Windows 7 experience


Windows 7 experience  

1826 members have voted

  1. 1. How was installation?

    • 7 - Awsome, very fast, no problems!
      1163
    • 6
      394
    • 5
      171
    • 4
      54
    • 3
      20
    • 2
      7
    • 1 - Couldn't be worse. Got nasty errors, couldn't install.
      17
  2. 2. How is compatability

    • 7 - Everything compatible (programs and hardware)
      750
    • 6
      611
    • 5
      319
    • 4
      99
    • 3
      27
    • 2
      7
    • 1 - Nothing at all, not even crucial things(processor, etc)
      13
  3. 3. The features

    • 7 - It has everything
      713
    • 6
      626
    • 5
      354
    • 4
      85
    • 3
      20
    • 2
      11
    • 1 - It has nothing, windows 1 was better.
      17


Recommended Posts

I've been running Windows 7 for well over a year and even from the Betas and RC it has been really solid. I even used it on one of my laptops I frequently tuned cars with. No issues what so ever. I really have to commend Microsoft as they really did a great job.

Speed(speed of everything in that matter, boot, shut down, programs, etc)

7 - Very fast, love it.

6

5 -- It's much better than I thought, but not as light as Ubuntu

4

3

2

1 - Extremelly slow, Lags a lot.

The looks

7 - Excellent, or don't really mind the looks.

6

5

4

3

2

1 - MS-DOS has better interface.

Overall

7 - Fantastic!

6 - A great OS, but it needs a lighter footprint and better hardware support

5

4

3

2

1 - Couldn't be worse.

Windows 7 is a great OS, but I'm really kind of annoyed that my fonts folder just went corrupt all of a sudden. No reason, modification, anything. I had to reinstall over an issue that is apparently popular.

I would recommend upgrading if you can afford it... *cough-torrent-cough*whistle.gif

features and comparability are top notch. it finally does not need a special driver on disk to connect to internet with your motherboard controller!!! that was so annoying with xp.

install is a bit slow at first, but i guess, overall, it is faster then xp.

i love the windows 7

  • 2 weeks later...

I just want to say that I am glad I thought of Windows 7 and MS finally decided to hear me out and follow through with my ideas.

I love Windows 7 and I am glad I thought of it. :laugh:

Seriously though, I love this OS. No crashes, speed is great, no issues to deal with works right out of the box as one would say.

I can't shiet on MS anymore.

:alien:

  • 2 weeks later...

I have x64 Ultimate..

Installation: 6 - I need Windows Update to find some drivers for my notebook

Compatibility: 5 - My Benq phone and some other hardware drivers just aren't there

Features: 5 - It has almost everything but somethings just aren't very good.. like the Disk Management is not as good as GParted IMO..

Speed: 6 - Way better than XP and Vista but not as good as Linux and Windows 2000

Looks: 6 - Almost perfect!

Overall: 6 - The best Windows yet!

And I'll add one more..

Stability: 6 - Excellent!

WINDOWS 7, HOME PREMIUM (Upgraded from Vista), 64 BIT

How was installation?

- 6, I chose this because, while it was fast, there were times (several minutes) where the progress bar just sat there. I know it was doing things in the background, but not having any indication of that made me worry it had stalled.

How is compatibility?

- 6, I chose this because Dragon Age has an issue with crashing in Windows 7 (64 bit), but that is the only program issue I have had. Even Photoshop 7.0 works!

The features

- 7, I don't need a lot of bells and whistles, so I'm happy with the features.

Speed

- 7, yay!

The looks

- 7, yay! Minor improvements over Vista like removing the teal glass on window borders, and toning down the other teal to be more blue (less green) is nicer on the eyes. I sometimes miss the appearance of the Vista task bar though. Icons are lovely, and the tray icons are fantastic. The evolution of the UI from XP, Vista, and now 7 has seen several improvements over each release, all for the better.

Overall

- 7, Fantastic!

  • 4 weeks later...

64 bit install dvd didn't support my hard drive out of the box, so I had to go into my BIOS and change it from AHCI to "Compatability" before it would actually boot the installation disc. I kept getting a BSOD. Once I got it going though it's pretty nice, just gotta get my Toshiba specific stuff installed since this machine came with Vista. Also I paid $310 USD for Windows 7 Ultimate and apparently I can't use it on my computer and my wife's at the same time, when I tried to activate hers it said that I couldn't use my license key any more...

64 bit install dvd didn't support my hard drive out of the box, so I had to go into my BIOS and change it from AHCI to "Compatability" before it would actually boot the installation disc. I kept getting a BSOD. Once I got it going though it's pretty nice, just gotta get my Toshiba specific stuff installed since this machine came with Vista. Also I paid $310 USD for Windows 7 Ultimate and apparently I can't use it on my computer and my wife's at the same time, when I tried to activate hers it said that I couldn't use my license key any more...

Beginning with Vista, Windows 7 supports AHCI. Not sure what happened.

Just installed a list of Windows updates as well as Office 2007, now it refuses to boot except in Safe Mode...I just get a BSOD and then the machine powers off. It doesn't restart, just powers off altogether. This is a legit copy of 7 that I just got from Best Buy.

It seems great to me so far 7 or near it for all options other than the new taskbar. It needs work. ;)

(No, I'm not arguing about the taskbar here, there's already threads about it. :D))

They need to scarp the whole Windows 7 thing and revive Vista...

  • 4 weeks later...

I can't say I am blown away by windows seven some changes and the lack of customization in some areas just seems brainless.

I don't understand why Libraries are forced on the user. Why can't I have the start menu links such as "my music" actually go to the "my music" folder? And why can't I create a link pinned to the taskbar that goes straight into my user folder rather than Libraries. For users like me who have no use for libraries what so ever, I should be able to turn them off. I mean did it never cross their minds that maybe someone might not want to use libraries.

It's little things like this that make me want to go back to Vista.

Like when I search, if I want to go a particular files location the option is second from the bottom of the context menu, it should be at the top.

WinXP use to be my favorite. Liked it better than Vista. Now, I have Windows 7 32bit and 64bit (TV tuner doesn't have 64bit drivers, but works on 32bit Win7). I still have XP Pro installed on this newer system, but mainly use Win 7 now. I really like the way it works, as it does what I need, without the problems Vista seemed to throw in at times. Overall, I am very pleased with it, but still playing with various Linux installs on a 4th hard drive just for kicks.

I don't understand why Libraries are forced on the user. Why can't I have the start menu links such as "my music" actually go to the "my music" folder? And why can't I create a link pinned to the taskbar that goes straight into my user folder rather than Libraries. For users like me who have no use for libraries what so ever, I should be able to turn them off. I mean did it never cross their minds that maybe someone might not want to use libraries.

Those are the two things that I disliked about Windows 7. Other than that, XP and Vista are dead and buried as far as I'm concerned.. couldn't pay me to go back to either. Fortunately, there's some easy ways to get around these two issues.

First, the music, pictures, documents and videos on the start menu; you can edit the registry to have them point to your personal directory instead of the library. Obviously, be damned careful editing the registry. You should probably export the following subkeys so you have an easy way to revert the changes in case you want to for whatever reason.

In the registry, navigate to the following location; all the changes are done in subkeys from here.

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\FolderDescriptions\

Now, find the menu subkey that you wish to change:

Documents - {7b0db17d-9cd2-4a93-9733-46cc89022e7c}

Music - {2112AB0A-C86A-4ffe-A368-0DE96E47012E}

Pictures - {A990AE9F-A03B-4e80-94BC-9912D7504104}

Videos - {491E922F-5643-4af4-A7EB-4E7A138D8174}

Inside each of these keys is an entry called "ParsingName". Change this entry exactly as shown! You want two colons at the beginning, and a closing brace at the end. No spaces anywhere. Copy carefully.

Documents - ::{59031a47-3f72-44a7-89c5-5595fe6b30ee}\\{FDD39AD0-238F-46AF-ADB4-6C85480369C7}

Music - ::{59031a47-3f72-44a7-89c5-5595fe6b30ee}\\{4BD8D571-6D19-48D3-BE97-422220080E43}

Pictures - ::{59031a47-3f72-44a7-89c5-5595fe6b30ee}\\{33E28130-4E1E-4676-835A-98395C3BC3BB}

Videos - ::{59031a47-3f72-44a7-89c5-5595fe6b30ee}\\{18989B1D-99B5-455B-841C-AB7C74E4DDFC}

Once you've changed the ones you want,log off and back in, and you'll see the changes. (You can probably just kill and restart explorer too.) Thats it, your start menu is now pointing to your personal directories and not the libraries.

You can pin other locations to your taskbar too. Make a shortcut on your desktop, the location being Explorer "C:\Program Files\Whatever\" or whatever path you want; note the quotes as you need that to surround the spaces in the path name. Give it whatever icon you want, and pin it anywhere. Only drawback with this one is that it won't stack the icons nicely with other opened Explorer windows.. haven't worked that one out yet, but I don't usually keep Explorer pinned anyway, I use desktop icons for that, just what I'm used to.

You don't need to do anything special to get specific folders pinned to the taskbar. I have explorer pinned to it and using the jump list I have all my common file locations on it. Just right click on the folder and drag it onto the task bar.

EDIT:// Crap, I didn't see that you found the right-click feature... and now I can't figure out how to delete this post.

You don't need to do anything special to get specific folders pinned to the taskbar. I have explorer pinned to it and using the jump list I have all my common file locations on it. Just right click on the folder and drag it onto the task bar.

EDIT:// Crap, I didn't see that you found the right-click feature... and now I can't figure out how to delete this post.

I don't know if you were talking about the same thing. I didn't want to to right click to have to avoid the libraries, instead I changed the default location of the explorer pinned to my taskbar, so I just click and launch straight into my user folder.

  • 3 weeks later...

Working well for me.It's pretty fast, has a sleek and pretty UI...and well in a word, great!

But as with any great software, there comes one or two issues.After all there's no such thing as perfect software.

The more annoying and prominent one being the blasted Windows Update that often wants me to restart the computer to install updates.Well, that's an ancient problem and it's a shame that they haven't sorted it out throughly.

The less obvious and trivial bug is that of Windows Media Player.Switch to the Now Playing mode and click anywhere within the player window besides the playlist.Yeah, the window loses focus as though you clicked outside the player window.

Also the fact that I haven't figured how to make Live Hotmail(or any other web mail service for that matter) my default e-mail app is really bugging me.Clicking any mailto link in and out of the web browser rises an error message saying that no default mail client is installed.Do I have to install an actual mai client to get around this problem?

I remember in Windows XP there was an option in Internet Options and Start Menu that let me set Hotmail as the default email handler.I think it was the same with Vista too.

Another problem being with the WMP library database.Every now and then a wizard pop up that's meant to fix the media player's currupted database.I went thru it pretty much every time it opened up, to no avail and also to the loss of many of my music files tags.

The last time I did it was yesterday and up until this moment it's going well.

All in all, thumbs up from me. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!