Mac's - are they overpriced?


Recommended Posts

I view Apple products in the same light as Bose or B&O. You can get other brands that do the same tasks, but you are paying a premium over these others for the asthetics. If you enjoy whatever product you've bought and at that price then it's not overpriced. You can't really put a price on that factor, because I get just as much out of my ?600 PC than I probably would out of a ?1,300 Macintosh.

The only thing I've really seen defend the price on this thread is OS and the software. I'd make the argument that free programs such as Paint.NET fills in the gaps for programs.

But an extra $1000 for an OS? Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have a Mac. I do like OSX and I do like the look and feel, but do I like it enough to pay $1000+ over Windows laptop? No.

Well, as a user of some pre-built x86 boxes, some homemade x86 boxes, and 2 Power Mac towers (i.e. not the "fashion statement" Macs as some refer to the iMac, etc.), here's my take on the issue:

There is no debating that Macs are more expensive than their x86 (I use PPC Macs, so I never quite shook that dichotomy)/non-Apple counterparts. This is an objective fact; prices can be researched and will show this.

Overpriced, however, is a subjective condition. It comes down to an issue of value, and value varies from user to user. I'm not talking about the "entire package" fuzzy-logic that some Mac-heads use. I'm talking about the process of assessing the worth of a purchase and comparing it to the monetary outlay involved. To me, the value I receive from my Macs in terms of functionality, speed, versatility, etc. is sufficient to justify the expenditure of $2300 and $3400 for my G4 and G5, respectively. Not everyone will find this to be true. Certainly a user who wants to send and receive E-mail, browse the Web, and watch some movies will not see the same value in dropping 3 and a half grand on twin dual-core PPC970s. However, a Mac Mini may be quite reasonable for them due to its extremely low space requirement and quiet operation. They certainly would not see it as "overpriced," whereas I see $600 as a bit steep for what it offers. Not prohibitively steep if I have the cash on hand, but I'd sooner save up for something else (like a nice Subaru Legacy before they may-or-may-not implement that hideous 2010 box-car redesign).

So it comes down to value. "Expensive" is a matter of numbers. "Overpriced" is a matter of numbers versus value received. I think, to a lot of hardware geeks, Macs are overpriced due to their specializations being geared toward certain software applications and the relative lesser ability to tinker with their innards. This is reasonable - people who like to mess with computer hardware, to tweak and overclock and optimize and upgrade, should go for those systems which fully enable them to do what they like most. To me, the value I get out of my Macs in video editing, UNIX tools, and other such fun things justifies the monetary expenditure and thus renders them "not overpriced."

In a nutshell, YMMV.

IMO, you're not just buying a computer - you're buying the whole Apple experience. And IMO they're not *that* expensive for what you get - I just came from an Apple store with this:

Macbook- ?816 (student discount)

iPod Nano- Free after rebate

Printer- Free after rebate

And let's face it, you'll struggle to get a Dell with similar specs and build quality (i.e. DDR3, plus other stuff like the multitouch trackpad which others don't actually use), an 8GB MP3/4 player, and a printer for just over ?800.

And as for Apple's service - I just brought my Macbook home and it has a very faint manufacturing mark on the lid (about 3 cm in size, looks like a scratch without being a scratch). I phoned them up, and within 2 minutes they told me to return it to the store and they'll swap it out - I'd like to see another company that would do that for a cosmetic issue.

@ bmaher : How did you get that free iPod nano?

I see no such thing in the UK store. (apple.com/uk ...) And maybe I could get it in Canada :p

Edit : Finally found http://www.apple.com/ca/promo/ and it only applies to Europe, we've had these during the summer. That would have been an awesome deal for me otherwise, to just buy a MB and sell my free nano.

The only thing I've really seen defend the price on this thread is OS and the software.

You skipped a couple of messages then... right? Including mine...

IMO, you're not just buying a computer - you're buying the whole Apple experience. And IMO they're not *that* expensive for what you get - I just came from an Apple store with this:

Macbook- ?816 (student discount)

iPod Nano- Free after rebate

Printer- Free after rebate

And let's face it, you'll struggle to get a Dell with similar specs and build quality (i.e. DDR3, plus other stuff like the multitouch trackpad which others don't actually use), an 8GB MP3/4 player, and a printer for just over ?800.

And as for Apple's service - I just brought my Macbook home and it has a very faint manufacturing mark on the lid (about 3 cm in size, looks like a scratch without being a scratch). I phoned them up, and within 2 minutes they told me to return it to the store and they'll swap it out - I'd like to see another company that would do that for a cosmetic issue.

Yes, but what do you get in terms of warranty? A standard one year hardware warranty, or AppleCare with 2 extra years of hardware warranty. In Canada (and primarily Nova Scotia), there's no sort of mail-in service without having to drive 2 1/2 hours into the city to visit an Apple Authorized Service Provider and I have found that AppleCare technical support in Canada to be mostly useless.

Dell offers CompleteCare accidental damage up to 4 years with on-site next business day service, so if you were to accidentally knock a cup of coffee on your laptop, you're covered. Not sure how the Apple service is in the UK or the USA but here in Canada I find it lacking.

Macs are not overpriced as much as they are overvalued.

Apple Marketing does a great job of convincing people that they need a bunch of features they will probably never use.

Who is seriously ever going to need to use use 4 figure gestures? Who trips over their power cord enough to justify the extra expense of the "mag safe" power cord. What happens if you trip over the ethernet cord instead. :p

Who really need to have their screen flush with the bezel? Who drops their laptop enough to need a body constructed from a solid block of aluminum and some extra accelerometers?

They pass this off as either "style" or "innovation" or "the apple experience".

Apple computers are a luxury item. It's really not any difference than any other luxury market sector.

Look at cars. Cars devalue as soon as you drive them off the lot. Computers devalue as soon as you buy them.

Cars continue to devalue the longer you have them. Computers devalue the longer you have them, and probably even faster.

Is there really any point in spending twice as much for a European import as there is for paying for a comparable asian import? Is there really any point in paying the "mac tax" when you could by a comparable computer for much less?

My guess it that no matter who you are, the answer to both of those questions are going to be the same.

It's a matter of mentality.

Who is seriously ever going to need to use use 4 figure gestures? Who trips over their power cord enough to justify the extra expense of the "mag safe" power cord. What happens if you trip over the ethernet cord instead. :p

well , they will just make ethersafe and charge 1000$ for being innovate ,and making something that nobody will need :p

Tired of hearing about "the apple experience" and "it just works", quantify it.

An Apple Experience is 2.34x better than a PC Experience.

It "just works" 4.93x more than a PC.

Here, I quantified everything you asked for. :rolleyes:

...

How do you think we can quantify something like that... lol

Yes, Macs are overpriced, but feature a better OS, better tech support at a cost, but outlasts most extended warranties. I'm not a fan of Apple's business prac..ok I'm not a fan of Apple in general, but their OS is top-notch.

cause nobody gonna sue them , they have tiny marketshare

everyone is after windows any new feature in windows = monopoly = easy money to get / sue them = MS get charged some billion dollar by DOJ/EU/china/etc

If I was in the market for a new laptop, I would consider buying from Apple, as their build quality is superior.

But for desktops, I find I get more bang-for-the-buck with a custom PC. My new system (E8400, 3GB RAM, 1TB HD103UJ) barely cost more than a Mac Mini. Its plain black case is lacking in aesthetics, but I was going for a good performance/dollar ratio.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!