Recommended Posts

hi

can i set group permissions on the server, which would apply to a folder that resides on a client pc ?

ex:

1) permission for a user who is trying to access some folder on the local pc which he is logged on

2) .... on some other local pc in the domain

in general, is there any difference in the approach if resources are on client pc's or on the server ?

no. you can set what groups get what permissions on the pc as well as the server. it can be security or it can be file/folder level.

and how do i manage permissions on pc's resources (folders), locally or remotely on the server ?

is there a centralized management of share permissions of all computers in the domain ?

and also there could be a permission conflict between local admin and server admin regarding access of some local folder.

i mean local admin could grant access to a group whereas the server admin could deny it (if he could, in the first place), and vice versa.

which one takes precedence?

(as for ntfs /security/, i suppose i cannot change ntfs permissions of the local pc's from the server.)

pcs are done at the pc level. you could always remote into the pc's. if you are an admin of the pc, doesn't matter if local admin or server admin (both are admins of the pc) yes they can control who has access to what. this is why you don't give a user admin rights over the pc and you also don't give a user the administrator password of anything (local or domain).

ntfs/share permissions are done at the server/pc/laptop/device you want to give access to. in otherwords, if I wanted to give you access to my pc I would have to be on my pc to do it. If i wanted to give you access to the server I would be on the server to do it. There is a reason you don't do shares on pc's, it is because you don't have as much control over them as you do the servers. Servers you know some dumbass isn't going to shut it down for whatever reason. Servers you know someone isn't going to muck up because they went out to a bad site on it. You don't share out pc's unless absolutely necessary. there is no reason for it. You make home drives on servers and redirect their documents and desktop to it, that way everything is backed up during your daily backup and aren't wasting time going over the network. There is a lot more to this than just setting up AD, it does require a little bit of thought and the abiltiy to have policies pushed down their throats without them knowing.

pcs are done at the pc level. you could always remote into the pc's. if you are an admin of the pc, doesn't matter if local admin or server admin (both are admins of the pc) yes they can control who has access to what. this is why you don't give a user admin rights over the pc and you also don't give a user the administrator password of anything (local or domain).

understood (Y)

i thought that dc admin has some centralized management of all shared folders of the domain.

so the admin just creates groups, and what that groups can do, must be specified locally (either on the server itself /if network folders reside on the server/, or on the pc's if they reside on client comps ?

edit:

ok, i didnt see your edited post.

its the answer to my question.

thanks

got the point thanks.

you know, it takes some time to transform from workgroup to domain logic :)

when you are ready to setup let me know. I will help you out/remote in and do it, you can learn how not to pigeon toe yourself. I don't know what you did on your test network, but it doesn't compute properly.

Really slow, and it is **** blocking you somewhere. I can go through your settings to see what they look like, it was really ugly. unless you are using a 10 base T hub (I know you aren't). or you are using home made patch cables and didn't crimp the casing into the end, leaving the wires exposed over an inch (they are already exposed about 1/2" in the end, which is all that should be exposed).

when you are ready to setup let me know. I will help you out/remote in and do it, you can learn how not to pigeon toe yourself. I don't know what you did on your test network, but it doesn't compute properly.

Really slow, and it is **** blocking you somewhere. I can go through your settings to see what they look like, it was really ugly. unless you are using a 10 base T hub (I know you aren't). or you are using home made patch cables and didn't crimp the casing into the end, leaving the wires exposed over an inch (they are already exposed about 1/2" in the end, which is all that should be exposed).

i have 100Mb (4 port) router and factory made cables, and on 2 of 3 machines i dont have any blocking software active, but i think the problem with remote apps is because my internet speed.

its 4M/256(upload) cable. :/

also, it could be due to some old dns servers. i have received addresses of a new pair of dns servers from my provider, so i'll set them and will see.

thanks for your offer. when it comes to real implementation in the firm, i'd appreciate any help.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I agree when are you going to read this (really poor BTW) article? Here is a better article so you actually know what is going on and answers questions you had in other comments --> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/05/speed-boosting-low-latency-profile-is-one-of-the-improvements-coming-to-windows-11/ It is unclear if one will be able to disable the new profile at this point but I am not seeing any reason why one would.
    • I disagree; they come off very "bitchy" and "whiny". Make a great product and combine that with a great price (free) and people will come over to your side. Or build it and they will come as they say. Constantly trying to get attention by complaining all the time, will turn people off to your product.
    • It use to be a nightmare, with LibreOffice supporting a newer draft ODF standard by default, and Microsoft Office supporting the older non-draft standard. Now that they both support the same version of ODF, they should be interoperable.
    • Brave Browser 1.91.171 by Razvan Serea Brave Browser is a lightning-fast, secure web browser that stands out from the competition with its focus on privacy, security, and speed. With features like HTTPS Everywhere and built-in tracker blocking, Brave keeps your online activities safe from prying eyes. Brave is one of the safest browsers on the market today. It blocks third-party data storage. It protects from browser fingerprinting. And it does all this by default. Speed - Brave is built on Chromium, the same technology that powers Google Chrome, and is optimized for speed, providing a fast and responsive browsing experience. Brave Browser also features Brave Rewards, a system that rewards users with Basic Attention Tokens (BAT) for viewing opt-in ads. This innovative system provides an alternative revenue model for content creators and a way to support the Brave community. SlimBrave Neo takes all the good things about Brave and makes them even better by keeping everything clean, light, and privacy-focused. It removes the extra clutter, turns off features you might not need, and cuts down on anything that could slow you down or collect unnecessary data. Because it relies on simple settings and policies instead of modifying the browser itself, you still get full Brave compatibility—just in a smoother, lighter, and more privacy-friendly package. Brave Browser 1.91.171 changelog: General Fixed Cardano not being disabled on upgrade to Brave Origin. Upgraded Chromium to 149.0.7827.103. Origin Removed “Survey Panelist” setting from brave://settings/privacy. Fixed P3A and usage ping under brave://settings/privacy being displayed on first launch on Linux. Upgraded Chromium to 149.0.7827.103. Download: Brave Browser 64-bit | 1.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Brave Browser 32-bit View: Brave Homepage | Offline Installers | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hi. As the title suggests, I can't access the forum on my phone. I'm using Edge on Android and when I try to navigate to the forum I get a "we value your privacy" popup and none of the buttons are clickable. It effectively stonewalls me from reading any forum content.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      190
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!