NXE Review By Rahul


Recommended Posts

I have it but I am a little iffy on if I am going to install it or not...I am not worried about playing GoW online anyway at first, going to complete the campaign at least and then I will play online. But I do like playing GTA with a few buddies online and thats the only thing stopping me from doing it right at this moment...What do you think? Also do I need to disconnect the xbox off my home network or will it just not alow me to connect to live?

Well you're definitely the first I have heard complain of streaming issues, I don't even remember reviews mentioning it and I certainly didn't see it. If anything there was minor complaints of frame rate (more so on the PS3 version). They did an awesome job of the 360 though running at 1080p no less :yes:

For example Gamespot's review:

edit: just got this from MN's Twitter..

Oh how I'll laugh if you're all banned :laugh:

I'd laugh harder if people who flashed their hard drive to play pirated games got banned :laugh:

I'd say 90% of this update is 'cosmetic nonsence' (a bit like XP to Vista and Vista to Windows 7), the other 10% is, well, debatable to say the least, HDD Play being, at best, negligible.

I wish there was an option 'not to update' to this 'eye candy driven release', as things are quite happily ticking along on my xbox, and wish it to remain so, without all that irritating crap.

I vote to keep it as it is :)

I'd say 90% of this update is 'cosmetic nonsence' (a bit like XP to Vista and Vista to Windows 7), the other 10% is, well, debatable to say the least, HDD Play being, at best, negligible.

I wish there was an option 'not to update' to this 'eye candy driven release', as things are quite happily ticking along on my xbox, and wish it to remain so, without all that irritating crap.

I vote to keep it as it is :)

could you possibly have managed to fit more ignorance in a single post

I'd say 90% of this update is 'cosmetic nonsence' (a bit like XP to Vista and Vista to Windows 7), the other 10% is, well, debatable to say the least, HDD Play being, at best, negligible.

I wish there was an option 'not to update' to this 'eye candy driven release', as things are quite happily ticking along on my xbox, and wish it to remain so, without all that irritating crap.

I vote to keep it as it is :)

HDD play negligible? Why's that? Because it doesn't appeal to you? Why don't you ask how all those PS3 owners feel having to install games just to get ACCEPTABLE loading times? The big argument was always "yeah, well, the 360 sounds like a ****ing jet engine" but now the 360 has the best of both worlds - install ANY game and have a nice quiet machine with faster loading times, or just play as normal. I'd say that's pretty significant.

The only thing left now is figuring out a way of having more content on the disks.

As for the interface, you've obviously not used it because it is VERY slick, everything is faster than before, even the guide. Now the guide, have you actually looked at that in detail? It's very smart and practical, it's quick, it lets you more or less control the whole machine from anywhere and what's more - it looks like the old dash. If you really don't like this update, why not just stick to using the new guide?

HDD play negligible? Why's that? Because it doesn't appeal to you? Why don't you ask how all those PS3 owners feel having to install games just to get ACCEPTABLE loading times? The big argument was always "yeah, well, the 360 sounds like a ****ing jet engine" but now the 360 has the best of both worlds - install ANY game and have a nice quiet machine with faster loading times, or just play as normal. I'd say that's pretty significant.

The only thing left now is figuring out a way of having more content on the disks.

As for the interface, you've obviously not used it because it is VERY slick, everything is faster than before, even the guide. Now the guide, have you actually looked at that in detail? It's very smart and practical, it's quick, it lets you more or less control the whole machine from anywhere and what's more - it looks like the old dash. If you really don't like this update, why not just stick to using the new guide?

+1

Don't really have anything else to say on the matter :p

to me the best part is the support for 16:10 resolutions. Makes a HUGE difference in terms of image quality on computer monitors.

well :unsure:, I can hardly notice any difference (on my 30") may be because I'm not using my native resolution?

HDD play negligible? Why's that? Because it doesn't appeal to you? Why don't you ask how all those PS3 owners feel having to install games just to get ACCEPTABLE loading times? The big argument was always "yeah, well, the 360 sounds like a ****ing jet engine" but now the 360 has the best of both worlds - install ANY game and have a nice quiet machine with faster loading times, or just play as normal. I'd say that's pretty significant.

The only thing left now is figuring out a way of having more content on the disks.

As for the interface, you've obviously not used it because it is VERY slick, everything is faster than before, even the guide. Now the guide, have you actually looked at that in detail? It's very smart and practical, it's quick, it lets you more or less control the whole machine from anywhere and what's more - it looks like the old dash. If you really don't like this update, why not just stick to using the new guide?

OH SNAP!!! THAT JUST HAPPENED!!! lol

The update itself is only like 8mb, it's Avatars that take up the rest of the space. I'd imagine that if you don't have enough space, you basically get what those who illegally installed the dash get - dash with no avatars and an inability to go online.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!