Apple responds to Microsoft ads: "a PC is no bargain"


Recommended Posts

Why do you think they are fighting tooth and nail with Psystar? Kinda sad when their OS is running on similar spec'ed machines for a hell of a lot cheaper.

Back in the day Apple used to let other companies make Mac clones. The problem was the clone makers were building better quality machines for cheaper prices and Apple wasn't getting as big of a cut of the pie. They abruptly stopped allowing clones to be made. Now that the OS isn't built into the ROMs anymore, they have very little control.

Back in the day Apple used to let other companies make Mac clones. The problem was the clone makers were building better quality machines for cheaper prices and Apple wasn't getting as big of a cut of the pie. They abruptly stopped allowing clones to be made. Now that the OS isn't built into the ROMs anymore, they have very little control.

I have a Mac clone sitting in my basement which Daystar ... I mean Pystar kind took a liberty with its name :p

well because 20 inch displays , Multi-Touch swivel screens , Built in 5.1 sound (5 Speakers and a Sub) , Built in media center compatible remotes etc etc are not the kind of thing you find on other laptops . Making HP's laptops innovative .

All those are found in other laptops.

The innovative part is integrating them in with the operating system - without needing to use third party crappy applications and drivers to get it working. Innovation isn't just attaching a dongle and screaming, "innovation!" any more than standing in a garage and screaming, "I am a car" suddenly makes you a car.

That fulfills the definition of innovative , Maby not your definition "Something apple does that other manufactures dont" .

As for 20inch laptop displays - it beats getting a hardon over a badge and its magical enhancing properties over computer hardware , At least its something tangible real and grounded in reality . Think about it this way comparing a 20 inch to a 15inch , Its like comparing a normal laptop to a netbook :p .

Pardon? who is getting a hard on? I have a laptop for portability - how the hell is attaching a 20inch screen going to allow me to carry it around without unneed bulk? if you're going to rave on about 20 inch screens I might as well point out that you save your money and get in all in one computer with a truck battery if you're not concerned about excessive bulk.

This is funny. Apple bashed MS left and right with their "I'm a Mac, and I'm a PC ads" and MS just stood back, didnt comment, and took it. Now MS is fighting back and Apple is crying like a bunch of babies.

What a surprise. Apple being immature, yet again.

Frankly, I don't like Microsoft's ads, either. "I'm a PC" was good, but now they are simply stooping down to Apple's mud-slinging level. It's a shame, really. Both Apple and Microsoft have had some very distinctive, very professional ad campaigns in the past, and I hate to see the companies stooping to such low levels.

But, oh well, the good thing is that competition between the two will only give us consumers better products in the end.

Oh yeah that HP can legally and natively boot into OS X? It has a Unibody design?

Your name says jewishornet, but you sting like a W.A.S.P.

Microsoft could do the same to your ****ty bootcamp clique and write off fruit-branded PC's in their EULA too.

While I don't condone the above statement, it would be a kick in the pants.

Just saying....

There is software that PC's dont have a equivilant to... like boot camp, and.. i'm not sure what else because I dont have a mac (only a iPod touch). Lets get the 3 letter word in here so he can tell us how were wrong!

Boot camp... Well of frickin course PC's dont have bootcamp since they don't NEED bootcamp as its entire purpose is to run windows on a mac. The reason OS X doesn't go well with PC's is because Apple restricted their drivers to only their hardware. PC's can dual boot Linux, or OpenBSD. Shouldn't that be considered "boot camp"?

All those are found in other laptops.

The innovative part is integrating them in with the operating system - without needing to use third party crappy applications and drivers to get it working. Innovation isn't just attaching a dongle and screaming, "innovation!" any more than standing in a garage and screaming, "I am a car" suddenly makes you a car.

HP has a few of the tools to work with that already come with Windows 7. They also have their own TouchSmart software made for multi-touch screens and their own version of Linux(Some distro I can't remember) for netbooks.

All those are found in other laptops.

No , no they're not.

The innovative part is integrating them in with the operating system - without needing to use third party crappy applications and drivers to get it working. Innovation isn't just attaching a dongle and screaming, "innovation!" any more than standing in a garage and screaming, "I am a car" suddenly makes you a car.
innovation

Noun

the act of starting something for the first time; introducing something new

No its not . Its introducing something new for the first time which HP have done time and time again. The fact that windows uses drivers for its hardware is irrelevant your simply using that to justify apples non inclusion of said features .

Pardon? who is getting a hard on? I have a laptop for portability - how the hell is attaching a 20inch screen going to allow me to carry it around without unneed bulk? if you're going to rave on about 20 inch screens I might as well point out that you save your money and get in all in one computer if you're not concerned about excessive bulk.

Its a figure of speach , your needs might be fulfilled with a dingy 15inch screen but this isnt a one size fits all world other people have different and more demanding needs . It fits in a bag to and back from work and thats fine for me .Its arrogant to just mark off other peoples needs as unnecessary because apple dosnt provide for them .

Thats great. Lets compare a $600 notebook to a $3000 notebook! that makes all the sense in the world! Hey apple, you want us to compare prices? Lets compare a 3k pc to a 3k mac, and i bet you the pc will blow that mac away in ever aspect. Mac has nothing to use as holding ground except for make believe and fanboyism. Hell, I could build a 1k computer that would blow most macs away.

Its a figure of sopeach , your needs might be fulfiled with a dingy 15inch screen but this isnt a one size fits all world other people have different and more demanding needs . It fits in a bag to and back from work and thats fine for me .Its arrogant to just mark off other peoples needs as unneccessory because apple dosnt provide for them .

Seriously. I prefer 14.1" laptops but I'm not going around calling people dumb for wanting a 17", 19", or 20" screen on their laptop. Hell some people buy a laptop and it just sits on their desk all day everyday until they take a vacation once a year and bring it with them. Some people only care to move it around in the various rooms of their house and have no intentions of going anywhere outside their home with it. It's just so mind boggling stupid for people to get ****ed off because they bough a laptop that doesn't fit your usage habits. Really, I think they're just trying to dismiss the argument because there is no way they can refute it. They want people to see that Macs are superior and when somebody points out that Apple doesn't build a laptop with the features they want they tell them they don't need those features or they call the user stupid.

Of cause the MacBook Pro is going to be better, for starters it costs $3K and it's a top of the line product and they are comparing it to a basic PC laptop...how about you think things though next time Apple, before opening your mouth and making yourself look stupid?

Thats great. Lets compare a $600 notebook to a $3000 notebook! that makes all the sense in the world! Hey apple, you want us to compare prices? Lets compare a 3k pc to a 3k mac, and i bet you the pc will blow that mac away in ever aspect. Mac has nothing to use as holding ground except for make believe and fanboyism. Hell, I could build a 1k computer that would blow most macs away.

I think you forgot design, style, reliability and OS X. How does a company gather 'fanboys' if their product isn't worth being excited over in the first place?!

Thats great. Lets compare a $600 notebook to a $3000 notebook! that makes all the sense in the world! Hey apple, you want us to compare prices? Lets compare a 3k pc to a 3k mac, and i bet you the pc will blow that mac away in ever aspect. Mac has nothing to use as holding ground except for make believe and fanboyism. Hell, I could build a 1k computer that would blow most macs away.

Aye, I built a PC 2 months ago with 4GB ram, a Q8200, 4870 1GB, 640 GB hard drive, MB with 3 PCIe 2.0's and an intel x38 chipset. All for 860$.

Compare to this.

http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB871LL/A?mco=NDE4NDIwNA

GT 120..pff add 200$ for a 4870 512mb, of course! Great deal! considering a 4870 512 is around 150$ by now! and that's And that's ADD 200$ so you're paying for the crappy GT 120 AND a 4870. Only place where this Mac Pro "blows my pc out of the water" is the processor. And even if I were to go Core i7, I could build the same system they have shown for under 1500$.

Seriously. I prefer 14.1" laptops but I'm not going around calling people dumb for wanting a 17", 19", or 20" screen on their laptop. Hell some people buy a laptop and it just sits on their desk all day everyday until they take a vacation once a year and bring it with them. Some people only care to move it around in the various rooms of their house and have no intentions of going anywhere outside their home with it. It's just so mind boggling stupid for people to get ****ed off because they bough a laptop that doesn't fit your usage habits. Really, I think they're just trying to dismiss the argument because there is no way they can refute it. They want people to see that Macs are superior and when somebody points out that Apple doesn't build a laptop with the features they want they tell them they don't need those features or they call the user stupid.

Good, so you think it is stupid to criticise what another person likes or dislikes based on what their requirements are.

Am I going to get an apology from people who think that me requesting 'Mac OS X' being dumb? labelling me dumb because my preference is Mac OS X?

As I said, if Apple doesn't make something - it doesn't make them suck, it just means they don't make it. Buy a device that suits your requirements but don't then turn around say that it is superior to everything on the market because you're contradicting what you originally claimed that its all done to personal preference. By claiming something rules you've transferred your original declaration of personal preference to a claim of objective superiority over others.

What a surprise. Apple being immature, yet again.

Frankly, I don't like Microsoft's ads, either. "I'm a PC" was good, but now they are simply stooping down to Apple's mud-slinging level. It's a shame, really. Both Apple and Microsoft have had some very distinctive, very professional ad campaigns in the past, and I hate to see the companies stooping to such low levels.

But, oh well, the good thing is that competition between the two will only give us consumers better products in the end.

I disagree - I don't think Microsoft has stooped to Mac's level in advertising. They haven't yet implied that Mac's are inferior, just that they cost way more, while at the same time showing what you can get for a cheaper price with a PC.

-Spenser

Umm, wasn't Apple doing a heck load of I'm a PC ads a few months ago? What are they wining about again?

I havn't seen one in almost a year. Its all be iPhone ads and a few ipod and macbook ads

i really hate that if you by an windows installed pc( a mac is a pc too) your cheap/broke and ignorant/stupid, if i had 3k i wouldn't buy a mac. I would buy a kickass 3k windows installed pc, not an mac

If I had 3k laying around, I'd buy one of those HP HDX systems and max it out in specs (and I might STILL have some money left over)

Oh yeah that HP can legally and natively boot into OS X? It has a Unibody design?

So what? OSX is just an OS. Unibody design? Please, while the process of making them is really cool and neat, its just the same plain design, while HP had designs and patterns. Might be a bit glossy, but at least its some class.

My PC does what I want it to do.

And that's all that matters. It does what the COUSMER wants, not what Joey wants from a neowin from. (No offence to any one name "Joe". I'm just saying?)

How is any of that innovative? you've still got the same operating system with all the same flaws - the experience is no different as an end user to any of the other alternatives out there. So you've strapped on some dongles which are poor integrated into the operating system and the applications that run ontop of it. Great - why not throw on a side mirror just for geek factor whilst you're at it.

And is that a problem? You won't run I to any problems if you're a smart computer user.

As for 20inch laptop displays - I don't know whether to laugh or cry at people who have a display size fetish.

HP discontinued their 20" HDX laptop a few years back. They brought back the HDX name for their new 16 and 18" displays.

The innovative part is integrating them in with the operating system - without needing to use third party crappy applications and drivers to get it working. Innovation isn't just attaching a dongle and screaming, "innovation!" any more than standing in a garage and screaming, "I am a car" suddenly makes you a car.

Good point.

Same goes for removing key ports like firewire and HDMI. Apple thinks the world is ready to go their way or the highway. But that's not the way it is.

Seriously. I prefer 14.1" laptops but I'm not going around calling people dumb for wanting a 17", 19", or 20" screen on their laptop.

Good job. You like 14" some like larger. It should bother you if someone else likes something you don't. Freaking out over that is just childish.

Hell some people buy a laptop and it just sits on their desk all day everyday until they take a vacation once a year and bring it with them. Some people only care to move it around in the various rooms of their house and have no intentions of going anywhere outside their home with it. It's just so mind boggling stupid for people to get ****ed off because they bough a laptop that doesn't fit your usage habits. Really, I think they're just trying to dismiss the argument because there is no way they can refute it. They want people to see that Macs are superior and when somebody points out that Apple doesn't build a laptop with the features they want they tell them they don't need those features or they call the user stupid.

And that is childish. I can't stand people like that.

Of cause the MacBook Pro is going to be better, for starters it costs $3K and it's a top of the line product and they are comparing it to a basic PC laptop...how about you think things though next time Apple, before opening your mouth and making yourself look stupid?

Erm, the last Microsoft ad was far from a basic PC laptop.

Buy a device that suits your requirements but don't then turn around say that it is superior to everything on the market because you're contradicting what you originally claimed that its all done to personal preference. By claiming something rules you've transferred your original declaration of personal preference to a claim of objective superiority over others.

Ill do that when you and your buddies stop claiming Macs are Superior to PCs and that everyone who uses a PC is poor and ignorant.

What makes HP laptops different to any one elses? apart from price and specifications - there are no differences. So yes, they are yet another cookie cutter company with zero investment in making their products different to anyone else's part from the superficial outside.

How does any laptop differ from any other laptop besides price, specifications, and the "superficial outside"?

Oh wait let me guess, you just wanted to say they don't have OS X.

Ill do that when you and your buddies stop claiming Macs are Superior to PCs and that everyone who uses a PC is poor and ignorant.

Wow, way to go collectivism. Collectivising all Mac users as a single entity.

I never made any such claims - my parents own two PC's based on my recommendation to go with Dell. Sine receiving them they have been incredibly happy. You really think that I'm sort of zealot who goes around imposing my views on others?

How about treating Mac users as individuals instead of lumping them all in one boat.

How does any laptop differ from any other laptop besides price, specifications, and the "superficial outside"?

Oh wait let me guess, you just wanted to say they don't have OS X.

Its the operating system. The operating system dictates the quality of the over all experience. If the operating system is poor quality then the experience over all is poor.

Heck, Microsoft has a whole video on their channel 9 website about fit and finish - to raise the bar for both third party software vendors and hardware integrators.

Then again, you keep abusing me because all you're focused on is the hardware because apparently hardware is the only thing that is of importance when purchasing a computer.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!