Windows 7 experience


Windows 7 experience  

1826 members have voted

  1. 1. How was installation?

    • 7 - Awsome, very fast, no problems!
      1163
    • 6
      394
    • 5
      171
    • 4
      54
    • 3
      20
    • 2
      7
    • 1 - Couldn't be worse. Got nasty errors, couldn't install.
      17
  2. 2. How is compatability

    • 7 - Everything compatible (programs and hardware)
      750
    • 6
      611
    • 5
      319
    • 4
      99
    • 3
      27
    • 2
      7
    • 1 - Nothing at all, not even crucial things(processor, etc)
      13
  3. 3. The features

    • 7 - It has everything
      713
    • 6
      626
    • 5
      354
    • 4
      85
    • 3
      20
    • 2
      11
    • 1 - It has nothing, windows 1 was better.
      17


Recommended Posts

What are you comparing the speed against? I am comparing the OS responsiveness against XP x64 SP2. I am also comparing speed of opening things like Photoshop CS3. It seems to take longer than in XP to go from A to B in the UI, even with those annoying animations disabled. By responsiveness I mean, the time between me clicking something and me getting a result. I don't feel like timing it, but if XP needs 1/50 of a second to open Explorer then 7 is more like 1/12 of a second... :/

Do you know how I could specify where to search (computer, etc) and how (+hidden, +system files, -zip files) before searching? Is there any way to enable classic search (Windows 2000 style) - I would love that! :D Or is there an alternative to Windows Search?

One thing that is odd is that regedit search is STILL not SMP optimized - it just does not use 100% of my both cores to search the registry - odd.

I think it needs tweaking, lot and lots of tweaking. Did anyone disable WFP?

Do not get me wrong, W7 is excellent in all departments, except diagnosing crash on boot problems and performance

To search for hidden files and to specify where to search, use the windows search hotkey: WIN + F

I installed the build 7000 beta on a newly-built machine, and even though it suffered a few quirks (all of which I attribute to so-so VIA chipset drivers), I was really impressed with Win7 in a lot of areas.

I was so impressed, in fact, that I decided to pull the RC off the torrents. This is something I almost never do, but since MS is giving it away in a couple of weeks anyway...

I also decided to tempt fate and attempt an upgrade of my beloved Q9550 Vista x64 machine. The upgrade was almost flawless; I needed to reinstall software for my Microsoft hardware (keyboard, mouse, and LifeCam), and of course I had to dispense with OneCare.

I'll admit, I don't see a lot of difference in performance, but this was a pretty good machine before, anyway.

I look forward to upgrading when RTM comes out. Probably Pro--I'm having a hard time seeing the benefit of Ultimate.

having some fun with it considering I would not be able to install the thing in the first place but after a whim of trying again I recived a magical whistle and like flew to windows 7 from xp.

As you can see in my magical picture I am a 1.0 on the rating scale Thank you very much!

post-250082-1241228591_thumb.jpg

I tried installing Win7 (beta 1 x64) on my laptop (dual boot with Vista) and while it is impressive, I'd hardly ditch Vista and start using the beta as my main OS. The minimalistic approach with the tool bars actually annoys me, I don't want just text and it would of been nice to at least have an option to turn the icons back on like Vista. It doesn't detect my graphics chipset (GeForce 9500M GS) properly and as a result it's quite unstable in that part (but I blame Nvidia for that, they are on the ball with the desktop boards but leave the laptop users behind, typical), I did try visiting that Laptopvideotogo website to get the modified infs to use the desktop drivers, but that didn't end well and had to format and reinstall! The new Media Centre is very impressive and works much better then Vista's but seems MPEG2 support has been disabled (anyone get that working again?) and it still needs alot work though. Application compatibility is definitely much better then Vista and it does run very smooth to the most part. It's definitely a good OS and the improved Media Centre definitely has my attention, will I upgrade to 7 come release day? maybe, but I'll wait till RC1 before making a definitive decision though.

Actually I will likely shift to using 7 RC as the main OS in a week IF I can upgrade the RAM and graphics hardware I have now. The software I run (along with all the hardware) is explicitly supported in 7 (either by 7 directly or via easily-downloadable drivers). My games all work (in fact they work better in 7 than in Vista). I have a low-end desktop (that I built myself); however I push it like Harris pushed Mahoney (the original Police Academy); the fact that 7 DOESN'T "throw up" (consider that I run the 64-bit version with but a gigabyte of RAM!) at load levels that either Vista or XP32 would have trouble surviving says volumes.

I tested the Beta over several computers and found it working well.

Speed: 5 - much faster than my Windows Vista SP1 HP OEM pre-installed, but still with space to improve;

The looks: 5 - also better than Vista, but high DPI still need improvement;

Overall: 6.

not on the RC yet, but the BETA became a dog using that Anti-vius app for me.

Took it off and tried NOD32 and the speed is back.

Didn't like that other app at all. Beyond the speed it never stopped asking permission every 3 seconds it seemed. Even my wife got annoyed by it.

After installing the 32bit version of Windows 7 last night, I'm still left a bit cold by it. The install was flawless and after a couple of updates everything seemed to be going well. After firing-up my PC in the evening to have another look at the OS, it just seems so "laggy" I don't know what's happened. I did install an anti-virus program (Kaspersky Beta) and did a defrag and cleaned up the install with CCleaner. I have had IE8 crash out on me a few times as well. Are there any trick for speeding up Windows 7? My Rig's spec shouldn't cause any problems:

Dell Inspiron 530

Q6600 QC

4GB DDR2 800mhz

HD4850 512mb

360gb SATA2 HD

I've been reading some posts on the Windows 7 TechNet site and i can't stop laughing... some people are so stupid and the comments are just laughable. If you don't have a basic knowledge of installing an OS and/or Beta Testing then you shouldn't be doing it! At least the people on here are knowledgable and understand what they are doing.

My only complaint is with the UI. If you disable ClearType (I'm one of those for whom the color fringing makes text unreadable), you still see it on certain headers, etc... It's really frustrating that disabling ClearType doesn't actually disable it. One of the few times I've yelled at an Operating System.... :o

"BAD WINDOWS 7! STOP FORCING CLEARTYPE ON ME! I DO NOT LIKE YOU!"

And so forth. Only with more profanity.

64 bit edition had some problems with my product key, ended up trying 3 different keys from MS, 3rd time lucky.

OS is stable, less customisation than XP which is a disappointment as I like to place things in certain places. The library feature seems basic and not really something I will use as I don't wish to include whole folders.

I know I have to use 7 as XP is now old but its going to be a struggle. Its a shame as I always loved upgrading. It seems to me MS have decided on one set way to have your files and tool bars and have removed the option for change - That cant be good.

Explorer options - I agree, and i think most people who were comfortable navigating with explorer really miss the "up" button. But, i think we'll eventually get used to the new method of navigation.

Alt + Up Arrow should still work though. Or simply Backspace. (but these two have some subtle differences in behavior)

Alt + Up Arrow should still work though. Or simply Backspace. (but these two have some subtle differences in behavior)

This just seems mad, you have methods of doing things which everyone is happy with and so you change it? Its meant to be an upgrade not just change for changes sake

64 bit edition had some problems with my product key, ended up trying 3 different keys from MS, 3rd time lucky.

OS is stable, less customisation than XP which is a disappointment as I like to place things in certain places. The library feature seems basic and not really something I will use as I don't wish to include whole folders.

I know I have to use 7 as XP is now old but its going to be a struggle. Its a shame as I always loved upgrading. It seems to me MS have decided on one set way to have your files and tool bars and have removed the option for change - That cant be good.

well firstly windows 7 is very customizable more so then what XP is but i wont go on further as others will say somthing in the same lines.

as for libraries being basic you must not under stand how libraries function i will post soem tidbits for you so you know

Windows Explorer in Windows 7 supports Libraries, virtual folders described in a .library-ms file that aggregate content from various locations - including shared folders on networked systems - and present them in a unified view. Searching in a library automatically federates the query to the remote systems, in addition to searching on the local system, so that files on the remote systems are also searched. Unlike search folders, Libraries are backed by a physical locations which allows files to be saved in the Libraries. Such files are transparently saved in the backing physical folder. The default save location for a library may be configured by the user, as can the default view layout for each library. Libraries are generally stored in the Libraries special folder, which allows them to be displayed on the navigation pane.

By default, a new user account in Windows 7 contains four libraries, for different file types: Documents, Music, Pictures, and Videos. They are configured to include the user's profile folders for these respective file types, as well as the computer's corresponding Public folders.

Downloaded the RC and installed on a Virtual PC using VirtualBox and all I can saw is WOW! What a excellent operating system. Can't wait to get the final version. Am considering installing it on my main system.

well firstly windows 7 is very customizable more so then what XP is but i wont go on further as others will say somthing in the same lines.

as for libraries being basic you must not under stand how libraries function i will post soem tidbits for you so you know

Windows Explorer in Windows 7 supports Libraries, virtual folders described in a .library-ms file that aggregate content from various locations - including shared folders on networked systems - and present them in a unified view. Searching in a library automatically federates the query to the remote systems, in addition to searching on the local system, so that files on the remote systems are also searched. Unlike search folders, Libraries are backed by a physical locations which allows files to be saved in the Libraries. Such files are transparently saved in the backing physical folder. The default save location for a library may be configured by the user, as can the default view layout for each library. Libraries are generally stored in the Libraries special folder, which allows them to be displayed on the navigation pane.

By default, a new user account in Windows 7 contains four libraries, for different file types: Documents, Music, Pictures, and Videos. They are configured to include the user's profile folders for these respective file types, as well as the computer's corresponding Public folders.

Im having difficulty finding this extra customisation. So far I am unable to move taskbar folders or have them slide out instead of drop down. I find the drop downs get messy if you are looking for buried programs.

I must admit I don't understand the library feature but if its as good as people are saying then Im happy to try. From what I have seen of it so far it enables me to have a link to a file or folder which is somewhere else but it is not a shortcut. The first thing that gets me here is backups, do I backup the library or just the original storage location - but then what if I forget storage location as Im used to using the library? Im having difficulty getting my head around the point of the library? If Im using a file or folder that often why is so hard to get to and thus needing this library?

First I like Vista. I have to say that since so many people hated it. Windows 7 is without question faster and more polished than Vista, but it should be since it is really a x.1 version.

The new UI is a very nice refresh of the Vista UI. The super bar is one of my favorite features. I've had a few compatiblity issues with software but that is to be expected and doesn't deserve docking points to the O/S. Though I do wish Stardock would get more of my Eye candy ready for Win 7. I'm betting Windowsblinds and Superbar present some very interesting challenges, especially for backward compatilbility to Vista and XP while moving forward for Win7. My overall satisfaction in roughly a 6.5, under the assumption a 7 is nearly unattainable.

How do you do that? :)

It is pretty much the same thing M$ done with Documents and Settings Folder - it is just a link.

You need VC++ 2005/2008 and a Shell Extension which you can google and install.

I also did it for Desktop - so I have the same desktop for XP and Windows 7. Although it ****es me off that W7 states that it is on C while actually it is on D - why confuse me so much?!

There is a sideeffect which I cannot get rid off or know why it happens - passwords do not get stored ???

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!