Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Pork Chopper said:

It's a freaking TV show don't analyze too much. :-)

A show is supposed to respect its internal logic. Since GoT is portrait as a realistic medieval setting, bar the magic, crap like that really kills enjoyment for me. And it's not like they couldn't have the same scenes but logical.

Spoiler

Instead of Ramsey firing one arrow at a time have his whole army fire on the dodging Rickon. Or have Jon Snow's army blocked by piles of corpses and Winterfell's walls if you want them surrounded. Piles of corpses make a lot more sense against a wall than in an open field.

But no, Dumb & Dumber had to go full retard again.

Just now, Luc2k said:

Since GoT is portrait as a realistic medieval setting, bar the magic

And the dragons, and the giants, and the white walkers, and the wall. It's called Fantasy for a reason. It's not meant to be grounded in anything. 

6 minutes ago, John. said:

And the dragons, and the giants, and the white walkers, and the wall. It's called Fantasy for a reason. It's not meant to be grounded in anything. 

You missed the last part of what I wrote "bar the magic" which includes all that you mentioned.

 

Now try to explain to me, using those fantasy elements how the corpses gathered themselves in neat, several meters high, piles or why

Spoiler

Rickon ran in a straight line.

 

2 minutes ago, Luc2k said:

You missed the last part of what I wrote "bar the magic" which includes all that you mentioned.

 

Now try to explain to me, using those fantasy elements how the corpses gathered themselves in neat, several meters high, piles or why

  Reveal hidden contents

Rickon ran in a straight line.

 

I personally don't think they're things that need explaining. If you're not happy with it, you can't exactly change it. What you saw was what the producers wanted you to see. It's up to you whether you're happy or not with it.

Just now, John. said:

I personally don't think they're things that need explaining. If you're not happy with it, you can't exactly change it. What you saw was what the producers wanted you to see. It's up to you whether you're happy or not with it.

The only explanation is bad writing and that isn't in-universe.

 

Yeah, well, I'll express my disappointment all the same. You see, I used to love this show and really believed it was going to be one of the greatest, however, with each new episode it gets closer and closer to nonsensical mediocrity.

Leave it to Luc2k to be dissatisfied with the episode, like for real dawg... Ramsay intentionally fired the arrows at all men, including his own, to create the corpse blockade, so that the phalanx could surround them. Was the corpse wall too high? Yeah, for sure it was. Was it wide enough so that people couldn't have passed around it, instead piled on top of it? Probably not. But not everything has to be super realistic, the gist of the idea was that Ramsay created a corpse wall and surrounded the soldiers, that I'm satisfied with. Also, one thing the episode really managed to get through well, was the sense of chaos and anxiety during the battle. Even Jon didn't know what he was doing, so there's another reason to suspend your disbelief about how high the corpse wall was and why they didn't go around it.

 

Also, whoever mentioned Sansa and not telling Jon about knights of the Vale: that was exactly the point. She warned him that Ramsay will play his games and that he would turn Jon's tactics on him, which he did - he lured him with Rickon and made the Stark & co. soldiers charge, which is exactly what Ramsay wanted and what Jon shouldn't have done. Had she told him, he would have probably wanted to use the cavalry right from the start. Doing it as she did, Sansa managed to surprise Ramsay, which again, was her point.

  • Like 2
17 minutes ago, Syanide said:

Leave it to Luc2k to be dissatisfied with the episode

As always, the voice of reason :D

17 minutes ago, Syanide said:

Ramsay intentionally fired the arrows at all men, including his own, to create the corpse blockade, so that the phalanx could surround them.

That doesn't really sound like legitimate and probable outcome in an open field. Sure, you may be OK with it as a means to an end, but I've already offered a better location for Jon's army getting pinned and I'm no writer.

 

Anyway, if you remember, it seems I was wrong about the whole giving Rickon as an hostage. What we saw was what we got, no intrigue, nothing.

Edited by Luc2k
14 minutes ago, Syanide said:

Also, whoever mentioned Sansa and not telling Jon about knights of the Vale: that was exactly the point. She warned him that Ramsay will play his games and that he would turn Jon's tactics on him, which he did - he lured him with Rickon and made the Stark & co. soldiers charge, which is exactly what Ramsay wanted and what Jon shouldn't have done. Had she told him, he would have probably wanted to use the cavalry right from the start. Doing it as she did, Sansa managed to surprise Ramsay, which again, was her point.

While plausible, its still a bitch move and no better than what Ramsay did with his corpse wall.  She's evil.  Ned would not approve.

4 minutes ago, Luc2k said:

That doesn't really sound like legitimate and probable outcome in an open field. Sure, you may be OK with it as an means to an end, but I've already offered a better location for Jon's army getting pinned and I'm no writer.

I agree with that, left it way to long to come to the rescue. It was very Gandalf-look to me on the dawn of the 5th day-esque.

This was a GREAT episode. Really got me on the edge from start to finish. 

Spoiler

I didn't expect Sansa's arrival, totally forgot about her during that battle. In fact, I was already thinking that Jon will be captured and how on earth he'll get out of this one :laugh:Anyway, one of the scenes that was "wow" for me is the one in the attachment. Beautiful!

 

Capturex.png

  • Like 2

@Luc2k: Everything can be done in a better way, but your level of criticism just to draw disenjoyment from something astounds me. This was a massively satisfying and engaging hour of television, with a battle that was pure carnage, that managed to translate the feelings of chaos, anxiety and claustrophobia that a close combat would probably have. Someone mentioned Saving Private Ryan to me, that's exactly what it felt like to me. Pure and utter chaos. The scene with Jon being trampled, that was masterfully pulled off. To watch all of that, and then focus on the fact that the reality of formations in regards to the battlefield wasn't super realistic, I don't know...

33 minutes ago, John. said:

I agree with that, left it way to long to come to the rescue. It was very Gandalf-look to me on the dawn of the 5th day-esque.

Not sure why you quoted me about that, but I'm oddly OK with it. Sure, it would be better if it didn't happen that way, but on the other hand it's a movie thing and I guess I'm accustomed to it. The Bolton's semicircle of death sure took it's time killing them though so I guess it evens out with LF's arrival, then again Ramsey might have wanted to toy with them.

26 minutes ago, Syanide said:

@Luc2k: Everything can be done in a better way, but your level of criticism just to draw disenjoyment from something astounds me. This was a massively satisfying and engaging hour of television, with a battle that was pure carnage, that managed to translate the feelings of chaos, anxiety and claustrophobia that a close combat would probably have. Someone mentioned Saving Private Ryan to me, that's exactly what it felt like to me. Pure and utter chaos. The scene with Jon being trampled, that was masterfully pulled off. To watch all of that, and then focus on the fact that the reality of formations in regards to the battlefield wasn't super realistic, I don't know...

Well, the Mereen "negotiations" would figure into "satisfying and engaging" for me although I would have liked to see some attempts at attacking the dragons. Dany and Yara's "Oh, you're a woman that wants power? What a coincidence, let's have sex!" was meh.

 

First problem with the battle was that Rickon happened, which started the mild annoyance, but I did see "a battle that was pure carnage, that managed to translate the feelings of chaos, anxiety and claustrophobia that a close combat would probably have" until the mountains of corpses reveal, at which point, I was completely disengaged. It's not like go into each episode expecting to be disappointed.. well I do, but never to this degree.

 

Take the previous two episodes. I didn't post because there wasn't much to complain about, apart from the Blackfish's stupid death. Should have written how ecstatic I was that Dondarion was the one still alive and not LS.

According to the behind the episode thing, the dead bodies piling up is based on historical fact. Bodies would pile up and cause obstructions during big battles back in medieval times. Still, having them pile up in one big clump like in the show was kind of far fetched. I'm sure it didn't get quite that bad way back when.

Couldn't the high pile of bodies been caused by men trying to advance over the bodies and getting killed by arrows?  This went on and on.  Of course it seems they could have gone around.  I think the The 300 movie had bodies pile up but they were in a narrow pass with a mountain on one side and a cliff on the other.

3 hours ago, Luc2k said:

I dare anyone to offer a good explanation for this dumb ######. Why would anyone even fight on unstable footing (the corpses) when there's perfectly frozen ground all around.

 

field 2.jpg

This is the most real answer i can offer. Its a freaking TV show about a fantasy series of novels. what did you expect realism?

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!