - in Windows 7, it isn't. On my 2 Gb RAM laptop, it shows 1.2 Gb cached in the text below the graph, but on the graph, it shows it is using 512 Mb or so being used.

In other words, using almost the same amount of RAM as Vista, but displaying it differently.

Sneaky. :shifty:

I like the change - I now won't have to keep repeating myself on forums saying that Windows is not a memory hog. :p

What failure rate at getting out there.

It's not selling as much as they hoped, but it's outselling ay other OS before it in the same timeframe from release, and I don't see many customers asking if they can get computers without vista anymore, those that do are easily turned when you give them the actual facts instead of the misinformation they have. Vista is selling just fine and healthily.

So no, Vista is nowehre near an ME of today, not even close.

Oh I didn't even notice that. It showed up in the start menu in Windows 7 so tried it out but never noticed it in Vista or just never took the time to check it out. Ya learn something new everyday!

The constant attacks on Vista are largely due to the FUD Factor that largely was*not* present when Windows XP launched (also, Code RED, one of the nastiest of Internet worm attacks up to that time, was still making the rounds, and Windows XP was the *only* non-Linux/UNIX operating system that was immune out of the box). As opposed to Code RED and its immediate progeny, which was a major XP sales driver, there has been no corresponding driver for Vista (instead, there has been lots of FUD and just plain bad intelligence-gathering regarding Vista performance, even on older hardware).

With all the fixes and improvements being done to Windows 7, can we call Vista the M.E. of today? It's not near as buggy as M.E. was, but its failure rate at getting it out there sure is.

No comparing vista to ME is epic fail. It didn't do nearly as poorly as ME and it is perfectly stable.

Nice job circumventing the site's profanity filters. And this kind of comment makes you no better than he is.

Quoting the offending text makes you an accessory to the crime. lol

Anyway, Vista is sweet running on 4 of my machines. 7 will be even better.

I just saw the demo video and I'm really starting to hate Windows 7 (codenamed Vista with touch or Vistouch). I hate the fact that I will have to go out and buy a touch screen and I can only imagine the monster of a computer it would take to run it. Why doesn't Microsoft take it one small innovation at a time and try not to make operating systems with the same requirements as a Crysis, Far Cry 2, and Gears of War Hell spawn.

Disclaimer: I'm a Mac zealot but I do hate misinformation and deliberate lying.

1) No where in any of the documentation is it stated that a touch screen is a minimum requirement.

2) So far all evidence shows that memory usage has dropped considerably - DWM.exe for example has gone from 70MB to 12MB, memory usage over all has gone from around 700MB to 461MB; I"m sure there is more optimisation on its way.

3) How can you make 'small changes' one at a time; how on earth do you do a bit by bit migration of GDI/GDI+ to the new WDDM? Before making conclusions like that - know what you're talking about.

Disclaimer: I'm a Mac zealot but I do hate misinformation and deliberate lying.

1) No where in any of the documentation is it stated that a touch screen is a minimum requirement.

2) So far all evidence shows that memory usage has dropped considerably - DWM.exe for example has gone from 70MB to 12MB, memory usage over all has gone from around 700MB to 461MB; I"m sure there is more optimisation on its way.

3) How can you make 'small changes' one at a time; how on earth do you do a bit by bit migration of GDI/GDI+ to the new WDDM? Before making conclusions like that - know what you're talking about.

Yup, he judged the book by its cover. In this case, a demo video, and he is already convinced and damned it as opposed to using it like most of us do. I think he just wants some attention.

Yeah, having used the Beta version of Windows 7 I'm pretty damn impressed. Will most certainly be changing when it comes out and I didn't even bother with Vista.

They seem to have sorted all the haggly nasty bits out of vista and made it run smoother in the process, M$ may have actually struck home with this one.

Having said that does anyone remember that certain early build of Vista that everyone liked but got dropped?

its obvious you don't understand anything from thoose sayings. duh, ofcourse they wont remember that most of people who use computers actually need to type things in them, like Work/Book's, programmers, everyone.yeah.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The machines are starting to fight back any way they can.
    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!