Recommended Posts

no i meant like, when you had to look up and press the action button to make him climb up, and look down and press the action button to make him do a slide... these are implied actions, and the game can only hope that it did what you want it to do... what if you have 2 platforms which are too close to each other and your character does something you totally didnt want him to do... especially if you are in a hurry and you dont have time to 'eyeball' your next action

imho, the consoles have so many buttons anyway, they should have used dedicated 'high' and 'low' action buttons, i.e. climb/hang from/pull up/jump over and crawl/slide/let go/hide behind ...

if this is coming to the PC, then yeah i agree that the view-based context sensitivity would work, since the mouse is alot better at pointing and PC fps games are generally rigidly use the WSAD input...

It is indeed coming to the PC. And I understand what your saying about the issues with the console, sometimes you aren't going to have time to look around for your next action, your going to want to start running and decide you action on the move, something more easily done on PC than consoles. I feel it will still work well as you will be pointing in the direction you want to go (pointing high or low depending on whether you want to go over or under an object), but as you said this is much easier on PC than on consoles.

As for the Mirror's Edge effect, the problem with that is in Mirror's Edge, you had linear gameplay. There were only a couple possible paths within any area of the game. In Brink, virtually any object you see on screen can be used to jump over/slide under/climb, etc. Adding a Mirror's Edge effect would hardly help because its up to you to decide where you want to go and how you want to get there. Its too open to allow otherwise, its not like ME where you can simply ignore/run past enemies and be done with them. If you run past them they are likely to follow.

It is in a way, loadout has little to do with your class, but each class has special abilities that the other classes do not have/cannot do. Soldiers have charges they can lay to blow stuff up (sadly probably only set areas, like when he blows a hole in the wall to get to his team faster), or engineers who can repair stuff, like the crane. Granted that is about the extent of the classes we have seen, and they only appear to have 1 special ability over the other classes, but it does not seem to be a system where you level and increase those abilities, if thats what you mean.

Yeah that's typical Splash Damage style and exactly what I mean about the RTCW/W:ET referneces. However in those games the classes had more than 1 attribute to differ them. I really want a new game which focuses on this type of team work.

Unlike today where you still get class based multiplayer games, you can run off and do your own thing, the classic games like RTCW would require team work or you lose. For instance the beach map the first thing you needed was an engineer to blow the sea wall up. If nobody bothered to play engineer and all chose soldier or sniper, you spent the match on the beach. Whereas in TF2 you can play for hours on end in a CTF match where nobody has an interest in capturing the intel because everyone just runs around playing TDM for what should be a 15 min match or whatever.

If Brink is anything like those classic class based games I'm going to be a very happy Munky, as right now the only game which even comes close to them is Battlefield, and sitting around waiting on a new release in the series isn't fun (N) Competition ftw (Y)

I'm so glad I'm not the only one who thought the gameplay looked atrocious... I commented on Voodoo Extreme and was reading the Kotaku responses and everyone made it out to be the next big thing, but just didn't look fun at all to me.

It looks like a generic FPS that's trying to innovate the team-based multiplayer space by changing very little from what we've already seen before... much like the countless Tribes clones out there. It actually reminds me of Section 8 -- looks pretty, but doesn't play very well.

Unlike today where you still get class based multiplayer games, you can run off and do your own thing, the classic games like RTCW would require team work or you lose. For instance the beach map the first thing you needed was an engineer to blow the sea wall up. If nobody bothered to play engineer and all chose soldier or sniper, you spent the match on the beach. Whereas in TF2 you can play for hours on end in a CTF match where nobody has an interest in capturing the intel because everyone just runs around playing TDM for what should be a 15 min match or whatever.

If Brink is anything like those classic class based games I'm going to be a very happy Munky, as right now the only game which even comes close to them is Battlefield, and sitting around waiting on a new release in the series isn't fun (N) Competition ftw (Y)

That part above I bolded above is the exact scenario that made me fall in love with MP FPS's. It was so awesome playing that level and seeing someone (more often than not I tried to make sure it was me) blow up that wall so then everyone could push on. Was awesome for sure.

I'm so glad I'm not the only one who thought the gameplay looked atrocious... I commented on Voodoo Extreme and was reading the Kotaku responses and everyone made it out to be the next big thing, but just didn't look fun at all to me.

It looks like a generic FPS that's trying to innovate the team-based multiplayer space by changing very little from what we've already seen before... much like the countless Tribes clones out there. It actually reminds me of Section 8 -- looks pretty, but doesn't play very well.

Cool so someone else that proves I am not crazy and to critical. I mean just in the very first video the gunplay looked so, so bad. The AI was not reacting at all to being shot, and it appeared as if you literally had to empty a clip into them and sometimes even then they would not go down.

And also call my unimpressed by the whole SMART thing. First there is the obvious Mirrors Edge has already done it, but second it looks like it is more or less pointless and just there for the sake of being there. I know they guy gave the example of avoiding the metal detector, etc., but yeah I was still not impressed.

Finally I just thought there was WAY to much sliding around. LOL

I am by no means writing this game off, in fact I am really, really into the whole 8 Player CoOp, I am however saying I saw nothing at all that floored me or made me think this an absolute must play. Right now it is at the "I will Rent it" stage for myself.

Whereas in TF2 you can play for hours on end in a CTF match where nobody has an interest in capturing the intel because everyone just runs around playing TDM for what should be a 15 min match or whatever.
That depends highly on the server. If you join a server running a map 24/7 with insta-respawn then yes, people will just run around playing TDM because they do not have to worry about the map time limits or anything. If you play a server running a normal rotation with normal map times (15-20 minute map limits) then you are going to get much more teamwork than on a 24/7 server.
Cool so someone else that proves I am not crazy and to critical. I mean just in the very first video the gunplay looked so, so bad. The AI was not reacting at all to being shot, and it appeared as if you literally had to empty a clip into them and sometimes even then they would not go down.

Yeah, the guy was emptying a nearly full clip into a person from behind to kill them.....I can understand a light machine gun requiring more shots but nearly a full clip?

And also call my unimpressed by the whole SMART thing. First there is the obvious Mirrors Edge has already done it, but second it looks like it is more or less pointless and just there for the sake of being there. I know they guy gave the example of avoiding the metal detector, etc., but yeah I was still not impressed.

Finally I just thought there was WAY to much sliding around. LOL

I am by no means writing this game off, in fact I am really, really into the whole 8 Player CoOp, I am however saying I saw nothing at all that floored me or made me think this an absolute must play. Right now it is at the "I will Rent it" stage for myself.

The way I see it, this game is Mirror's Edge with much more gun play and multi-player. The SMART movement system is probably not required, but it in my opinion will make the game much more fun than if the game didn't have it. I personally hate being limited to the set map paths many FPS games utilize. I would much rather be able to move around the level how I want to. Imagine if MW2 had this type of movement system, being able to jump up on buildings in the city and fight from up there and what not, rather than just being limited to the ground.

As for the sliding around I agree with you, by doing that they gave the impression that you must slide around in order to get behind cover which will get very annoying very fast.

I feel the same way you do, it definitely looks fun and I will likely end up getting it, but its nothing on the scale of how fun AC or AC2 looked in their respective trailers.....its not one of those games (IMO) that you see the trailer and put it at the top of your GamesToBuy list.

It looks like a generic FPS that's trying to innovate the team-based multiplayer space by changing very little from what we've already seen before...

Don't fix it when it's working, eh ? ;)

They were one of the first developers to do class based games, it's not like they suddenly jumped on the bandwagon for the money.

Don't fix it when it's working, eh ? ;)

They were one of the first developers to do class based games, it's not like they suddenly jumped on the bandwagon for the money.

Who said it was working? Quake Wars and Section 8 are the two recent games most similar to this just based on what I've seen in the videos, and those didn't do too hot.

Splash Damage wasn't one of the first, don't fool yourself. They did well with Enemy Territory, don't get me wrong, but one of the first? Not by a long shot.

What the..?

There have been tons of class-based multiplayer games. Battlefields, TF2, CoD(maybe :D didn't really play it).

I think he means games with settings like Brink (i.e. dark and drab, or as Yahtzee would put it, "graphics that look like they've been dunked in dirty dishwater").

What the..?

There have been tons of class-based multiplayer games. Battlefields, TF2, CoD(maybe :D didn't really play it).

Not to sound rude, but if you haven't played CoD, why list it?

And I said games most similar to this. Being class-based doesn't make it that similar.

Killzone 2 is class-based. Too bad that game is terrible

Could have been fantastic though with a less Team Fortress like system, a proper controller and a decent online community ... Should have been released on the 360 - Then it would have been a sweetheart of mine :p

I think the gimmick of KZ2's cover system as well as the "realistic handling" were its downfall. That made players spend too much time getting used to the controls than actually having fun.

This game made me hate the L2 button

The whole of KZ2 control system was not helped by a poor controller which isn't the best for FPS along with the stupid blur it had everytime you moved! I must say I did give it a change but it just didn't flow well for me but I am curious as to how this would have done on the 360, control wise!

Anyhow, back to Brink, need more videos to watch!

As for the Mirror's Edge effect, the problem with that is in Mirror's Edge, you had linear gameplay. There were only a couple possible paths within any area of the game. In Brink, virtually any object you see on screen can be used to jump over/slide under/climb, etc. Adding a Mirror's Edge effect would hardly help because its up to you to decide where you want to go and how you want to get there. Its too open to allow otherwise, its not like ME where you can simply ignore/run past enemies and be done with them. If you run past them they are likely to follow.

its not about linearity, its about context... unless they have the player movement so heavily tied into the physics that everything can be climbed onto, its still a neccessity to know which objects are valid gameplay elements and which are just decoration... its not like you will see the red with every step you take, but yeah there should be alot more than Mirror's Edge since Brink isnt linear...

  • 3 months later...

It looks interesting, and sure, if they have a beta I'll give it a shot, but I'll reserve my reservations about it until it actually gets some reviews. Note: I am the BIGGEST Bethesda Softworks fan alive.. and I'm kind of excited to see them branching into new territory, but this just makes me go :blink:.

I'm holding my breath for it though.

It's a spiritual sequel to Quake Wars. Borderlands was dire and shant be uttered in the same breath. :p

Linked this to DM this morning, looks well cool. :D

borderlands is an amazing game

i thought bethesda were just hte publishers? so they arent branching into a shoot-em-up at all

im looking forward to this, however the shooting didnt look too amazing but this is supposedly pre-alpha - those trailers (cant be?)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends. @WaltC - Memories, 2x Voodoo in SLI with a Riva TNT with an Aureal A3D soundcard.
    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!