Windows 7 new milestone 7105 ------6.1.7105.0.winmain.090404-1235


Recommended Posts

It is believed that this is a new phase in the development of Windows 7 because the second digit of the build has been incremented. This pattern would closely follow previous events in the incubation of Windows 7:

Milestone 2: 6500 series

Milestone 3: 6700 series

Pre-beta: 6800 series

Beta 1: 7000 series

This is NOT fake.

Build number is like this due to kernel changes, also this IS rc escrow and yes, they most of the time change numbers before those releases.

do you have screen shots to back this claim up about it not being fake ?

As much as I hope this is real, I wont get too excited untill i see at least screens from a reliable source. And also if it turns out to be real i hope it leaks out soon while i still have lots of free time to test it :p

What happened to "not fake unless proved otherwise"?

I wonder what the changes have been if it's a new milestone, maybe a completely redesigned Aero style? Many now will say they wouldn't change much on the UI this late but if I remember correctly wasn't the Luna UI from XP only exposed while being near RTM?

What happened to "not fake unless proved otherwise"?

I wonder what the changes have been if it's a new milestone, maybe a completely redesigned Aero style? Many now will say they wouldn't change much on the UI this late but if I remember correctly wasn't the Luna UI from XP only exposed while being near RTM?

If you read you will know already about the changes.

What happened to "not fake unless proved otherwise"?

I wonder what the changes have been if it's a new milestone, maybe a completely redesigned Aero style? Many now will say they wouldn't change much on the UI this late but if I remember correctly wasn't the Luna UI from XP only exposed while being near RTM?

I'm still all for the "fake unless proved otherwise" but not "not fake unless proven otherwise".

Aero isn't changing.

Hi,

something is strange:

Why 7105 and not 7100?

because RC1 is ready :) and move forward (7100 will be the rc. this quite possibly has already been compiled but wont

be released due to final tweaks )7105 has been compiled but is only an internal release to test the new code

microsoft often start new thread before finalizing the last one e.g. build 7005

was started before 7000 had been compiled and released

Edited by billibi
Wow, as if I haven't heard that line before

Even if the build is real, and out there somewhere your childish response doesn't exactly elicit confidence in you. If you really want to be taken seriously, provide your proof. Otherwise just accept that people aren't always going to believe you and stop resorting to childish name calling

Even if screenshots are provided people still call the word fake so no point wasting time, just wait a few days and see this build surface too the wild and let everyone check it for themselves, this time i will do an upgrade, didn't bother with all the previous builds, waste of time :D

Aren't these sites just listing every single build number and putting "RC ESCROW" next to it in the hope that one will stick and they'll get "credit" for it?

No they say possibility !

because RC1 is ready :) and move forward (7100 will be the rc. this quite possibly has already been compiled but wont

be released due to final tweaks )7105 has been compiled but is only an internal release to test the new code

microsoft often start new thread before finalizing the last one e.g. build 7005

was started before 7000 had been compiled and released

You talk jibberish here, 7105 will be RC-escrow if any and it will be released to testers as planned for April 2009, 10th if I'm correct. Not positive but pretty sure.

7100 won't be RC if the RC-Escrow is 7105, they still have a month to go regarding this, they won't go backwards in builds. 7005 was internal, 7000 was public...If 7105 is RC-Escrow then RC Public will be higher build.

That's my guess, what's everyone else think.

You talk jibberish here, 7105 will be RC-escrow if any and it will be released to testers as planned for April 2009, 10th if I'm correct. Not positive but pretty sure.

7100 won't be RC if the RC-Escrow is 7105, they still have a month to go regarding this, they won't go backwards in builds. 7005 was internal, 7000 was public...If 7105 is RC-Escrow then RC Public will be higher build.

That's my guess, what's everyone else think.

I think a lot of you might have it wrong. Build 7105 is part of a new branch. I'm guessing the RC will be build 7100 and this new branch could be the RTM branch. that's assuming the RC escrow doesn't have it's build number inflated which i'm guessing it won't as it's just a build for internal testers.

but brandon live would actually know.

Isn?t it fun that we will all know what build the RC is going to be when it will be released, than the half of the people on this thread will be right and the other half will be wrong.

Who will be right or who will be wrong?

....only time and MS can tell ;))

I found this as the file name on another site: 6.1.7105.0.090404-1235_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULFRER_EN_DVD

I DON'T KNOW if it is fake or not.

same site that "predicted" 7065 and 7070 build leaks and few others, with sizes and pictures and everything.... So guess how real that is. Dont get me wrong im not saying this might not be RC (altho i doubt, for me is more RTM branch), but that site posts a lot of bull s* and even if its real and gets out they will be lucky, nothing more nothing less.

a thread with windows 7 and religion, I say quite reasonable (even though I am an atheist) since easter is just around the corner -> Rising of the lost son ;)

I think this build is real and we will see this on sites by the end of the week (even though it's Good Friday, hence Crucifixion, maybe we have to wait a few more days... ;) ).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!