Apple responds to Microsoft ads: "a PC is no bargain"


Recommended Posts

:sleep:

Unscientific and clearly biased.

Some savvy PC buyers might be aware that they can find free antivirus tools on the Internet, but between the fraudulent malware posing as free antivirus tools and the heavily promoted, multi-billion dollar security industry that staunchly defends its right to profit from adding the security that Microsoft left out of Windows, there's clearly a lot of PC buyers who will end up suckered into paying that extra $150 over the short lifetime of their PC to keep it as clean as the Mac would be without any antivirus software.

The implication here is that OS X is inherently safer, that Apple have designed it to be more secure and made an especial effort for that purpose.

Well, they may have, but, if so, why doesn't the author deal with the issue directly and discuss it properly?

All that has been done is the FUD approach, use stereotypes and abuse the ignorance of consumers.

No real evidence has been produced, I conclude that the author is lazy and this article can not be trusted.

While I agree that the Mac Pro is far overpriced for the average user, it is a workstation. Not the same as a desktop computer. The inside is designed so you can take things out and add them easily, and it is built at professional quality. Still too pricey, but not as bad as most people make it out to be.

Now, I'm going to ask one more time. Would everyone stop getting butthurt over these ads? From Microsoft and Apple.

Apple and its fanboys are upset at Microsoft for making the ads.

Microsoft and its fanboys are upset at Apple and its fanboys for being upset at Microsoft's ads.

Microsoft and its fanboys are upset at Apple for making their ads.

Apple and its fanboys are upset at Microsoft and its fanboys for being upset at Apple's ads.

Does no one see the hypocrisy in every single one of the four statements above? Severe hypocrisy?

Counterpoints:

1. 699 + 150 + 129 < 999

2. There are a wide variety of 699 laptops but Apple only has one 999 MacBook.

3. Not everyone has 999 at the time of purchase.

4. Costs that add up over years is more acceptable than a huge upfront cost.

5. Chances are the 699 laptop will have better hardware than the 999 MacBook.

6. Apple Stores are few and far between. Free support is not accessible to a large portion of the US/World.

7. The 129 additional cost isn't inevitable and thus should not be part of the equation.

Never mind that all those PC programs don't offer much in terms of tight integration like the Mac's iLife titles.

Tight integration...don't Mac users often complain about this exact aspect of Windows?

While I agree that the Mac Pro is far overpriced for the average user, it is a workstation. Not the same as a desktop computer. The inside is designed so you can take things out and add them easily, and it is built at professional quality. Still too pricey, but not as bad as most people make it out to be.

Now, I'm going to ask one more time. Would everyone stop getting butthurt over these ads? From Microsoft and Apple.

Apple and its fanboys are upset at Microsoft for making the ads.

Microsoft and its fanboys are upset at Apple and its fanboys for being upset at Microsoft's ads.

Microsoft and its fanboys are upset at Apple for making their ads.

Apple and its fanboys are upset at Microsoft and its fanboys for being upset at Apple's ads.

Does no one see the hypocrisy in every single one of the four statements above? Severe hypocrisy?

Indeed. I had to make the previous comment because I dislike such lame tactics, but overall I find it rather bizarre that people get so upset over the value for money issue. I presume people dislike the idea that they can't easily justify their preferences, which is silly, because as long as you are happy with what you have, you don't need to..

While I agree that the Mac Pro is far overpriced for the average user, it is a workstation. Not the same as a desktop computer. The inside is designed so you can take things out and add them easily, and it is built at professional quality. Still too pricey, but not as bad as most people make it out to be.

Ok, so other than the workstation Mac Pro, what are the options for someone that wants a home system? An iMac laptop-on-a-stick that is essentially an iAppliance, to be tossed when it's fulfilled it's usefulness, since it is near-impossible to upgrade in any easy or measurable way, or the Mini, which is only a serious option for someone who really, truly wants to carry around their precious Apple in their man-purse.

The Apple portables are the bread 'n butter, yet still rather mediocre when compared with similar price range Wintel laptops, but their desktop, home use offerings are laughable at best.

The Apple comparison of a $600 PC to a $1200 is stupid. It's like their early iSwitch ads where they were comparing OSX to Windows 3.1. I guess Apple are hoping that since the majority of computer users are stupid, they wont see the difference.

If apple and Microsoft could just work together like mature men, we wouldn't have this sort of problem. Hey, imagine a apple/microsoft OS. Built by both, and one clean, neat design. and SECURE

But that would NEVER work and would be a huge FAIL. Each company relies on their innovations to move forward. Competition is good. Apple makes something fantastic and so microsoft has to make something better. And thats how our technology moves forward.

Indeed. I had to make the previous comment because I dislike such lame tactics, but overall I find it rather bizarre that people get so upset over the value for money issue. I presume people dislike the idea that they can't easily justify their preferences, which is silly, because as long as you are happy with what you have, you don't need to..

No, I think people are getting sick and tired of the smug manner in which Apple users imply that people that choose to purchase a PC are cheapskates, poor or ignorant. Quite frankly, that's a bunch of bull****.

Love apple machines, hate the idiots that write this type of tripe...

Apple has responded to the new Microsoft ads promoting low-cost generic PCs as a cheaper alternative to the Mac, stating "A PC is no bargain when it doesn't do what you want."

-

I cant think of one thing my PC cant do but Mac can.

The comment, from Apple spokesman Bill Evans, appeared in a BusinessWeek article by Erik Hesseldahl, which examined the differences between the $699 HP notebook Microsoft recommended to its TV audience over Apple's 17" MacBook Pro, a system in a considerably higher quality and price range.

If there is some things (beyond the standard obvious things) in common between a machine starting at $2,799 (4 times the price???) and a machine at $699, then you really do have big problems! If there's is nothing in common then what's the point? Microsoft never claims to have the same spec as this machine - they claim to offer a machine that does what the consumer wants for $699.

NEWS: Next week Bill Evans compares a new exotic pet snake for $2,799 (ohh shiney)! or a loving dog at $699

"The one thing that both Apple and Microsoft can agree on is that everyone thinks the Mac is cool," Evans added. "With its great designs and advanced software, nothing matches it at any price."

"everyone thinks the Mac is cool", who is The Mac? Steve Jobs or Ronald McDonald? They are too alike to really matter anyway, hyped up advertising selling you something you don't really need. Advanced software - errrr, lots of "advanced software" comes out on PC only. The majority of "mac only" software is made by Mac. Autodesk products anyone? including AutoCad and 3DSMax arent available.

What you pay

Hesseldahl did the math to find out, noting that the lower cost HP notebook ships with a 60-day trial Norton Internet Security 2009, but requires a $50 subscription to help keep Windows from falling to the onslaught of PC viruses and malware.

Some savvy PC buyers might be aware that they can find free antivirus tools on the Internet, but between the fraudulent malware posing as free antivirus tools and the heavily promoted, multi-billion dollar security industry that staunchly defends its right to profit from adding the security that Microsoft left out of Windows, there's clearly a lot of PC buyers who will end up suckered into paying that extra $150 over the short lifetime of their PC to keep it as clean as the Mac would be without any antivirus software.

The analysis also points out that PC users who run into inevitable problems will face a $129 fee from Geek Squad just to diagnose the problem, while pointing out that Apple offers free help from its retail stores' Genius Bar.

$129 where did he pull that number from? As already pointed out $50 for Norton is a nonexpense. And if I install no antivirus software on a PC it also reports having no viruses! Magic that!

What you get

Hesseldahl also outlined the difference in what users get in terms of usability with iLife's iMovie, iDVD, GarageBand, and other software. He noted that the PC ships with some third party movie editing tools that usually cost $184, but figures that collecting a few other software titles to match what ships on the Mac would easily cost another $340. Never mind that all those PC programs don't offer much in terms of tight integration like the Mac's iLife titles.

iDontUse titles, no one spends an extra $340 on titles they don't use on a PC, well unless they are included in the price of a Mac, errr sorry fail.

All that missing software and the extra fees can easily double the cost of the cheap PC hardware. And as the report describes, the bargain basement HP hardware isn't very compelling, with a wimpy battery rated for 2.5 hours compared to the MacBook Pro's eight, an extra 1.2 pounds of weight in a thicker case, and a far lower quality display with much lower resolution, 1440x900 compared to the MacBook Pro's 1920x1440.

1440x900 for 99.9% of people is plenty on a 17inch screen. Im using two 24 inch screens at 1920x1200 each - Why you would need a higher res than that on a 17inch screen is far beyond me. Is that another pointless expense? 8 hours is all well a good for advertising, but the reality like most apple advertising is far from the truth, even with brightness and other power saving options turned down most people report max of about 4 or 5 hours, and that's trying to get as much as possible out of it. Wait till they turn the brightness up and take the processors out of power saving mode - I wonder what temperatue the room was at where they tested it too?

Ok, so other than the workstation Mac Pro, what are the options for someone that wants a home system? An iMac laptop-on-a-stick that is essentially an iAppliance, to be tossed when it's fulfilled it's usefulness, since it is near-impossible to upgrade in any easy or measurable way, or the Mini, which is only a serious option for someone who really, truly wants to carry around their precious Apple in their man-purse.

....

Do average users upgrade their PCs? Most that I know do not. They buy their system and run it for 3,5,7 years eventually replacing the whole thing.

Just because you want that ability it does not follow that every other user needs or wants it.

The Apple comparison of a $600 PC to a $1200 is stupid. It's like their early iSwitch ads where they were comparing OSX to Windows 3.1. I guess Apple are hoping that since the majority of computer users are stupid, they wont see the difference.

Perhaps you didn't read the article properly or follow the previous MS ad?

MS started this particular discussion by offering the $600 PC as a good solution for a user on a budget, and it does various things that user wanted. Their point was you do not need to spend a fortune upfront to get a good PC. Apple are, naturally, disputing that.

No, I think people are getting sick and tired of the smug manner in which Apple users imply that people that choose to purchase a PC are cheapskates, poor or ignorant. Quite frankly, that's a bunch of bull****.

Although MS did the same really. They said, if you have a limited budget, go for Windows. Their advertisements.

When people say that, I just get the feeling they are over sensitive about their lack of money. If you really can afford a Mac but choose not to buy one, you must have good reasons. So why get upset if some silly little Mac fan looks down on you? It just comes across as jealousy and/or immaturity.

And not all Apple users are smug, either, so stop generalising, it's a poor argument and annoys the many Mac users who do not fit such stereotypes. Ignoring it is the best thing you can do. It only goes to show your own immaturity if the views of some child upset you so much. As an independent human being you made your choice, you are happy with it, so even if someone does think it cheap/bad/whatever, why get upset? Sure it's annoying, but not worthy of a stroke.

Personally I don't like to see people say Macs are a total rip off and crap and whatever other insults that get thrown around. But I won't be crying myself to sleep over it.

People like things, and that's enough to justify their choice but everyone is hung up on using price/spec/whatever to justify it.. it doesn't make sense to me. Everyone has a different idea of what makes a good computer, but no one will admit this and act like we all want the same thing, and there is actually a perfect machine in existence that would suit everyone... o_0

When people say that, I just get the feeling they are over sensitive about their lack of money. If you really can afford a Mac but choose not to buy one, you must have good reasons. So why get upset if some silly little Mac fan looks down on you? It just comes across as jealousy and/or immaturity.

Because they're not just looking down on me but everyone else who has a non apple computer , Thats smug self centered and down right stupid . I think its shocking how you assume just because people dont have an apple computer they are poor .

Newsflash: There are plenty of high end systems that are not made by apple. Would you say someone with an alienware laptop is poor , a htc shift ? or indeed any other computer just because of a badge . Apples computers are NOT the pinnacle of computing there are reams of systems with bigger screens , higher specs etc etc etc

Thats some ****ed up attitude , I dont know how you go through life looking down on everyone

Edited by bob21
Apple has responded to the new Microsoft ads promoting low-cost generic PCs as a cheaper alternative to the Mac, stating "A PC is no bargain when it doesn't do what you want."

I can name one thing my PC can do that a Mac can't: play all of my games. This type of attitude from Apple is exactly the reason why I will NEVER have any of their products on m PC or in my house. Get over it Apple. My PC can do more than any of your Mac's can. Apple should realize that many people like me are simply happy with Windows.

I agree with the above statements.

My computers I own are all under 800 bucks, minus the component upgrades (RAM, HDs, monitor, vid card, router, etc) I made since 2006. The server part I have there as shown in the red font part of my sig is not an actual server per se, but it's a self-built PC that I made for one of my classes at the past university - I just put the Windows Server 2003 and 2008 operating systems on it and ta-da, it's a server now lol.

Anyway, the last time I was at Best Buy was on April 5th, and they sell iCrap and MacBooks - guess what they cost? Yup - >= (greater than or equal to) 999!

A Best Buy rep came up to me as I was looking through the Mac section and asked me if I need any help. Ha! I told him bluntly that the Macs are expensive, and he agreed with me.

Uh, hello? Then why have those Macs at Best Buy there to begin with, anyway? (I didn't say that to the rep, lol)

A lot of good points, coming from Apple who is a design company

Yes the quality is better hence the reason you are paying for the design and the brand.

But also some people just dont want to spend the money and will go for the low cost HP because it just works

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!