Halo Reach Thread


Recommended Posts

wow graphics actually look much better than Halo3/ODST. As good as screenshots! (granted only one screenshot above but still!)

wait a min, hold X to swap? That wasn´t in H3 right?

dual wielding is gone, back to Halo1 baby! cool.gif I don't remember reading about controls layout yet but I think X will be same as Halo1 and RB will be for engaging AA.

wow graphics actually look much better than Halo3/ODST. As good as screenshots! (granted only one screenshot above but still!)

I?m not sure if its the graphics or the lighting engine as the lights almost blinded me :yes:

dual wielding is gone, back to Halo1 baby! cool.gif

that?s what I was thinking but wasn?t sure. Haven?t touched H3 in about a year.

I?m not sure if its the graphics or the lighting engine as the lights almost blinded me :yes:

that?s what I was thinking but wasn?t sure. Haven?t touched H3 in about a year.

Probably both. The lighting is definitely toned down and has somewhat pastel look to it.

It does look great for a console game tbh. I?m interested how the health system works, if it is a direct rip from ODST or not. My guess it is but tweaked. BTW, any idea what the icon in the far left is? Guessin equipment?

No equipments in Reach, may be icon for one of the Armor Abilities? :/

Lol he forgot to remove his gamertag in the game screenshot, might be screwed big time!

http://live.xbox.com/en-US/profile/profile.aspx?pp=0&GamerTag=Jester%20the%20bro

dual wielding is gone, back to Halo1 baby! cool.gif

I actually didn't know about that until now. I'm not entirely sure how I feel about that. I never used the dual weapons much in Halo 3, and the general consensus on the Bungie forums appears to be positive, so I suppose I shouldn't be too worked up. That said, I did like messing with sword campers on The Pit/Pit Stop with my dual maulers :).

Some new multiplayer modes were revealed by Bungle: http://www.joystiq.com/2010/04/14/halo-reach-multiplayer-modes-blown-wide-open/

Not too sure about Headhunter, but Stockpile and Generator Defence sound pretty fun. Here's hoping the new modes are actually good, unlike Braiiins and Run for Cover from Halo 3.

There's quite a bit of footage of the multiplayer in the newest episode of GameTrailers TV: http://www.gametrailers.com/episode/gametrailers-tv/89&ch=1&sd=0?ep=89&ch=1&sd=0

A few things:

1. I wonder if assassinations are mapped to the same button as the regular melee, like in Halo 3. It looks like assassinations are more time consuming than regular melee attacks, and it would definitely suck if you had the ability to kill a weak enemy with a beatdown, only to accidentally go for an assassination instead and get interrupted.

2. T-bagging is still there :). There's a brief shot of an Elite t-bagging... the ground.

3. I wonder if Spartans and Elites will be balanced. I suppose that's what the multiplayer beta is for.

4. New battle rifle looks awesome.

5. Still no word on whether or not 4-player online splitscreen is in. My crew wants this so badly, even if they have to lower the graphical settings on each of the screens in order to do it.

There's quite a bit of footage of the multiplayer in the newest episode of GameTrailers TV: http://www.gametrailers.com/episode/gametrailers-tv/89&ch=1&sd=0?ep=89&ch=1&sd=0

A few things:

1. I wonder if assassinations are mapped to the same button as the regular melee, like in Halo 3. It looks like assassinations are more time consuming than regular melee attacks, and it would definitely suck if you had the ability to kill a weak enemy with a beatdown, only to accidentally go for an assassination instead and get interrupted.

2. T-bagging is still there :). There's a brief shot of an Elite t-bagging... the ground.

3. I wonder if Spartans and Elites will be balanced. I suppose that's what the multiplayer beta is for.

4. New battle rifle looks awesome.

5. Still no word on whether or not 4-player online splitscreen is in. My crew wants this so badly, even if they have to lower the graphical settings on each of the screens in order to do it.

AFAIK

1. Hold B for a longer more stylish assassination or just press it to beatdown.

3. Elites and Spartans are not balanced, if by balanced you mean the same. They are different sizes with different amounts of health, different shield systems, and different abilities.

5. 4 Player local is in the beta, only system link is not.

AFAIK

1. Hold B for a longer more stylish assassination or just press it to beatdown.

3. Elites and Spartans are not balanced, if by balanced you mean the same. They are different sizes with different amounts of health, different shield systems, and different abilities.

5. 4 Player local is in the beta, only system link is not.

1. Nice. Just what I wanted :)

3. From what I've read, it sounds like the Elites are quite superior to the Spartans. I was hoping that even after the asymmetry, each side would have their own strengths and weaknesses, but Elites appear to have an advantage over the Spartans (more health, more shield, faster shield regen, no need for health packs). According to Giant Bomb, the Arena games are only going to have Spartans vs Spartans and Elites vs Elites, so perhaps I'm getting worked up over nothing. I was afraid that Arena matches were going to let you choose whether or not you wanted to be a Spartan or an Elite (like Halo 3), in which case everybody would choose Elite.

5. Also nice. That was my group's biggest fear about the game, since we use 4-player local all the time.

1. Nice. Just what I wanted :)

3. From what I've read, it sounds like the Elites are quite superior to the Spartans. I was hoping that even after the asymmetry, each side would have their own strengths and weaknesses, but Elites appear to have an advantage over the Spartans (more health, more shield, faster shield regen, no need for health packs). According to Giant Bomb, the Arena games are only going to have Spartans vs Spartans and Elites vs Elites, so perhaps I'm getting worked up over nothing. I was afraid that Arena matches were going to let you choose whether or not you wanted to be a Spartan or an Elite (like Halo 3), in which case everybody would choose Elite.

5. Also nice. That was my group's biggest fear about the game, since we use 4-player local all the time.

I think it's all levelled out except for Generator Defence in the beta, which may not even be in the final game (hopefully it will be). That's always Spartans Defending uphill to Elites that begin downhill. Then there's Invasion which I think is Spartans vs Elites iirc :wacko:

They would never allow the Reach Elites to go up against regular Spartans in Arena matches n jus normal matchmaking, as that's why they had to alter the Elites in Halo 3 - i.e. the stooping etc.

Hmmm, despite not being a Halo fan this does look quite interesting - Hopefully I'll get to try the Beta and make up my mind :)

Get somebody to fork over their ODST disk :). If you're more into military shooters, then it's probably not going to be a very good fit, but it never hurts to try. Besides, the 360 is pretty starved for competitive multiplayer games right now.

You have to use natal to teabag though so you look ridiculous irl :p

If Natal had support for Halo Reach t-bagging, I would buy it just for that ;).

I think it's all levelled out except for Generator Defence in the beta, which may not even be in the final game (hopefully it will be). That's always Spartans Defending uphill to Elites that begin downhill. Then there's Invasion which I think is Spartans vs Elites iirc :wacko:

They would never allow the Reach Elites to go up against regular Spartans in Arena matches n jus normal matchmaking, as that's why they had to alter the Elites in Halo 3 - i.e. the stooping etc.

I believe you are right about Invasion. I'm not worried about Invasion at all (in fact, I'm looking forward to it) since at least Bungie can balance that game mode out on a map-by-map basis i.e. give the Spartans a terrain advantage and a weapon advantage (or a numbers advantage) on each of the three tiers to offset their lower health and shields.

I believe you are right about Invasion. I'm not worried about Invasion at all (in fact, I'm looking forward to it) since at least Bungie can balance that game mode out on a map-by-map basis i.e. give the Spartans a terrain advantage and a weapon advantage (or a numbers advantage) on each of the three tiers to offset their lower health and shields.

It's going to be immense :jump:

Embargo lifted

Eurogamers hands on

Hello! Like a lot of concerned citizens, for the past few weeks I've been very worried about jetpacks. How worried? Well, if I was writing about it in a text, I would write, "I'm *very worried* about all these jetpacks. (LOL)."

I don't mean I've been fretting about jetpacks because of their awful carbon footprint, or that I've been panicking over whether or not they'll spoil the nation's youth with idleness. No, I've been worrying about something far more serious: I've been worrying about how they're going to fit into Halo.

I've been worrying that they'll bust multiplayer right open, turning matches into nasty little bee storms filled with buzzing annoyances, that they'll break the game's tight convergence of weapons, environments and tactics, and that, really, they're only there as a gimmick to tempt people back from Modern Warfare 2.

More at link :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
    • Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount by Taras Buria In late January 2026, Apple introduced its second-generation AirTag trackers, bringing a refresh to the old model that has been on the market for half a decade. Now, you can get these new trackers at an all-time low price, thanks to the first big discount that brought the price down by 17% on Amazon. While the second-generation AirTag looks identical to its predecessor, it packs meaningful upgrades inside. The second-gen ultrawideband chip works 50% farther than the original AirTag, allowing you to detect lost items in a wider range. In addition, the second-generation AirTag features an upgraded Bluetooth chip for extended range and a significantly louder speaker (up to 50%) so that you can hear it better when locating a lost item. Note that the second-gen AirTag only works with iPhones and iPads that run iOS/iPadOS 26 and newer, so you need a compatible device to use the tracker. Like the original AirTag, the AirTag 2 is available in two packs: one and four pieces. Both are now available at a notable discount on Amazon, and you can purchase them using the links below. Apple AirTag 2 tracker - $24 | 17% off on Amazon Apple AirTag 2 tracker (four-pack) - $89 | 10% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S.- specific and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!