Recommended Posts

Note: I am the BIGGEST Bethesda Softworks fan alive.. and I'm kind of excited to see them branching into new territory, but this just makes me go :blink:.

It's not actually being developed by Bethesda, they're just the publisher. The game is being developed by Splash Damage, the guys behind Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory (and a certain god-awful cross-over that shall not be named).

Saw some of the videos and it's looking really good. I just hope SD has redacted any memory of ever developing that one game and instead focuses on the past success of ET and translates that forward.

It's not actually being developed by Bethesda, they're just the publisher. The game is being developed by Splash Damage, the guys behind Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory (and a certain god-awful cross-over that shall not be named).

Saw some of the videos and it's looking really good. I just hope SD has redacted any memory of ever developing that one game and instead focuses on the past success of ET and translates that forward.

What are you on about?! ET:QW is GREAT! <3
  • 3 months later...

Now available on Steam for pre-order for ?29.99!

937478710.jpg

Kit out your Brink character with new and exclusive customization options. Containing an exclusive weapon, a new scope attachment, a slick combat mask, and a unique ?Dogtag? body tattoo, the Spec Ops Pack will put you amongst the Ark?s most elite warriors as you fight over the future of humanity?s last refuge.

  • Exclusive weapon: the ?Hockler? Machine-Pistol
  • Exclusive ?GreenEye? Combat Optical Scope
  • Exclusive Security ?Sloani? Combat Mask
  • Unique Dogtag body tattoo

  • 2 weeks later...

Borderlands had horrid single-player, I couldn't even stand playing through the single-player campaign and I'm the kind of person that plays a game for its story not gameplay.

I loved the concept of borderlands (graphic style and what not) but I just didn't like the game itself at all for some reason.

That being said, I hope Brink does a lot better on its singleplayer (that is, if Brink has a singleplayer.....from the sound of it they are going for 8-player campaign with no single player, but bots and what not would at least allow a sort of singleplayer experience).

I'm assuming those videos are played using a PC with an Xbox360 controller? It showed 360 controller prompts but there's no way the 360 is pushing out those visuals....

That aside, I've been reluctant in pre-ordering this for the PC - predicting it would be just another multi-class cluster-f*ck of 14 year olds who can't spell 'teamwork' without 'X' and 'P'. However the objective system looks like a nice simple way to make that less of an issue.

'A++ Would pre-order again'

I'm assuming those videos are played using a PC with an Xbox360 controller? ?It showed 360 controller prompts but there's no way the 360 is pushing out those visuals....

Possibly, but the game is being released on PC, Xbox 360 and PS3 and assuming its a simultaneous release, its very possible that graphics are going to be the same (or at least very similar) across all platforms. If they were made on the PC though, what kind of idiot would use an xbox controller for a FPS though? They would quite literally have to be stupid to use an Xbox controller when they have a mouse and keyboard available for FPS games.

If they were made on the PC though, what kind of idiot would use an xbox controller for a FPS though? They would quite literally have to be stupid to use an Xbox controller when they have a mouse and keyboard available for FPS games.

To sell glossy visuals to children on a console that can't handle them? I hate to be cynical but that kind of slick acting wouldn't surprise me in the least in the gaming industry of today. However most of all - my thoughts are fueled by the fact that I haven't seen a game on the 360 in a while that wasn't a Vaseline coated jagged mess at a range of less than 5 feet.

Console hardware remains the same. 5 years old. Games need to progress, and developers today are mostly not only cheap but also lazy. Therefore, content continues to increase - whilst visuals and the like, rather conspicuously I might add, continue to decline.

That being said, I hope Brink does a lot better on its singleplayer (that is, if Brink has a singleplayer.....from the sound of it they are going for 8-player campaign with no single player, but bots and what not would at least allow a sort of singleplayer experience).

The singleplayer is just like a multiplayer botmatch in Brink based on everything I've read. People eagerly anticipating the game will tell you otherwise, but every preview I've read, all the videos of it... it's just a botmatch.

The singleplayer is just like a multiplayer botmatch in Brink based on everything I've read. People eagerly anticipating the game will tell you otherwise, but every preview I've read, all the videos of it... it's just a botmatch.

That's fine by me so long as the multiplayer is up to the same level of quality as Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory was back in the day. I'd rather have them just focus on multiplayer, as opposed to having them divert resources to a single-player campaign that would probably end up sucking anyways.

I just watched that developer diary video, and I don't really know what to make of it. The gunplay was nothing special, and the environments had a very Borderlands-esque look to them. I wish they would have shown us an entire match, rather than just a bunch of random cuts with people getting shot. I'm yearning for the same kind of team-based gameplay that ET had, and I'm hoping that Splash Damage can deliver. This is still on the "wait and see" list for me.

The singleplayer is just like a multiplayer botmatch in Brink based on everything I've read. People eagerly anticipating the game will tell you otherwise, but every preview I've read, all the videos of it... it's just a botmatch.

As long as there is some form of singleplayer with somewhat of a storyline I will be at least partway interested in it....hopefully they release a demo for the game.

That's fine by me so long as the multiplayer is up to the same level of quality as Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory was back in the day. I'd rather have them just focus on multiplayer, as opposed to having them divert resources to a single-player campaign that would probably end up sucking anyways.

I hope not, I prefer singleplayer it games, mostly because the only game released anytime recently that has held my interest has been TF2, but that gets to both highs and lows with me. Up until a few days ago, I hadn't bothered launching TF2 because I was so bored with it. But, a few days ago I got some free time, and decided to get back into it a bit. That being said, I doubt Brink will have multiplayer that I personally find more interesting than TF2, but I can usually only stand to play 1 multiplayer FPS at a time, leaving little room for Brink multiplayer.

I personally wish devs would focus more on singleplayer though, great gameplay with a crappy story is as bad as a good story with horrible gameplay. Story is as important to the fun a game offers than gameplay.

  • 4 months later...

I hate that this game, and many others today, still continue to FORCE you to be a male. ESPECIALLY when they boast about heavy character customization. Customization should always include gender as well. All the silly customization options in the world don't matter one bit if I don't want to play as a GUY to begin with.

I hate that this game, and many others today, still continue to FORCE you to be a male. ESPECIALLY when they boast about heavy character customization. Customization should always include gender as well. All the silly customization options in the world don't matter one bit if I don't want to play as a GUY to begin with.

Their choice was in-depth customization for male characters or general customization for male and female characters. Unfortunately, they went with the former option and I can understand their decision. Brink is a game about customization. Everything from changing your appearance (fat vs. skinny) to changing what attatchments you have for your gun (scope vs. scope + silencer) affects your characters stats.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!