Google Chrome Browser


Recommended Posts

or you could just disble the indexing service, something I'm sure the google dekstop search installer would be quite capable of, if you absolutely wanted to replace instant search wth somethign inferior.

Oddly enough, there is no search bar in the services panel, and while the indexing service is easy to spot in English installations of windows vista, good luck GUESSING the bloody translation in other languages.

Oddly enough, there is no search bar in the services panel, and while the indexing service is easy to spot in English installations of windows vista, good luck GUESSING the bloody translation in other languages.

I wasn't aware that services changed name between localized versions of the OS.

and anyway it's besides the point since my point was that the GDS installed would be able to turn of the indexing service. and the search box in the start menu have allways been cheangeable to a custom desktop search provider. It was only the button that wasn't and that google whined about getting removed.

still why would you install GDS over instant search anyway. GDS doesn't have the no overhead realtime indexing of files that instant has, and it doesn't have nearly as good algorithms. Google is good at web searc and that's just due to the algorithm that checks the accuracy of the hit based on other peoples searches (wich while it was what made Google great is what'sruingin it now by the serice becoming a dinosaur with too much info giving inaccurate hits opared to newer algoritms used by ohter service, but with less index pages holding them bak).

Either way the whole Google whine was pointless, and I'm still not sure that search is a feature that google should be able to claim should be changeable on an OS anyway, it's a fairly core part of the OS. especially instant search engine wich can be used by any windows app if the coder wishes. I you are to make that whole system modular enough for the whole search engine to be replaced and any app that use instant search to use some slapped on third party search instead. that Means you'll need to add a lot of abstractions and extra code layers for said other third party searches to plug in. Wich will slow things down.

There are valid criticism for what isn't core parts of an OS, Moviemaker, for example, that'd be a valid complaint, noone is though. Search, a browser and mediaplayer are not valid complaints.

Google needs to finish their products. They start something and don't update it or finish it and now they want to start another project? A browser? They haven't even polished the Google Talk application nor updated its GUI in God knows how long. Gmail has been in Beta for years. Google Talk is awesome and they should put more effort on it. Gmail needs a bit of improvement on the UI. I hope that browser is as good as the rest of the stuff they have made. They have some tough competition out there when it comes to browsers.

Two different things, really. The search bar in Start menu doesn't have the same advanced search options as "Start + F". It's more like a "run" ("Start + R") option.

However, at the bottom of the returned search results, it has two links: "Search everywhere" and "Search the Internet". Clicking the former takes you to the same window as pressing 'Start+F" would, with the results already in. Anyway, my point is that without allowing a third-party indexing engine, the presence or absence of a dedicated button really makes no difference. And what's more, with a built-in desktop search/indexing engine which does a decent job, I wouldn't ever bother with experimenting with 3rd party products. Now, if there was nothing built-in, I could have chosen Google's engine though. Actually, I used to have Copernic desktop search on my old WinXP computer.

Bah, I'm not interested; I have enough browsers as it is. And as a web developer, I already have three major browsers to build for; I don't need another; I already don't bother building for Safari, this will just end up being on that list too (at least until the next major redesign, I s'pose). I'm much more interested IE8 or Opera 10, personally. ^_^

Bah, I'm not interested; I have enough browsers as it is. And as a web developer, I already have three major browsers to build for; I don't need another; I already don't bother building for Safari, this will just end up being on that list too (at least until the next major redesign, I s'pose). I'm much more interested IE8 or Opera 10, personally. ^_^

But it uses WebKit... frankly, as a web developer, you should be getting as many people to use such a browser as possible, no?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Marshall Major V Bluetooth headphones are now up to 47% off on Amazon by Ivan Jenic The Marshall Major V in Midnight Blue is currently $89.99 on Amazon, down from $169.99. That's 47% off and $80 saved on a pair of wireless on-ear headphones from one of the most recognizable names in audio. The Major V is Marshall's take on a long-lasting everyday headphone. The headphones deliver 100+ hours of wireless playtime, which puts them in a completely different category from most Bluetooth headphones that hover around 30-40 hours. You’re charging this thing once a week at most, and with wireless charging supported, you don’t have to worry about additional cables. Marshall promises its signature sound profile, with strong bass, smooth mids, and clear highs. There’s a customizable M-button, which you can set to quickly access Spotify Tap, your EQ settings, or a voice assistant. The design is foldable and lightweight at 186 grams, so it’s easy to pack for travel. And finally, the faux leather finish gives the Major V a sleek, premium look. At $89.99, the Major V Midnight Blue is a genuinely strong buy for anyone who wants a reliable daily headphone without paying premium prices. It’s also worth mentioning that the Cream and Brown variants are also discounted to $89.99, though from a lower original price of $99.99. Marshall Major V Midnight Blue - $89.99 | 47% off on Amazon This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • +1 on XVI. I still use it. 
    • Age 16, old enough to get a full-time job, your own bank account, a passport, get married, even join the military and go to war. But talking to your friends on the internet? Oh hell no!
    • I remember when all games had demos; it was a normal thing, not a limited time promotion.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Cosminus earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      483
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      122
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      neufuse
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!