Recommended Posts

Note: I am the BIGGEST Bethesda Softworks fan alive.. and I'm kind of excited to see them branching into new territory, but this just makes me go :blink:.

It's not actually being developed by Bethesda, they're just the publisher. The game is being developed by Splash Damage, the guys behind Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory (and a certain god-awful cross-over that shall not be named).

Saw some of the videos and it's looking really good. I just hope SD has redacted any memory of ever developing that one game and instead focuses on the past success of ET and translates that forward.

It's not actually being developed by Bethesda, they're just the publisher. The game is being developed by Splash Damage, the guys behind Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory (and a certain god-awful cross-over that shall not be named).

Saw some of the videos and it's looking really good. I just hope SD has redacted any memory of ever developing that one game and instead focuses on the past success of ET and translates that forward.

What are you on about?! ET:QW is GREAT! <3
  • 3 months later...

Now available on Steam for pre-order for ?29.99!

937478710.jpg

Kit out your Brink character with new and exclusive customization options. Containing an exclusive weapon, a new scope attachment, a slick combat mask, and a unique ?Dogtag? body tattoo, the Spec Ops Pack will put you amongst the Ark?s most elite warriors as you fight over the future of humanity?s last refuge.

  • Exclusive weapon: the ?Hockler? Machine-Pistol
  • Exclusive ?GreenEye? Combat Optical Scope
  • Exclusive Security ?Sloani? Combat Mask
  • Unique Dogtag body tattoo

  • 2 weeks later...

Borderlands had horrid single-player, I couldn't even stand playing through the single-player campaign and I'm the kind of person that plays a game for its story not gameplay.

I loved the concept of borderlands (graphic style and what not) but I just didn't like the game itself at all for some reason.

That being said, I hope Brink does a lot better on its singleplayer (that is, if Brink has a singleplayer.....from the sound of it they are going for 8-player campaign with no single player, but bots and what not would at least allow a sort of singleplayer experience).

I'm assuming those videos are played using a PC with an Xbox360 controller? It showed 360 controller prompts but there's no way the 360 is pushing out those visuals....

That aside, I've been reluctant in pre-ordering this for the PC - predicting it would be just another multi-class cluster-f*ck of 14 year olds who can't spell 'teamwork' without 'X' and 'P'. However the objective system looks like a nice simple way to make that less of an issue.

'A++ Would pre-order again'

I'm assuming those videos are played using a PC with an Xbox360 controller? ?It showed 360 controller prompts but there's no way the 360 is pushing out those visuals....

Possibly, but the game is being released on PC, Xbox 360 and PS3 and assuming its a simultaneous release, its very possible that graphics are going to be the same (or at least very similar) across all platforms. If they were made on the PC though, what kind of idiot would use an xbox controller for a FPS though? They would quite literally have to be stupid to use an Xbox controller when they have a mouse and keyboard available for FPS games.

If they were made on the PC though, what kind of idiot would use an xbox controller for a FPS though? They would quite literally have to be stupid to use an Xbox controller when they have a mouse and keyboard available for FPS games.

To sell glossy visuals to children on a console that can't handle them? I hate to be cynical but that kind of slick acting wouldn't surprise me in the least in the gaming industry of today. However most of all - my thoughts are fueled by the fact that I haven't seen a game on the 360 in a while that wasn't a Vaseline coated jagged mess at a range of less than 5 feet.

Console hardware remains the same. 5 years old. Games need to progress, and developers today are mostly not only cheap but also lazy. Therefore, content continues to increase - whilst visuals and the like, rather conspicuously I might add, continue to decline.

That being said, I hope Brink does a lot better on its singleplayer (that is, if Brink has a singleplayer.....from the sound of it they are going for 8-player campaign with no single player, but bots and what not would at least allow a sort of singleplayer experience).

The singleplayer is just like a multiplayer botmatch in Brink based on everything I've read. People eagerly anticipating the game will tell you otherwise, but every preview I've read, all the videos of it... it's just a botmatch.

The singleplayer is just like a multiplayer botmatch in Brink based on everything I've read. People eagerly anticipating the game will tell you otherwise, but every preview I've read, all the videos of it... it's just a botmatch.

That's fine by me so long as the multiplayer is up to the same level of quality as Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory was back in the day. I'd rather have them just focus on multiplayer, as opposed to having them divert resources to a single-player campaign that would probably end up sucking anyways.

I just watched that developer diary video, and I don't really know what to make of it. The gunplay was nothing special, and the environments had a very Borderlands-esque look to them. I wish they would have shown us an entire match, rather than just a bunch of random cuts with people getting shot. I'm yearning for the same kind of team-based gameplay that ET had, and I'm hoping that Splash Damage can deliver. This is still on the "wait and see" list for me.

The singleplayer is just like a multiplayer botmatch in Brink based on everything I've read. People eagerly anticipating the game will tell you otherwise, but every preview I've read, all the videos of it... it's just a botmatch.

As long as there is some form of singleplayer with somewhat of a storyline I will be at least partway interested in it....hopefully they release a demo for the game.

That's fine by me so long as the multiplayer is up to the same level of quality as Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory was back in the day. I'd rather have them just focus on multiplayer, as opposed to having them divert resources to a single-player campaign that would probably end up sucking anyways.

I hope not, I prefer singleplayer it games, mostly because the only game released anytime recently that has held my interest has been TF2, but that gets to both highs and lows with me. Up until a few days ago, I hadn't bothered launching TF2 because I was so bored with it. But, a few days ago I got some free time, and decided to get back into it a bit. That being said, I doubt Brink will have multiplayer that I personally find more interesting than TF2, but I can usually only stand to play 1 multiplayer FPS at a time, leaving little room for Brink multiplayer.

I personally wish devs would focus more on singleplayer though, great gameplay with a crappy story is as bad as a good story with horrible gameplay. Story is as important to the fun a game offers than gameplay.

  • 4 months later...

I hate that this game, and many others today, still continue to FORCE you to be a male. ESPECIALLY when they boast about heavy character customization. Customization should always include gender as well. All the silly customization options in the world don't matter one bit if I don't want to play as a GUY to begin with.

I hate that this game, and many others today, still continue to FORCE you to be a male. ESPECIALLY when they boast about heavy character customization. Customization should always include gender as well. All the silly customization options in the world don't matter one bit if I don't want to play as a GUY to begin with.

Their choice was in-depth customization for male characters or general customization for male and female characters. Unfortunately, they went with the former option and I can understand their decision. Brink is a game about customization. Everything from changing your appearance (fat vs. skinny) to changing what attatchments you have for your gun (scope vs. scope + silencer) affects your characters stats.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      459
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!