Recommended Posts

You know what? I am NOT even to going purchase any music/movies Legally if Digital download becomes the most preferred format someday.

**** That, I just get them without paying everytime! I CAN NOT stand Digital download as a form of buying whatsoever!!!

The ONLY way I will ever truly buy something if it's Physical, period.

You know what? I am NOT even to going purchase any music/movies Legally if Digital download becomes the most preferred format someday.

**** That, I just get them without paying everytime! I CAN NOT stand Digital download as a form of buying whatsoever!!!

The ONLY way I will ever truly buy something if it's Physical, period.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalization

We don't care about the advantages?

Look, I don't care about all that storage, my hard drive is only 10 times bigger than a blu-ray (250GB), and I don't see what in the world I would put on that!?!? Every GarageBand Jam Pack maybe? lol

What I do care about though is that games on the PS3 can be much bigger, I don't want to insert a 2nd, 3rd or 4th optical disc anymore when I'm in the middle of a game. Blu-ray fixed it. Also, companies could have a hard time selecting what to keep and what not to keep for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th optical drive... (ie. in a couple of Final Fantasies, in the last disc, you cannot access a few cities, is it seriously because the story tells you so or was it a storage problem?) So the gaming industry doesn't have to think about it. It's not a lot you might say, but they do save a couple of days.

Most importantly is the video features. 480p is the past, 720p is good, but 1080p is gorgeous. This is what we're looking for when we're watching a movie. If a videophile has the option to choose a DVD or pay a little more to get a blu-ray, I think the choice will be easy, he'll go with a Blu-Ray. It can only touch a small % of the population though, because you need a blu-ray reader, a good and recent TV, etc... Maybe this explains why it's not so popular. HD costs a lot of money, and even though I agree it's not worth all this cash, it's still awesome.

This article fails :(

We don't care about the advantages?

Look, I don't care about all that storage, my hard drive is only 10 times bigger than a blu-ray (250GB), and I don't see what in the world I would put on that!?!? Every GarageBand Jam Pack maybe? lol

What I do care about though is that games on the PS3 can be much bigger, I don't want to insert a 2nd, 3rd or 4th optical disc anymore when I'm in the middle of a game. Blu-ray fixed it. Also, companies could have a hard time selecting what to keep and what not to keep for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th optical drive... (ie. in a couple of Final Fantasies, in the last disc, you cannot access a few cities, is it seriously because the story tells you so or was it a storage problem?) So the gaming industry doesn't have to think about it. It's not a lot you might say, but they do save a couple of days.

Most importantly is the video features. 480p is the past, 720p is good, but 1080p is gorgeous. This is what we're looking for when we're watching a movie. If a videophile has the option to choose a DVD or pay a little more to get a blu-ray, I think the choice will be easy, he'll go with a Blu-Ray. It can only touch a small % of the population though, because you need a blu-ray reader, a good and recent TV, etc... Maybe this explains why it's not so popular. HD costs a lot of money, and even though I agree it's not worth all this cash, it's still awesome.

This article fails :(

So LaserDisc was a resounding success? It had a whole lot more going for it than VHS movies too, you know, and it didn't even come close to replacing VHS.

Most importantly is the video features. 480p is the past, 720p is good, but 1080p is gorgeous. This is what we're looking for when we're watching a movie.

Not everybody looks for that in a movie. Most people are pretty satisfied with DVDs because they look good on standard TVs. It's only the home theater fanatics, such as yourself, that thinks that a "gorgeous" picture justifies spending an extra $10-15 for the Blu-ray version of a movie. VHS has awful quality while DVD doesn't. So, Blu-ray isn't going to just become a huge success right away like DVDs did. It's going to take more time.

Not everybody looks for that in a movie. Most people are pretty satisfied with DVDs because they look good on standard TVs. It's only the home theater fanatics, such as yourself, that thinks that a "gorgeous" picture justifies spending an extra $10-15 for the Blu-ray version of a movie. VHS has awful quality while DVD doesn't. So, Blu-ray isn't going to just become a huge success right away like DVDs did. It's going to take more time.

He mentioned Videophile, how did you missed that?

I am a huge Movie buff, also a Videophile, I gotta see it Sharp and clear!

He mentioned Videophile, how did you missed that?

I am a huge Movie buff, also a Videophile, I gotta see it Sharp and clear!

I know. That's why I said "It's only the home theater fanatics, such as yourself." Only those people feel the need to spend the extra money on better picture quality. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, but I'm just explaining why that article speculates that Blu-ray will fail. It won't fail, I'm quite sure of that, but it's going to take some time before it reaches the same popularity as DVDs. Until HDTVs become a norm and BD prices start to go down, not everyone will rush out to get a Blu-ray player yet.

2 things wrong with that statement; you don't need 1080p on a smaller than 37" (some even say higher) display, and upconverting players are not limited to 720p. You're mis-stating the cable issue completely. HDMI will happily pass an upconverted signal.

But most people today buy 40"+ HDTVs, which is why I started that Huge HDTV thread (which was finally closed, thankfully). So, since everyone is buying big 1080p HDTVs, people would want the true (non-upscaled) 1080p signal. Cable and DVDs need to be upscaled to 1080p, which is not as good as the true 1080p signal. The only way to get that is through Blu-ray.

No.

Actually it's true. My cousin used to have a 27" regular TV. It broke and now he bought a 46" HDTV and his house is too small too. My co-worker used to have just a 20" regular TV and now he upgraded to a 52" HDTV. Let's face it, people today live large. The larger your TV, the more you'll want the true 1080p signal.

Not everyone is ready to trade up to blu ray

See the economy lately? :laugh:

Actually, that predicts well for Blu-ray. Historically, in hard times, people spend money on entertainment to make themselves feel better. It's how Hollywood blew up during the Great Depression. People have to cancel vacations they can't afford, so they end up buying new TVs/movies/etc.

Actually, that predicts well for Blu-ray. Historically, in hard times, people spend money on entertainment to make themselves feel better. It's how Hollywood blew up during the Great Depression. People have to cancel vacations they can't afford, so they end up buying new TVs/movies/etc.

But this is a "financial" crisis. Why would you spend money on entertainment when the stock market is eating up your money. How are you going to afford it? Not to brag or anything, but I used to be a millionaire. Now thanks to the economy, I ain't anymore.

But this is a "financial" crisis. Why would you spend money on entertainment when the stock market is eating up your money. How are you going to afford it? Not to brag or anything, but I used to be a millionaire. Now thanks to the economy, I ain't anymore.

Uh, last time I checked, the Great Depression was a "financial" crisis.

I know. That's why I said "It's only the home theater fanatics, such as yourself." Only those people feel the need to spend the extra money on better picture quality. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, but I'm just explaining why that article speculates that Blu-ray will fail. It won't fail, I'm quite sure of that, but it's going to take some time before it reaches the same popularity as DVDs. Until HDTVs become a norm and BD prices start to go down, not everyone will rush out to get a Blu-ray player yet.

But most people today buy 40"+ HDTVs, which is why I started that Huge HDTV thread (which was finally closed, thankfully). So, since everyone is buying big 1080p HDTVs, people would want the true (non-upscaled) 1080p signal. Cable and DVDs need to be upscaled to 1080p, which is not as good as the true 1080p signal. The only way to get that is through Blu-ray.

Actually, most folks buy HDTVs *smaller* than forty inches (especially for bedrooms); it is for that reason that there has been a bloodbath in the 32" FPTV space (also, that is why there is a 37" FPTV space, which has completely replaced the old 36" CRT space; the smallest of 1080p HDTVs are 37 inches).

A forty-two inch HDTV (regardless of whether it is LCD or plasma) still eats up a lot of wall; most folks don't want such a wall-eater in a bedroom (or any room other than a home theater or media room) mostly because they don't have enough flat wall space.

what part of "not on a 32" HDTV" do you not understand?

I have a 37" full HD Samsung, and yes there is a difference, but if you're the average 40yo with eyesight issues you will struggle to notice.

Really not all that different to me. I mean yeah, the BluRay is obviously better, but not enough to justify buying a whole new player for. Especially not for the average consumer who just watches a movie or two every few weeks.

And HD-DVD.

Ah, but that's obsolete now. Now, HD-DVD is what I would call "dead," not Blu-ray. :D

Actually, most folks buy HDTVs *smaller* than forty inches (especially for bedrooms); it is for that reason that there has been a bloodbath in the 32" FPTV space (also, that is why there is a 37" FPTV space, which has completely replaced the old 36" CRT space; the smallest of 1080p HDTVs are 37 inches).

A forty-two inch HDTV (regardless of whether it is LCD or plasma) still eats up a lot of wall; most folks don't want such a wall-eater in a bedroom (or any room other than a home theater or media room) mostly because they don't have enough flat wall space.

But most people buy a TV for their living room before buying one for their bedroom. A bedroom TV is just an additional TV.

the smallest of 1080p HDTVs are 37 inches

Nope.

http://www.amazon.com/Sharp-Aquos-LC32D62U...p/dp/B000NEDYEC

Ah, but that's obsolete now. Now, HD-DVD is what I would call "dead," not Blu-ray. :D

Mine still works. The timebomb must not have gone off yet. You know, the timebomb that renders my HD-DVDs useless.

Mine still works. The timebomb must not have gone off yet. You know, the timebomb that renders my HD-DVDs useless.

Whoops, sorry. I didn't notice your signature. I don't think they release any new HD-DVDs anymore. Everything now is either DVD or Blu-ray. But I'm with you. I'm kind of bummed that Blu-ray won the war. We can all blame the PS3 for that.

Nope.

http://www.amazon.com/Sharp-Aquos-LC32D62U...p/dp/B000NEDYEC

Mine still works. The timebomb must not have gone off yet. You know, the timebomb that renders my HD-DVDs useless.

Lack of support was the timebomb, and render it useless? Nah. Some would even say VHS, or even Betamax is dead, but heres to those still using ancient equipment (Y)

  • 2 weeks later...
Yup and we're having another one now.

That's the point. During times of economic crisis (such as, when there's 25% unemployment and even greater numbers of underemployment), people turn to entertainment for escapism - movies, games, etc.

With TV going all digital in the U.S. next year, some people will be looking to upgrade since they are forced to cut costs in other places. While I don't expect a sudden spike in 70" DLP's, smaller HDTVs will get good sales this year considering the situation, possibly even close to last year's numbers. For instance, Circuit City will be looking to get any money they can, even if it means liquidating stock, to keep afloat, so expect good deals.

Sony and the Blu-ray group will be heavily pushing the blockbuster movies like Dark Knight, Ironman, etc. this holiday. Hell, it's cheaper to buy the Blu-ray than to see it in theatres.

In my uninformed economic opinion, expect massive hits in the travel industry, but with winter doldrums and depression, expect entertainment (movie, games, bars, etc.) sales to maintain.

Why will Blu-ray succeed when DVD is "good enough"? Because in America, "good enough" isn't good enough. We need the latest, greatest, shiniest crap to keep up with the Joneses - iPhones, HDTV's, SUV's, laptops, etc.

How much do you pay for a ticket? :p

Well it's usually $12-15 per ticket. So, if you're treating your family and/or friends to a movie, that's quite a fortune. This is precisely why I don't go to theaters anymore. I used to just rent movies until all the Blockbusters and Hollywood Videos in my area closed. I would try Netflix, but I don't like being stuck with a plan. I'd rather pay per rental. Anyways, now I just buy a movie that interests me. If I like it, I keep it; if not, I sell it on Ebay. It beats paying $12 per ticket.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!