Ridley Scotts "Prometheus" (2012)


Recommended Posts

In a recent interview with art-director Roger Christian, he let slip to Shadow Lock that 20th Century Fox will release their Alien prequel in 3-D. "Ridley's doing the next Alien in 3D," Christian told the site adding, "Ridley told me some of his ideas when we were here in Toronto. He has a very clear understanding of where this should go. They kind of stopped dead one of the greatest horror franchises there's ever been, and it had legs to go on. So I'm hoping he'll revive another three. The world certainly wants it, and the fans want it - everybody." Ridley Scott, who brought the first Alien into the world, will be going back behind the camera for the untitled prequel being penned by Jon Spaihts.

Source

In a recent interview with art-director Roger Christian, he let slip to Shadow Lock that 20th Century Fox will release their Alien prequel in 3-D. "Ridley's doing the next Alien in 3D," Christian told the site adding, "Ridley told me some of his ideas when we were here in Toronto. He has a very clear understanding of where this should go. They kind of stopped dead one of the greatest horror franchises there's ever been, and it had legs to go on. So I'm hoping he'll revive another three. The world certainly wants it, and the fans want it - everybody." Ridley Scott, who brought the first Alien into the world, will be going back behind the camera for the untitled prequel being penned by Jon Spaihts.

Source

I can see it now.. facehuggers flying off the screen.

As long as it's not gimmicky, then I'm looking forward to this.

Agreed, although i dont remember any modern day movies that have anything like the "atmosphere" of the original Alien, 2010, Blade Runner etc.

Things have moved on and something has been lost, or maybe its just i got older and it doesnt scare the living bejezus out of me any more bacause of that.

  • 1 month later...

MTV spoke to the filmmaker about his new film Robin Hood and was able to uncover some details about this upcoming project. Scott says that the story has been decided, they are in their fourth draft, and that designers are already ?working graphically on designs for the various requirements of the film.? In the next few weeks he?ll have to turn a ballpark budget figure to the studio, but Scott is adamant that the film is actually going to happen. What is the story about? Scott explains:

?It?s set in 2085, about 30 years before Sigourney [Weaver's character Ellen Ripley]. It?s fundamentally about going out to find out ?Who the hell was that Space Jockey?? The guy who was sitting in the chair in the alien vehicle ? there was a giant fellow sitting in a seat on what looked to be either a piece of technology or an astronomer?s chair. ? [The film] is about the discussion of terraforming ? taking planets and planetoids and balls of earth and trying to terraform, seed them with the possibilities of future life.

In a 2002 interview, Scott wanted to return ?to where the alien creatures were first found and explain how they were created.? It sounds like this idea has been incorporated into the prequel/reboot. Jon Spaihts is writing the screenplay, a job he earned after pitching the studio and production company Scott Free. Spaihts has no produced credits, but has written Shadow 19 and Passengers, both of which are also sci-fi space thrillers. Star Wars and Alien art-director Roger Christian previously confirmed that the movie will be shot in 3D.

(MTV)

Collider was at the Robin Hood junket today and learned that Ridley Scott has plans for not one, but two prequel films. Scott referred to the two films as ?prequel one and two?, but admits that he is only working on part one at the moment. So who knows when he might ever get around to part two. Scott also confirmed the previous report that he will shoot the prequels in 3D.

I have this crazy idea that maybe they should come up with something original and brand new? rather then rehashing something that's already been done to death? Maybe I'm the only one, but I'm getting kinda tired of all these "reboots" and whatnot, would like to see some fresh ideas (Avatar was a good start, despite the story being a rehash of Pocahontas :p Still the universe was fresh and different).

To the topic at hand, as cool as it would be to learn more about the "Space Jockey" and more on the origins of the Aliens...I think that is better left to official books that can go into a lot of detail and really flesh it out...rather then trying to fit it all into a movie. To be honest, the Alien movies were great but I feel no need to redo them, but that is just me.

Originals were great, but limited to their time. New technology can make them far more believable. Like Scott himself, I'd be against a sequel. But a prequel is fine with me as it doesn't ruin the originals. It just helps explain how they originally started. I'm really looking forward to this.

As for original ideas vs reboots. Consider all those original horrors they came up with. If I see another Saw I might have to shoot someone. Just pathetic. At least rehashing these classics doesn't involve people being hacked to bits. Fear is a lot more than slowly dying.

I agree James Cameron's Aliens (#2) was Absolutely the BEST!!!

With Respect to Ridley Scott, James Cameron were the better director!

Lay off the excitement cheerleader, both directors attempted to do different things with the franchise. Scott wanted a suspense/horror movie, Cameron wanted a suspense/action movie. Both did a great job and their works stand as their own.

Lay off the excitement cheerleader, both directors attempted to do different things with the franchise. Scott wanted a suspense/horror movie, Scoot wanted a suspense/action movie. Both did a great job and their works stand as their own.

Agreed.(Y)

I have this crazy idea that maybe they should come up with something original and brand new? rather then rehashing something that's already been done to death? Maybe I'm the only one, but I'm getting kinda tired of all these "reboots" and whatnot, would like to see some fresh ideas (Avatar was a good start, despite the story being a rehash of Pocahontas :p Still the universe was fresh and different).

To the topic at hand, as cool as it would be to learn more about the "Space Jockey" and more on the origins of the Aliens...I think that is better left to official books that can go into a lot of detail and really flesh it out...rather then trying to fit it all into a movie. To be honest, the Alien movies were great but I feel no need to redo them, but that is just me.

I completely disagree. I don't think Aliens has been done to death at all. And no one is "redoing" the Aliens films either. I think the Aliens universe is great because there could potentially be lots of films set in different times with different characters and different angles. I always wondered why they stopped making them.

Also there is not that many reboots and remakes, people are always overacting about that.

  • 1 month later...

In this interview with Hero Complex's Geoff Boucher, Scott talks about many of his movies, including the original Alien, Blade Runner, Legend etc. But this is all about the highly anticipated prequel to his first(best?) film.

Here are the main bits. With both quotes from Scott, and bullet points of info..

?I sat thinking about the franchise, which now has died on the road somewhere way back and lying in the dust, and thought what I should do is go back? in the first Alien, when John Hurt climbed up and over the top of the rise? there was a massive giant lying in a chair. The chair was either a form of engine or some piece of technology and I always thought no one has ever asked who was the space jockey??

- The Alien prequel will be broken into two films. The scripts are written and Scott is prepping it now.

- Time frame is way before Alien. Not only will we find out who the Space Jockey is, we?ll find out where his people come from.

- The first Alien was The Old Dark House with 7 people with an unwelcome visitor. Scott loved the script, but it was a very basic screenplay.

-The prequel will go further into the world of terraforming and will focus on the realities of what it takes to leave for another planet. He mentioned the theory of Near Faster-Than-Light travel, which is complete science fiction at the moment; ?Mr. Spock stuff? as he called it, rearranging matter essentially, but theoretically possible. ?But what we?re allowed to do by movies is to cheat like hell. But I think the closer it is to the truth, the closer it is to the technological feasibility then it becomes that much more interesting. And if it?s a film like the one I?m going to do, then it becomes that much more frightening.?

Scott also mentioned they're going to be exploring Zeta 2 Reticuli, the same system from Alien. Naturally they'd be going back at some point if the prequel leads up to Alien, but from what Scott was saying it seems like this system plays a large role in the prequels.

- On the Space Jockey: ?I think beneath that carcass? it?s not a carcass, it?s a suit. Inside the suit is a being.?

Source

what is this space jockey they are on about? i don't recall it... is there a screen capture?

It's the name of a large alien carcass from the first Alien movie. See here: http://aliens.wikia.com/wiki/Space_Jockey

  • 1 month later...

Uh-oh. I don't know if I should be glad or mad. Lost was a decent show and I liked the original script for this prequel so I guess I'm on the fence here. If he does re-write it, I hope it's as good as the previous story and not as overly-complex as Lost.

  • 1 month later...

We?ve known for years that Ridley Scott has wanted to return ?to where the alien creatures were first found and explain how they were created? for his Alien prequels, and bit by bit, he?s been expanding on what such an origin story would entail.

In an interview with The Independent, Scott spent a great deal of time not-so-modestly reflecting on his career, but also shared some brief details on the first of the 3D Alien prequels.

The film will be really tough, really nasty. It?s the dark side of the moon. We are talking about gods and engineers. Engineers of space. And were the aliens designed as a form of biological warfare? Or biology that would go in and clean up a planet?

These few sentences help clarify an earlier interview with Scott, in which he said:

It?s set in 2085, about 30 years before Sigourney [Weaver's character Ellen Ripley]. It?s fundamentally about going out to find out ?Who the hell was that Space Jockey?? The guy who was sitting in the chair in the alien vehicle ? there was a giant fellow sitting in a seat on what looked to be either a piece of technology or an astronomer?s chair. ? [The film] is about the discussion of terraforming ? taking planets and planetoids and balls of earth and trying to terraform, seed them with the possibilities of future life.

In other words, the terraforming in some way results in the creation of the alien creatures, and the film will likely join a slew of other sci-fi films in demonstrating the consequences of playing God.

Read more: Ridley Scott Talks Alien Prequels | /Film http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/09/05/ridley-scott-talks-alien-prequels/#ixzz0yhCfSpDv

I'm highly skeptical of this. Alien is one of the best horror/sci-fi films out there, but Ridley's recent output displays such a deterioration in artistic merit that it's hard to imagine this living up to the best of the series. All this talk about it being much faster-paced and shot in 3D only fuels the pessimism. I don't need to see the origins of the Alien. I don't need to see what happened to the space jockey. Don't you get it, Ridley? Not knowing was part of why the first is so great. Oh well, I'll still watch it when it comes out. He damn well better make it closer to the first film than Aliens, which, as entertaining as it is, is inferior to the first, and looks dated.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      83
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!