[Official] Call of Duty: World at War


Recommended Posts

Took me a few tries of Veteran and once I passed it I was pretty happy. The game is so dumb on Veteran all I see is grenades so sick of them.

I was able to get through the tank and plane mission without dying but I didn't kill 45 Zeros. After trying the Heart mission for about an hour, I gave up and decided to get my 45 Zeros before going to bed. I ended up getting 50 :D At this point, I have the last two missions to complete on Veteran and then I'm done. Getting bombarded with grenades sucks, what sucks even more is when I would run to different spots to crouch and hear the continuous clanks of grenades being thrown at me... :no:

tanks aren't so bad. I was worried they would kill the game myself, but after playing for a while, they are way to easy to avoid, and you can just pick off a person manning the machine gun on top.

Completed the game again but this time on hardened difficulty. The second last level was kinda tough to complete. Germans were keep respawing. I killed over 150-200 germans in that level. :p

Too bad the game has poor replay value. :(

  • Like 2

Bwahahaha... I just completed Veteran. Downfall wasn't nearly as tough as Heart of Reich. In fact, Downfall was much like what the game should've been on Veteran. Heart of Reich was retarded, Downfall was spot on. Now to get the last two death cards and try my best to get the Blue Ribbon.

Edit: Got the cards, but man... this game just pulled one on me. I just got done with a competitive coop on Blowtorch and Corkscrew and was in first place, but one of the players timed out before the story portion at the end finished, therefor the mission didn't end with four people, but three, thus robbing me from the last achievement. Joygasm!

Edited by Mathachew
Users may experience difficulties posting statistics and matchmaking within Call of Duty 5 on Xbox LIVE. We are aware of the problem and working to resolve the issue. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause and thank you for your patience.

Even Microsoft Call It Call of Duty 5! WHY!

They really need to patch the under the map crap on Castle. It's getting to the point I just quit any games played on that map. It's a shame, too, cause I like the map.

Had a good time playing with you the brief time we did play, definitely have to play some more in the future.

Had a good time playing with you the brief time we did play, definitely have to play some more in the future.

Yeah, sorry. The best time for me to play is early in the day after work (since I work a very early shift) or on my days off. Last night I was expecting a call from my girlfriend, but not that soon and on the weekends, I have no time to play at all since I spend them with her.

It was nice playing with people I could communicate with, though. Instead of saying I need help only to watch a guy run in the opposite direction.

so uh.. There were some servers up 2 days ago that were "Powerleveling Servers" I mean some people were getting 20k xp per round, and jumping 10-15 levels in a round.. It was so cheating.....

I hope they fix that soon.

Sorry to DirtyLarry and anyone else I bailed on. My gf just got a new phone and I was walking her through how to unlock it and do this and that (windows mobile device) so I got frustrated and just shut off the damn console.

  • 3 weeks later...

Got the game today when game shopping.

Played only about 15-20 mins, first campaign mission then a bit on-line.

The first on-line match I went into I got killed quite a lot, but there were quite a few levels which I thought was a bit daft since surely it should be kept to reasonably low levels, but ah well.

Second game I started getting use to it, came top, which was pretty good since I was the lowest and there was a 20 something level on there.

But my gawd, on-line should be called "Shoot the dogs mode" or something, I have a feeling I am going to see a lot more of those damn dogs in the coming days.

I played it on the regular difficulty before my brother got this game for me for Christmas, but let me just say that Treyarch royally messed up the Veteran difficulty with the grenade spamming. Making a game cheap to make it harder is just stupid.

I still stand by my original assessment, too: not by any means a bad game, but inferior to Infinity Ward's versions and does nothing to advance the series.

I played it on the regular difficulty before my brother got this game for me for Christmas, but let me just say that Treyarch royally messed up the Veteran difficulty with the grenade spamming. Making a game cheap to make it harder is just stupid.

Actually that's the signature of Veteran difficulty of all Call of Duty games, mass grenade spamming.

Though yes, Treyarch have royally messed up Veteran mode, just not by grenade spamming.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google DeepMind published a document on June 18, 2026, that may be the most consequential admission yet from a frontier AI lab: alignment training alone cannot guarantee that AI agents will remain under human control, so structural containment must be built before more capable models arrive.............. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318758/20260620/google-deepmind-ai-control-roadmap-when-alignment-fails-defense-depth-takes-over.htm  
    • I've got a SoundBlasterX G6 that I use in my streaming setup. Sounds great to me and I've had zero issues with the ancient software package so far in Win11. That G6 has 7.1, Dolby, fully working SPDIF and since it's a USB device it's outside of my rig so I don't have to worry about EMF distortion. Looks like for now this is a pass for me as I think I have better hardware....
    • How do you connect 5.1 Speakers to this thing?
    • I agree with both of you... It's absolutely imperative that science is completely based on actual proven facts and hard evidence and is not considered dogmatic in any way. Science is not a religion and it will never be, and that's exactly how it's supposed to be.
    • I'd basically agree. The only point I would add is to be careful not to treat science as a religion, complete with priests, dogma, and blasphemy. Humans are highly susceptible to religious-oriented ways of thinking since it aids in forming communities of like-minded people. The problem is that when this happens, nobody wants to be ostracized from the group by saying that a deeply-held idea is wrong. Science and "peer review" are not immune to this behavior, unfortunately. In the end, finding truth is our own responsibility and we can't depend on others to hand it to us. Skepticism is key, along with curiosity and the willingness to critically evaluate and consider ideas both new and old.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!