Recommended Posts

Restrict voting to Hardware Hangout, Internet, Network & Security, etc. You know, the good sub-forums.

That would probably be better than what we had. I really don't think the rep points that I received from RWI should suggest that I am any better at diagnosing a router. The same goes for the polarized battles in Gamers Hangout.

We might still have issues with Mac vs PC topics though.

In some cases - brentaal, tiagosilva29 - it accounted for the majority of the member's reputation points.

so do these guys really matter much that the rep system got disabled for the whole forum? How about disabling repping members who have a warning, until their warning is back to 0%?

but how much does this account for total rep points? I've never visited IRC & my posts are mostly troll free, yet I used to have 185 points.

Yeah. I had like over 100 and most of those were from valued contributions in my opinion. Supporting members with their hardware or software issues, just giving good sound advice that others agreed was good and thus agreed instead of quoting what I had said and putting "+1" I don't really think the small amount of 'flash-mob reputation givers' are enough to warrant the systems deactivation.

Neobond has mentioned they will come up with a better system but the only thing I can imagine is only allowing staff members to +1 or something along those lines. But hey I'll wait and see.

If you guys intend to implement your own system perhaps take a look at the Reddit source code as they have algorithms built in to their voting system to weed out abuse.

Hey, I skimmed through this and other threads but didn't see any answer... my rep on the posts have completely disappeared! I can't +1 or see other's rep on the posts... is that normal?

Our attempt to right the sinking ship seems to have been unappreciated. Now the rep system has been disabled since there was no point in continuing the status quo. It wasn't working towards our goals of a more helpful more friendly community.

Maybe its different because I have been a member here for so long. But I don't see a point in a rep system. I don't need one to tell me who makes quality posts. I already know if its a quality post by seeing who posted it. I already know most of the members here who make quality posts, and the others who I ignore.

I don't think you can fix it. Because any rep system you put in place people will complain that it will be abused. The only thing I can think of is if you make the person add a comment to the rep, stating why the person was rep'd. Then these comments are checked by mods/staff.

It might be a lot of work, but thats the only thing that I can see working, maybe someone else will have a better idea.

Either way, doesn't matter to me, because I just ignored the rep points, and prolly will continue to do so, once they are reinstated.

In some cases - brentaal, tiagosilva29 - it accounted for the majority of the member's reputation points.

umad.jpg

I am unrestricted for less than a month and you're saying that I took part on the monopoly of points? I'm not that good in sex.

Is it just me or the forum reloads much faster with the rep system disabled?

It isn't just you. It seems to be browsing better. Less crashes in IE too (I'm at work). Kudos to the admins for this move!

I think the main issue here is we have different views of what we want the 'rep' system to achieve.

Staff imagine it being used as a system by which members can see which other members contribute well to the community, and add value with what they post.

However, members have been using the rep system to indicate that they agree with an opinion that another member has expressed, which while it may be similar, is not quite the same as the goal that staff had intended with the system.

We are currently looking at designing a new system, where reputation points would mainly be handed out to members automatically for certain things. A few ideas off the top of my head, that may or may not be included in the system: maintaining a 0 warn level whilst being active on the board, providing the 'solution' to a 'problem' posted by a member (akin to Experts Exchange) and so on. We have many more ideas, but I don't want to list a whole load of things that may not end up included in the final product.

We are currently looking at designing a new system, where reputation points would mainly be handed out to members automatically for certain things. A few ideas off the top of my head, that may or may not be included in the system: maintaining a 0 warn level whilst being active on the board, providing the 'solution' to a 'problem' posted by a member (akin to Experts Exchange) and so on. We have many more ideas, but I don't want to list a whole load of things that may not end up included in the final product.

I like these ideas very much.

providing the 'solution' to a 'problem' posted by a member (akin to Experts Exchange) and so on. We have many more ideas, but I don't want to list a whole load of things that may not end up included in the final product.

Oh, I like this part a whole lot! Once a problem has been resolved, the thread is marked resolved and the solution provider gets a point! :cool:

yeah but still...if I went on to name everyone who I don't like on the forums in here it wouldn't be right...just my 2 cents

It's not about me not liking the members in question. It's more about calling out the main trolls because their behaviour disgusts me.

Just my 0.02 ?.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You can disable the bloat on every browser. That's not the point. I will never use a browser of a shady company. I don't trust them at all. I can still find adblocking solutions than having to rely on a browser from a shady company. Every year they try something shady lol 2016: Brave Ad Replacement https://archive.is/W0k4j#selection-203.7-203.28 2016: pay-to-win Wikipedia clone into the default search engine list https://github.com/brave/browser-laptop/issues/5475 2018: Tom Scott and other creators noticed Brave was soliciting donations in their names without their knowledge or consent. https://www.reddit.com/r/brave...aims_that_brave_is_falsely/ 2020: Brave got caught injecting URLs with affiliate codes https://www.theverge.com/2020/...-crypto-privacy-ceo-apology 2021: Brave's TOR window was found leaking DNS queries https://www.zdnet.com/article/...n-addresses-in-dns-traffic/ 2022: Brave floated the idea of further discouraging users from disabling sponsored messages. https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/22066 2023: Brave got caught installing a paid VPN service on users' computers without their consent. https://www.xda-developers.com...owser-installs-vpn-windows/ 2023: Brave got caught scraping and reselling people's data with their custom web crawler, which was designed specifically not to announce itself to website owners. https://stackdiary.com/brave-s...ghted-data-for-ai-training/ 2024: Brave gave up on providing advanced fingerprint protection, citing flawed statistics https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...tion-as-it-breaks-websites/ 2025: Brave staff publish an article endorsing PrivacyTests and say they "work with legitimate testing sites" like them. This article fails to disclose PrivacyTests is run by a Brave Senior Architect! https://brave.com/blog/adblock...esting-websites-harm-users/
    • Alpine Linux 3.24 released with support for COSMIC Desktop and other improvements by David Uzondu Alpine Linux 3.24 has been released with updated system packages, including Linux kernel 6.18 and Rust 1.96. The team also added IPv6 support to the system installer, and they introduced automatic serial console configuration for headless setups. System76's COSMIC desktop environment is now available in the community repo. System76 originally started building this DE because its developers found GNOME to be pretty limited. Plus, it did not help that with virtually every GNOME update, the changes broke System76's custom desktop extensions. As for system packages, the Alpine team moved GTK+ 3.0 from the main repository to the community repository due to its legacy status. py3-setuptools has been upgraded to version 82.0.0, while the old pkg_resources module has been completely dropped. The team also removed outdated packages that still relied on py3-six and GTK+ 2.0. In addition to that, libsoup 2 has been removed because the library was affected by multiple security vulnerabilities. If you're a GRUB user, the Alpine Team said that you must manually run the grub-install command with your specific device or EFI options right after upgrading your system, otherwise, your computer may fail to boot properly with the newly updated GRUB 2.14 bootloader. New installations of Alpine Linux now offer an optional path to a /usr-merged directory layout if you set the BOOTSTRAP_USR_MERGED environment variable to 1 before you execute the setup-disk command. If you already run an older installation, you can migrate manually by installing the merge-usr package and executing its binary as the root user. The team recommends this layout to align Alpine with modern Linux standards, though you should verify your custom scripts before making the switch. Alpine Linux is a pretty tiny (~5MB) Linux distro built around musl libc, BusyBox, and OpenRC. It's been around since 2005, comes with its own package manager called Alpine Package Keeper (APK), and is widely used in modern cloud computing and software deployment.
    • Instagram now lets you manually reorder posts on your profile grid by David Uzondu Instagram is finally rolling out the ability to customize your feed layout as you see fit by letting you reorder posts on your profile grid. This feature comes several months after the app introduced a tool that lets users rearrange photos and videos within a carousel post after it has already been published. To do that, people tap the three-dot menu in the top right corner of the post, select the edit option, and reorganize their slides. Now that Instagram has expanded the feature to your profile grid, you can organize your main page without deleting old uploads. To use the new system, you simply tap any picture on your grid and select the option to reorder. This action opens up a separate screen where you can freely drag your grid items around until you get your preferred aesthetic, and then you just hit the back button to save your changes. Instagram's Threads account posted that the system would reach accounts starting this week, so you might need to wait for the automatic update to hit your phone. https://www.threads.com/@instagram/post/DZVV_fyjjSW In other Instagram news, last week, people figured out that if you ask Meta's AI support assistant to hand over any Instagram account, the bot will actually hand it over (even if the victim's account had 2FA enabled). The security exploit involved the assistant accepting prompts from users and generating password reset links for unauthorized email addresses. Meta said that the issue has now been fixed, but this came after the issue affected several high-profile accounts, including @obamawhitehouse. Last month, the company finally rolled out paid subscription tiers for WhatsApp and other Meta social platforms after months of testing. WhatsApp Plus costs $2.99 a month and gives you custom themes, while Instagram Plus and Facebook Plus cost $3.99 a month for extra profile customization and story rewatch counters. Meta's also working on Meta One, a unified subscription service that contains options for heavy users of its servers who want more reach or advanced features. For instance, Meta One Essential ($14.99/mo) comes with a verified badge and impersonation protection. If you pay for Meta One Premium ($19.99/mo), you get deeper AI reasoning tools, whereas the Meta One Advanced ($49.99/mo) tier increases your search placement (on Facebook and Instagram) and visibility.
    • Hello mysterious lamborghiniv10, I was in Australia and... now I'm in the Netherlands. 
    • EU says Meta must restore rival chatbots' access to WhatsApp by Hamid Ganji The European Commission has ordered Meta to restore third-party AI chatbots’ access to WhatsApp after the tech giant decided to block them from operating on the popular messaging platform. After Meta banned rival AI chatbots from operating on WhatsApp, the European Commission launched an antitrust investigation to determine whether the company had abused its market dominance. As a result of Meta’s decision, third-party AI chatbots, including Microsoft’s Copilot and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, were prevented from operating on WhatsApp. At the time, Meta said it wanted to reserve the WhatsApp Business API for other types of businesses and did not allow rival chatbots to use it. This effectively prevented the WhatsApp ecosystem from being used to distribute rival chatbot services. However, the European Commission has now announced an interim measures decision requiring Meta to restore access to WhatsApp for rival general-purpose AI assistants on the same terms and conditions as before October 15, 2025. The Commission has also asked Meta to maintain that access until the antitrust investigation is concluded. The Commission argues that Meta has used its dominant market position to prevent rival AI chatbots from accessing the WhatsApp Business API. While Meta allowed rival services to return to WhatsApp by paying a fee, the European Commission still considers that arrangement to be a de facto access ban. According to EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera, the fees introduced by Meta are so high that using WhatsApp is no longer economically sustainable for competitors. “It seems that Meta expects to leverage the vast reach and likely dominance of WhatsApp to benefit its own AI assistant and to foreclose rivals,” Ribera said. “We cannot let large digital incumbents leverage their dominance of the past to dictate who in Europe gets to compete and who gets to innovate in AI.”
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Edouard
      134
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!