Windows 7 experience


Windows 7 experience  

1826 members have voted

  1. 1. How was installation?

    • 7 - Awsome, very fast, no problems!
      1163
    • 6
      394
    • 5
      171
    • 4
      54
    • 3
      20
    • 2
      7
    • 1 - Couldn't be worse. Got nasty errors, couldn't install.
      17
  2. 2. How is compatability

    • 7 - Everything compatible (programs and hardware)
      750
    • 6
      611
    • 5
      319
    • 4
      99
    • 3
      27
    • 2
      7
    • 1 - Nothing at all, not even crucial things(processor, etc)
      13
  3. 3. The features

    • 7 - It has everything
      713
    • 6
      626
    • 5
      354
    • 4
      85
    • 3
      20
    • 2
      11
    • 1 - It has nothing, windows 1 was better.
      17


Recommended Posts

First I tried an upgrade from vista and boot times were around 5 to 6 mins though windows performance noticably faster than Vista. Just completed a clean install and it boots in seconds now. Ive got to say im slightly disappointed in that its been the most trouble free install of windows Ive ever had. It just works - so what am I supposed to do now.

First I tried an upgrade from vista and boot times were around 5 to 6 mins though windows performance noticably faster than Vista. Just completed a clean install and it boots in seconds now. Ive got to say im slightly disappointed in that its been the most trouble free install of windows Ive ever had. It just works - so what am I supposed to do now.

LOL Not happy if you have nothing to fix?

I love the install speed, this is a good improvement over XP.

Regarding the 7100 RC x64

Performance went down the drain and I cant make it double click to open and single click to select - so I would rate the RC fairly low if I could now rerate but I can't

That's a deal breaker right there :(

Thread hijacks ftw :p

Although, I am just trying this out so I might have been wrong about that statement. Now I think they are back (???) - I have no idea - after all I am also using a beta Firefox. :) It has performance hickups it seems to me - although page loading is on steroids

Great experience so far, install no problems, the one thing I did not expect to get working was my old Canon Lide20 scanner, Vista drivers worked for that, the only thing so far, my LG phone software acts up a bit, but I can get there with it. Speed good, boot fine, shut down fine, love it. Jim

Ok is everyone drinking the Windows 7 kool-aid? How can Windows 7 possibly get a 7 rating for features? It is virtually identical to Windows Vista SP1 in every way, save for the taskbar features there are no ground breaking features in 7 AT ALL.

Performance is improved on boot times but other than that it feels the same as Vista.

I think XP users might have a reason to upgrade, but as for Vista users its more of the same thing. Same annoying explorer windows, horrible Vista Start Menu which you are now FORCED to use, an even more messy display panel.

What an incredibly overrated operating system. This should be a pay for service pack for Vista not a new operating system. No way can I see anyone sanely justifying shelling out $100+ for this update from Vista.

First I like Vista. I have to say that since so many people hated it. Windows 7 is without question faster and more polished than Vista, but it should be since it is really a x.1 version.

The new UI is a very nice refresh of the Vista UI. The super bar is one of my favorite features. I've had a few compatiblity issues with software but that is to be expected and doesn't deserve docking points to the O/S. Though I do wish Stardock would get more of my Eye candy ready for Win 7. I'm betting Windowsblinds and Superbar present some very interesting challenges, especially for backward compatilbility to Vista and XP while moving forward for Win7. My overall satisfaction in roughly a 6.5, under the assumption a 7 is nearly unattainable.

but it is effectively NT7.0

I still see no improvements over Vista SP2. Sorry but there is none.

bla bla bla

Ok is everyone drinking the Windows 7 kool-aid? How can Windows 7 possibly get a 7 rating for features? It is virtually identical to Windows Vista SP1 in every way, save for the taskbar features there are no ground breaking features in 7 AT ALL.

Performance is improved on boot times but other than that it feels the same as Vista.

I think XP users might have a reason to upgrade, but as for Vista users its more of the same thing. Same annoying explorer windows, horrible Vista Start Menu which you are now FORCED to use, an even more messy display panel.

What an incredibly overrated operating system. This should be a pay for service pack for Vista not a new operating system. No way can I see anyone sanely justifying shelling out $100+ for this update from Vista.

more bla bla bla

I had my first problem with 7 this week lol. It was loading 7127. First boot was slow as hell. It froze 3 times on the desktop. Everything was slow as hell. Firefox installed but ALWAYS said it was already open (even though it wasn't). Reboot didn't fix these problems.

Went out last night, turned my PC on this morning and it is all working great again now :/ lol. No idea what happened.

It is virtually identical to Windows Vista SP1 in every way, save for the taskbar features there are no ground breaking features in 7 AT ALL.

Have you even tried out 7 for more than 5 minutes and looked beyond the taskbar? Faster search results, improvements to the sound (changes to output or enhancements no longer stop playback of audio), Aero Snap, WDDM 1.1 (less memory consumption with DWM, GDI acceleration, etc), HomeGroup, Play music to other devices using WMP12, faster access to Wifi connections, Libraries, the list just goes on and on. There's just too many improvements in 7 to list them all here.

Have you even tried out 7 for more than 5 minutes and looked beyond the taskbar? Faster search results, improvements to the sound (changes to output or enhancements no longer stop playback of audio), Aero Snap, WDDM 1.1 (less memory consumption with DWM, GDI acceleration, etc), HomeGroup, Play music to other devices using WMP12, faster access to Wifi connections, Libraries, the list just goes on and on. There's just too many improvements in 7 to list them all here.

None of these features are ground breaking, none of them justify shelling out $150+ on a upgrade from a Vista machine.

None of these features are ground breaking, none of them justify shelling out $150+ on a upgrade from a Vista machine.

Who justifies their purchase based on ONE feature? Not I. The features I mentioned are what I would consider to be worthy of my money because they are of importance to me. It's never been about one "killer" feature. It's always been about the many small features that improvement the overall experience. They may not be important you, but they matter to millions of other people. The improvements to the Start Menu and Taskbar are my main interests of 7 due to the fact that they make everyday tasks THAT much easier to perform.

Who justifies their purchase based on ONE feature? Not I. The features I mentioned are what I would consider to be worthy of my money because they are of importance to me. It's never been about one "killer" feature. It's always been about the many small features that improvement the overall experience. They may not be important you, but they matter to millions of other people. The improvements to the Start Menu and Taskbar are my main interests of 7 due to the fact that they make everyday tasks THAT much easier to perform.

I don't, but thats the main feature that appeals to me [the new task bar] and that alone will not justify the purchase price. I'd upgrade if they offered a step-up version for a limited time for $50-$60 for Vista users...but as a full fledged update I'm not interested in "under the hood" tweaks that will yield no real world performance differences outside of benchmarks.

Difference of opinion bro, I just don't happen to think the operating system is "feature rich" when compared to Windows Vista. Maybe someone coming from XP would be impressed , but as a Vista Ultimate x64 user there isn't much this operating system offers me.

I'm really disappointed in the continued use of the Vista style start menu it makes more work for the user than the XP style/classic ever did..just highlight now its a clicking game. I'm even more disappointed in the force of using this style of start menu.

I just wanted to say how impressed I am with some of the features that were added to Windows 7. For one, the Aero Snap is a HUGE time saver, especially when working in Office programs and Firefox. Also, I love how .mov Quicktime videos will now play natively! My digicam records videos in .mov and never could be read by XP or Vista so I had to download some reg hacks and other programs to be able to use mov in Windows Explorer and Media Center. I had to use Quicktime which I really don't like, but WMP is much better (and finally greatly improved!) Those are just two that I can think of right now, but there are plenty others that make the experience so much better!

Thanks MS for the hard work and listening to your customers. (Y)

This release is actually verry important to system admins and developers. It's going to make their life's alot easier ... Vista was the other way arround. It was made to impress the consumers. This time it's the itpro's turn !

I love it ! In fact I'm installing it on a work pc to try out with server 2008 as we speek. Never did this with a beta os before ...

Zwinky

p.s. To all the critics here: Get a life ... After this release bashing MS is just not done anymore :) After hearing "ow but aren't there alot of problems with Vista" on a daily basis for over 2.5 years this is going to be a relief !

I don't, but thats the main feature that appeals to me [the new task bar] and that alone will not justify the purchase price. I'd upgrade if they offered a step-up version for a limited time for $50-$60 for Vista users...but as a full fledged update I'm not interested in "under the hood" tweaks that will yield no real world performance differences outside of benchmarks.

Difference of opinion bro, I just don't happen to think the operating system is "feature rich" when compared to Windows Vista. Maybe someone coming from XP would be impressed , but as a Vista Ultimate x64 user there isn't much this operating system offers me.

I'm really disappointed in the continued use of the Vista style start menu it makes more work for the user than the XP style/classic ever did..just highlight now its a clicking game. I'm even more disappointed in the force of using this style of start menu.

What the Search bar in the start menu is so Hard to understand and use or something. if you cant use the Search function and call that complicated and hard to use them you sire should be operate a computer period. . . . . . .

now in windows 7 the search in the start is more defined and separates what you need based on categories so if you type in the word ( Power ) it will separate what is a control panel options and or regular programs you installed with the word Power in them

Windows 7 tho as a Whole has 100s to 1000s of little improvement and some big ones in all Windows 7 is about usability discoverabilty and the user experience something in witch those 3 things lacked in previous version of windows well some of it may have been but it was a hit or Miss .

Edited by notuptome2004
This release is actually verry important to system admins and developers. It's going to make their life's alot easier ... Vista was the other way arround. It was made to impress the consumers. This time it's the itpro's turn !

I love it ! In fact I'm installing it on a work pc to try out with server 2008 as we speek. Never did this with a beta os before ...

Zwinky

p.s. To all the critics here: Get a life ... After this release bashing MS is just not done anymore :) After hearing "ow but aren't there alot of problems with Vista" on a daily basis for over 2.5 years this is going to be a relief !

Myself and and a mate are using Windows 7 it at work. We use Active Directory, Exchange Management Console, VMware, Citrix, Lotus Note, RDC, ManageSoft and Softgrid.

When I upgraded my work PC to Vista I got all those apps to work, but I had to find and install a heap of patches, mainly for the AD and Exchange admin tools.

With W7 everything worked straight away and its super fast.

I love windows 7! There are 2 things that are a problem but that's only because its a BETA (I am using Build 7100 32-bit. Latest as far as I know at the time of this post.).

Issues:

1. NVIDIA GeForce 9600GT drivers and motherboard drivers work but the video quality has gone from 1080i to 420p. Yes I checked and its the OS.

2. Some new monitors don't work with Windows 7 Build 7100. I know this should even happen but I was able to recreate the problem several times.

Rating you ask? I give it a 9 out of 10

Finally got around to installing it on my MacBook Pro via BootCamp today. I was using it in Fusion but I wanted better gaming support (AOEIII in Fusion was sluggish). So far, it's been great. Had to jump through various forum threads to get the x64 drivers for the Mac but now I know what to do so installs shouldn't take too long anymore.

I didn't use Vista a whole lot so going from XP to W7 has been different for me. XP is just so damn solid, hopefully W7 can/will be as reliable. Everything seems much more accessible.

Not bad. Supported a heap of things in the installation that Windows XP needed tons of driver discs for so that was a good start.

1. Installation and startup times are much faster. Startup even is fast enough with loads of junk installed and doesn't seem to stall the process. Lots of useful features to make it easier to use once you get used to them.

2. Having a permanent search bar in explorer is a blessing too. No need to pop up a separate window over your main on and obscure everything under it.

3. The ability to turn off drive letters in explorer is a good thing (very UNIXesque) except for beginners who don't understand the difference between copying and moving between different devices and are likely to forget that some of these devices are not always there and are going to turn off drive letters accidentally and then whinge when they remove a device and they can't find their files because they can't see a drive letter in the list.

4. Libraries can be a lot of fun when you are used to them. Even better (and strange) is that the timeouts associated with disconnected devices being selected is instant compared to my trouble with disconnected network devices causing explorer lockups. This could be improved.

I like the fact that external device libraries show the drive letter and you can see 'at a glance' everything in the one place instead of trawling through literally thousands of files and directories.

A 'favourites' for the file system. Some people are still going to forget the difference between copying and pasting to links in the library and miss files.

Minor problems. I can still lock up explorer when it clicks on a network link that is disconnected. And I mean totally lock up. But..It doesn't take the system with it or cause everything to reload unlike XP did. That's a good feature.

Windows 7 Rocks. Fast & Stable. No problems at all. It's now my primary OS even its in RC. :)

I love windows 7! There are 2 things that are a problem but that's only because its a BETA (I am using Build 7100 32-bit. Latest as far as I know at the time of this post.).

Issues:

1. NVIDIA GeForce 9600GT drivers and motherboard drivers work but the video quality has gone from 1080i to 420p. Yes I checked and its the OS.

2. Some new monitors don't work with Windows 7 Build 7100. I know this should even happen but I was able to recreate the problem several times.

Rating you ask? I give it a 9 out of 10

Yeah man you gave rating correctly because its very difficult to make a new OS flawless because you dont have oppurtunity to check it with old hardwares.

Well let's see...

It is much faster than sluggish Vista. The UI responds faster and better. Uses much less resources and less services running than Vista.

So far build 7201: Very good. It recognized EVERY piece of hardware on my Asus laptop, even the Nvidia card. I didn't have to install a single driver. Amazing. Vista never recognized anything! I had to install all drivers except for the sound on Vista.

I still think the UI needs a little bit more speed tweaking. Other than that, I can say that Vista is hanging by a rope right now. As soon as 7 comes out, Vista will hit the pages of history and I will burn the Vista DVD with so much pleasure it won't be funny.

Have you even tried out 7 for more than 5 minutes and looked beyond the taskbar? Faster search results, improvements to the sound (changes to output or enhancements no longer stop playback of audio), Aero Snap, WDDM 1.1 (less memory consumption with DWM, GDI acceleration, etc), HomeGroup, Play music to other devices using WMP12, faster access to Wifi connections, Libraries, the list just goes on and on. There's just too many improvements in 7 to list them all here.

I don't think he has. Windows 7 is a big improvement over Vista definately.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!