Windows 7 Build 6936 Screenshots IS HERE !


Recommended Posts

If there was a 2000 x64 I'd still be using it.

I hear ya.. finally upgraded to Vista after procrastinating, dual booting, tweaking and so on. The performance is at a level that I like now, and XP is just an OS that I used in the past and enjoyed, much like when I used Windows 98 and loved it.

I think Win7 will be more than just a new taskbar. Sure that's the main focus now, but I expect other new and cool features as well.
I don't know why you would want to use IE anyways. Firefox is where it's at.

LMAO where did that come from Nomad? haha

MY bad, quoted the wrong person. I was referring to the discussion about tabbed browsing in IE. IE is at the bottom of my list of browsers I would use.

1. Firefox

2. Chrome

3. Opera

4. Safari

.

.

.

.

.

99. IE

I'm more interested in what your 5 through 98 would be...

I'm more interested in what your 5 through 98 would be...

LOL, quoted for truth.

@Nomad77: If you were really serious... other than those five browsers, the rest are just Gecko, Trident, or KHTML (Konqueror) shells. And honestly IE8 beta 2's a worthy contender in the browser wars, get with the times.

@ikonizer: What would "impress" you? Just to save you from the inevitable flaming please do not mention the word "WinFS" or link the two words "new" and "kernel" together. :p

I know Windows 7 is just in alpha release at the moment, but from what I've seen so far, I'm not in the least bit impressed. I'm even considering downgrading from Vista back to XP.

and why are you not impressed and why would ya downgrade to an outdated OS What do you like to pay good money for hardware and not take advantage of what it can do. unless you seriously have some bad eyes and assume vista not working right for you then go back to XP

OMG! People liking and using Windows 2000 should be banned from the Internet and confined to Intranets only!

Don't see why. Maybe it's just because you're very uninformed.

And a horse to get to work, and candles, and a black and white tv. Move on already.

Explain to me the massive difference between 2000 and XP that can make you compare them as if one was a horse and the other a modern car.

Explain to me the massive difference between 2000 and XP that can make you compare them as if one was a horse and the other a modern car.

I've never used Windows 2000, but from what I've read, a lot of popular consumer software didn't always run on Windows 2000, and Windows 2000 also lacked a lot of media software that was on the 9x releases like 98 and ME. XP was the first consumer-oriented NT release, which supposedly added a lot of compatibility that the NT line was missing.

Again, I could be totally wrong here, especially seeing as I do know many people who used Windows 2000 with little issue.

+RM20010: Are you seriously going to tell me that IE8 is a contender against Firefox 3.1???

If IE8 is the times then I don't want to get anywhere near them.

IE8 isn't even done and I still prefer it to Firefox. I was never a fan of the Firefox UI, though it is a good, reliable browser. But IE's features like crash recovery, activities, great zoom / high DPI features, and protected mode are all a big deal to me.

Strange, Ive asked a few people who've used it an the same happens to them. It will only display maybe 2-5 results, the rest only show after a couple of page refreshes. It doesnt happen with every search but it is frequent and it happens on XP, Vista and Windows 7.

Is that an animated fish on the desktop?

I know you can already animated the desktop in Visa by typing something like following on the command-promt.

aurora.scr /p65552

hey nifty little trick man...I guess my old butt learns something new everyday :D

LOL, quoted for truth.

@Nomad77: If you were really serious... other than those five browsers, the rest are just Gecko, Trident, or KHTML (Konqueror) shells. And honestly IE8 beta 2's a worthy contender in the browser wars, get with the times.

@ikonizer: What would "impress" you? Just to save you from the inevitable flaming please do not mention the word "WinFS" or link the two words "new" and "kernel" together. :p

do they even make konquerer and the other linux browsers for windows? :o

Since I much don't care or use addons any plus to using FF over IE8 is lost on me. I've been running IE8 since beta 1 and it's been doing good for something that's not finished. I also run IEPro for Ad block, and I'm set. My pages render and work fine, so I don't see the need to change. Before this I used Opera, and still have it installed for the heck of it.

But I don't know why browsers came into this anyways, we're talking about Win7.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!