Ok, I think its me...


Recommended Posts

It affects the usability of the website for one day. How is that taking it too far? :s

"April Fools day is just an excuse to do something stupid and get away with it." - EXACTLY. That is my point :) What is wrong with doing something stupid for one day, just for a laugh? Life is too serious sometimes, it's nice to have a laugh :)

I understand if it's for a laugh, but in order for something to be laughed at it has to be funny. This wasn't funny, it was annoying.

Yes, that would be the definition of April Fool's day. It's not like the date is a secret beforehand.

I don't get why people / sites / whatever get to act stupid for one day. You don't gain anything from it, and it usually ends up annoying people.

I understand if it's for a laugh, but in order for something to be laughed at it has to be funny. This wasn't funny, it was annoying.

And the Jokes and Funny Stuff header would tell you that humour is subjective.

If I saw that a majority of members were in outrage over flipped and twirly images (which, BTW, could've been worked around by using a non-Webkit browser), then I guess an apology would be in order....

It doesn't matter anyway. You've got 364 days left to continuously enjoy the site.

If you are still getting "annoying" effects then clear your browser cache.

(: ˙dn ǝpıs ʇɥƃıɹ ɟןǝsɹnoʎ uɹnʇ oʇ ǝɯıʇ s,ʇı ʞuıɥʇ 'ɹǝʌo sı sןooɟ ןıɹdɐ

I found it intrusive and annoying.

Would Google, BBC, Engadget, Slashdot, Digg do it to there news page? not bloody likely, but maybe that says more about Neowins leaders goals than anything.

YouTube, which is owned by Google, did the exact same thing as us (after we had already activated it).

Also, how was it intrusive?

LOL at the moaners.. seriously guys if you cannot stand one day of lawl, put the keyboard down, get out of your arse curve in your chair, and go through the damn front door and go somewhere!.

Seriously a flipped picture is intrusive? LMFAO please, read it out loud while your brain is in your head and not up your arse and you may understand how PATHETIC you BLOODY SOUND.

God you people remind me of those whiners who want to ban Xmas because it offends some tiny person who has **** all to do with the country and it's history anyways.

Would Google, BBC, Engadget, Slashdot, Digg do it to there news page? not bloody likely, but maybe that says more about Neowins leaders goals than anything.

So you're saying that because Google doesn't do such actions that it's wrong to do so? Way to go.

I'm saying a professional new source would do something funny and different (how google does a seperate page you go and view), they wouldn't comprimise there content view.

Youtube is hardly a news source. I'm just saying. It didn't bother me that much, I didn't visit as much as I would have. Trying to view peoples attachments sucked.

In defense of Youtube, they did allow you to revert the prank. (unlike last year where all their featured videos went straight to a rick roll)

But honestly. This flipped image prank was much less intrusive and annoying than some of our other ideas we had.

I'm saying a professional new source would do something funny and different (how google does a seperate page you go and view), they wouldn't comprimise there content view.

Youtube is hardly a news source. I'm just saying. It didn't bother me that much, I didn't visit as much as I would have. Trying to view peoples attachments sucked.

Then for one day you can go to another site for your news fix. And if you choose not to come here anymore due to a silly April Fools prank then all the power to you.

I think you're overreacting. By the way, it's April 2nd.

Then for one day you can go to another site for your news fix. And if you choose not to come here anymore due to a silly April Fools prank then all the power to you.

I think you're overreacting. By the way, it's April 2nd.

It wouldn't surprise me if people are still be moaning about this come May 2nd :laugh:

I thought it was quite funny, the people moaning need to get a life, they moan that a news source doing a joke like this is stupid but in most of the articles you don't need pictures to get all the information anyway.

Another option is to just check the articles a day later? :p I guess some people just have to have something to complain about.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      445
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!