Mac's - are they overpriced?


Recommended Posts

Hey instant.human? why don't you "shut the heck up" and let people argue if they want?

It's simply their option to take part in discussion.

posts like your never lead anywhere. never. period.

afterall it's just opinions.

live and let live man.

If you don't like this topic, don't read it.

Hey instant.human? why don't you "shut the heck up" and let people argue if they want?

It's simply their option to take part in discussion.

posts like your never lead anywhere. never. period.

afterall it's just opinions.

live and let live man.

If you don't like this topic, don't read it.

whoah, peace, man. there is that little ":p"-guy... actually, i put it there for folks like you, to emphasize that that particular sentence is not to be taken too seriously.

but thanks for the constuctive critique. i will think about it... not.

its getting harder to post here. because even if youre trying to be nice and calm, somewhat neutral or just not taking sides, some member will yell at you anyways.

well I have to throw my $.02 on this one...

I want a Mac so bad.. I have wanted one for quite a while now. I even tried the OSx86 method, but on my AMD laptop it just wasn't very stable... The reason I haven't gotten a mac is price. I can not afford to pay that much money for a computer. Main thing is "I can not talk my wife into letting me pay that much". She knows how much a normal pc costs, and there is no way in hell she would let me spend that much money for a computer, just because its a MAC.

Overpriced? Yes

The reason why these type of discussions get 8 pages in one day is because there are so many perspectives on the argument. So far this thread has been an interesting read because both sides of the argument are showing there reasons. No one has gone out of there way to bitch at a member specifically, so I don't understand why instant.human, your telling the "fanboys to shut up"? We're having a discussion and I frankly I think either you should add to it, or not bother.

No pun intended dude, just trying to make a random point clear :p

Here are two simple & great looking laptops not from Apple:

Sony Vaio FW

2804464966_e68bca79cc_m.jpg

Dell XPS m1530

2922465300_81ba25670f_m.jpg

It's good to see other companies besides Apple giving some attention to the looks.

I laughed when people were going "OMG Sony copied Apple's keyboard!" when it was the other way around!

Apple's design is nice as well :)

Richard Hammond is banging on about quantifying the 'Mac' experience. I can quantify it through anecdotes and my general experience with the Mac (and accessories so far) but I suspect it won't be enough.

When I used the 'It just works' the other day someone shot me down in flames as if it wasn't a justifiable description to use when talking about the experience I've had with the Mac so far but frankly no other description works as well. I've had my iMac now for about 3 months, I had a Mac Mini before that for about 10 months, and I've had various iPods and now I have an iPhone. You know, I can't tell you how enjoyable it has been owning all of this kit because I think in all that time I've run into two small issues that a simple reboot has fixed.

The entire experience such as the way the Mac works, the way that the iPhone works, the way that the two devices work together, is so polished and seamless - with Windows stuff you can often see "the cracks" and even the most devout Microsoft fan cannot deny that the experience isn't occasionally painful. My boss this week just took delivery of his HTC Touch Pro.. he's a staunch MS Smartphone advocate and has more PDA's and smartphones than I care to mention. We often banter about iPhone vs The Competition but I just couldn't help but become that smug **** with the iPhone as he's already running into interesting software glitches and quirks. I'd cut him some slack but the phone he's replacing with the HTC Touch Pro is similarly troublesome and has issues rotating the display, and with the slideout keyboard, etc.. you know the iPhone has been a smooth ride since the day I took it out of the box.

And it just flows the whole way through to the Mac. It's just excellent. It works, it never misses a beat, and it never makes me sit back in my chair and say "What the hell is it doing?" or "Why is my computer playing up?" or "Why have I got this unexplained error?!". I'm not just saying this without some decent experience to back me up - I am a Windows System Administrator and am part of a team responsible for hundreds of Windows Servers.. I do LIKE Windows and from an administration point of view I don't think I'd want to change to anything else, but I also believe in giving credit where credit is due. The Apple experience (be it iPhone, Mac, iPod) is just bloody well done and fun to be part of.

I already love my iPhone and my iMac is the best computer i've ever owned. I'm actually looking FORWARD to something breaking on them so I can see just how good Apple's customer service is.

Hope that helps explain what the 'experience' means to me.

I don't think the machine itself is overpriced, I think its Leopard that is, when you buy the machine you have to pay for Leopard as well. Which adds on about $100 (or something like that) to the price tag.

You forgot to add that you pay also for iLife, is bundled in any new Mac machine.

That is a plain stupid analogy.

More like Apple is a Ford, but comes in a Ferrari body kit...under the shell, it's the same as that Ford.

That being said, my next laptop purchase will be a Macbook.

Agreed.

I find it funny when people think Apple components are somehow better and more powerful than off-the-shelf equivalents. An Intel Core 2 Duo is the same, whether it's in a Dell or a Mac.

I do think that Mac computers as a whole are far more expensive than the average PC, but I don't necessarily think they're overpriced. While I'm no fanboy of Apple, I do admit that Apple computers just seemingly have better build quality than other computers. I use and enjoy Vista and Mac OS X equally, but I do appreciate the way that Mac OS X works in comparison to Vista.

I just recently bought a Dell XPS notebook and sold my (polycarbonate) MacBook, and now I again want to get the new MacBook, because of its build quality simply being the best out of any notebook I've ever owned. No, I don't need it and yes I'm probably suffering from impulse buying, but that's just the thing about Apple. Everything they make, you want it. Likewise, I don't want everything made by Dell and Sony.

It still amazes me the often gross generalizations there are in this ongoing battle/argument over whether Mac's are worth the price or even if they are overpriced to begin with. Let me first start off by saying that my views are based purely on desktop computers and not laptops. Laptops are a horse of a total other color and have a lot of other consideration to deal with involving fabrication process of the shell and other proprietary parts as well as third part companies that make chips for them that laptop manufacturers might use. Apple laptops subjectively are nice and worth the price for me but I don't know enough about some of the tech they use to make the products sturdy and other tech under the hood such as multi-touch track pads to make an informed opinion about them based on a pricing standpoint. Using that same logic I don't think most of the people here in this forum are qualified for that either; but I could be wrong. ANYHOW, I've commented on many of these threads and unlike what my sig might suggest I'm not a fanboy in the least; I'm a realist. I've been a windows engineer for 10+ years now and have worked in all manner of windows environments and some Linux environments as well. I've been in charge of purchasing for large organizations as well as government agencies... I think I have an equal grasp of all sides of this argument and the fact of the matter is that the argument is derived from the wrong line of thinking. The question isn't whether Apple is overpriced. Rather, the question is whether or not RETAIL computers are 'overpriced' vs. DIY. Everyone makes these claims like 'I can build a computer for half the price that's just as fast or faster' while that MAY be true, it isn't a truism for Apple alone but rather for ALL or at least MOST retail PC manufacturers. Fact of the matter is you can build a cheaper and faster PC than MOST if not ALL retail PC companies. End of discussion... it's not an Apple vs the world type of argument. It's a Retail vs DIY type of argument. Anyone who wants to make it otherwise is either severely ignorant or purposefully trying to carry out an agenda based on pure bias and Anti Apple/MS vs. Apple culture which has no place in an objective conversation. Now are there exceptions? Yes of course no matter how you slice it there will always be some exceptions to EVERY rule of thumb but for the most part I have found even when purchasing my own machine seen below in my sig that other retailers were moderately and in some cases grossly more expensive than what I payed for this machine.

If you want to purchase a computer from any retailer including Apple, the best rule of thumb would be to order a base and then add DIY parts... this is what I call the "Best of Both Worlds Scenario". Order the computer you want minus the Hard Drives, RAM, Video Card, and Optical drives that you want, then get all those aforementioned parts on after market websites such as pricewatch etc... or NewEgg.

In any case, through my many years of being in both environments it's very evident that they are not overpriced when compared to similar or the same specs as other competitors they are always within a couple hundred of each other in either direction and some times within 50 of each other in either direction. Anyhow I digress...

I'm not a mac hater, but something seems strange to me...

I can buy a laptop with better battery capacity,cpu, more ram, better gpu, higher res. display than the basic config macbook , and still get a lower price. I can even get all those things, and then buy a license of macosx, and STILL get a better price (not that i can use it out of the box).

Of course, the mac design is sleek and nice, but I am looking from a point of view where that does not matter.

AND, i bet that apple does not pay more for their components than other OEM's.

I beginning to wonder if either the computer it self is way overpriced, or the OS is highly expensive to create.

Please, these are my observations, and i just want to hears some of your opinions, mac users, and non-mac users.

Especially mac users.

Not intending this for flamebate, so DO NOT FLAME.

edit; Please people, I wrote; "Of course, the mac design is sleek and nice, but I am looking from a point of view where that does not matter. ". And please look away from the OS. Lets talk hardware technology, not OS (because then we could argue forever).

I have had two laptops, so that's where my perspective comes from (so desktops might be a different kettle of fish).

If you are looking at it as an Intel CPU in Mac vs an Intel CPU in a Dell then clearly one shouldn't cost more than the other.

However looking at most of the rest of the components and overall build quality I think you pay for more quality when you buy a Mac.

My first laptop cost me ?450 without an OS. The screen developed a fault after a year and the battery life was **** poor. Overall, it's quality was on the cheap side, but not awful. It was OS X that really made me want to change.

My Macbook really impressed me with the quality of the hardware as compared to my cheaper old one, but I don't think it's necessarily better than a pricey Sony or HP. I want to point out that Apples aren't the only hardware that is expensive but those who want to bitch always compare prices with the cheapest (PC) options available rather than a true like for like comparison.

Something I've seen in this thread: people scoffing with "it's not worth $100,000 extra for feature x" or "$100,000 extra for feature y" ... but you are paying extra for all those features together not just one of those. And it's the whole package that makes the experience, not this feature alone or that feature alone.

Yes they are,

I call it the Apple Syndrome where by uneducated Computer users see apple products on

......

Well, some users are like that. I know of someone who bought all Macs for their new estate agency office (real estate). And then worried about software compatibility, a big mistake. But then you get the same with PC users, but because they get infected with spamware galore, it's much more dangerous...

Personally, I am in the third year of a computer science degree. I am not "uneducated" about computers. Neither are the dozen or so lecturers and professors in my department who also use Macs. To assume all Mac users are ignorant is ignorant.:pp

Build quality and lots of the hardware and concepts that they use aren't even out yet... you're always going to pay more for the newest and greatest thing.

Same thing with why buy a PS3 when the 360 is cheaper..... Blu-ray is expensive and people want that and games.

These topics keep coming up from windows guys, it seems like a jealousy thing otherwise they wouldn't comment on it at all.

Yes they are,

I call it the Apple Syndrome where by uneducated Computer users see apple products on films and tv being used by their favourite characters which happens an awful lot.

Fair play to Apple for it's product placement.

And all they want a computer for is emails :(

Interesting. Since most Mac users are/were Windows users (at work, mostly) and have made an informed choice.

Switchers.

I chose to dump Windows after over 4 years of home use. Not because it was inherently a bad system. Did the job. But trying out a Mac on display at the time simply blew me away. Never looked back. And frankly, my experiences with Apple have prejudiced me in a way against other manufacturers. I haven't regretted it yet, however.

It's usually the clueless Wal-Mart shopper type that goes in for the PC, that is. the average retail PC, since that is what's on display and looks and works the same as the one at work.

Then again, you find newbs in both camps. One is just a newb with more money to spend, it seems.

Edited by LTD

Mac's - are they overpriced?

Short answer: No

Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Performance wise, they will cost more than most PC OEMs will sell for. Just because something costs more doesn't mean it is overpriced.

I wouldn't buy another one though. Mac OS doesn't impress me anymore than Windows Vista does so I'm unwilling to pay that premium.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Exactly, this is just the beginning. I hope that by that time, our inept politicians devise something like a Universal Basic Income, because unemployment and poverty rates will skyrocket otherwise. And believe me, robots that perform physical work aren't a matter of IF, but WHEN. No career is truly safe from AI/androids, it's just a matter of time.
    • Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Subtitle Edit is a powerful, free, and user-friendly subtitle editing tool designed for creating, editing, and converting subtitles for videos. It supports a wide range of subtitle formats, including SRT, ****, and SUB, allowing users to easily modify and adjust subtitles for accurate timing and formatting. With its intuitive interface, Subtitle Edit provides a variety of features such as waveform audio display, spell-check, subtitle synchronization, and real-time video preview, making it an ideal choice for both beginners and professionals. The software also includes powerful tools for batch processing, translating subtitles, and converting between different subtitle formats. Subtitle Edit features: Create/adjust/sync/translate subtitle lines Convert between SubRib, MicroDVD, Advanced Sub Station Alpha, Sub Station Alpha, D-Cinema, SAMI, youtube sbv, and many more (300+ different formats!) Cool audio visualizer control - can display wave form and/or spectrogram Video player uses mpv, DirectShow, or VLC media player Visually sync/adjust a subtitle (start/end position and speed) Audio to text (speech recognition) via Whisper or Vosk/Kaldi Auto Translation via Google translate Rip subtitles from a (decrypted) dvd Import and OCR VobSub sub/idx binary subtitles Import and OCR Blu-ray .sup files - bd sup reading is based on Java code from BDSup2Sub Can open subtitles embedded inside Matroska files Can open subtitles (text, closed captions, VobSub) embedded inside mp4/mv4 files Can open/OCR XSub subtitles embedded inside divx/avi files Can open/OCR DVB and teletext subtitles embedded inside .ts/.m2ts (Transport Stream) files Can open/OCR Blu-ray subtitles embedded inside .m2ts (Transport Stream) files Merge/split subtitles Adjust display time Fix common errors wizard....and more. Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 changelog: Subtitle Edit 5 is a major new release and a big step for the project. For the first time, Subtitle Edit runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux from a single, modern, cross-platform codebase. The builds are self-contained, so no separate .NET installation is required, and on macOS and Linux the needed media components (mpv/ffmpeg) are bundled in. Please read before upgrading: Subtitle Edit 5 is a new application, not just an update of Subtitle Edit 4. It has been rebuilt from the ground up to be cross-platform, so: It is not 100% the same app. The look, layout, and some workflows have changed. Some things are in different places, and a few behave differently than in SE4. Not every SE4 feature exists in SE5 yet. SE5 covers all the core editing, conversion, sync, video playback, OCR, and online services, but some of the more specialized SE4 tools are not available yet. Features will continue to be added. If you rely on a specific SE4 feature that is missing, please keep SE4 installed alongside SE5. The easiest way to run both side by side is to use the Portable versions of SE4 and SE5, which keep their settings separate and do not interfere with each other. Which version should I use? Subtitle Edit 5: recommended for most users on Windows 10 (22H2) or newer, macOS 12+, and Linux. Subtitle Edit 4: please continue to use SE4 if you are on an older Windows version (Windows 7/8), or on older / slower computers where SE5 may not run well. SE4 remains available and is the right choice in those cases. To run SE4 and SE5 at the same time, use the Portable versions - you can try SE5 while keeping SE4 as a fallback. Download: Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 | ARM64 | ~60.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Subtitle Edit Portable | 103.0 MB View: Subtitle Edit Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends. @WaltC - Memories, 2x Voodoo in SLI with a Riva TNT with an Aureal A3D soundcard.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      475
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!