Recommended Posts

So does anyone know if there will be any beta updates for this game or will it just be a mass fix at the end and hope that it cures all?

They made a post about that to summarize it was along the lines of: "If we have time to knock out another release with some of the fixes implemented we will".

They made a post about that to summarize it was along the lines of: "If we have time to knock out another release with some of the fixes implemented we will".

Sigh..I hope they realize that they have a great opportunity to make a game that will be around for a long time & I hope they are taking it as serious as the FPS gaming community is. They have the potential to get at least half of the MW2 community to change plus the whole BF2 community as well.

Gametrailers just posted a PC Beta montage. The biggest thing I noticed, other than the player sucked LOL, is that some of the sniper shots were definitely kills, but were never recorded.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/pc-beta-battlefield-bad/61456

Gametrailers just posted a PC Beta montage. The biggest thing I noticed, other than the player sucked LOL, is that some of the sniper shots were definitely kills, but were never recorded.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/pc-beta-battlefield-bad/61456

Whoever was playing sucks, a lot.

I have to say I will be hugely disappointed if they do not patch the PC beta not just once but multiple times as that is afterall the point of having a beta to begin with. To fix everything that may be an issue before launch. Their approach is far to casual and really leaves me to believe their priorities are all in the wrong places.

  • Like 2

I went to play a game today and as I get into the game I notice I can't use any of my unlocks. Anyone else have this happen to them? Is it for certain servers or what? I used the Play Now button.

I think there are some unranked servers out there. You might have "Played now" into one of those perhaps.

I have to say I will be hugely disappointed if they do not patch the PC beta not just once but multiple times as that is afterall the point of having a beta to begin with. To fix everything that may be an issue before launch. Their approach is far to casual and really leaves me to believe their priorities are all in the wrong places.

Just gave you +1

Yeah I hope they at least show us the fixes and improvements before the Beta closes. At the moment, the Beta makes me wondering whether I should cancel my pre-order or not (I know it's still Beta, but I want to know whether it's going to be roughly the same or it will be different in retail)

I have to say I will be hugely disappointed if they do not patch the PC beta not just once but multiple times as that is afterall the point of having a beta to begin with. To fix everything that may be an issue before launch. Their approach is far to casual and really leaves me to believe their priorities are all in the wrong places.

The point of the beta is more to fix things in the final game then patching the beta. I wouldn't mind it if they patched it through, just so we can see some of the improvements the final game will have.

The developers twitter feed said they will have around 3 updates for the beta before it ends & they already launched one the other day I don't know what game you guys are playing lol. Also now that I have gotten some time to tweak the settings in the config I am much more happy with the game. I dropped it to dx9 and all the bugs went away for me even the keyboard sticking problem...also take that damn bloom effect off it's a major performance hit and it looks so hideous. This config can be found in your My Documents folder in the BF BC2 Beta folder called 'settings', just edit and save and bam game looks and feels a-lot better.

I guess it makes sense this game is CPU heavy. PS3 and Xbox both have multiple cores. Quad might need to start being the standard. I am not sure why the graphics cards are having such issues....

I sure hope they have some magic code.

It makes sense for a console graphics engine, but not a PC one. This post scares me:

Originally Posted by Holden

The game is much more processor intensive. Meaning the game is more optimized for consoles, and consoles have the large majority of real time processing allocated into the CPU. You know the whole procedural rendering thing, and the LOD loading, which is basically a function for loading objects, or increasing detail and loading specular, bumps, and detail maps? That is a system that is entirely catered to, and only beneficial to consoles.

The real performance bottleneck for consoles is memory, whether it be cache, graphics memory, DDR memory, they have limited memory all together. They need this real time loading system to run the game well, because they're much better at processing things then keeping them on reserve on their practically non-existent RAM.

[...]

SOURCE

I didn't think I'd resort to this but I might just edit the settings.ini file to get more performance out of the game. Change the dxlevel to 9, disable bloom, etc.

EDIT: I found this. It looks like a configuration utility for the game. I haven't tried it yet, but I assume it edits the settings.ini file on the fly.

Here's a screenshot...

lisedasconfig.png

It makes sense for a console graphics engine, but not a PC one. This post scares me:

SOURCE

I didn't think I'd resort to this but I might just edit the settings.ini file to get more performance out of the game. Change the dxlevel to 9, disable bloom, etc.

EDIT: I found this. It looks like a configuration utility for the game. I haven't tried it yet, but I assume it edits the settings.ini file on the fly.

Here's a screenshot...

lisedasconfig.png

Urgh, I have to have my keyboard and mouse. That is saddening that the PC engine got the shaft, especially from DICE.

The thing is, COD MW2 streams textures as well...

Nothing got the shaft, the game looks stunning and runs great on the PC.

While I agree it works fine for some ( including me, 50-80 FPS) it works quite poor for others. Why else would there be complaints? There were not complaints of this magnitude for MW2 performance. I can't help but to think it can be optimized quite a bit better. I will concede that this is by no means unplayable, it is not a Crysis. I just think people with the 8800GT and a dual core should probably be able to player decently at medium settings. A Xbox 360 is not more powerful than that...

And remember the beta doesn't even really have the 'high' detail settings. The final game will looks better, and will be better optimized as well. The build they chose for the beta was 6 weeks old. DICE said they wanted to choose the most stable build at the time over one with newer content.

While I agree it works fine for some ( including me, 50-80 FPS) it works quite poor for others. Why else would there be complaints? There were not complaints of this magnitude for MW2 performance. I can't help but to think it can be optimized quite a bit better. I will concede that this is by no means unplayable, it is not a Crysis. I just think people with the 8800GT and a dual core should probably be able to player decently at medium settings. A Xbox 360 is not more powerful than that...

Because this is a Beta which is the keyword, DICE have already said they are working on optimization and the Beta is even an old build!

No way can you judge final performance at this point.

How do you guys think this would run on a Quad Core Q6600, 8800 GT, with 4GB of RAM?

I think you can manage 45fps at medium-high settings. (Y)

As for the game's performance, I have no doubt that it will be optimized. I just hope those optimizations make it to the beta. The "it's fixed in the retail version" excuse is lame.

The developers twitter feed said they will have around 3 updates for the beta before it ends & they already launched one the other day I don't know what game you guys are playing lol. Also now that I have gotten some time to tweak the settings in the config I am much more happy with the game. I dropped it to dx9 and all the bugs went away for me even the keyboard sticking problem...also take that damn bloom effect off it's a major performance hit and it looks so hideous. This config can be found in your My Documents folder in the BF BC2 Beta folder called 'settings', just edit and save and bam game looks and feels a-lot better.

Can you post your config choices? I honestly feel like this game is going to be as bad as Counter Strike where we are all working on nice configs and posting them.

Can you post your config choices? I honestly feel like this game is going to be as bad as Counter Strike where we are all working on nice configs and posting them.

All I did was change the DX level to 9 & set everything to high settings..DISABLED bloom..and whatever that bsoa setting is I chose to enable it. HOWEVER in dx9 I dont think that setting works as I saw no performance hit in dx9 with it on & also you CANNOT enable AA while using dx9 in this beta. With those setting chose I got my fps at 80ish down to 40's in firefights also one thing to remember is im using a quad core with a 4870

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This seems backwards. You should have to explicitly authorize files for outside use. It shouldn't be the default.
    • Wow you are right, I never even noticed this until you said it! (870E Aorus Master) Before testing this card I had a TP-Link tx401 10GbE PCIe card in that slot (now using XikeStor 310 Thunderbolt to Ethernet adapter).
    • Lack of 5.1 makes this a no sale. What I really wish creative would make would be a USB version that supports 5.1 analog audio for speakers, can switch to headphone mode, and matches the specs of their top tier cards. The current X870E AMD motherboards dont have a great option for adding a PCIE x1 card without cutting down pcie lanes to the graphics card.
    • The Microsoft Office feature that time forgot by Usama Jawad I have been actively using Microsoft Word for the past couple of decades in academic, professional, and personal capacities. Although I used it through the perpetual version of Office apps at the start, I have been an active subscriber of Microsoft 365 Family subscription for over five years now. This means that my Word installation is regularly updated with new features, some of which I don't really like, but that's beside the point. As new features get continuously added, old ones that used to be a staple of Word have started to take a backseat. While I was reminiscing over my Windows experiences from my childhood today, I suddenly remember one such capability that I heavily used in my younger years but have not really touched in over a decade, and haven't seen in documents created by others either. That feature is WordArt. Just to clarify, WordArt is not a Microsoft product specific to Word, and is included in other Office apps like PowerPoint and Excel too. However, Microsoft Word is the app that I used Word Art in heavily, while making assignments or other deliverables for school. If you're unaware, WordArt offers a collection of styling techniques for text, introducing 3D effects like shadows and reflections in the text. It used to be one of the coolest things ever when I was at school and me and my classmates would often compete to ensure that our assignment's title in WordArt was truly the best and stood out above the rest. See some examples of WordArt, still present in the latest versions of Word below: Although WordArt is undeniably cool, it has taken a bit of a backseat, and has been relegated from the Home tab to the Insert toolbar, along with a bunch of other utilities, making it very easy to miss. This isn't exactly surprising because WordArt doesn't really have a place in academic and professional documents anymore, and while I have seen some creatives using it while developing promo material, even that sector has gravitated more towards dedicated graphic designing tools in the past years. For the vast majority of us, WordArt doesn't really exist, and that's alright. At least, it's still an option that can allow us to reminisce our childhood or even make some quick text stylization, if we really need it. Perhaps its usage has waned over time or the novelty has worn off, but I haven't even seen children use it in their academic assignments anymore. In fact, many don't even know that it exists. Maybe that's the fate of every beloved feature. What once felt cutting edge eventually becomes a relic, quietly tucked away as tastes, trends, and technology move on. WordArt may no longer dominate school assignments or decorate the covers of classroom projects, but for those of us who grew up with it, it remains a colorful reminder of a time when making text glow, bend, and cast giant shadows felt like the height of creativity. Hidden behind a few clicks in modern Word, it still survives not as a productivity tool, but as a small piece of computing nostalgia that refuses to disappear.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      158
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!