[Official] Halo 3: ODST


Recommended Posts

:drool:

I'm glad it's physical and not digitally distributed. It's way nicer having the case and disc in your hands than a purchase that isn't tangible :wub:

I'm going to guess it's going to be both (for those who already own Halo 3), which is perfect (Y)

Have they talked about how much this will be? I just don't see how I am going to be able to play much of this with the 360's lineup this fall. Overload!

Fortunately for you, Fall 2009 is not coming this year. :p

I'm going to guess it's going to be both (for those who already own Halo 3), which is perfect (Y)

And so this will be a major release with the current H3 MP attached to it? I doubt Bungie would make it inefficient for you to switch discs to join a MP match unless its an entirely new MP experience.

Hope they use a new graphical engine.

I doubt they would as what you see in H3 is a refinement of what they were crafting back in H2. Its not a bad engine when you consider the big changes in H2 and H3 and how it scaled for HD graphics quite easily.

^ I'm pretty sure it's a standalone expansion pack. After all, it will be released as a game of its own (and not as downloadable content).

But dude he's wearing RECON ARMOUR!!!oneoneoneoen!!!hax1!1ksldlas

Looking forward to this :)

I don't know what the hell the soldier is wearing in the trailer, but it sure as hell isn't Recon.

And I have to say the score sounds incredible. Marty at his best.

According to this article, Bungie gave away Recon armour to two lucky individuals.

Bungie-Awards-Halo-3-Recon-Armors-if-Your-Game-is-Funny-2.jpg

Found this via HBO. Luke posted on NeoGAF.

The word "stealth" here isn't really a great word. This isn't a stealth action game like a Splinter Cell game. This is a Bungie-made Halo game where you will play as an ODST, which of course, is different (and no, I'm not talking about how it's different ;b) than playing as a Spartan super soldier. This isn't Halo Cell, Ghost Recon: Halo, Republic Commandalo or whatever.

Edit: Forgot Call of Halo and Gears of Halo.

Post Link

There's your problem -- you're getting all wrapped up in bogus rumors. Fail less! ;b

Brian and I have a bunch of interviews tomorrow with the good stewards of the worldwide media; so there should be some more information to be gleaned from those.

Post Link

I think it might be just some random conglomeration of letters so as to appease those trying to find out about their projects early. But who knows, knowing Bungie, I wouldn't be surprised if it actually does stand for something. ;)

It's not random. If you know a bit of Bungie lore, they put these 'random' strings of letters on nearly all their products - if you have any of the games, CDs, books, etc, take a look around on the front/back covers and you'll find these. Many have been deciphered, and many have not, but Bungie only says anything about them when they're confirming the correct deciphering of one.

So yes, it stands for something, though not necessarily something related to this game in particular.

/edit - here's a list of all of the acronyms found (minus this new one): http://bs.bungie.org/2006/04/the_bungie_acro_1.html

Looks like only six are confirmed. Also, there's language in that link (as part of the acronyms) that's NSFW.

-Spenser

Edited by stifler6478

I'm still not sure this isn't going to be both a stand-alone game and a downloadable expansion, for whoever said it was standalone. I mean, we've still got tons of achievements in the Halo 3 update (a record 1750) that aren't being used ;)

According to Kotaku, this will not be a download, only retail:

http://kotaku.com/5061375/halo-3-recon-box-art

So I guess the 1,750 points for Halo 3 are all for Halo 3... :blink: And this game gets 1,000 points of its own... strange. Guess it's like Crysis: Warhead.

http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/news/42139/Re...rilogy-Projects

Recon is Bungie's last Halo game, apparently.

What Halo 3 is/is not:

http://kotaku.com/5061475/what-is-halo-3-r...es-what-its-not (LOTS OF INFO!)

Edited by Ayepecks
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
    • My Photos app is version 2026.11050.1001.0 and it remembers the window size and position. My Snipping Tool is version 11.2602.49.0 and it can capture the taskbar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!