Bing Is No. 2 in Search, Yahoo Down, Google Next


Recommended Posts

Its miles away from google...

Of course it is, at the moment :)

This thread and article is about the fact that it overtook Yahoo! at one point this/last week. If you read the article I linked to, it reports on that and shows a screenshot :)

There are a few things which Bing needs to improve upon which Google has;

Why do I have to hover over an image to view details about it? With google, I search for a keyword in images, and at first glance I can see the dimensions and size of each image I'm looking at. With Bing, it takes a whole minute or so to hover over each image and see details. Not to mention the filters like Size/Layout are all hidden in the corner somewhere.

There are a few things which Bing needs to improve upon which Google has;

Why do I have to hover over an image to view details about it? With google, I search for a keyword in images, and at first glance I can see the dimensions and size of each image I'm looking at. With Bing, it takes a whole minute or so to hover over each image and see details. Not to mention the filters like Size/Layout are all hidden in the corner somewhere.

There's a setting in Bing Images which lets you set it to show details without hovering :) I've attached a screenshot to this post to show you how (it's not obvious :p). I hope that helps :)

You say there's a few things that Microsoft need to improve on in order to compete well with Google, but only mentioned that one; is there anything else? :)

post-194916-1244327378_thumb.png

I would love to switch my SE over to Bing, but in order to do that, they'd need an iBing that is on par with iGoogle. I've tried having different home pages, but iGoogle just wins. The results however are very good, and I'm liking a lot of the features.

Really? I get better results with Bing, so far. I've found everything I've needed and very quickly.

A lot of people say "I get better results with Google" but I don't always believe them because I know most people are just jumping on the bandwagon. I think people need to use Bing as their search engine constantly for at least a month before they decide. They can't just do a couple of searches and then decide which engine gives them better results.

The reverse is true too. You can't use it a couple of days and claim Bing gives you better results than Google. ;)

I use search a lot for my work and nothing has every given me as good of results as Google. I'm still testing Bing, though.

The reverse is true too. You can't use it a couple of days and claim Bing gives you better results than Google. ;)

Exactly :) That's why I said "so far" in my response ;) I'm still testing it and thoroughly comparing it to Google and it's good to see you're still testing it too :)

I've tried it and it's surprising good. I think you will see Bing's fortune continue to rise. Google is still my #1 though, as I still get better results with it.

Too bad that's been/was a feature of Live Search for some time now...

Where exactly is that video search?

Oh my gosh, I've just tried using the 'Portugal' version and I see what you mean. That's ridiculous! I thought they were bad with the UK and other residents but to only include those 3 search types in the Portugese version is ridiculous!

Do you get all types of searches with Google in your area?

For the time being, it would be best to follow this link and use the 'Estados Unidos da Am?rica - Ingl?s' version. That will give you every feature and you'll really see how good Bing is (in the United States at least..:hmmm:m:). It may be a bit of a disadvantage to not use your own country's market, but it's all that can be done at the moment. I'm using a different country's market and I've had no problems with the location-based feature:):)

f - a - d

Fad.

Well it will be a fad if everyone looked at it like that. Why not try it out for a bit? So far, it works much better, for me, than Google ever has. Therefore, I really doubt it will be a fad for me.

Well it will be a fad if everyone looked at it like that. Why not try it out for a bit? So far, it works much better, for me, than Google ever has. Therefore, I really doubt it will be a fad for me.

Really? Are you in the US or the UK?

The Shopping, Comparison and Travel features seem to be a joke in the UK and shopping link sends you directly to ciao.co.uk!?!? (Which they seem to have acquired??)

The general search is just Live Search in my experience (comparing the indexes of a number of my sites they're identical as for Live (Google, Yahoo etc.. are considerably different in some cases)).

So, while I agree with this for a lot of new MS services, I'm not sure that Bing (especially in the UK) is ready for prime-time. Heck, the features they couldn't rebrand in time got dropped but no-doubt will reappear!

Really? Are you in the US or the UK?

The Shopping, Comparison and Travel features seem to be a joke in the UK and shopping link sends you directly to ciao.co.uk!?!? (Which they seem to have acquired??)

The general search is just Live Search in my experience (comparing the indexes of a number of my sites they're identical as for Live (Google, Yahoo etc.. are considerably different in some cases)).

So, while I agree with this for a lot of new MS services, I'm not sure that Bing (especially in the UK) is ready for prime-time. Heck, the features they couldn't rebrand in time got dropped but no-doubt will reappear!

Bing in the UK is definitely not ready for prime-time and a Bing official said that on a demo; that's why it's still in 'Beta' :) You should still notice a difference in search results, but the US version, by far, gives the best results and has most of the new, innovative, features which you don't find in most, if not all of, the other versions.

I've tried the UK version, along with some other versions and I totally understand your view on that one. The 'Maps' link even re-directs to MultiMap, since they acquired that service. Bing Maps is just as good, if not better than MultiMap.

I know they plan on including more features in the UK version, as well as other versions, before removing the 'Beta' tag, but I really think it's ridiculous that they've not included a lot of the stuff yet; even something as little as the new 'Explore' sidebar - they still have the links above the search bar :huh:

So, whenever I compliment Bing, I'm talking exclusively about the 'United States (English)' version. Even though I find the UK version better than Google, it's no match for the US version of Bing. You should really try it out here :)

As for comparing, once you are on the 'United States (English)' version, try using this comparison tool? with the query "The Killers" and you'll see the advantages over Google :)

Nope, we don't have the video search.

Well, I know that Bing plan to stay in 'Beta', on the Portugese version, until they feel it has enough features to be better than the competition, but I really hope they include video searching. I don't see a reason why they can't. If they want to beat Google hands-down then they really need to start thinking about their international users more.

Well

If bing fixes its "RELEVANCE" part

and yea..some people use search engines for spellcheck

so

if Bing fixes its Relevance and "DID U MEAN" part

than i personally think that it will be the best search engine on eath

actually google has a loottttt of experience when it comes to "DID u mean" :p and relevance. They have collected alot of statistics...

anyway

time will tell...but im sure that its really so damn hard to beat google...almost impossible ,,, ALMOST.but Still anything can happen

I used Live Search before Bing, so naturally I switched... But I know quiet a few people who was using Google and have since switched to Bing recently, they love it and I couldn't agree more. It's faster, and the searches are much better than when I use to use Google.

YAY! Another thing Microsoft can use to control the internet, and the technology age! Let's all give the Monopoly even better results!

-.-.

// I uses Swagbucks. It's only logical for me to find what I need, AND get paid. (if that fails, I use Google :p)

Isn't being an Athiest just the same as being religious? They both agree they're right even if there was proof.

I agree MS have the monolopy, MSN; Live Search; bing; Windows ! The list goes on and on

Edit

You know I really thought that MS bought Google, out ?

But obviously not, even though more than half of the entire MS search goes to Google.

Edited by kimsland
Isn't being an Athiest just the same as being religious? They both agree they're right even if there was proof.

Atheism is classed as a religion, indeed. And sure, you could say we're religious when it comes to the evidence presented by the atheist community :). Atheism has more counter proof than any religion to date has proof. So... /win. (Sorry, don't troll me, dangit ;). IRC if you must ^.^)

I agree MS have the monolopy, youtube; google; bing; Windows ! The list goes on and on

What?

Google && YouTube != Microsoft

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The fact I need to use "Show more" like 99% of the time is so annoying. Or why I have 7-zip under 3 submenus when it could be in top. And Microslop keeps saying how they'll improve Start and I've not seen ANY improvement yet. In MONTHS. WTF?! I'll believe any of it when they actually deliver anything.
    • LosslessCut 3.69 by Razvan Serea LosslessCut aims to be the ultimate cross platform FFmpeg GUI for extremely fast and lossless operations on video, audio, subtitle and other related media files. The main feature is lossless trimming and cutting of video and audio files, which is great for saving space by rough-cutting your large video files taken from a video camera, GoPro, drone, etc. It lets you quickly extract the good parts from your videos and discard many gigabytes of data without doing a slow re-encode and thereby losing quality. Or you can add a music or subtitle track to your video without needing to encode. Everything is extremely fast because it does an almost direct data copy, fueled by the awesome FFmpeg which does all the grunt work. Features Lossless cutting of most video and audio formats Losslessly cut out parts of video/audio (for cutting away commercials etc.) Losslessly rearrange the order of video/audio segments Lossless merge/concatenation of arbitrary files (with identical codecs parameters, e.g. from the same camera) Lossless stream editing: Combine arbitrary tracks from multiple files (ex. add music or subtitle track to a video file) Losslessly extract all tracks from a file (extract video, audio, subtitle, attachments and other tracks from one file into separate files) Batch view for fast multi-file workflow Remux into any compatible output format Take full-resolution snapshots from videos in JPEG/PNG format Manual input of cutpoint times Apply a per-file timecode offset (and auto load timecode from file) Change rotation/orientation metadata in videos View technical data about all streams Timeline zoom and frame/keyframe jumping for accurate cutting around keyframes Saves per project cut segments to project file View FFmpeg last command log so you can modify and re-run recent commands on the command line Undo/redo Give labels to cut segments View segment details, export/import cut segments as CSV Import segments from: MP4/MKV chapters, Text file, YouTube, CSV, CUE, XML (DaVinci, Final Cut Pro) Video thumbnails and audio waveform Edit file metadata and per-stream metadata Edit per-stream disposition Cut with chapter marks Annotate segments with tags View subtitles Example lossless use cases Cut out commercials from a recorded TV show (and re-format from TS to MP4) Remove audio tracks from a file Extract music track from a video and cut it to your needs Add music to a video (or replace existing audio track) Combine audio and video tracks from separate recordings Include an external subtitle into a video Quickly change a H264/H265 MKV video to MOV or MP4 for playback on iPhone Import a list of cut times from other tool as a EDL (edit decision list, CSV) and run these cuts with LosslessCut Export a list of cut times as a CSV EDL and process these in another tool Quickly cut a file by its MP4/MKV chapters Quickly cut a YouTube video by its chapters (or music times from a comment) Change the language of a file's audio/subtitle tracks Attach cover art to videos Change author, title, GPS position, recording time of a video Fix rotation of a video that has the wrong orientation flag set Great for rotating phone videos that come out the wrong way without actually re-encoding the video. Loop a video / audio clip X times quickly without re-encoding LosslessCut 3.69.0 changelog: Add lossless cropping & aspect ratio override via bitstream and container metadata #643 Alow shifting tracks for each file (-itsoffset) #216 Add "decimate video" tool to filter away all non-keyframes #2111 Add Windows ARM 64 native build with native ffmpeg Move timecode out of timeline and make it copy-able #2592 #2691 #2800 #483 #2808 Upgrade Electron to latest Add new "opposing" align mode #2654 Add FFmpeg -hwaccel auto setting for hardware acceleration of certain operations Add API events export-start and export-complete Allow deleting track metadata #2819 Improve shift segments dialog #2839 Show keyboard shortcuts inside button tooltips in UI Warn if trying to cut with too few keyframes around cutpoint #516 #2780 #2756 (Linux) include app name in notification #2794 Pull latest translations Other notable changes: Advanced output directory selector #2101 #2115 #2755 increase max file name length to 250 (truncation) #2779 don't reset playback speed when using special playback modes #2889 preserve chapters when merging files that already have chapters don't merge adjacent segments in combineOverlappingSegments #2896 don't transfer segment name when filling gaps #2754 always scroll up to zoom in #2703 #2786 increase max keyframes to 10000 Don't bind ctrl/cmd+c by default (they interfer with copying text) Many other improvements and fixes Download: LosslessCut 3.69.0 | ARM64 | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Links: LosslessCut Website | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Doesn't even need a UI for point 2 - use some sort of JSON/XML container - because MOST users won't even bother.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      488
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      263
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      85
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!