Apple responds to Microsoft ads: "a PC is no bargain"


Recommended Posts

I wouldn't post with these corrections as I'm overall agreeing with your assertions re PC's running OS X and Macs running Windows but I felt it prudent to point out these inconsistencies.

Noted. However I was basically responding about the "native" nature. There's nothing native about it, at least not with Windows XP which was the original Windows on a Mac. You are correct about EFI and Intel, but Windows XP did not support it thus it was pretty impossible to run Windows XP on a Mac until the hack competition solved the problem. All I did was point out the curious coincidence that happened right after the hack was released, a month later Apple came out with Bootcamp even though they said they would not do it. They were obviously influenced or even taken to some extent the solution from this competition to make Windows XP work at that point.

That was the sole purpose of Bootcamp. It acted as a boot layer so you could install XP. With Vista, there's no need for a hack because Vista supports EFI so you can boot it from the disc by pressing C and picking DVD drive as boot just like on any other x86 based PC, but you won't be able to partition HFS/Mac partitions.Again, this is all Windows thing, not Mac/OSX.

Edited by Boz

And another thing. Even though I own Apple's most powerful Mac, I find the overpricing pretty mind-boggling with them.

First example is the new ATI 4870 upgrade kit for a Mac Pro that costs $380ish. The same card/chip with 1gb memory (Apple's is 512mb) can be had for $185 on NewEgg. Which clearly shows why Apple computers are overpriced. Same components, huge markups and there's absolutely no difference in components.

So what all these defensive articles boil down to is OSX and how the case looks nice. As I addressed before, running Mac and OSX for years, I can freely say that even with the need for antivirus and other software on Windows I had actually more problems with my Mac then with PCs, including hilarious bugs and revisions of Leopard from the start with incompatibilities in software, mysterious things like keyboard simply stopping to work in Finder until you log out and a bunch of other things and I'm not even getting into the whole Rosetta fiasco where apps ran 1/3 of speed when compared to PC apps.

What's also interesting is that Apple stopped making those famous charts where they compare Apple computer performance to Intel PC. I wonder why? ;)

Yes I agree they had their hand pushed by the 3rd party developers. However bootcamp itself is not a boot layer its not a boot device nor does it effect the ability for Windows or Linux or any other compatible x86 operating system to boot on a Macintosh. It is just basic Partition software which makes it easier. And even then the code for actually partition in the way that Bootcamp does is present in OS X and can be accessed through a Terminal session Bootcamp just puts a nice GUI on top of that.

The actual BIOS emulation is all done inside EFI which sits on the Motherboard. I had a Mac back then when they released the Bootcamp beta and what they did was release a firmware update for all Intel based Macs via Software Update and this contained the updated EFI firmware with BIOS support. Once you had that you could comfortable boot in to Windows straight away but you would have to Wipe your Mac OS X partition to do so unless the OS you were booting in to had the capability to re-size / repartition OS X created Partitions (Which not a lot if any did back then, I still don't know of any that can do it right now).

There are a few Motherboards in the market at the moment that run on EFI with BIOS support as-well its no different to what Apple are doing. EFI is very advanced.

The actual BIOS emulation is all done inside EFI which sits on the Motherboard. I had a Mac back then when they released the Bootcamp beta and what they did was release a firmware update for all Intel based Macs via Software Update and this contained the updated EFI firmware with BIOS support.

So an EFI update is still something correct? Bootcamp wouldn't work without it? Or at least not with Windows XP as far as I'm aware, so it did require meddling with EFI, which is what I was trying to point out. They had to "hack" it or update it or whatever you want to call it. I may have pointed to Bootcamp as it is the first thing you use so I appreciate the correction.

:laugh: All four of the new apple ads are great and much better than Microsoft's ones. Apple seems to have a creative and comedy side to their ads whereas Microsoft just puts out a straight point.

The only thing that's funny about those is that they are all repetitive and really not something that Mac users will be free off. There are more and more viruses on OSX and system patches and updates are definitely not PC/Windows thing. Just cause you ignore it, doesn't mean it doesn't or it won't happen (which it recently happened when a bunch of macs became zombies for a new Trojan). And I find it really silly that Apple constantly tries to make themselves as NOT PC. Apple constantly has to put out security and OS patches, so basically it's just spreading nonsense and fueling hatred trying to be funny. Not to mention that OSX has blue screens too and ridiculous crashes even more so then Windows right now despite a bunch of apps running.

I'm definitely not a worshiper of Microsoft, but I really hate the Apple hypocrisy.At least Microsoft says it what it is and doesn't make digs directly against Apple, which shows much greater maturity if anything.

And that facial recognition ad is so silly and incorrect. Microsoft Photosynth is so much more advanced then what Apple is using it's not even funny. And that came right from Microsoft Labs which Apple simply copied.

Edited by Boz
So an EFI update is still something correct? Bootcamp wouldn't work without it? Or at least not with Windows XP as far as I'm aware, so it did require meddling with EFI, which is what I was trying to point out. They had to "hack" it or update it or whatever you want to call it. I may have pointed to Bootcamp as it is the first thing you use so I appreciate the correction.

Yeah an EFI update is something. All I'm trying to correct is the saying that Bootcamp is what makes it work and that EFI's support of BIOS is somehow a hack when its a built in feature of EFI and Bootcamp is only partition software and nothing more. That is all.

The only thing that's funny about those is that they are all repetitive and really not something that Mac users will be free off. There are more and more viruses on OSX and system patches and updates are definitely not PC/Windows thing. Just cause you ignore it, doesn't mean it doesn't or it won't happen (which it recently happened when a bunch of macs became zombies for a new Trojan). And I find it really silly that Apple constantly tries to make themselves as NOT PC. Apple constantly has to put out security and OS patches, so basically it's just spreading nonsense and fueling hatred trying to be funny. Not to mention that OSX has blue screens too and ridiculous crashes even more so then Windows right now despite a bunch of apps running.

I'm definitely not a worshiper of Microsoft, but I really hate the Apple hypocrisy.At least Microsoft says it what it is and doesn't make digs directly against Apple, which shows much greater maturity if anything.

And that facial recognition ad is so silly and incorrect. Microsoft Photosynth is so much more advanced then what Apple is using it's not even funny. And that came right from Microsoft Labs which Apple simply copied.

Just to start off so I don't start a war which usually occurs. I like both Microsoft and Apple (I use my main Computer with Windows, and my macbook with Leopard).

I don't use an antivirus on my Macbook because viruses are hard to get on OS X whereas with just a little browsing the internet on Windows with no antivirus you can browse to a website (for example a serial key website) and sometimes add-ons will install without you knowing, or pop-ups will flash up. On Leopard this doesn't seem to be the case as most viruses are made for Windows and you can browse to the same site without any trouble. Also about the updates Microsoft seems to release updates very regularly where Apple released a whole package every few months which is an update to the system (10.5.6 to 10.5.7 to 10.5.8). If you have more products from Apple installed like 'ilife 09' you will get more updates available for Leopard, this is the same on Windows so with program updates it is very even for the amount of them issued.

Just to start off so I don't start a war which usually occurs. I like both Microsoft and Apple (I use my main Computer with Windows, and my macbook with Leopard).

I don't use an antivirus on my Macbook because viruses are hard to get on OS X whereas with just a little browsing the internet on Windows with no antivirus you can browse to a website (for example a serial key website) and sometimes add-ons will install without you knowing, or pop-ups will flash up. On Leopard this doesn't seem to be the case as most viruses are made for Windows and you can browse to the same site without any trouble.

This is natural because it comes with market share. The number of security holes btw are the highest on OSX fyi, it's just that you don't really care because you think you are safe, which is perfectly fine until it happens to you. The whole virus thing through websites is pretty much gone or at least more rare, since browsers got better and ActiveX which was a necessity for many other cool things you could build was to blame. That is fixed and if you try to browse a malicious site with IE or FF on Windows you will get a warning and the site would get locked down.

There's also Data Execution Prevention (DEP) you can define, Windows Defender against Spyware and UAC that protect you. Admittedly UAC is annoying (something that will be fixed in Windows 7) but you can download Norton UAC control, which is free that will allow you to remember often used parts of OS and it won't ask you ever again locally. So essentially you don't really need an Anti-Virus but you still use it because you can download something, run it and get it just like it's happening in OSX with pirated/downloaded iWork '09 and turned Macs into online zombies.. I ran my both PCs without an anti-virus software and didn't get a virus at all. Now I do run anti-virus, but it's more of a precaution then real necessity.

Also, OSX not only has quite a bit of updates and they are not only for Leopard or apps but a bunch of security fixes too. Windows does it just the same and Windows Update is pretty much transparent, it will only ask you to restart if it's something important, just like on OSX.

So in essence everything they spout in these ads through funny rhetoric is really BS.

And I really don't feel right defending Microsoft as they are not a peach company by any means but I hate even more childish and misleading information Apple is doing trying to promote something that's not entirely true. Apple's legal team is the WORST out of all corporations, including numerous limitations and legal stuff for OSX or apps and they have the nerve to talk about EULAs. Not to mention the fact the amount of companies they have shut down just because they compete with their own products. Ridiculous.

Edited by Boz

I have a Packard Bell IpowerGX Q006 ( that's a gateway P-7808u FX for you U.S. folks :) ) and I'm still looking for something equivalent coming from Apple at the same price ... That says it all.

Apple is just selling underpowered, overpriced stuff. How dare they come crying like a bunch of emo kids now that M$ is getting back at them ?

Hmm, I'd say you were wrong there. Any game that can be installed on a PC can also be installed and played on a Mac if you also install Windows via Boot Camp.

Not out of the box and certainly not as well as a dedicated Windows gaming box, even the cheap ones. The Mac was not even made with gaming in mind since that is not apple's niche.

Actually, most people that I encounter that use Windows are NOT satisfied with it, but use it because it is all they know.

It's probably because as the operating system used by all OEMs except one, they clutter up the OS with their own bundled crap. But is it really the OS's fault?

In the past, probably. These days, I wouldn't think so.

I can probably arrive as the same conclusion as you did, but reversing the roles. Most people I encounter are satisfied with Windows. Some even use multiple OSes.

Anyone whos primary focus is gaming should have a console, not a PC (or Mac). I happen to have all three.

I prefer to game on my PC because I can, my PC's capable of doing so, and the games I prefer happen to play better on the PC.

Not out of the box and certainly not as well as a dedicated Windows gaming box, even the cheap ones.

You buy a Mac + You install Windows + You play game

vs

You build a PC + You install Windows + You play game

Define "out of the box"...

The Mac was not even made with gaming in mind since that is not apple's niche.

That is true, they're not made with gaming in mind.

You buy a Mac + You install Windows + You play game

vs

You build a PC + You install Windows + You play game

Define "out of the box"...

Out of the box:

You buy a Mac + You install Windows + You play game

vs

You buy a "PC" (with Windows already on) + You play game

first of all there is no "Mac version of Windows" Vista Home Premium costs $259.95 , It costs around 60$ OEM hence the price difference.

Oh the SMUG :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: ;) La La La im so great because i use a PC . Cant have a SMUG free post

first of all there is no "Mac version of Windows" Vista Home Premium costs $259.95 , It costs around 60$ OEM hence the price difference.

Jesus, don't you even understand sarcasm?

Oh the SMUG :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: ;) La La La im so great because i use a PC . Cant have a SMUG free post

Are you on LSD or something?

Yes somehow this is my fault that you were ignorant , i see how that works . Look at em dodge and run when they're proven wrong

Cant let a little thing like reality get in the way of that ego.

They? Are you wearing some kind of tinfoil hat too? Really, what's your problem, tell me, 'cause you most likely don't know me at all.

Keep playing the Windows vs Mac fan war you guys have going over here. I'm really tired of reading the same crap over and over again. It's like no thread here is immune.

I see what's going on in your head, everything Apple related looks like an opportunity to start some stupid war with someone. Well, just keep living in your distorted reality, argue all you want and be happy.

Oh btw, my ignore list says Hi (Y).

--

Posted from my awesome Windows machine.

o_o' ... H'okay so, am I the only person here who loves OS X, Windows, and Linux? All three of them are awesome and have pros and cons that equate each other.. EXAMPLE TIME! :D

Leopard - Sleek, sexy, stylish, the apps have a little bit of extra shine applied to them, and the OS can satisfy my geek needs to a point with being able to access Unix commands in Terminal.

Linux - GEEKSPLOSION! Terminal, compiling my own programs from source, tweaking and editing the UI to no ends, going overboard with Compiz, tweaking the UI with Emerald..

Windows (7) - Superbar, the Aero UI, compatibility with my games and programs, GAMING for one..

And on that note, I'm off, uber-storm brewing. Enjoy your foolish little fanwar, I'll be sure to use all three OS's to the extent that I can use them, heck I might even triple boot Leopard 10.5.6, Ubuntu 9.04, and Windows 7 in some way or another. :)

You buy a Mac + You install Windows + You play game

vs

You build a PC + You install Windows + You play game

Define "out of the box"...

Most gaming pc's are not built but bought that way with Windows preloaded, so quit comparing apples and oranges. (Enthusiast who build vs most gamers that just buy from Dell/Alienware and the likes.)

So for most gamers it is goes: You buy a gaming PC and then just game.

That is true, they're not made with gaming in mind.

Which is why it is silly to even argue that Windows PC's are superior in this area. Only a person who has religious zeal for Apple would try to argue otherwise.

first of all there is no "Mac version of Windows" Vista Home Premium costs $259.95 , It costs around 60$ OEM hence the price difference.

Oh the SMUG :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: ;) La La La im so great because i use a PC . Cant have a SMUG free post

To be fair, Vista HP is around $90 online for a systems builders version. (OEM) But still a Mac owner paid a premium for the hardware and then adds near $100 to the already high cost of a Mac. It doesn't make any sense to even try to game on a Mac when for the same money you can just buy a PC that will kill any Mac when it comes to gaming.

Most gaming pc's are not built but bought that way with Windows preloaded, so quit comparing apples and oranges. (Enthusiast who build vs most gamers that just buy from Dell/Alienware and the likes.)

So for most gamers it is goes: You buy a gaming PC and then just game.

Gamers I know (and even the whole bunch who keep bragging here about it) build their own computers. Even those who buy them have no other choice as to immediately format the PC because system builders always include that extra crap we love. That's why I believe pretty much every gamer will have to install Windows anyway.

Which is why it is silly to even argue that Windows PC's are superior in this area. Only a person who has religious zeal for Apple would try to argue otherwise.

Unfortunately it's still a common comparison.

To be fair, Vista HP is around $90 online for a systems builders version. (OEM) But still a Mac owner paid a premium for the hardware and then adds near $100 to the already high cost of a Mac. It doesn't make any sense to even try to game on a Mac when for the same money you can just buy a PC that will kill any Mac when it comes to gaming.

But that's purely from a gamer's perspective. Aside from that group, who's gonna want to run Windows on a Mac? People who work with Windows everyday, and depend on exclusive applications. Those people already have Windows. That's also where I happen to fit in.

Bob completely failed at understanding sarcasm when I pointed out his flaw, adding different costs of Windows for PC and Mac. They're the same. Actually, when we're talking about people either building a new computer or installing Windows on a Mac, both will probably have a copy already, so the cost of Windows is most likely 0 anyway.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!