Windows 7 experience


Windows 7 experience  

1826 members have voted

  1. 1. How was installation?

    • 7 - Awsome, very fast, no problems!
      1163
    • 6
      394
    • 5
      171
    • 4
      54
    • 3
      20
    • 2
      7
    • 1 - Couldn't be worse. Got nasty errors, couldn't install.
      17
  2. 2. How is compatability

    • 7 - Everything compatible (programs and hardware)
      750
    • 6
      611
    • 5
      319
    • 4
      99
    • 3
      27
    • 2
      7
    • 1 - Nothing at all, not even crucial things(processor, etc)
      13
  3. 3. The features

    • 7 - It has everything
      713
    • 6
      626
    • 5
      354
    • 4
      85
    • 3
      20
    • 2
      11
    • 1 - It has nothing, windows 1 was better.
      17


Recommended Posts

Just installed Win7 Pro x64 (obtained via MSDNAA, thanks college :D)

All seems to be running fine. Only thing I can see that hasn't installed is my webcam and there appears to be no driver available. Not a biggy really. Network, audio and all that jazz going straight off the bat...no messing around.

Seems to run quite smooth and all my applications are installing fine even if most are going into this 32bit program files folder it seems to have. RAM use seems a tad higher than XP Pro...currently it's using about 1GB of my 2GB with just firefox and spotify running. Seems quite responsive overall on my core2duo e6300 (2x1.8GHz cpu)

Notice it has a lot of drivers installed out of the box including for my graphics card (8800GT). Says driver provider is NVIDIA but I'm assuming these are generic and I should still head over to NVIDIA site and download "real" drivers (for want of a better word). Or has it actually installed everything straight off?

Hello again Neowin!

I was able to get Windows 7 Pro through my university and it is one sexy beast! I'm coming from XP and this actually runs faster. Installed perfectly putting my old files in the Windows.old folder. I had already backed up important media anyways. No major hiccups yet.

My Windows Experience Index is a 3.4 bottlenecked because of my CPU which is a 2.6ghz P4 *gasp* also I have 2gigs of RAM, but that gave me a 4.8. Still though, runs great, very sexy!

EDIT: Oh Snap, haven't been here in a while (check joined date) so these specs are a little old.

Well, I think Win7(64bit) works well. I've had the RTM running for 22days without needing a restart while recording TV. Media Center is now great! I have only had problems with drivers for older printers (that did work with Vista 64bit). I have had no problems at all with Intel/Nvidia drivers. I was not a big Vista fan, I always thought of it as bloat ware, and slow. XP was and is a great OS, but its old now. MS can only do so much with it at this point. I'm using Microsoft Security Essentials, and have blocked many unwanted programs from installing with it. MSE does not seem to slow the OS down much at all. I think MS has a winner here, and no I'm not a MS fanboy. I was actually close to going Mac myself early this year. All this on a 1.8 dual core machine with 2gigs of RAM. Hardly a great machine, but I do not play games on computers anymore. As soon as I can take commercials out automatically, it will be perfect. :)

Windows 7 is running well here on my MacBook Pro. :D I thought the installation was a little slow in comparison to other OSs I've installed, but it was still quick. No driver incompatibilities (running Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit) and has a nice slew of features.

However, it definitely won't become my main OS. Despite it being a great OS, I still think Snow Leopard is better for what I use my computer for.

After a number of issues with World of Warcraft within 5 mins of starting up which I've finally fixed. I'm thoroughly enjoying the experience. Coming from XP. Visually it's came on leaps and bounds as well as performance it's much quicker. :)

managed to get Windows 7 pro x64 through university and MSDN.

I absolutely love it!!! Much better than vista and everything is compatible and runs so so well. Much more efficient, and quicker than vista.

I had vista from the start and never had problems with it, but Windows 7 is my new love!

Whoever doesnt have it already, GET IT. You will no be dissapointed.

Installed Windows 7 Ultimate 32bit (From Launch Event) on HP Pavillion DV6928US.

Clean install only took about 15 minutes, and system ran perfectly. Some Windows Updates installed some driver updates, and a couple of security patches, then it all ran smooth.

Installed VS 2008 Standard (From product launch event), Office 2003 Pro (from product launch event), Vegas Movie Studio 7.0 Platinum with DVD Architect Studio 4.0, as well as Security Essentials and Live Mail.

So far, I have had no issues, and everything works. Still playing with it, and testing it, but it already seems a lot better than Vista Ultimate (32bit) that I had before.

Not sure what to do with the Vista Ultimate 32bit software. Maybe on a VM as a test environment?

7/7/7

Installed Windows 7 Ultimate 32bit (From Launch Event) on HP Pavillion DV6928US.

Clean install only took about 15 minutes, and system ran perfectly. Some Windows Updates installed some driver updates, and a couple of security patches, then it all ran smooth.

Installed VS 2008 Standard (From product launch event), Office 2003 Pro (from product launch event), Vegas Movie Studio 7.0 Platinum with DVD Architect Studio 4.0, as well as Security Essentials and Live Mail.

So far, I have had no issues, and everything works. Still playing with it, and testing it, but it already seems a lot better than Vista Ultimate (32bit) that I had before.

Not sure what to do with the Vista Ultimate 32bit software. Maybe on a VM as a test environment?

7/7/7

You know what, as someone who has primarily been a Mac user for 4+ years following a 10+ year evangelism with anything Microsoft, I am quite impressed with Windows 7. I have dropped it on a couple older computers and a netbook with an Atom processor, and it is quite a nice release. They took some of the best parts of XP and learned from all of the mistakes of Vista, and they went and produced an all-around decent operating system.

Don't get me wrong, I won't be ditching the Macintosh OS that I love and live with today, but I have to at least tip my hat to the boys (and girls) in Redmond for finally listening to what consumers wanted.

So, when I would put myself back in the shoes of being a Windows admin, I would look at Vista and I could never imagine any corporate environment in their right mind ever adopting it over Windows XP or Windows 2000. At least, no company that wanted to be taken seriously. However, with Windows 7, I can almost see Microsoft being back at that stage in the game.

It's just a reminder that you should never get so big that you forget about the wants and needs of the people who got you to that position.

Besides having to buy a new wifi card (because of Linksys' lack of support) it is awesome! Now I had the beta and rc installed for quite a while, so there is nothing really new...but still a fine os. Very fast!

7/7/7

loving new taskbar, i had a small problem with install when its was taking ages to get from one window to another, etc. then i "googled" and it turns out you have to disable floppy in the bios, from then on everything went smooth.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!