Stargate Universe (Season 1)


Poll added by Fred Derf on April 10th  

157 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should lead on Destiny?



Recommended Posts

I really dont like that one soldier who was in detention, i can already tell hes gonna be that guy no one likes but ends up being a hero.

Me neither. I didn't care for any of the characters but this one least of all. In one scene he was gonna shoot Rush and wouldn't stand down? What a jerk.

I think they are trying to copy BSG a bit....

If so, they've got a long, long way to go.

Your name is Lord Ba'al so I'm assuming you're a big fan of SG-1, just like I am. So I'll ask you this. You, and the others talking about this very point, realize this is an original stargate seeding ship right?

The ancients created the stargates a very, very long time ago and this ship was built to seed them unmanned throughout the universe. So of course it's old. The characters on SGU are talking about thousands, even hundreds of thousands, of years old but when you look at the timeline established in SG-1 and SGA you'll see that even Atlantis was used up until 10,000 years ago. So this ship is most likely freaking old. It put stargates on an untold number of planets far before the ancients had advanced to the point of flying cities, such as Atlantis, and ascension.

The ship was designed as is and has always been known to be an ancient ship. The creators/ producers have been saying that since the beginning. And of course another reason for the obvious design deviation is the fact that this is a new show. They wanted to create a separate world so the designers probably wanted something different and fresh but still grounded within the Stargate universe, no pun intended. :p

You should see the theories, about this and everything else, being post on Gateworld.net. All the hardcore Stargate fans are there and the depth at which they go into stuff is crazy. And I'm one of them. :rofl:

Destiny does not seed stargates, it is following the ships that did seed the gates, it is a research ship which is why it had CO2 scrubbers and shuttles. I am not sure where the inhabitants went/happened but it will probably be explained later on. I would say it's safe to assume this ship is older than Atlantis.

Yea much older than Atlantis. Even he said they likely ascended before even needing the ship. It does look very similar to the ship from Atlantis which if memory serves me right was an old ancient war ship :) So it's likely this is roughly from the same era.

Also I think Rush is a good guy just misunderstood as he puts science before all. And I quite dislike that one solider guy. Even the other younger guy annoys me a little. Certainly no O'Neill or Sheppard.

i like all of the SG1 people but the one i like the most is General O'Neil as he handles himself very well and does throw in some humor from time to time then Tylk as he is honest and handles himself well in Battle and will not back down. Carter is very knowledgeable for a female and handles herself well and she looks hot to and Dr Jackson is very scientific and likes to explain things but General O'Neil likes to say huh n stuff like that and the new SGU seems pretty good sofar.

Destiny does not seed stargates, it is following the ships that did seed the gates, it is a research ship which is why it had CO2 scrubbers and shuttles. I am not sure where the inhabitants went/happened but it will probably be explained later on. I would say it's safe to assume this ship is older than Atlantis.

It was explained in the pilot. There was never anyone on it. It was sent out unmanned with the intention that they'd gate a crew in once it had gotten really far away.

Even the other younger guy annoys me a little. Certainly no O'Neill or Sheppard.

i like the younger ones, hes sexy, so ill tolerate him

but i think some ppl have brought up good pts, none of the characters are really all that interesting so far

They all resemble characters weve seen already

The next episode preview doesnt seem all that tempting to me at all either, except that one soldier ill hate even more because he seems like hes trying REALLY hard to seem badass, like a cop with a new taser just pointing his gun everywhere

i like all of the SG1 people but the one i like the most is General O'Neil as he handles himself very well and does throw in some humor from time to time then Tylk as he is honest and handles himself well in Battle and will not back down. Carter is very knowledgeable for a female and handles herself well and she looks hot to and Dr Jackson is very scientific and likes to explain things but General O'Neil likes to say huh n stuff like that and the new SGU seems pretty good sofar.

Naturally O'Neill is a favourite because of his attitude and humor. Teal'c was great because he was Spock-like and provided great balance for O'Neill and well, anyone human. Jackson was funny and smart and Carter was smart and like you said, hot :drool: Even Atlantis had its unique characters, Sheppard (more like O'Neill than anyone else in the 3 series) McKay of course, and I liked Beckett as the doctor while he lasted.

It was explained in the pilot. There was never anyone on it. It was sent out unmanned with the intention that they'd gate a crew in once it had gotten really far away.

Yea they did say that but its also possible someone managed to hijack it while it was stationary or even moving since its not in hyperspace. Something has to explain the damage on it. Now that also could have easily just been from running into things or being shot at by someone else as it flew by. But if I had to place my bet, I'd say no one has ever been on board and thats why life support and soon enough other things will fail because they never were used.

i like the younger ones, hes sexy, so ill tolerate him

but i think some ppl have brought up good pts, none of the characters are really all that interesting so far

They all resemble characters weve seen already

The next episode preview doesnt seem all that tempting to me at all either, except that one soldier ill hate even more because he seems like hes trying REALLY hard to seem badass, like a cop with a new taser just pointing his gun everywhere

Yea, I'm not to interested in their sexiness ;) I'll let you have that one. That's more of Rappy's department anyways.

Like I said above, SG1/Atlantis characters had very distinct traits, very few on SGU have unique traits (so far) I suppose its nice to hear that a lot of them die throughout the season. Hopefully that dick soldier will be one of them.

Destiny does not seed stargates, it is following the ships that did seed the gates, it is a research ship which is why it had CO2 scrubbers and shuttles. I am not sure where the inhabitants went/happened but it will probably be explained later on. I would say it's safe to assume this ship is older than Atlantis.

When they originally announced SGU they said the Destiny would be an original seeding ship. Granted that may have changed but either way you got the gist of my post. Thanks for repeating what tons of others have already said about the Destiny being older than Atlantis though. :p

i don't know if it's been brought up, but was it kind of implied with the camera view and heavy breathing in one scene that it might be an alien on the ship watching them? that might explain why the systems were already on and wore down for one. we'll just have to give them time to flush it out.

i don't know if it's been brought up, but was it kind of implied with the camera view and heavy breathing in one scene that it might be an alien on the ship watching them? that might explain why the systems were already on and wore down for one. we'll just have to give them time to flush it out.

Camera view and heavy breathing?

And the Life Support systems that don't work properly, along with the lights and whatever else were seen turning on just before the Stargate came to life.

ok i just watched the scene again and just some clarification. It was when they were walking out of the room where they first found the Kino's, the camera POV was definately above them and not the Kino, but the breathing I heard was from the next scene transistion where the Colonel was lying in his bed and breathing hard. The audio just came before they cut away so I thought they might be hinting at some life on the ship.

ok i just watched the scene again and just some clarification. It was when they were walking out of the room where they first found the Kino's, the camera POV was definately above them and not the Kino

It's the kino. Why else would he be looking at the kino and holding the remote control/ video screen? We see the kino rise and fall in height.

The creators already said the kino is going to be a story telling tool and possibly play a role in the show itself, not to mention the 30 webisodes planned to be shot from the kino's perspective.

http://www.gateworld.net/news/2009/08/thir...s-in-the-works/

Yea 20 episodes is the normal for Stargate at least. Every season in each series has been 20, some 19 if you count the 2 hour premiere. I decided to re-watch Atlantis alongside SGU and compare it. While I really enjoyed Atlantis premiere I think I enjoyed SGU's more. Probably because its new, but it had a very different feeling to it. Still ****ed off they haven't shown any wormhole animation. That was my favourite part about going through the Stargate.

And I like the idea of the Kino. It reminds me of all the Mockumentary shows and using it for the webisodes is cool.

Strong start for Sky1's 'Stargate Universe'

Stargate Universe made a strong start for Sky1 last night, according to early viewing figures.

The two-hour premiere, which starred Robert Carlyle as Dr Nicholas Rush, averaged a respectable 865k (4%) between 8pm and 10pm, making it the most-watched show on the multichannel stations.

Later, at 10pm, 265k (1.5%) stayed with Sky1 for Stargate Universe: Access All Areas.

Elsewhere, the Maxine Peake-fronted Criminal Justice improved on Monday night's opener, logging 4.67m (19.9%) for BBC One at 9pm and easily winning the hour. Its nearest rival, ITV1's The Fixer, interested 2.82m (12%).

The final instalment of Jamie's American Roadtrip brought in 2.46m (10.5%) for Channel 4, 2.35m (10%) tuned in for BBC Two's Blitz: The Bombing Of Coventry, and CSI: Miami managed 2.07m (8.8%) for Five.

Holby City led the 8pm hour, bringing in 5.69m (24.9%) for BBC One. ITV1's Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? was its closest competitor, averaging 3.42m (15%).

The latest episode of BBC Two's MasterChef: The Professionals put in 3.05m (13.3%), Warship had 1.03m (4.5%) for Five, and 1.87m (8.2%) watched Gok Wan's How To Look Good Naked on Channel 4.

Overall, BBC One dominated primetime with an average share of 24.2% to ITV1's 15.4%. BBC Two was third with 8.8%, followed by Channel 4 with 7.3% (+1: 1%) and Five's 5.7%.

It did well on Space.

STARGATE UNIVERSE?S (SGU) destiny has been revealed with a record breaking 2+ average minute audience of 565,000, making it SPACE?s highest rated single episode ever.* SGU was the #1 non sports specialty program of the day for 2+ and the key demographics of A25-54 and A18-49.* With two additional airings on Saturday, Oct. 3, SGU rocketed onto SPACE with a total reach of 2.3 million 2+ viewers.** After SGU?s edge-of-your-seat premiere unfolded, nearly 150,000 viewers stayed tuned as SPACE?s new original daily series INNERSPACE blasted onto the scene Friday, Oct. 2 at 11 p.m. ET.

http://www.channelcanada.com/Article3627.html

Probably because its new, but it had a very different feeling to it. Still ****ed off they haven't shown any wormhole animation. That was my favourite part about going through the Stargate.

I said to the gf when we were watching that I was wondering what it would be, especially when they came to Destiny.

But we didn't get either. :(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.10 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.10 changelog: New Features The bootstrapping algorithm has been completely redesigned. The software can now launch directly without requiring TS Preloader. As part of this change, the startup splash screen displayed during initialization has been removed. In addition, spikes in CPU usage have been eliminated, resulting in a more stable architecture with significantly lower memory consumption. The Microsoft Office detection infrastructure within the Operating System section has been enhanced. Additional detection support has been added for Office C2R (Click-to-Run) installations. Furthermore, the license status evaluation system has been improved, and the priority order has been revised as follows: Licensed > Grace Period > Other (NOTIFICATIONS, EVALUATION, etc.). Glow now includes preliminary support for Wi-Fi 8 technology, allowing more detailed information to be displayed for Wi-Fi 8-compatible network adapters. Glow now provides full support for Bluetooth 6.2. Adapters supporting Bluetooth 6.2 can be analyzed in greater detail and with improved accuracy. The disk distribution view in the Disk section has been modernized, replacing the traditional table layout with a new 2×2 card-based design. The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to v26.7. Thanks to the new custom controls, all Türkaysoft applications now offer a more modern and consistent user interface aligned with Windows 11 design standards. Bug Fixes Potential line-ending handling issues in the Office detection code within the Operating System section have been resolved. Additionally, the output format has been standardized to UTF-8 to prevent character encoding issues and ensure consistent data processing. Several stability and file management issues within the Debugging infrastructure have been addressed. Problems that prevented new log files from being created after Debugging was disabled, as well as issues causing debug records to be lost, have been fixed. File deletion and reaccess issues that occurred after file locks were released have also been resolved. In addition, a bug that caused newly recreated log files to remain locked after deletion has been eliminated. Unnecessary blank lines within debug logs and the extra empty line that could appear at the end of log files have also been corrected. A shortcut key conflict caused by assigning identical hotkeys to both the DNS Test Tool and the Donation page has been fixed. The DNS Test Tool can now be accessed using CTRL + Shift + D, while the Donation page is available via CTRL + Alt + D. Changes The service responsible for providing the Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider information in the Network section has been updated to use the ipinfo.io infrastructure. This change improves the accuracy and consistency of the displayed data. (No external requests are made while Hiding Mode is enabled.) Some terms in the Dutch and Korean language files have been updated to make them clearer and more user-friendly. [TS Updater] Before the update process begins, users are now prompted to choose whether they would like to view the release notes. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.10 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!