[TGS] Gran Turismo 5: March 2010 in Japan


Recommended Posts

Okay is this true that GT5 is only 65% complete? WTF Why the hell were they saying rubbish like saying its ready to release now. I'm starting to think it won't even come out in March now.

God of War III only says 60% and it's coming in March.

Heavy Rain 50% and it's due Q1 2010.

Okamiden: 25%

Lost Planet 2: 70%

Valkyria Chronicles 2: 70%

Yakuza 4: 65%

The Last Guardian: ?

Crackdown 2: ?

Alan Wake: ?

Halo Reach: ?

Final Fantasy XIV: 50%

Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker: 50%

God of War III: 60%

Heavy Rain: 50%

Good explanation

These numbers are misleading, because one would like to assume that percentage is linked to time, when it is really linked to things getting done. As such, if I game is going to be huge, a large proportion of time will need to be set aside for QA and bug testing, and thus it would be more appropriate for the percentage to reflect that. The game could be technically "done" content-wise but that definitely doesn't mean it's worth shipping.

Or for another example, if a game's development is paused at 30% without the public knowing, should it increase to 50% automatically if 2 years passes? Most people would say no, right? And that's why percents are fairly useless.

If you want a good idea about how far along a game is, ask them whether the QA team is busting their asses like no other. While most developers try to squash bugs as the game is being developed, a separate team is brought in to give it a major once over near the end.

Feature complete/ready to ship are different stages.

One would gather GT5 is pretty much feature complete, hence the release any time comment, however the level of polish necessary to ship isn't deemed there, most likely to do with model damage getting flak at Gamescom.

hmm if the JP version has no region locking i might just get that one.

Bad idea unless

a) You have a visa card to buy DLC in yen off JPN store

b) Are willing to double dip for EU/USA release if it's coming later than March

c) Are willing to put up with all Japanese, don't think Japanese GT has ever had English subs

This game will definitely have DLC.

Store content is never region free, just the games.

I'd just hold off a bit longer to hear what the EU/USA release window is, no point in jumping to conclusions when we have months before the Japanese one anyway.

You deserve them.

I lawled at the news. 5 years+ for one game :laugh:

5 years+ for GT5 and GT PSP, same studio handled both and they were in development at the same time. PSP development timescales are probably only around a year or so though, where as console games are typically around 2 years +.

Still a long development time, but as I pointed out on the last page the amount of content in GT5 as a single entity is unrivalled.

Alan Wake was announced in 2005 though?

Gran Turismo 5 was announced at E3 2006, called 'Vision Gran Turismo' back then. GT HD then came at Christmas 2006 I think, GT5 Prologue 2007, GT5 at this point was suppose to be 2008, then that changed to Q4 2009, now March 2010.

Alan Wake has been on the go publicly for longer than GT5 :p

5 years+ for GT5 and GT PSP, same studio handled both and they were in development at the same time. PSP development timescales are probably only around a year or so though, where as console games are typically around 2 years +.

Still a long development time, but as I pointed out on the last page the amount of content in GT5 as a single entity is unrivalled.

Gran Turismo 5 was announced at E3 2006, called 'Vision Gran Turismo' back then. GT HD then came at Christmas 2006 I think, GT5 Prologue 2007, GT5 at this point was suppose to be 2008, then that changed to Q4 2009, now March 2010.

In an April 2008 interview, game creator Kazunori Yamauchi revealed that 150 people had worked on Gran Turismo 5 for four years, with all of Polyphony Digital's 120 employees working on GT5, and the game costing 50 times more to develop than 1997's Gran Turismo.[4]

So they started work in 2004. I don't know when Alan Wake started but it doesnt matter, totally off-topic.

Why do I get the feeling that Sony isn't happy they've taken this long. Could this be the last in the series?

5 years+ for GT5 and GT PSP, same studio handled both and they were in development at the same time. PSP development timescales are probably only around a year or so though, where as console games are typically around 2 years +.

Still a long development time, but as I pointed out on the last page the amount of content in GT5 as a single entity is unrivalled.

Gran Turismo 5 was announced at E3 2006, called 'Vision Gran Turismo' back then.

But why couldn't they just focus on the game instead of the car count. We could have had this game one or two years ago, getting the remaining cars through free periodic DLC. Something is wrong over at PD

@AB, Maybe to you it's unrivalled, not for me it's not.

So what other racing game has 950+ cars and 70 tracks?

But why couldn't they just focus on the game instead of the car count. We could have had this game one or two years ago, getting the remaining cars through free periodic DLC. Something is wrong over at PD

Why not create a game with such an impressive car inventory? It is a racing sim, they've brought in NASCAR and WRC, it's not just 950 street/supercars.

None of us are going any where, yeah it means more waiting, but the end product will have a much longer life rather than require an iteration in a few years.

So what other racing game has 950+ cars and 70 tracks?

Why not create a game with such an impressive car inventory?

None of us are going any where, yeah it means more waiting, but the end product will have a much longer life rather than require an iteration in a few years.

It is about quality not quantity imo. Besides, I doubt all 950+ cars are even playable. Also don't forget, many will just be similar with slight tweaks. At least thats how it was in GT4.

AB, you sure do like to post then make edits pretty much everytime? Why not type it all at once, makes it a lot easier.

It is about quality not quantity imo. Besides, I doubt all 950+ cars are even playable. Also don't forget, many will just be similar with slight tweaks. At least thats how it was in GT4.

AB, you sure do like to post then make edits pretty much everytime? Why not type it all at once, makes it a lot easier.

WTF? Of course they are playable. Yes there is going to be a Golf, then a Golf Turbo, etc, but that's the same in most racing games. It's still 950 cars.

Yes quality matters, I've already said on the pages before we can't really judge that until we play the game but the quantity directly affects development time, regardless of quality. You're still modelling all those cars. Which is why I don't understand people being surprised at development time length, I understand disappointment though, but that's mostly because of what we read about release, then don't get in the end.

If the game has high quality and high quantity, then it's win-win, good value for money, but we'll need to wait a few more months to see I'm under no illusion of that.

GT5 Prologue was pretty good, it was more of a technical power house though, as in terms of the game play elements, things such as physics needed work.

So I guess this is one debate you are happy to just compare numbers huh AB :p

Nope sorry, doesn't work like that. There's a hell of a lot more to it than "we have more nah nah". And like Peter already said, 950 cars, but not 950 unique cars.

None of us are going any where, yeah it means more waiting, but the end product will have a much longer life rather than require an iteration in a few years.

If they thought that way, Prologue would not exist.

Prologue was rushed and 5 is coming late, they should really settle on some middle ground.

So I guess this is one debate you are happy to just compare numbers huh AB :p

Nope sorry, doesn't work like that. There's a hell of a lot more to it than "we have more nah nah". And like Peter already said, 950 cars, but not 950 unique cars.

Yeah and Forza/NFS, "x amount of cars, but not x unique cars".

It's still modelling work which = development time, even if you're just changing body shape, dials, interior, the badges and the engine sounds. Every car also has to be put through Q&A regardless of if it's just a more powerful iteration.

We're talking development times Munky "we have more" = "more time in the cooker" most of the time. Read my post above, I'm not talking quality, I've already said a game with less can be better than a game that claims more.

What you guys are questioning though is the length of time since this game started development, which with everything they're trying to put into the game alongside them creating a PSP version I don't think is all that unreasonable.

If they thought that way, Prologue would not exist.

Prologue was rushed and 5 is coming late, they should really settle on some middle ground.

Prologue was clearly just a bone thrown to those waiting. They've always put out a prologue, it probably pays for a chunk of the final games development :laugh: Sad or not for being classed a "demo" GT5P still sold 4 million copies and it's created out of GT5 assets.

Then what does the number of cars have to do with anything being "unrivalled" if a game with less cars can still be better, in your words?

:blink:

For all you know Turn 10 have dozens of DLC car packs to release for F3, if numbers really mean that much to you.

Then what does the number of cars have to do with anything being "unrivalled" if a game with less cars can still be better, in your words?

:blink:

For all you know Turn 10 have dozens of DLC car packs to release for F3, if numbers really mean that much to you.

Because I at least have been talking about development time for pretty much this whole topic.

950 cars being developed for one game is unrivalled as far as I'm aware. If no other game has done that, you don't really have anything to compare GT5 to on a development time scale.

DLC is fine, but if it's costing money for every pack it's not that bad a deal paying RRP for a game and getting 950 cars.

cars:

• more than 950 cars

○ confirmed new brands: Ferrari, Bugatti, Lamborghini, Tesla

○ confirmed new series: NASCAR, WRC

tracks:

• 20 locations ?, 70 tracks (these numbers are still vague)

○ confirmed new race circuits: Top Gear Test Track, Daytona, Indianapolis

○ confirmed new road circuits: London, Eiger, Madrid, Tuscany

○confirmed new rally circuits: Tuscany

offline features:

• single race, 2 player splitscreen

• time trial

• garage, car wash, oil change

• licence test, championships

• photo mode (circuit & locations)

• museum

• GTTV (compatible with PSP)

online features:

• private rooms, lobbies

• text & voice chat

• photo and replay album

• YouTube replay output

• time trial rankings

other details:

• car tuning

• damage, affects handling, roll overs

• PlayStation Eye head tracking

• up to 1080p 60fps

• up to Dolby 7.1

• custom soundtracks

release date:

• March 2010

menu:

• Arcade, Online, Dealer, GT mode, Status, Theatre, Options, Manual

Thank god they confirmed roll overs, the physics were terrible in GT5P when you smacked another car and it just violently pivoted on front 2 wheels/back 2 wheels/front 2 wheels for about 10 seconds.

Head tracking confirmed as well, but where's the frickin demo of it?

Also off the blog for EU/USA

Finally, Gran Turismo 5 now has a solid Japanese release date – March 31. An American and European release date will be announced soon.

Source: http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/09/tgs...other-new-info/

Quite possibly the worst video you'll ever watch in your life, but

http://qik.com/video/2989238

The Ferrari comes down the track and the dude recording says @ 5:34 "Ferrari Damage" and from his blurry camera you see the door has a crumbled look.

If so first non-rally car to have damage, unless that bash I posted earlier in the topic is indeed a bash.

gt5damage2.png

Hopefully a better video soon that isn't "awww ferrarray damaaage". I can't believe the demo would be on the showfloor with press/gamers around and the best recording we'd get is from a ****ty 1995 cellphone.

edit: Unless this is related to TGS

No_photo.jpg

and Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG GT5 video

Edited by Audioboxer
and it could still beat Alan Wake to release :rofl:

nobody on any forums talks about that, it'll come out when its ready, i dont see anyone crying about it not coming out this year.... gt on the other hand is talked about daily

gt is sonys big title, has been in production for 5 years and is still going to miss the christmas timeframe? might as well come out with prologue 2 demo and release it in christmas 2010, wouldnt suprise me

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      533
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!