New ban wave?


Recommended Posts

Well he did talk about it here on Neowin, didn't find the thread but it should be out there, I might just suck at searching :)

it's not a secret, and as I said I think he's arily anti piracy now, and he's done his time for it.

I know that I vaguely remember the topic, but it's the way Kushan worded his reply

Also one final note: For those of you out there badmouthing all the people who hack the 360 and the like, you should know that one of the Admins of this very forum was once the leader of one of the biggest and longest-running warez groups out there. Think about that.

Sort of if to say "Admins of Neowin do it as well".

Maybe I'm interpreting him wrong, but that's the vibe I got, hence my response of if you don't know about anything, no point in speculating.

Piracy is piracy, it's moderated on Neowin when taken to unfavourable levels (it can be discussed, but you can't run around proclaiming everything you download, etc). Doesn't matter if Neobond is sitting on a pirate ship of cds and dvds, rules are rules for the board :p

I know that I vaguely remember the topic, but it's the way Kushan worded his reply

Sort of if to say "Admins of Neowin do it as well".

Maybe I'm interpreting him wrong, but that's the vibe I got, hence my response of if you don't know about anything, no point in speculating.

Piracy is piracy, it's moderated on Neowin when taken to unfavourable levels (it can be discussed, but you can't run around proclaiming everything you download, etc). Doesn't matter if Neobond is sitting on a pirate ship of cds and dvds, rules are rules for the board :p

well yeah, I agree that Kushans reply wasn't very well thought out or worded. Hence my first reply :)

its like waiting for a call from the doctors with test results or somtething lol..

So technically when we can check, its either your banned or your not banned? would MS banned people later on after the ban wave? So They have either flagged me or not? A simple yes or no answer? if you guys understand what im saying

Woah, I think a lot of people took what I said a little too seriously there, although I definitely could have worded it better.

When I mentioned that he was once the leader of Razor1911, I wasn't saying "He did it, so it's ok!", I was saying "Be careful what you say about them, because more people than you realise are or were involved in such things".

If you are on NXE I think you might be, I was just told the Z: code for current NXE bans are 0000-0000. ( Could be mistaken though )

EDIT: Just checked and 0000-0000 should just be some sorta' connection problem, you should be fine :)

Edited by Sethos

I'm having issues connecting myself. The "Z" code is the "offences" code, so if that's all 0's then it's a Live (or connection) issue, not a piracy issue. I think the NXE "bans" are different because it's not so much a ban, it's more of a "not authorised" code, hence why it falls under the "Y" code.

Are there people that have hacked their firmware but have not been banned on Live? If so, does anyone know what the discrepancy is?

Yes, because Microsoft cannot detected the modified firmware itself, they can only detect a "Bad" backup if it's played while connected to live. If they never play backups on live, they'll never get banned from live. Likewise, it's entirely possible to make "good" backups that Microsoft cannot (currently) detect, so there's still plenty of pirates out there who haven't been banned because they were careful (or lucky) enough.

just out of curiosity, when you try to connect to XBL with the NXE (hoping to see if im banned or not lol) it asks you to download an update, click yes then it quickly stops? whats the go?

Update? I plugged in my NXE yesterday to check my Ban status and was never prompted for anything :(

just out of curiosity, when you try to connect to XBL with the NXE (hoping to see if im banned or not lol) it asks you to download an update, click yes then it quickly stops? whats the go?

Because there is two parts to the NXE. The first part you have which is basically the new dashboard. The second part is the software for the avatars. When you sign in it's prompting you to download the second part, but your console ID doesn't match any of the accepted ones in the beta, so it cancels.

So what makes a "bad backup" bad (relative to "good" ones)? Technically speaking, of course, I know the obvious difference of it being detectable. :p

Quite a lot. An Xbox 360 ISO contains several important files that must be backed up correctly. The trick is that the game itself doesn't check this data, it's Xbox Live that does, so the game will boot perfectly fine if this data is incorrect, but if it doesn't match when Microsoft checks it (each game is different), then you get slapped with a ban at a later date.

There are also a few other things they can check for, such as where the layer break on the DVD is (360 disks are always in the same place) or even if the Booktype of the disk is DVD-ROM or not.

There's been no evidence to show that playing a "review copy" will get anyone banned or playing a game early or anything like that (mainly because lots of people legitimately do it, you just have to look at neogaf for that), but if the information in the images isn't exactly right, well...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!