World Cup 2010: South Africa ponders vuvuzela ban


Recommended Posts

874010773.jpg

South Africa's World Cup organising chief Danny Jordaan may ban vuvuzelas from inside stadiums after complaints from broadcasters and supporters.

The constant sound of the high-pitched horn-like instrument has so far drowned out much of the atmosphere-generating singing usually associated with games.

And Jordaan, when asked if he would get rid of them, told BBC Sport: "If there are grounds to do so, yes.

"We did say that if any land on the pitch in anger we will take action."

France captain Patrice Evra has already blamed the noise generated by the vuvuzelas, which has been likened to the drone of thousands of bees, for his side's poor showing in their opening group game against Uruguay, which finished goalless.

He said: "We can't sleep at night because of the vuvuzelas. People start playing them from 6am.

"We can't hear one another out on the pitch because of them."

Jordaan conceded that while the noise was irritating for some people, they were doing all they could to minimise the impact.

"We've tried to get some order," he continued. "We have asked for no vuvuzelas during national anthems or stadium announcements. It's difficult but we're trying to manage the best we can.

"We've had some broadcasters and individuals [complaining] and it's something we are evaluating on an on-going basis."

Jordaan admitted he was not a huge fan of them himself. "I would prefer singing," he said.

"It's always been a great generator of a wonderful atmosphere in stadiums and I would try to encourage them to sing.

"In the days of the struggle (against apartheid) we were singing, all through our history it's our ability to sing that inspired and drove the emotions."

Source

  • Like 2

**** the French, complaining. Everybody else is dealing with it, it is part of SA culture, and adds atmosphere. Don't blame the horns or the ball (as commented on by ESPN commentators mid match) for your loss. You're under the same conditions everyone else is. Get over it.

They are extremely annoying just watching the match, nevermind being there!

Bee's is an understatement, its like having a swarm put over the top of your head.....The sound has been turned down on all matches so far...

But yeh, do agree with above....both sides were under same conditions so while they may be 'disadvantaged', both teams were equally.

  On 13/06/2010 at 15:39, Alladaskill said:

**** the French, complaining. Everybody else is dealing with it, it is part of SA culture, and adds atmosphere. Don't blame the horns or the ball (as commented on by ESPN commentators mid match) for your loss. You're under the same conditions everyone else is. Get over it.

Everybody else is dealing with it?! It's all over the news, I have seen nothing but complaints - They are annoying, they are way too loud and they ruin the entire atmosphere of the matches. There's no

fans singing, no fans cheering, no sound of the ball getting kicked about, no nothing - Just some cheap crappy plastic horns deafening the stadium and the commentators.

I've had to mute every match I've seen and it's a bloody shame.

Taken this from Twitter and it's spot on;

  Quote
charltonbrooker Jesus. Really. Never mind Iran's nuclear programme, why didn't we stop South Africa developing the mass-produced plastic trumpet?

I have had to turn off all sound because of the noise these horns make. You cannot enjoy watching the games when you cannot even hear what the commentators are saying. I have finally given up the games all together on TV. I now just go to the ESPN site and read the updates about the games along with the stats. :(

They can't get rid of these things soon enough. For the first game it wasn't that bad, as I had figured it was due to the host nation playing. After seeing that's not the case these things really need to go, they're just way too annoying and are preventing so many from enjoying these games.

These things are really annoying and ruin the atmosphere of a football match. The players can't even talk to themselves on the field, affects their concentration, can cause permanent hearing damage to the public... There are only reasons to ban these things.

  On 13/06/2010 at 16:15, Richteralan said:

i like it.

makes every worldcup something different in atmosphere.

GTFO.

band u say??

i hear nothing but bees around me..

im sure im gona hear the sound in my dream every night watching 2 3 matches daily like this..

its so irritating on T.V .. i cant imagine what it will be like in the stadium.

I loved the singing and chanting..

always loved it.

f*ck no. dont get rid of them. we watched the game outside in the rain, volume turned as high as it could go, on the spanish channel (the english commentator is boring as hell), and we had the time of our life. How can you have a sporting event such as soccer, or american football, or hockey, and complain about the noise the supporters are making? what are we going ot do when they start making noise another way? put a cap on the noise limit? NO. let it be, its the excitement of the games, and the atmosphere of it all.

ps. any player/coach/team that complains of the noise needs to pack it up and go home

It's annoying, not just for us, but for the people there who can't hear themselves think. No characteristic chanting, just BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT.

Let the banhammer strike where necessary.

This World Cup is the worst ever. There is no real football atmosphere in the stadiums, noone sings and I see no emotions. This annoying and highly barbaric sound of these instruments has to stop if FIFA wants to save the rest of the World Cup. I get a headache every day now because of this f**** sound.

I do not want to insult the people of South Africa and I am sure that there are also many people there that are against it, but this sound has nothing to do with football culture. It is just sth that only a barbarian would produce...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But that is most likely what they referred to with their comment. Although, I was sure I saw headlines about Microsoft confirming it shortly after it popped up in media, but I cannot find any such articles anymore. The latest ones say Microsoft denies this, so it would be interesting to know what actually happened. They never explained what they meant by his email being cancelled, I assume he used Microsoft 365 or something as email service and that access was shut down, meaning he wouldn't get his stored emails even if he switched email service. And if his email address used Microsoft domains, it would be very easy to actually "cancel" his email.
    • Microsoft expands European sovereign cloud offerings with new data and key controls by Paul Hill Microsoft has announced today that it’s expanding its European Digital Commitment with Microsoft Sovereign Cloud (MSC). The MSC is a comprehensive set of sovereignty solutions that has now been expanded to include Data Guardian, where European personnel control access to European data, External Key Management, where customers control encryption keys, Regulated Environment Management, which provides simplified policy management, and Microsoft 365 Local for critical productivity services in private cloud environments. Through MSC, Microsoft is meeting its obligations under European law. This solution aims to give customers in the EU greater choice, control over data privacy, and more digital resilience. It builds on the existing European Data Boundary, which stores customer data in the EU. Deeper dive into Sovereign Public and Private Cloud options Microsoft offers three different solutions as part of the wider Microsoft Sovereign Cloud: Sovereign Public Cloud, Sovereign Private Cloud, and National Partner Clouds. The Public and Private Cloud offerings are still in preview and will be generally available later this year. The Sovereign Public Cloud is an evolution of Microsoft Cloud for Sovereignty and is available across all European data centers for all European customers. When you use this, your data stays in Europe under European law, with operations and access controlled by European personnel. Any workloads already running in European data centers do not need to be migrated. The Sovereign Private Cloud is designed for hybrid or air-gapped environments and allows the customer to have full control over the physical environment. It supports workloads on Azure Local and integrates Microsoft 365 Local and security platforms. Finally, National Partner Clouds are designed for government and critical infrastructure. These clouds are hosted by government-approved local operators separate from Microsoft. Some examples include Bleu with Orange and Capgemini for SecNumCloud in France and Delos Cloud, an SAP subsidiary, for German government requirements. Impact on European organizations and the broader cloud ecosystem With the Microsoft Sovereign Cloud, the Redmond giant hopes that its solutions will enable organizations in the European Union to grow, compete, and lead on their own terms with more control. To help organizations make the most of their new solutions, it has launched a preview of the new Microsoft Sovereign Cloud specialization in the Microsoft AI Cloud Partner Program. The specialization will help European customers identify partners that have demonstrated capabilities in supporting their “Sovereign Cloud ambitions on Microsoft technology.” Microsoft said that its preview partners include Accenture, Arvato, Area, Atos, Crayon, Capgemini, Dell Technologies, IBM, Inspark, Infosys, Lenovo, Leonardo, NTT Data, Orange, Telefonica, and Vodafone. The solutions announced by Microsoft will help businesses in the European Union comply with the stringent data rules that the bloc has so far introduced. In an increasingly unstable world, Europe’s actions will mean that its data is more secure.
    • Thanks for your linked article of off site examples of Windows Next hate, for a moment I thought you were lumping in all neowin users and reporters into that same category.
    • Man, the only Vista hate I remember was the fact you needed a pretty decent GPU to enable Aero Glass, and they also turned it off until you Activated Windows (no try before you buy). Point me to any articles we did on Vista hate? People shouldn't throw around accusations like this without at least backing themselves up.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      patrickft456 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      patrickft456 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Jdoe25 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Explorer
      Legend20 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • One Month Later
      jezzzy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      618
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      281
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      178
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      151
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      119
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!