Official Zune HD thread


Recommended Posts

It's actually pretty full of facts, take away the PR and marketing spin and MS released an equal to the iPod Touch, but it's not category killer.

If it's so full of facts please tell me why Oled's suck, when countless and countless of people have said oled looks better than lcd

i expect legit facts and not bs facts you've made up

please stop trolling this thread

I'm stuck between this (Zune HD) and the Cowon S9. :wacko:

The Cowon S9 has an superior screen, and sound quality

good battery life at 55 hours of music, and an nice set of codecs

The Zune HD is better looking, has HD radio and output, Not sure about the battery life yet, games and apps, and an smoother UI

also you have to use the zune software(which is amazing in itself)

It's actually pretty full of facts, take away the PR and marketing spin and MS released an equal to the iPod Touch, but it's not category killer.

Um, not really. It's almost entirely full of opinions to combat the facts about Zune specifications. Normally I like AppleInsider and MacRumors, but that article is fud.

It's actually pretty full of facts, take away the PR and marketing spin and MS released an equal to the iPod Touch, but it's not category killer.

They are not facts at all. That article very much so appears to be written by someone who just has a bone to pick, and most of the "facts" he brings up have many problems.

I'll address each one:

Myth 1: OLED is a great display technology for mobile devices

He goes on to say that LCD's are brighter (despite most people saying otherwise), and he goes on about how the device will look terrible in bright environments. Well, apparently he didn't see this picture: http://reviews.cnet.com/2300-6490_7-10001328.html?tag=mncol That is a bright environment, and the zune's display is very bright, clear, and everything looks great. With regards to outdoors, LCD's aren't great, to be quite honest. Every LCD device that I have looks awful in sunlight, and results in me having difficulty reading the information on the screen.

With regards to his claim about OLED's taking more power on average, I would like to see some evidence to support that claim, and he provides none.

Myth 2: NVIDIA's Tegra processor leapfrogs existing mobile processors

His basic argument here is that the Tegra processor is overrated and that the CPU in the 3Gs is way better. That is BS. Tegra has many more cores, and applications which are able to effectively use them will always run better. That's just common sense.

He then says: "Even if the Tegra did supply multiple CPU cores, the Windows CE kernel used by the Zune HD doesn't support multi-core SMP so it couldn't make any use of them." Oh really? Do he care to provide evidence to prove that? Complete BS. Clearly the Zune HD has the ability effectively use the multiple cores, which is why it runs very smooth.

Myth 3: Zune HD is mobile HD

He states that the Zune is not an HD device (via it's resolution), and that the iPod Touch has more screen real estate. True, however misleading. The Zune HD's resolution has a 16:9 aspect ratio, the iPod Touch does not. That is not something to ding the HD on.

Myth 4: Zune HD delivers high definition radio

He basically thinks HD Radio sucks - his opinion. Yes, HD radio doesn't have a ton of coverage yet, but new stations are coming out. It also functions as a regular FM Radio. This is also a feature that the iPod Touch does not have.

Myth 5: Zune HD games and software will wow you

Ok, there isn't an established App Store. Apple didn't have an established App Store right away either.

That article has a lot of FUD.

Edited by Mikee99

Yes, it's true in sun light OLED can be a little bad in direct sunlight, I experienced this with my s9 when I had the brightness turned down, but when you turn the s9 to max brightness, you can see the screen mostly in sunlight. The AMOLED screen on the s9 is leaps and bounds better than any LCD screen on a mobile device, even in the sun. I didn't get a chance to test my zunehd in direct sunlight, it's sorta cloudy now. Maybe tmrw! I still think the s9's AMOLED screen is better than the ZuneHD's. I will have to try putting videos on the ZuneHD, and see how it looks vs. the s9. I think the reason for this is because the ZuneHD's interface is mostly black/white, whereas I have the s9 utilizing wallpapers/UCI with rich colors.

HD radio is freaking awesome! Sounds pretty damn good, granted there are very limited number of stations in my area. I think the s9's FM tuner is better at picking up regular FM reception. The s9 also allows you to record from the FM tuner, as well as other sources, which I don't use, but some might.

The now playing screen is awesome too. I do miss some features from the s9, but overall I'm liking this device.

If you had to choose between a zuneHD and an s9, me thinks it's an easy choice. Take your pick, do you want a device that has WiFi, apps (power of Tegra), HD radio/HD out, or do you want a device that is audiophile worthy with excellent battery life, plays almost everything, gapless, can run flash apps, and is slightly cheaper?

Man i luv the new Zune software 4.0! So smooth and slick! Has anyone done the smart dj mix yet? I dont like the fact i have to enable the update metadata settings. (very anal about music metadata not MS fault) Does it mess up metadata in any way? I so want a 64gb version please come out with one soon MS!

So some updated impressions I have: I love the new software, and I hate it. It is very responsive, and the now playing screen is just downright gorgeous. The fact it takes your album art and makes this slick dynamic wallpaper is just fantastic. i can see myself using this everyday as a main player. Integrates well with some of the Windows 7 features. What I hate is the continued lack of a good selection on the marketplace. The options are just downright garbage.

Now, for the player itself: I don't want to get too down on things like the website not working, or the updates taking ages. Getting the software was like pulling teeth, updating the firmware took even longer. Windows did not recognize the Zune until I had installed the software and rebooted the computer, pretty minor issue. I gave the browser a shot, definitely nothing spectacular. I found it to be on par or a little worse than the browser on my Iphone. I mentioned the side button previously, and i think its absolutely useless. I had no way while watching a video to change the volume without interrupting playback. This also eliminates the possibility of adjusting the volume while the unit is in my pocket, something I am used to with the rocker style control. Seems like a missed opportunity. The HD radio is a nice inclusion, but many places including around here have maybe one or two stations, and I hate the radio. Works quite well though.

I do agree that the sound quality is better than on the Ipod/Iphone. Its not hugely better, but an improvement for sure. Video playback was crisp and clear, even for a smaller screen. I loved the playback screen, very interactive and fun. i feel overall this player has a lot to offer people. I do however feel this is probably not the player for me, due to the previously mentioned issues. Size was also another concern, I really would have like to have seen a larger size, especially with the touted video playback through the tv. I am going to give this a few more days to see how it grows on me, otherwise back to the store it goes.

Kudos to Microsoft, this is a big step in the right direction, but it still feels not all there.

Well unsurpsingly the best buy I pre-ordered at took way more pre-orders then the 6 32gbs they got in. Managed to find me one about 45mins away as I didn't feel like waiting a week(last zune dead reasonf for getting HD) and I like having my music. They gave me the warrnty money and I got one. Loving it so far.

never heard of that before probably just OLED haters(they are alot of them)

Can confirm that the screen looks very beautiful even under bright lightning conditions. I had the chance to compare it with my iphone 3gs and, well, I wish iphone had the same screen as zune hd.

What about the screen in bright light? Outside sun?

Every demo of the ZuneHD was done in low light places, some bad mouth are saying that the OLED screen (quality) is just awful under light/sun.

In any case, MS is not giving me a choice, I would have loved a ZuneHD, but I'm in Canada, so the winner is Apple Touch 3rd gen....

Can you find us an outdoors review of iphone 3gs screen? cause I can tell you that it doesnt look as nice at outdoors either.

Was there a specific reason as to why the Zune HD didn't launch in Canada? I don't think I could wait another month or so. I need an mp3 player now!

/me looks at the Cowon S9

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qmmp 2.3.3 by Razvan Serea Qmmp (Qt-based MultiMedia Player) is a free, open-source audio player that delivers a classic music listening experience with a modern foundation. Inspired by the legendary Winamp, Qmmp features a familiar, customizable interface that supports both Winamp and XMMS skins, making it instantly recognizable to long-time users. It handles a wide variety of audio formats including MP3, OGG Vorbis, FLAC, WAV, AAC, and many others, ensuring smooth playback across diverse music libraries. In addition to basic playback, Qmmp offers advanced features such as a 10-band equalizer, crossfading, gapless playback, and audio visualization plugins. Users can manage playlists efficiently, create and save multiple lists, and even enable streaming from online sources. Plugin support extends the player’s capabilities, allowing integration of features like lyrics display, ReplayGain, and more. Built with the Qt framework, Qmmp runs smoothly and efficiently, making it ideal even for older systems. 10 great QMMP features you might not know: Global Hotkeys Support – Control playback using customizable system-wide keyboard shortcuts. CUE Sheet Support – Automatically detects and plays tracks from CUE files for full album playback. Last.fm Scrobbling – Integrated support for sending playback data to Last.fm. Audio CD Playback – Play music directly from audio CDs. Command Line Interface – Control Qmmp via command-line options for scripting or automation. System Tray Integration – Minimize to and control playback from the system tray. MPRIS Support – Integration with desktop media player controls via the MPRIS (Media Player Remote Interfacing Specification) interface. Spectrum Analyzer and Oscilloscope – Built-in visualizations for real-time audio feedback. Configurable Notifications – Custom pop-ups for track changes and playback status. Multiple Output Backends – Support for ALSA, PulseAudio, JACK, and more, offering flexible audio routing. Qmmp 2.3.3 changelog: fixed build with PipeWire versions less than 0.3.50; fixed settings dialog layout; fixed default CUE encoding; fixed possible null pointer dereference; fixed tracks order when added using drag and drop (2.3.3 only); fixed uninitialized structure usage; improved sid plugin: added libsidplayfp 3.0 support; added feature to build without residfp engine; fixed memory leak; fixed displaying audio information; updated Japanese translation (2.3.3 only). Download: Qmmp 64-bit | 24.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Qmmp 32-bit | 24.1 MB View: Qmmp Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • BATorrent 3.0.3 is out.
    • The current Statcoungter desktop numbers has Google Chrome increasing it's market share this past year and currently commanding 75% share. Everybody else is just making up the numbers with even MS Edge losing 3% this past year and has dipped just below 10% share which is staggering considering it's default on every Windows deviced purchased. If these numbers are correct that terrible Edge number is both devastating and embarrassing for MS especially when you add in the terribly low Bing market share. This leads me to ask a couple of questions as the default browser holding just less than 10% market share seems really weird. It used to be that all Chromium browsers were being counted as Google Chrome in some cases.  Is this still happening? Do these high Google Chrome numbers contains some Edge user numbers?
    • Yeah, all web browsers seem to have some junk in them these days. The regular Brave browser has a lot of unnecessary stuff in it, similar to Microsoft Edge, so I don't see any benefits of using Brave over Microsoft Edge if you already have Microsoft Edge fully set up with ad blockers and that. The cleanest or best free browser outside of 'Microsoft Edge' I’ve tried so far is 'Samsung Browser'. It has very little bloat and is a nice-looking web browser with an inbuilt 'Ad blocker'. I also really like the web browser called 'Floorp' that is based on Firefox. This browser can also install Chrome extensions. I have a system wide Ad blocking program for Windows 11 that doesn't just blocks ads in the web browser, but over the whole system. I don't really need a web browser with an inbuilt ad blocker because of that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      491
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!