[TGS] Gran Turismo 5: March 2010 in Japan


Recommended Posts

gt5-tgs-09.jpg

Gran Turismo 5?s release window has just been set to March 2010 for Japan, according to Kazunori Yamauchi at the TGS press conference. This, unfortunately, runs directly counter to everything that we?ve heard so far from a wide variety of sources for nearly an entire yeaNovember 30, 2008 ? Sony executive in Europe mentions GT5 will ?arrive at Christmas? during an interview with a financial mJune 4, 2009, 2009 ? Kazunori Yamauchi states: ?We can release Gran Turismo 5 whenever we want.? duringAugust 2, 2009gust 2, 2009 ? GTPlanet acquires internal company documents which clearly outline the date that Sony expects to release the game (and it was weAugust 22, 2009ugust 22, 2009 ? Kazunori Yamauchi states that ?GT5 will be released shortly after this date [October 1st]??August 23, 2009

August 23, 2009 ? Printed material distributed by Sony at the GamesCom 2009 conference clearly indicate the game will be released during the fourth quarter of 2009.

Needless to say, everyone ? including myself ? are pretty surprised by the most recent turn of events. Was there a problem during the game?s development? Did criticisms of the damage engine shown off at GamesCom send Polyphony Digital back to the drawing board? We may never know for sure.

Source: [url=http://www.gtplanet.net/gran-turismo-5-march-2010-in-japan/]http://www.gtplanet.net/gran-turismo-5-march-2010-in-japan/[/:pl]

Well done Boz :p

Looks like it may have been 2009 though until criticism from Gamescom. What we know,

GT5 Features:

Kazunori says it's to achieve a sCars: Over 950lity.

1Over 20 locations and 70 tracksr 20 locations and 70 tracks.

1:40 Physics: new physics, damage, movable objects on the track, and the newest hybrid and electric cars.

1:40 Hippie.

1:41 Arcade Mode: Single Player, split-screen two player

1:41 GT Mode: World Map, My Garage, Car Dealer, Tuning Shop, Championship Race, and License Test.

1:42 Online: Open Lobby, Text/Voice Chat, Private Room, Online Photo Album, Online Replay Album, and you can export replays to YouTube.

1:42 YouTube!

1:42 Photo Mode: Photo Drive, Photo Stage

1:43 GT TV: Improved UI, export of videos to PSP, and progressive downloading.

That is impressive!

More later

9:44: This is all they're announcing about GT5's feature set now. There will be more features announced in the feature.

Someone already thinks damage on non-racing cars being worked on

gt5damage3.png

gt5damage2.png

No dent in other side

gt5damage1.png

I agree that it's probably the criticism they received at Gamescom that caused the considerable delay, considering they were ripped to shreds over how they planned to implement damage! Still, this isn't a concrete release date either so it still can slip (forward or back depending on how long it takes for them to "fix" things). Plus, since this is the planned Japanese launch window you'll need to add a few extra months on top of that for translation for the NA and Europe releases as well (more for Europe as European titles generally support more languages then the JP/NA releases) so it may not realistically release till mid to late 2010....of cause this is all just a guess, so take with a grain of salt!

What a joke! You have to laugh honestly.

I knew 100% that the game would no drop in 2009 even with advertisments stating exactly that. Maybe it won't even drop in 2010.

It should be a launch title for PS4 at this rate.

Well if the release was the rumoured December, it's only a 3 months difference.

Either way this is actually the first time PD have given a proper release date, (month and date). Believe it or not until now it's just been a year. I'm waiting to see what they say about Europe/USA, they said they planned a worldwide release.

The features list so far impressed me enough, it's going to blow every other game away on amount of content. Youtube uploading will be awesome for the replay mode.

I'm disappointed, but if the game comes away better I can hold off a few more months, especially if it is putting damage on all cars. What I hate PD most for though is all the whining we're now going to have to see in every GT thread about how it's the end of the world and the game will never launch :p

ps. Everyone missed this, was posted before even the first keynote - http://kotaku.com/5366437/gran-turismo-5-i...-is-nearly-done

SLR spoiler moves around 0.55, so hopefully bringing damage modelling to all cars...

image_gran_turismo_5-11615-1865_0001.jpg

image_gran_turismo_5-11615-1865_0007.jpg

2uge0ra.png

Short video of new Ferrari in cockpit, looks like hand animations have been improved a bit - http://www.gamersyde.com/stream_gran_turis...t-12989_en.html

Some new screens

gran-turismo-5-20090924002025627.jpg

gran-turismo-5-20090924002028221.jpg

gran-turismo-5-20090924002031752.jpg

Not wanting to be fussy g~man, but its grandma. :whistle:

And I'm actually pleased its going to be released next year, because I'd be skint if I picked up all these games come Christmas. Looks like its only going to Uncharted 2 and Modern Warfare 2 for me for the rest of this year. (And maybe FIFA or Assasins Creed 2)

Edited by RPatel

SLR spoiler moves around 0.55, so hopefully bringing damage modelling to all cars...

i'm pretty sure that's just the spoiler raising to act as an air brake, which is something that the McLaren SLR do...

and 2010 is not good, despite the spin of more/better features blah blah blah. they intimated 2009 and that's what i was geared up for, so i'm bitterly disappointed in them. i've been waiting for this game for too long already.

i'm pretty sure that's just the spoiler raising to act as an air brake, which is something that the McLaren SLR do...

and 2010 is not good, despite the spin of more/better features blah blah blah. they intimated 2009 and that's what i was geared up for, so i'm bitterly disappointed in them. i've been waiting for this game for too long already.

Yeah that is exactly what it is, just the SLR's air brake. I doubt they'll add damage to non-race races this late, not to mention not all the cars can be damaged (as some manufacturers have refused, so I've heard) which could be the real reason why all non-race cars have no damage (as it would destroy the experience if you had races where some cars are destructible while others are not...imagine the cheating!!) still I could be wrong, this is just my opinion!

GT5 will be worth the wait, despite the nay sayers claiming the GT franchise's doom. Despite the moaning, GT5 has never been actually "delayed" (for it to be delayed it must first have a set release date) sure Sony/Polyphony have throw around years and months but most of it rumors, "ball park" numbers and wishful thinking of fans. I'd rather Polyphony take their time and make GT5 as good as it can be, if they released it now (after the grilling session at Gamescom) people would probably be moaning it's not finished or that it was released too soon...anyway, with Forza 3 almost at our doorsteps it'll keep me occupied till GT5 finally arrives (I think it's better that way, means they both don't have to compete for my attention as I plan to buy both!!) Take with a grain of salt.

Edited by Xerxes
What were they talking about when they said something like it was ready and that they could ship it now?

Exactly and "Will release sooner than expected" .... well most people were expecting December, so clearly it's not sooner :(

I'm thinking it has something to do with Gamescon too given the critism it came under. Good to see that they are maybe willing to accept that and do something about it before release.

Yeah that is exactly what it is, just the SLR's air brake. I doubt they'll add damage to non-race races this late, not to mention not all the cars can be damaged (as some manufacturers have refused, so I've heard) which could be the real reason why all non-race cars have no damage (as it would destroy the experiencing if you had races where some cars are destructible while others are not...imagine the cheating!!) still I could be wrong, this is just my opinion!

GT5 will be worth the wait, despite the nay saying claiming the GT franchise's doom. Despite the moaning, GT5 has never been actually "delayed" (for it to be delayed it must first have a set release date) sure Sony/Polyphony have throw around years and months but most of it rumors, "ball park" numbers and wishful thinking of fans. I'd rather Polyphony take their time and make GT5 as good as it can be, if they released it now (after the grilling season at Gamescom) people would probably be moaning it's not finished or that it was released too soon...anyway, with Forza 3 almost at our doorsteps it can tides us over till GT5 finally arrives (I think it's better that way, means they both don't have to compete for my attention as I plan to buy both!!) Take with a grain of salt.

It's disappointing we're going to have to wait another 3 months from the date we were led to believe from a fair few sources, I'm pretty damn bummed and frustrated, seriously :( Boz was sure right, but to be fair on most of us Sony put out that Q4 2009 flier, and multiple sources said December. I truly have a feeling they were shooting for Dec09, but whatever is left to do just can't be done in time, whether it's improving on criticisms or just plain finishing stuff. I think the damage modelling is what will be under scrutiny for the foreseeable months left in development.

Still as you said this is actually the first official release date.

For all the whining about the 3 months that's going to happen now, Forza 3 and GT5 were never on a similar development time scale... I've compared Forza 2/3 combined against GT5 on tangible details we have from both.

Cars (at launch)

Forza 2 - 300~350

Forza 3 - 400~450

Total - 700~800 (won't be 700~800 unique, cars that are in Forza 2 will have carried into 3.).

GT5 - 950~1000

Total - 950~1000

Unique Tracks from separate Locations (at launch)

Forza 2 - 14

Forza 3 - 19 from 7 locations

Total - 34

GT5 - 70 from 20 locations

Total - 70

Overall Track Layouts (Mirrored/From same track location) (at launch)

Forza 2 - 47

Forza 3 - Over 100

Total - 147~

GT - Unknown

Total -

Racing Styles

Forza 2/3 - Road/Street racing

GT5 - Road/Street racing, NASCAR, World Rally Championship

Technically

Forza 2 - 720p/60FPS/8 cars on track

Forza 3 - 720p/60FPS/8 cars on track/Unsure about split-screen

GT5 - 1080p/60FPS/16 cars on track/split-screen two player

Purpose here isn't to discredit Forza 3, but many people attack PD as if the games are on a level development scale, and PD are somehow being lazy or wasting our time. GT5 even has more cars than Forza 2 and 3 combined, whether or not that's overkill for you it still affects the development time scale.

In terms of actual content GT5 was always going to have the longer development time cycle, you don't model 450 cars then click a magic button which doubles it to 950+. Interior and exterior in all those cars needs modelled the same way it is for every other car. Same goes for unique tracks, yeah once you've modelled a track it's probably easy to "click a button" and put it in reverse mode or slightly modify the layout.

You're probably only going to see one GT on the PS3, with DLC, that will most likely be sufficient in terms of iterations, it seems they're trying to chuck everything in to future proof the engine as much as possible and expand with DLC. With the split screen, and what seems like robust online components, combined with the solid technical engine, all we'll really need will be car/track DLC.

Multiplatform owners have Forza 3 to enjoy for the next 6 months :) Demo in the next few hours as well, but knowing my luck it'll be Gold only for a week :(

And for anyone about to get angry at me, I acknowledge development time scale doesn't = any proof of game play quality, something with less, can easily be better. However I'd just like to point out why we're most likely waiting as long as we are. I demand to know an EU/US release asap, I heard the PSBlog is doing an interview with Kaz today, I expect that to be asked.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      533
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!