Recommended Posts

It's clear today that the upvote system was abused too, so whats the point of having it?

It might be an idea to just allow staff to downvote and block the rep system from everyone else.

Only downvoting would be a bad idea in my opinion. If anything, let the staff and MVCs both upvote and downvote the posts (and disable it for everyone else). This way people will be held back from trolling, but encouraged to make useful posts as well.

Also the reputation in your profile would actually reflect the user's contribution to the community, better than the post counter (let's be honest, the post count hardly ever goes along with quality of the posts)

Only downvoting would be a bad idea in my opinion. If anything, let the staff and MVCs both upvote and downvote the posts (and disable it for everyone else). This way people will be held back from trolling, but also encouraged to make useful post, and also the reputation in your profile would actually reflect the user's contribution to the community.

Yeah we have decided that downvoting only isn't the way to go, I think we need a system where contribution is rewarded but at a moderated level, which is now the focus of our discussion on staff right now.

Bring it back! I usually make good thoughtful post's and the majority of my posts got up voted because of my view on things not because I trolled. I enjoyed checking my profile to see if I got any new rep points because it ment someone was agreeing with me. Bring them back!

+1

Would have +rep'd you but they disabled it :shiftyninja:

Anyway i never noticed any abuse, and found the plus rep system to give you pretty accurate way of how much someone contributes by posting useful or insightful things.

Really hope you guys rethink your decision and set it back to plus rep only.

The purpose of rep points was to encourage people to be friendly and helpful to other members. Someone will help you with your router problem and you'd rep them up as a "thank you". I think various members learned early on that there were much easier ways to get rep points and it had nothing to do with being friendly or helpful. The reputation system that we've been using up until today hasn't been meeting the goals that we had set for it and this is as good a time as any to re-evaluate our approach.

I suppose if the system had only been neutral (not working towards our goal and not working against them) then we might have keep it going but it has now become obvious that it actually was detrimental to the goals of encouraging members to be friendly and helpful.

The purpose of rep points was to encourage people to be friendly and helpful to other members. Someone will help you with your router problem and you'd rep them up as a "thank you". I think various members learned early on that there were much easier ways to get rep points and it had nothing to do with being friendly or helpful. The reputation system that we've been using up until today hasn't been meeting the goals that we had set for it and this is as good a time as any to re-evaluate our approach.

I suppose if the system had only been neutral (not working towards our goal and not working against them) then we might have keep it going but it has now become obvious that it actually was detrimental to the goals of encouraging members to be friendly and helpful.

Ive gave several people rep points because they helped me out so its not like no one was doing it.

I'm disappointed that's it's gone, but I can understand your reasoning. Although there was some noticeable abuse of the reputation system, I didn't think it was enough to consider removing it.

I can understand your opinion on this, because you don't know who is abusing it and what staff have to deal with.

The rep points really don't matter. I just liked them because how I got rep points were legit.Now I could see a problem with them if you all had a contest based on rep points, then it would be a big problem. But really I don't judge an answer by the rep points. Theres been a lot of comments I didn't agree with that got rep point's but they weren't trolling comments either. I just like to see that people have a common belief in some things.

But what is done is done I suppose.Hopefully you all will come up with something new for us or something I dunno.

Just need to implement some moderator system, where troll posts which wouldn't usually warrant a warning could get -1 rep ( public or internal display ) and when it reaches -10 or -15 across the board, it would

unlock a warning. Then on the other hand, making great posts and being very helpful would allow staff to give you +1 on the profile and when you reach +10 or +15, you'd get a little special star and when you reach +50

perhaps your warning level would go down 10%.

See, there's a reason to take posting seriously!

Just need to implement some moderator system, where troll posts which wouldn't usually warrant a warning could get -1 rep ( public or internal display ) and when it reaches -10 or -15 across the board, it would

unlock a warning. Then on the other hand, making great posts and being very helpful would allow staff to give you +1 on the profile and when you reach +10 or +15, you'd get a little special star and when you reach +50

perhaps your warning level would go down 10%.

See, there's a reason to take posting seriously!

Why? Mods need to do less rather than more. They don't need to babysit every troll.

How about this: Be a dick, get a kick.

Temporary bans for repeat trolls (even if your warning level is low)

Why? Mods need to do less rather than more. They don't need to babysit every troll.

How about this: Be a dick, get a kick.

Temporary bans for repeat trolls (even if your warning level is low)

They wouldn't be babysitting, they would click a little plus sign or minus sign based on what they thought of the post, that's it.

Wouldn't have to do it on all posts, just the best / worst.

All public systems are subject to abuse. not implementing one is your best bet.

Internal is another. Maybe you guys should keep it to yourselves. Only allowing Staffers to +/-. This makes it easier on you guys when you have to sort things out between members. Of course, this is Tons more for you guys behind the scenes which goes back to my original thought. No system is best.

Sorry but when I look at certain profiles of active members here with serious (long) warn logs and see their rep is huge, it makes me think the system is completely worthless.

We're already talking about adding a system that rewards true good contribution to the site, and that will be added in due course. This system is useless.

People agree with what they want. You can't control that. Simply labeling upvoting of contraversial posts as abusing the system is you believing everyone should agree with your concept of right and wrong. That wont ever happen.

I understand that you guys own the site and run it how you wanna run it but at the same time you need us to be here for the site to function and at some point you have to negotiate with the community, you aren't selling a service or a product your hosting a website that requires the community to create the content. It can't always be a one way street or the users will go to other sites with more democratic decision making.

With the previous system, highly opinionated posts received +1 votes from like-minded people.

You could get the most rep point by:

Attacking Apple outside of the Apple forums

Attacking Microsoft in the Sony Console Forum

Attacking Sony in the Microsoft Console Forum

Attacking either Democrats or Republicans in Real World Issues / Domestic Politics

So basically, I could post stuff about "the Apple tax", "the red ring of death" or "Obama's socialist agenda" and I'd be in rep heaven. Does any of this make Neowin better? Does it show my value to Neowin? No, it makes Neowin a less friendly more divided place. That isn't what we want.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm fine with a little reasonable promotion of Edge, but the degree which they do it right now I consider extremely unreasonable. 
    • Microsoft AI boss no longer believes that AI will replace human workers by David Uzondu Mustafa Suleyman, the head of Microsoft AI, recently took back his statements concerning white-collar jobs that he gave to the Financial Times in an interview made back in February, where he claimed that AI would replace office workers within 12 to 18 months. On Monday's episode of The Verge's Decoder, Suleyman recast the technology as more like a helpmate than a tool designed to take over your job. He explained that smaller office duties will "increasingly become digitized, automated" as people generate more digital materials. During the discussion, Suleyman emphasized a "very important distinction" between "tasks" and "jobs" to clarify his previous claims. He argued that his earlier comments only referred to individual actions that people perform at their desks. Suleyman used to work for DeepMind, the research lab he co-founded in 2010 alongside Demis Hassabis and Shane Legg, before he left in 2022 to establish Inflection AI and build an empathetic digital assistant. Microsoft hired him in March 2024 to lead its newly formed "Microsoft AI" division, placing him in charge of consumer products like Copilot, Bing, and Edge. His February comments also detailed plans for Microsoft to achieve self-sufficiency with a $140 billion infrastructure budget to train frontier models, predicting that creating a customized AI will soon feel like creating a podcast or a new blog: The 41-year-old is not the only AI executive who's softened his "AI will replace you" stance. OpenAI's CEO, Sam Altman, last month used X to push back against employment panic by arguing that his startup builds tools to assist humans rather than build replacements. He had previously garnered backlash by suggesting that many modern office roles that AI might replace did not qualify as "real work" in the first place, at least when you compare desk jobs to physical, historical labor like farming.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader DC 2026.001.21662 by Razvan Serea Adobe Acrobat Reader DC software is the free, trusted standard for viewing, printing, signing, and annotating PDFs. Its the only PDF viewer that can open and interact with all types of PDF content – including forms and multimedia. It’s connected to Adobe Document Cloud – so you can work with PDFs on computers and mobile devices. Adobe Document Cloud is a revolutionary, modern and efficient way to get work done with documents in the office, at home or on-the-go. At the heart of Document Cloud is the all-new Adobe Acrobat DC, which will take e-signatures mainstream by delivering free e-signing with every individual subscription. Document Cloud includes a set of integrated services that use a consistent online profile and personal document hub. With Adobe Document Cloud, people will be able to create, review, approve, sign and track documents whether on a desktop or mobile device. Businesses will be able to take advantage of Document Cloud for enterprise which provides enterprise-class document services that integrate into systems of record such as CRM, HCM, CLM, and CMS, adding speed, efficiency and transparency to getting business done with documents. Adobe Acrobat Reader DC new feature highlights: Work with PDFs from anywhere with the new, free Acrobat DC mobile app for Android or iOS. Select functionality is also available on Windows Phone. Use the new Fill & Sign tool in your desktop software to complete PDF forms fast with smart autofill. Download the free Adobe Fill & Sign mobile app to add the same option to your iPad or Android tablet device. Save money on ink and toner when printing from your Windows PC. Store and access files in Adobe Document Cloud with 5GB of free storage. Get instant access to recent files across desktop, web, and mobile devices with Mobile Link. Sync your Fill & Sign autofill collection across desktop, web, and iPad devices. Adobe PDF Pack premium features includes: Convert documents and images to PDF files. Use your mobile device camera to take a picture of a paper document or form and convert it to PDF. Turn PDFs into editable Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, or RTF files. Combine multiple files into a single PDF (web only). Get signatures from others with a complete e-signature service. Send, track, and confirm delivery of documents electronically instead of using fax or overnight services (tracking not available on mobile). Store and access files online with 20GB of storage. Download: Adobe Acrobat Reader DC 64-bit | 719.0 MB (Freeware) Link: Adobe Acrobat Reader DC Home Page | Release Notes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Meta will now use data from outside businesses to personalize AI responses by David Uzondu In an update that's rolling out globally (except in a handful of countries), Meta will use your data from outside businesses to personalize your AI responses and your primary feeds. Meta already utilizes your shopping activity to target ads, but the company now plans to expand this tracking to personalize other "parts of your experience" like feed algorithms and AI assistant chats. The company is replacing the two settings ("Your activity off Meta technologies" and "Activity from other businesses") that currently let you disconnect off-platform activity with a single, renamed setting called Activity from other businesses. If you don't want Meta to manipulate your feed and AI responses using your outside history, you can just turn the Activity from other businesses setting off in your account settings. This toggle resides within your Accounts Center, applying your choice to every connected profile. Turning this off will not stop companies from sending your data to Meta. The company will still collect your web interactions, but it only uses them to train products, while still accessing external accounts you connect. When The Verge spoke to Meta spokesperson, Emil Vazquez, the representative said that this update will exclude several locations at launch including the European region, the UK, Brazil, Thailand, South Africa, Turkey, South Korea, Ecuador, Nigeria, and Kenya. The new update comes at a time when the social media giant is recovering from a major PR disaster involving generative AI. Last week, there was a huge security issue on Instagram where attackers figured out a way to exploit a prompt injection vulnerability. Hackers managed to trick Meta AI into handing over account ownership (even if the victim had 2FA enabled). Some of the affected accounts include the dormant Obama White House profile, cosmetics brand Sephora, the Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force, and security researcher Jane Manchun Wong. Internally, the company also had to scale back plans on its Model Capability Initiative (MCI), an employee-monitoring program designed to train corporate AI models by recording worker keystrokes and screen activity, after employees raised privacy concerns and complained about severe battery life drain.
    • JetBrains is working to cut false positives in RustRover 2026.2 by David Uzondu Recently, JetBrains released the fifth EAP build of its dedicated IDE, RustRover 2026.2, bringing improvements like a Run gutter icon for criterion_main! macro benchmarking and a feature that alerts you when there are unused traits in your current scope. Now, the company is out with a blog post addressing one of the "most common" complaints from users: false positives. In RustRover, a false positive occurs when the editor incorrectly highlights something as an error even though the project compiles and runs successfully. This mismatch flags a gap between the IDE's internal intelligence and the actual compiler. When the editor flashes red warnings over perfectly valid code, developers lose trust in the tool, which stalls momentum. Traditionally, RustRover runs cargo check to detect compiler errors and warnings, but it also relies on its own code analysis engine to power real-time features. To provide quick feedback, this engine parses your source code into a syntax tree while inferring types and resolving names as you type. Because this engine must work on broken, half-written code and react instantly, its logic sometimes diverges from the compiler's, producing false positives that do not exist in the compiler's eyes. JetBrains said that it has a "dedicated task force" focused specifically on identifying and fixing false positives by analyzing user reports and examining large-scale open-source projects. To speed up this process, the team built an internal system modeled after Crater, the famous Rust project that compiles and runs tests for every single crate published on crates.io. This automated pipeline compares the diagnostics from RustRover's analysis with actual compiler output to catch discrepancies before they reach users, ensuring smoother workflows. RustRover, for those who're unaware, is a dedicated IDE designed specifically for Rust developers. It's been around for a couple of years now, providing features like built-in debugging via LLDB, seamless cargo integration, advanced macro expansion, and HTML support. JetBrains distributes the app under two licensing models: a paid commercial subscription and a free option for non-commercial use.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Edouard
      134
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!