Disabling Post Counts is good!  

63 members have voted

  1. 1. Disabling Post Counts is good!

    • Yes, I agree
      35
    • Noooooooooooooooooooo
      28


Recommended Posts

i like tim's idea.. :)

*i seem to have lost 60+ posts (dont care about the count.. just lot my posts..) and my profile detail changed.. my member title, sig etc.. to old ones.. i have not been on since neowin went down so anyone care to explain? sorry if its been asked lots of times..*

Thats a load of crap.

Even spammers aren't really a problem. They are delt with before they can get a high post count. The worst spammer was scoobie, and he was dealt with.

Quailty will improve when people stop acting immature and start acting responsible enough to browse a board.

I mean seriously. We can't even edit posts after a certian amount of time because ###### will screw up their posts in threads to get a laugh out of it.

I'm tired of people acting like ###### and we have to suffer the consequences, and its nobody's fault but the craphead member thats a dick.

I agree with every decision the admins have made including editing post restrictions, but taking away post counts won't help anything.

It will help!!! You're being really narrow minded, there are whole bunch of people here who openly admint to posting purely to get a high post count, and the posts are crap.

If that reason for posting is gone, surely that leaves one reason, genuinly helping the thread starter, which is where the *focus* should lay, surely...

As I said in the other thread, the emphasis on IT has almost compeltely vanished, and neowin is turning into a kiddies playground, where the more posts you have, the better lego bits you own :)

I do think its cool having over 1000 posts, it represents some hard work, some stupid fights, and some interesting debates. But if I have to loose that, to get rid of all of these retarded posts, then I'm more than happy to.

I used to just think 'dont like it, dont read it', but when the 'active threads' search is full of them, it makes it a little harder to ignore, and when the quality of responses regarding technical problems falls as low as it appears to, then its time to at least poll public opinion, which I respect the admins for doing right now (whether that be the reason or not).

To summarise:

- I like having a high post count, who doesnt.

- I dont like the forums full of complete crap that probably belongs on www.boredschoolkid.com .

- I'll loose the former to fix the latter, because to me neowin is a IT resource first, a 'social community' second.

Maybe, but we shouldn't have to loose everything.

I like having a high post count too. I'm in the top 50. I'm not bragging or anything, but its a nice achivement to have.

I would be ****ed if yet another thing was taken away because ###### can't control their behavior.

*i seem to have lost 60+ posts (dont care about the count.. just lot my posts..) and my profile detail changed.. my member title, sig etc.. to old ones.. i have not been on since neowin went down so anyone care to explain? sorry if its been asked lots of times..*

We lost our database in the downtime and were reset back to 3 weeks ago. So, it's whatever it was 3 weeks ago :s

We lost our database in the downtime and were reset back to 3 weeks ago. So, it's whatever it was 3 weeks ago :s

my member title and stuff like that were like that for about 2 months now.. :s

So what would be in its place, just about everything you could think of would be abused.

I think it was mentioned on the first page but I think something like noting if someone is a Beginner, Experienced and so on using post count as a reference would work out very well.

OK. That would be acceptable, however a lot of work for the staff to rate each member.

Actually it wouldn't, just have a link visable only to Mods which we could click as we read though threads which would add a +1 to the User's Karma. :) It wouldn't take any more time than any of our other stuff does right now. :)

Alright then. I propose that postcounts remain, but with the option of switching them off via cp. (much the same way as sigs). This way everyone is happy. In addition we implement Cara's karma system. (heh, rhymes ;) . I think it will better enable staff to identify our more positive contributors. This way everyone will be awarded as per their experience/contribution level. This will keep everything fair. Staff members will be exempt of course. We know we are cool lol!

Alright then. I propose that postcounts remain, but with the option of switching them off via cp. (much the same way as sigs). This way everyone is happy. In addition we implement Cara's karma system. (heh, rhymes ;) . I think it will better enable staff to identify our more positive contributors. This way everyone will be awarded as per their experience/contribution level. This will keep everything fair. Staff members will be exempt of course. We know we are cool lol!

That works, simple comprimise.

People who want their post count get to keep them and people who don't want to seem them have the choice to hide them.

The option should be enabled by default to show your post count.

-xStainDx

Alright then. I propose that postcounts remain, but with the option of switching them off via cp. (much the same way as sigs). This way everyone is happy. In addition we implement Cara's karma system. (heh, rhymes ;) . I think it will better enable staff to identify our more positive contributors. This way everyone will be awarded as per their experience/contribution level. This will keep everything fair. Staff members will be exempt of course. We know we are cool lol!

Grrr... I think I am invisible. :ninja:

Next time I might use Jon's suggestion and wear the dress next time.

*looks in the direction of Cara* :shifty:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      467
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!