Recommended Posts

Image stopped showing up again.... wtf

3933387542_1d8c3c1d8b.jpg

Don't take my criticism the wrong way but i'm curious as to why you chose to edit the photo's this way. IMO this shot could have been nice with some bright green and rich blue sky, but it's been dulled out completely and it looks as if there is a spotlight on a ball of hay. I'm guessing it's some sort of HDR. I'm not trying to be mean so please don't take it personal, i'm just boggled as to why you chose to darken all the parts of the image that would make it pop.

Don't take my criticism the wrong way but i'm curious as to why you chose to edit the photo's this way. IMO this shot could have been nice with some bright green and rich blue sky, but it's been dulled out completely and it looks as if there is a spotlight on a ball of hay. I'm guessing it's some sort of HDR. I'm not trying to be mean so please don't take it personal, i'm just boggled as to why you chose to darken all the parts of the image that would make it pop.

Better? I tend to get it right, and then process it a bit more lol, It could be that it's the middle of the night.

I love comments/criticism

3932837531_5c9e01da6d.jpg

I agree with what Bubba is saying.

I would like to see what the original image looks like. From the looks of it, I would probably like the original better.

I understand you wanting to do some compositing, similar to the ones KoL does, and I understand that you have to start somewhere.

Don't stop, this one is better than the others. I feel like the lighting needs to be worked on. Overall, it looks a little Drab/Muddy. The treeline/skyline needs some work also. I don't want to sound condescending, I am by no means an expert photoshop'ist, but you'll get there with practice.

Just wondering... are you working with photos you have taken, or with some stock images from somewhere...?

I agree with what Bubba is saying.

I would like to see what the original image looks like. From the looks of it, I would probably like the original better.

I understand you wanting to do some compositing, similar to the ones KoL does, and I understand that you have to start somewhere.

Don't stop, this one is better than the others. I feel like the lighting needs to be worked on. Overall, it looks a little Drab/Muddy. The treeline/skyline needs some work also. I don't want to sound condescending, I am by no means an expert photoshop'ist, but you'll get there with practice.

Just wondering... are you working with photos you have taken, or with some stock images from somewhere...?

These are all my photos, I took these today. I never use stock, I like the whole image to be "my" work. I'm trying to get practice on photoshop, there's so much to learn.

So you don't like the "Light" version either? Would you increase contrast and get blown out clouds? I'm wondering how to make it less muddy. Would taking off the multiply gaussian blur overlay help make it less "muddy"? (I still can't remember the name for that effect.)

I'll spend some more time on the treeline right now.

Edited by Boifido

Sorry, we must have been posting around the same time. I was counting on my post being right under Bubbabyte's post :) Unfortunate coincidence.

I do prefer the 'Lighter' version. Much much better. I find the sky to be a little too purple tho.

Sorry, we must have been posting around the same time. I was counting on my post being right under Bubbabyte's post :) Unfortunate coincidence.

I do prefer the 'Lighter' version. Much much better. I find the sky to be a little too purple tho.

Great, I'll un-purple-ize it a bit, and finish the trees. I'm sure there has to be a better way than layer mask and brush, but I haven't found it yet.

I tend to take my photos about one step to far though. I was about to save, and then I randomly added that dark layer on top :rolleyes:.

Before saving I should press ctrl+alt+z a few times. :laugh:

I do love -Kol's images though, I have a bunch printed in my room.

I feel like HDR is a phase a lot of people go through where they HDR everything. I know I sure did. It's really cool when you're first learning it. Then it's a tool in your bag of tricks you can use later on.

My current phase is off camera lights. Once I get a pretty good grasp on it I'll probably move onto something else.

@Boifido: If you added that dark layer on top, try setting it to 'Overlay' and bring it down to 15% or something like that. Should make the sky and the colors pop more then just a black layer set to 15% alone.

@crazzy88ss: Like anything, good HDR has it's place. The over-processed looking HDR that a lot of people just pump though photomatix (or the like) I could do probably do without. Though, what Boifido is doing is more compositing than it is HRD i think.

@Boifido: If you added that dark layer on top, try setting it to 'Overlay' and bring it down to 15% or something like that. Should make the sky and the colors pop more then just a black layer set to 15% alone.

@crazzy88ss: Like anything, good HDR has it's place. The over-processed looking HDR that a lot of people just pump though photomatix (or the like) I could do probably do without. Though, what Boifido is doing is more compositing than it is HRD i think.

Thanks for the tip. I still have to learn what all the different blending options in that dropdown box do. I'll seek out a tutorial tomorrow. There are many options!

Yea, It's not really hdr at all, mostly just since the hay bale one is made up of 25 images, I can set the correct shutter speed for each part of the bale/sky/grass/trees.

In fact, the set of 10 images(sky), and the set of 15(ground) images were taken less than 100 meters from each other. The sky to the left was much better. I figure starting with 2 main images is a good way to easy into composites that can contain 10's of seperate images.

The reason I make a "panorama" of everything is that our point and shoot camera has horrible noise close up. This way, the 15 images of the grass are far enough away that it looks okay from a pixel noise point of view.

I do have to admit, for about a week, about a half year-ish ago, I did tonnes of overprocessed HDR's. I didn't upload or show them to anyone, but I definitely caught the HDR fever :D

Edited by Boifido

Thanks for the comments guys but compared to you my photos are crap hehe. Love the photos in this thread. I need to keep learning.

Great, I'll un-purple-ize it a bit, and finish the trees. I'm sure there has to be a better way than layer mask and brush, but I haven't found it yet.

I tend to take my photos about one step to far though. I was about to save, and then I randomly added that dark layer on top :rolleyes:.

Before saving I should press ctrl+alt+z a few times. :laugh:

I do love -Kol's images though, I have a bunch printed in my room.

Cool :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!