New ban wave?


Recommended Posts

Some people are saying it's because of playing games early? I managed to get mirrors edge yesterday from my boy who works @ game

Hope they don't think it's pirated

If you mean gamestop how does that work?

We arent allowed to take street dated games home that we alreayd have or we get fired. Thats BS that you have the game and arent gonna get banned.

If you mean gamestop how does that work?

We arent allowed to take street dated games home that we alreayd have or we get fired. Thats BS that you have the game and arent gonna get banned.

Microsoft doesn't ban people who paid for a legitimate copy of a game, even if they got it early. Why the hell would they? Microsoft is out to ban people who pirate games, not those who pay for legit copies.

-Spenser

Yeah good for MS IMHO. If they pirate and get caught it's their own problem.

These guys can complain all they like and make excuses like they were just "trialing" the game or they "would have gotten it later", but it still remains they broke the rules and in most countries, the law. Really, banning uses is on the very low end of the scale in regards to punishments MS could deliver with adequate proof which in these cases I'm sure it has. If they were the RIAA there'd probably be an untold number of lawsuits being handed out.

So yeah, not too fussed if people pirate games themselves, my friend does with his console infact. But at the same time I'm happy to see MS take action too. The consoles cheap enough that these guys can own two, hell the $300 or so price tag here for an arcade is roughly 3 - 3.5 games which I'm sure the guys who need this second console have more saved from the games they have downloaded as opposed to buying.

Microsoft doesn't ban people who paid for a legitimate copy of a game, even if they got it early. Why the hell would they? Microsoft is out to ban people who pirate games, not those who pay for legit copies.

-Spenser

the problem is that sometimes they can't tell the difference ;)

so yeah.. its definitely happening.

I’ve gotten a few messages and seen some forum threads pop up on console bannings so I thought I’d post and let folks know what’s up. In our our continued effort to keep gameplay safe and secure for our community of more than 14 million members, Microsoft has taken action against a small percentage of Xbox 360 consoles that have been illegally modified in order to play pirated games. You should know that modifying your Xbox 360 console is also a violation of the Xbox LIVE terms of use, will void your warranty and result in a ban from Xbox LIVE. The health of the video game business depends on customers paying for the genuine products and services they receive, both from manufacturers and the local companies that support them. We will continue to employ and bolster anti-piracy security measures to counter piracy in the gaming industry and improve security in the Xbox LIVE community.

http://majornelson.com/archive/2008/11/11/...le-banning.aspx

^ that actually bothers you? so you sit there, while killing people or playing NHL (presume NHL cause you from BC) thinking "man this sucks cause people got this for free, its ruining my entire experience".

halo 3 is the only game i play online.

and it dosnt ruin the experience it just 'urks' me thinking that other people im playing against havnt paid for s***.

Also:

I?ve gotten a few messages and seen some forum threads pop up on console bannings so I thought I?d post and let folks know what?s up. In our our continued effort to keep gameplay safe and secure for our community of more than 14 million memMicrosoft has taken action against a small percentage of Xbox 360 consoles that have been illegally modified in order to play pirated games.s. You should know that modifying your Xbox 360 console is also a violation of the Xbox LIVE terms of use, will void your warranty and result in a ban from Xbox LIVE. The health of the video game business depends on customers paying for the genuine products and services they receive, both from manufacturers and the local companies that support them. We will continue to employ and bolster anti-piracy security measures to counter piracy in the gaming industry and improve security in the Xbox LIVE community.

Please don't get that confused with getting the NXE early or playing a legit copy of a game early.

http://majornelson.com/archive/2008/11/11/...le-banning.aspx

-Spenser

Yes they can.

-Spenser

If they can tell the difference, whats stopping them from banning every single console, as opposed to a handful?

Don't get my wrong, I'm glad that Microsoft is doing this, but don't make claims you can't back up. I'm with everyone else on this and that the only people being banned are ones who played the review copies online, or used poor rips.

If they can tell the difference, whats stopping them from banning every single console, as opposed to a handful?

Don't get my wrong, I'm glad that Microsoft is doing this, but don't make claims you can't back up. I'm with everyone else on this and that the only people being banned are ones who played the review copies online, or used poor rips.

I just backed it the hell up with a post from Major Nelson. I figure he knows more about it than you or I do. I don't know how you figure that just because only a handful of people are getting banned means that they can't tell the difference between a modded console and a regular console playing a review copy. That's bogus. It just means that perhaps they can't tell that some consoles are modded while others they can.

-Spenser

Major Nelson gave away absolutely no method to the banning.

Only said it was for piracy.

I wish people would stop acting like they know exactly what MS check for banning, no one really knows.

Every time ban waves come, lots of pirates run around saying they aren't banned, while others are.

I mean, you could say faulty rips are pretty much 99.9% guaranteed to get you done, but even then, some people claim they've played bad rips/review copies/etc, and still aren't banned.

Major Nelson gave away absolutely no method to the banning.

Only said it was for piracy.

First of all, I'm not acting like I know how they do it. Second, right there is the point I was trying to get across. Some people are arguing that people are getting banned for playing legit copies of games early (whether they purchased them early or are review copies) on legit (unmodded) Xbox 360's. That's just not true.

It's no surprise at all that MN doesn't say anything as to the method - that would ruin everything for them.

-Spenser

For what it's worth Richard Hammond, after I've just said to everyone else it's pointless trying to guess, detection seems to be done through software, not hardware.

Else anyone with modified firmware, regardless of if they had even played a copy, would've been stung.

First of all, I'm not acting like I know how they do it. Second, right there is the point I was trying to get across. Some people are arguing that people are getting banned for playing legit copies of games early (whether they purchased them early or are review copies) on legit (unmodded) Xbox 360's. That's just not true.

-Spenser

No that's not true, that's a load of bollocks.

That doesnt make any sense, if they had a way of finding out how some were modded they would be able to tell all that were modded...?

Not necessarily. For a start, there's actually about 4 different DVD drives the 360 can have and they're flashed in a slightly different way. What's more, the vast majority of people are certain that it's not the modification itself that Microsoft can detect, but rather it's the disk you put in the drive. So-called "bad" rips are ISOs that have been improperly backed up and leave telltale signs that Microsoft can detect. The whole "don't play games long before they're released" thing is a bit of a farce, it's not so much the fact that you're playing GoW2 weeks before it's out that Microsoft gets ****y with, it's the fact that you can't actually verify the copy you're using until someone has a couple of retail copies to check it against. Chances are a lot of those early leaks are the "bad" rips and people are just too eager and impatient to wait, so they risk it.

If you've got a modded console and you only play online with rips that you've tested and verified yourself (i.e. YOU backed them up and YOU scanned the ISO against your backup to be sure it's exact), you technically should be fine and bar a select few who say they do this, generally around the ban waves, these people are ok.

Not necessarily. For a start, there's actually about 4 different DVD drives the 360 can have and they're flashed in a slightly different way. What's more, the vast majority of people are certain that it's not the modification itself that Microsoft can detect, but rather it's the disk you put in the drive. So-called "bad" rips are ISOs that have been improperly backed up and leave telltale signs that Microsoft can detect. The whole "don't play games long before they're released" thing is a bit of a farce, it's not so much the fact that you're playing GoW2 weeks before it's out that Microsoft gets ****y with, it's the fact that you can't actually verify the copy you're using until someone has a couple of retail copies to check it against. Chances are a lot of those early leaks are the "bad" rips and people are just too eager and impatient to wait, so they risk it.

If you've got a modded console and you only play online with rips that you've tested and verified yourself (i.e. YOU backed them up and YOU scanned the ISO against your backup to be sure it's exact), you technically should be fine and bar a select few who say they do this, generally around the ban waves, these people are ok.

yeah you are right, its all in the way you burn the files. You just got to make sure they are burned properly. Their are people on the internet (and lots of them) who have had their consoles modded for a very very long time and nothing has happened to them because they know what they are doing.

yeah you are right, its all in the way you burn the files. You just got to make sure they are burned properly. Their are people on the internet (and lots of them) who have had their consoles modded for a very very long time and nothing has happened to them because they know what they are doing.

That's only partially true, yeah it matters what way you burn them, but it also makes a big difference WHAT you burn.

For people who claim that they pay for all their games, you sound very educated about how the things work with modding consoles, bans, burning pirated DVDs. Or maybe you have too much time on your hands, hmmm?

Reading a couple of articles on how it all works does not mean you have too much time on your hands.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!