Apple responds to Microsoft ads: "a PC is no bargain"


Recommended Posts

I wouldn't post with these corrections as I'm overall agreeing with your assertions re PC's running OS X and Macs running Windows but I felt it prudent to point out these inconsistencies.

Noted. However I was basically responding about the "native" nature. There's nothing native about it, at least not with Windows XP which was the original Windows on a Mac. You are correct about EFI and Intel, but Windows XP did not support it thus it was pretty impossible to run Windows XP on a Mac until the hack competition solved the problem. All I did was point out the curious coincidence that happened right after the hack was released, a month later Apple came out with Bootcamp even though they said they would not do it. They were obviously influenced or even taken to some extent the solution from this competition to make Windows XP work at that point.

That was the sole purpose of Bootcamp. It acted as a boot layer so you could install XP. With Vista, there's no need for a hack because Vista supports EFI so you can boot it from the disc by pressing C and picking DVD drive as boot just like on any other x86 based PC, but you won't be able to partition HFS/Mac partitions.Again, this is all Windows thing, not Mac/OSX.

Edited by Boz

And another thing. Even though I own Apple's most powerful Mac, I find the overpricing pretty mind-boggling with them.

First example is the new ATI 4870 upgrade kit for a Mac Pro that costs $380ish. The same card/chip with 1gb memory (Apple's is 512mb) can be had for $185 on NewEgg. Which clearly shows why Apple computers are overpriced. Same components, huge markups and there's absolutely no difference in components.

So what all these defensive articles boil down to is OSX and how the case looks nice. As I addressed before, running Mac and OSX for years, I can freely say that even with the need for antivirus and other software on Windows I had actually more problems with my Mac then with PCs, including hilarious bugs and revisions of Leopard from the start with incompatibilities in software, mysterious things like keyboard simply stopping to work in Finder until you log out and a bunch of other things and I'm not even getting into the whole Rosetta fiasco where apps ran 1/3 of speed when compared to PC apps.

What's also interesting is that Apple stopped making those famous charts where they compare Apple computer performance to Intel PC. I wonder why? ;)

Yes I agree they had their hand pushed by the 3rd party developers. However bootcamp itself is not a boot layer its not a boot device nor does it effect the ability for Windows or Linux or any other compatible x86 operating system to boot on a Macintosh. It is just basic Partition software which makes it easier. And even then the code for actually partition in the way that Bootcamp does is present in OS X and can be accessed through a Terminal session Bootcamp just puts a nice GUI on top of that.

The actual BIOS emulation is all done inside EFI which sits on the Motherboard. I had a Mac back then when they released the Bootcamp beta and what they did was release a firmware update for all Intel based Macs via Software Update and this contained the updated EFI firmware with BIOS support. Once you had that you could comfortable boot in to Windows straight away but you would have to Wipe your Mac OS X partition to do so unless the OS you were booting in to had the capability to re-size / repartition OS X created Partitions (Which not a lot if any did back then, I still don't know of any that can do it right now).

There are a few Motherboards in the market at the moment that run on EFI with BIOS support as-well its no different to what Apple are doing. EFI is very advanced.

The actual BIOS emulation is all done inside EFI which sits on the Motherboard. I had a Mac back then when they released the Bootcamp beta and what they did was release a firmware update for all Intel based Macs via Software Update and this contained the updated EFI firmware with BIOS support.

So an EFI update is still something correct? Bootcamp wouldn't work without it? Or at least not with Windows XP as far as I'm aware, so it did require meddling with EFI, which is what I was trying to point out. They had to "hack" it or update it or whatever you want to call it. I may have pointed to Bootcamp as it is the first thing you use so I appreciate the correction.

:laugh: All four of the new apple ads are great and much better than Microsoft's ones. Apple seems to have a creative and comedy side to their ads whereas Microsoft just puts out a straight point.

The only thing that's funny about those is that they are all repetitive and really not something that Mac users will be free off. There are more and more viruses on OSX and system patches and updates are definitely not PC/Windows thing. Just cause you ignore it, doesn't mean it doesn't or it won't happen (which it recently happened when a bunch of macs became zombies for a new Trojan). And I find it really silly that Apple constantly tries to make themselves as NOT PC. Apple constantly has to put out security and OS patches, so basically it's just spreading nonsense and fueling hatred trying to be funny. Not to mention that OSX has blue screens too and ridiculous crashes even more so then Windows right now despite a bunch of apps running.

I'm definitely not a worshiper of Microsoft, but I really hate the Apple hypocrisy.At least Microsoft says it what it is and doesn't make digs directly against Apple, which shows much greater maturity if anything.

And that facial recognition ad is so silly and incorrect. Microsoft Photosynth is so much more advanced then what Apple is using it's not even funny. And that came right from Microsoft Labs which Apple simply copied.

Edited by Boz
So an EFI update is still something correct? Bootcamp wouldn't work without it? Or at least not with Windows XP as far as I'm aware, so it did require meddling with EFI, which is what I was trying to point out. They had to "hack" it or update it or whatever you want to call it. I may have pointed to Bootcamp as it is the first thing you use so I appreciate the correction.

Yeah an EFI update is something. All I'm trying to correct is the saying that Bootcamp is what makes it work and that EFI's support of BIOS is somehow a hack when its a built in feature of EFI and Bootcamp is only partition software and nothing more. That is all.

The only thing that's funny about those is that they are all repetitive and really not something that Mac users will be free off. There are more and more viruses on OSX and system patches and updates are definitely not PC/Windows thing. Just cause you ignore it, doesn't mean it doesn't or it won't happen (which it recently happened when a bunch of macs became zombies for a new Trojan). And I find it really silly that Apple constantly tries to make themselves as NOT PC. Apple constantly has to put out security and OS patches, so basically it's just spreading nonsense and fueling hatred trying to be funny. Not to mention that OSX has blue screens too and ridiculous crashes even more so then Windows right now despite a bunch of apps running.

I'm definitely not a worshiper of Microsoft, but I really hate the Apple hypocrisy.At least Microsoft says it what it is and doesn't make digs directly against Apple, which shows much greater maturity if anything.

And that facial recognition ad is so silly and incorrect. Microsoft Photosynth is so much more advanced then what Apple is using it's not even funny. And that came right from Microsoft Labs which Apple simply copied.

Just to start off so I don't start a war which usually occurs. I like both Microsoft and Apple (I use my main Computer with Windows, and my macbook with Leopard).

I don't use an antivirus on my Macbook because viruses are hard to get on OS X whereas with just a little browsing the internet on Windows with no antivirus you can browse to a website (for example a serial key website) and sometimes add-ons will install without you knowing, or pop-ups will flash up. On Leopard this doesn't seem to be the case as most viruses are made for Windows and you can browse to the same site without any trouble. Also about the updates Microsoft seems to release updates very regularly where Apple released a whole package every few months which is an update to the system (10.5.6 to 10.5.7 to 10.5.8). If you have more products from Apple installed like 'ilife 09' you will get more updates available for Leopard, this is the same on Windows so with program updates it is very even for the amount of them issued.

Just to start off so I don't start a war which usually occurs. I like both Microsoft and Apple (I use my main Computer with Windows, and my macbook with Leopard).

I don't use an antivirus on my Macbook because viruses are hard to get on OS X whereas with just a little browsing the internet on Windows with no antivirus you can browse to a website (for example a serial key website) and sometimes add-ons will install without you knowing, or pop-ups will flash up. On Leopard this doesn't seem to be the case as most viruses are made for Windows and you can browse to the same site without any trouble.

This is natural because it comes with market share. The number of security holes btw are the highest on OSX fyi, it's just that you don't really care because you think you are safe, which is perfectly fine until it happens to you. The whole virus thing through websites is pretty much gone or at least more rare, since browsers got better and ActiveX which was a necessity for many other cool things you could build was to blame. That is fixed and if you try to browse a malicious site with IE or FF on Windows you will get a warning and the site would get locked down.

There's also Data Execution Prevention (DEP) you can define, Windows Defender against Spyware and UAC that protect you. Admittedly UAC is annoying (something that will be fixed in Windows 7) but you can download Norton UAC control, which is free that will allow you to remember often used parts of OS and it won't ask you ever again locally. So essentially you don't really need an Anti-Virus but you still use it because you can download something, run it and get it just like it's happening in OSX with pirated/downloaded iWork '09 and turned Macs into online zombies.. I ran my both PCs without an anti-virus software and didn't get a virus at all. Now I do run anti-virus, but it's more of a precaution then real necessity.

Also, OSX not only has quite a bit of updates and they are not only for Leopard or apps but a bunch of security fixes too. Windows does it just the same and Windows Update is pretty much transparent, it will only ask you to restart if it's something important, just like on OSX.

So in essence everything they spout in these ads through funny rhetoric is really BS.

And I really don't feel right defending Microsoft as they are not a peach company by any means but I hate even more childish and misleading information Apple is doing trying to promote something that's not entirely true. Apple's legal team is the WORST out of all corporations, including numerous limitations and legal stuff for OSX or apps and they have the nerve to talk about EULAs. Not to mention the fact the amount of companies they have shut down just because they compete with their own products. Ridiculous.

Edited by Boz

I have a Packard Bell IpowerGX Q006 ( that's a gateway P-7808u FX for you U.S. folks :) ) and I'm still looking for something equivalent coming from Apple at the same price ... That says it all.

Apple is just selling underpowered, overpriced stuff. How dare they come crying like a bunch of emo kids now that M$ is getting back at them ?

Hmm, I'd say you were wrong there. Any game that can be installed on a PC can also be installed and played on a Mac if you also install Windows via Boot Camp.

Not out of the box and certainly not as well as a dedicated Windows gaming box, even the cheap ones. The Mac was not even made with gaming in mind since that is not apple's niche.

Actually, most people that I encounter that use Windows are NOT satisfied with it, but use it because it is all they know.

It's probably because as the operating system used by all OEMs except one, they clutter up the OS with their own bundled crap. But is it really the OS's fault?

In the past, probably. These days, I wouldn't think so.

I can probably arrive as the same conclusion as you did, but reversing the roles. Most people I encounter are satisfied with Windows. Some even use multiple OSes.

Anyone whos primary focus is gaming should have a console, not a PC (or Mac). I happen to have all three.

I prefer to game on my PC because I can, my PC's capable of doing so, and the games I prefer happen to play better on the PC.

Not out of the box and certainly not as well as a dedicated Windows gaming box, even the cheap ones.

You buy a Mac + You install Windows + You play game

vs

You build a PC + You install Windows + You play game

Define "out of the box"...

The Mac was not even made with gaming in mind since that is not apple's niche.

That is true, they're not made with gaming in mind.

You buy a Mac + You install Windows + You play game

vs

You build a PC + You install Windows + You play game

Define "out of the box"...

Out of the box:

You buy a Mac + You install Windows + You play game

vs

You buy a "PC" (with Windows already on) + You play game

first of all there is no "Mac version of Windows" Vista Home Premium costs $259.95 , It costs around 60$ OEM hence the price difference.

Oh the SMUG :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: ;) La La La im so great because i use a PC . Cant have a SMUG free post

first of all there is no "Mac version of Windows" Vista Home Premium costs $259.95 , It costs around 60$ OEM hence the price difference.

Jesus, don't you even understand sarcasm?

Oh the SMUG :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: ;) La La La im so great because i use a PC . Cant have a SMUG free post

Are you on LSD or something?

Yes somehow this is my fault that you were ignorant , i see how that works . Look at em dodge and run when they're proven wrong

Cant let a little thing like reality get in the way of that ego.

They? Are you wearing some kind of tinfoil hat too? Really, what's your problem, tell me, 'cause you most likely don't know me at all.

Keep playing the Windows vs Mac fan war you guys have going over here. I'm really tired of reading the same crap over and over again. It's like no thread here is immune.

I see what's going on in your head, everything Apple related looks like an opportunity to start some stupid war with someone. Well, just keep living in your distorted reality, argue all you want and be happy.

Oh btw, my ignore list says Hi (Y).

--

Posted from my awesome Windows machine.

o_o' ... H'okay so, am I the only person here who loves OS X, Windows, and Linux? All three of them are awesome and have pros and cons that equate each other.. EXAMPLE TIME! :D

Leopard - Sleek, sexy, stylish, the apps have a little bit of extra shine applied to them, and the OS can satisfy my geek needs to a point with being able to access Unix commands in Terminal.

Linux - GEEKSPLOSION! Terminal, compiling my own programs from source, tweaking and editing the UI to no ends, going overboard with Compiz, tweaking the UI with Emerald..

Windows (7) - Superbar, the Aero UI, compatibility with my games and programs, GAMING for one..

And on that note, I'm off, uber-storm brewing. Enjoy your foolish little fanwar, I'll be sure to use all three OS's to the extent that I can use them, heck I might even triple boot Leopard 10.5.6, Ubuntu 9.04, and Windows 7 in some way or another. :)

You buy a Mac + You install Windows + You play game

vs

You build a PC + You install Windows + You play game

Define "out of the box"...

Most gaming pc's are not built but bought that way with Windows preloaded, so quit comparing apples and oranges. (Enthusiast who build vs most gamers that just buy from Dell/Alienware and the likes.)

So for most gamers it is goes: You buy a gaming PC and then just game.

That is true, they're not made with gaming in mind.

Which is why it is silly to even argue that Windows PC's are superior in this area. Only a person who has religious zeal for Apple would try to argue otherwise.

first of all there is no "Mac version of Windows" Vista Home Premium costs $259.95 , It costs around 60$ OEM hence the price difference.

Oh the SMUG :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: ;) La La La im so great because i use a PC . Cant have a SMUG free post

To be fair, Vista HP is around $90 online for a systems builders version. (OEM) But still a Mac owner paid a premium for the hardware and then adds near $100 to the already high cost of a Mac. It doesn't make any sense to even try to game on a Mac when for the same money you can just buy a PC that will kill any Mac when it comes to gaming.

Most gaming pc's are not built but bought that way with Windows preloaded, so quit comparing apples and oranges. (Enthusiast who build vs most gamers that just buy from Dell/Alienware and the likes.)

So for most gamers it is goes: You buy a gaming PC and then just game.

Gamers I know (and even the whole bunch who keep bragging here about it) build their own computers. Even those who buy them have no other choice as to immediately format the PC because system builders always include that extra crap we love. That's why I believe pretty much every gamer will have to install Windows anyway.

Which is why it is silly to even argue that Windows PC's are superior in this area. Only a person who has religious zeal for Apple would try to argue otherwise.

Unfortunately it's still a common comparison.

To be fair, Vista HP is around $90 online for a systems builders version. (OEM) But still a Mac owner paid a premium for the hardware and then adds near $100 to the already high cost of a Mac. It doesn't make any sense to even try to game on a Mac when for the same money you can just buy a PC that will kill any Mac when it comes to gaming.

But that's purely from a gamer's perspective. Aside from that group, who's gonna want to run Windows on a Mac? People who work with Windows everyday, and depend on exclusive applications. Those people already have Windows. That's also where I happen to fit in.

Bob completely failed at understanding sarcasm when I pointed out his flaw, adding different costs of Windows for PC and Mac. They're the same. Actually, when we're talking about people either building a new computer or installing Windows on a Mac, both will probably have a copy already, so the cost of Windows is most likely 0 anyway.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I would never install install this build before rtm process. only 3 months to go. never install on your daily devices. just wait 3 months.
    • Motrix Next 3.9.6 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.6 changelog: New Features Clipboard management — App-owned copy actions no longer trigger the Add Task auto-detect popup. aria2 input compatibility — Multi-line aria2-style task input is supported for URLs with per-task options such as out=. BitTorrent IPv6 DHT — Added IPv6 DHT support and related configuration. File category URL patterns — File category rules can match URL patterns with validation and localized hints. Task status tags — Added clearer waiting and sharing states for task cards. Download event bridge — Added an aria2 WebSocket event bridge for faster download notifications. Improvements Improved task list transitions and preserved task state during tab switches. Kept RPC origin access enabled for local integrations. Restored AppImage stripping in release builds after beta validation. Added localized preference guidance across supported languages. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!