Engadget posts in depth preview of Windows Phone 7


Recommended Posts

http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/19/windows-phone-7-in-depth-preview/

Engadget wasn't exactly impressed by this nearly finished version of Windows Phone 7. There are just too many things missing that give the impression that Microsoft rushed out to bring WP7 on the market.

It is really a shame but I get the impression that Microsoft is too late on this game.

That phone looks terrible =/ I understand its just a demo/test unit, but dam.

Also, I think everyone knew by now that the first version of WP7 will ship "incomplete" with more features getting added constantly over time. That's how it always has been in the mobile industry, the first iPhones shipped with a lot of things missing that slowly got added over time and Android was the same.

You can never really have a complete OS, unless you're saying that we're done with this and moving on. Take android for example, 2.1 was pretty good and had all the features one would expect in a phone and then suddenly 2.2 added a JIT complier that gives a major performance boost; now 2.1 seems like a unfinished product. What will 2.3 add?

Of course there should have been things added in from the very beginning of WP7, like copy and paste, but that doesn't mean MS is late to this game or this product will fail. Do I like WP7? Not at the moment since its just not aimed towards power users. Instead MS has decided to go down the general consumer route, and this first version will give them everything they want in a smartphone. Later versions should add more functionality, and at that time I'll make my decision whether or not its worth getting. Of course if MS fail to keep their promise of constant updates then well they'll have dug their own grave.

That phone looks terrible =/ I understand its just a demo/test unit, but dam.

Also, I think everyone knew by now that the first version of WP7 will ship "incomplete" with more features getting added constantly over time. That's how it always has been in the mobile industry, the first iPhone s're hipped with a lot of things missing that slowly got added over time and Android was the same.

You can never really have a complete OS, unless you're saying that we're done with this and moving on. Take android for example, 2.1 was pretty good and had all the features one would expect in a phone and now suddenly 2.2 added a JIT complier that gives a major performance boost; now 2.1 seems like a unfinished product. What will 2.3 add?

Of course there should have been things added in from the very beginning of WP7, like copy and paste, but that doesn't mean MS is late to this game or this product will fail. Do I like WP7? Not at the moment since its just not aimed towards power users. Instead MS has decided to go down the general consumer route, and this first version will give them everything they want in a smartphone. Later versions should add more functionality, and at that time I'll make my decision whether or not its worth getting. Of course if MS fail to keep their promise of constant updates then well they'll have dug their own grave.

Whats wrong with the hardware of the phone? big screen, squarey, id buy it although id prefer to LG Pather.

Anyway +100 for the most sensible and smartest assesment of things.

Whats wrong with the hardware of the phone? big screen, squarey, id buy it although id prefer to LG Pather.

I dunno, it just doesn't suit me. I guess I'm just too used to the way my HD2 looks (also Desire, Incredible, Droid X, Nexus one, Evo etc).

The phone just looks so much better with the screen literally taking up the entire phone, with minimal bezel around it. In this case, theres a gigantic Samsung logo right above the screen and then "wasted space." That said, the screen does look gorgeous and so does the OS when displayed on it.

I really want to see what HTC can come up with, since they seem to be the best at the moment when it comes to phone design.

I dunno, it just doesn't suit me. I guess I'm just too used to the way my HD2 looks (also Desire, Incredible, Droid X, Nexus one, Evo etc).

The phone just looks so much better with the screen literally taking up the entire phone, with minimal bezel around it. In this case, theres a gigantic Samsung logo right above the screen and then "wasted space."

I agree with the phone looking really ugly. Thankfully the design is never going to be released to the public and we have htc to make nice phones for WP7 and Android.

I'm on the fence here, but I'm not seeing WP7 being a major deal...

We will have to see how smooth these "constant updates" are. Sprint has ALWAYS been VERY slow approving OS updates on their network. Is Microsoft going to get special treatment? If consumers will end up languishing in limbo hoping for Carrier approved updates or new product releases Microsoft is doomed.

I must agree. Everyone was pushing WP7 as being the next biggest thing at the announcement early this year. Now it all seems to be falling in a heap...

Really, who didn't see it coming? With the changes they announced, it sounded more like a whole new platform than an upgrade - essentially it is.

I'm on the fence here, but I'm not seeing WP7 being a major deal...

We will have to see how smooth these "constant updates" are. Sprint has ALWAYS been VERY slow approving OS updates on their network. Is Microsoft going to get special treatment? If consumers will end up languishing in limbo hoping for Carrier approved updates or new product releases Microsoft is doomed.

I think the update system works in two ways:

1. Minor version updates (bug fixes etc) will be OTA (and possibly even through the Zune client)

2. Major version updates will be through the Zune client

Hence even if carriers take weeks to approve OS updates OTA, a user can simply just plug it in and the zune client will update the phone accordingly.

I must agree. Everyone was pushing WP7 as being the next biggest thing at the announcement early this year. Now it all seems to be falling in a heap...

Really, who didn't see it coming? With the changes they announced, it sounded more like a whole new platform than an upgrade - essentially it is.

Yep they threw the baby out with the bathwater. Only time will tell if throwing their existing Windows Mobile customer base off a cliff will help them or harm them...

At the very least it will give their competitors a large influx of customers (as many have delayed purchases to see how 7 shakes down) as many switch from Windows Mobile to something else...

They are starting not only the OS over, but their customer base too. Not to say it will make Windows Phone 7 a failure, but it definitely makes the success story a lot harder to achieve. And if they don't get strong sales early on they might run into a problem convincing OEMs and Carriers to pickup the platform.

They aren't too late, but they do need to be gambling wisely.

Hm... Thanks for the heads up, I'll have to give these previews a read... I do agree with the one mention that in the text messaging screen that your messages and received messages should be different colors... Hopefully Microsoft will take some of these suggestions into consideration for refinement before release...

I think the update system works in two ways:

1. Minor version updates (bug fixes etc) will be OTA (and possibly even through the Zune client)

2. Major version updates will be through the Zune client

Hence even if carriers take weeks to approve OS updates OTA, a user can simply just plug it in and the zune client will update the phone accordingly.

We will have to see as this has been a tight area of contention with Carriers. Sprint, for instance, won't allow any phone on their network they haven't approved, same for updates (officially, of course). So I can see there be a lot of issues in the future with updates being banned by Carriers or delayed severely.

If this is a core part of their strategy though, constant updates, they will need to expose their agreements with Carriers early and honestly...

Unlike other companies MS has the dollars to play the long-game. This is the same sort of strat we saw for xbox and what I suspect we will see with WP.

For sure. Microsoft will be in this game for the win. WP7 might not be anything more than a flop (or a iPhone Killer who knows? I can't predict the market), but Microsoft knows their future depends on it. So like a prize fighter smacked across the head with a lead pipe. Microsoft is stumbling to recollect their composure and sense of the world and is throwing wild ignorant swings, but they will become more focused and powerful over time.

so

1. its different.

2. its not finished and looks like it'll be a beta when launched. considering some important features are missing

to beat iphone and Android, MS has to be better than them. WP7 doesn't even match them :(

then there is the entire thing about, distribution channels. zune+xbox = win but when about apps, books, tv and movies ?

The carriers have no say about OS updates, it's all done through MS, this was said early on and a few times already. Any carrier OEM updates have to go through MS first and then out to the phone, not the other way around. Just search for info on WP7 update process it matches that of desktop windows more or less. This also leads me to believe that we'll be getting frequent updates not having to wait a year for something like WP8.

TV and movies are part of the zune marketplace, and i'm expecting a kindle WP7 app/reader from amazon on the OS so that covers your books. Apps in the marketplace ofc, and games though Xbox, that covers everything so I don't see any problems with content distro in the least.

This is just like the original xbox (which wasn't all that great) but it built a foundation. Microsoft is patient (and rich) enough that it can wait out years of losses. Plus, the refresh time on phones is pretty fast so when Microsoft does put out a really complete mobile os it will be picked up pretty qucickly.

I think it looks really unfinished. The entire UI is very basic. Just square boxes that come out of a black abyss. Microsoft is hoping that the transitional effects between applications and menus will offset the basic appearance but I personally am just not buying it.

The design of this phone right now looks like when you are making a design concept. This is the sort of design you mockup in a couple hours to show your boss how things would be arranged, not the actual end product. I could literally do the entire UI of this phone including every application it ships with in a weekend and that isn't a good thing.

And I'm not just talking about looks and appearance. There is usability issues with this. That home screen alone is going to become extremely cluttered when you start loading it up with apps. More to the point why are applications like Mail taking up so much space? Or why is the screen losing 30% of its volume on the right side just to let the user know that they can swipe sideways?

I truly believe this will fail after release I think Android will flatten Windows Phone 7 in the market not just from OEM's deciding not to get on the Win Phone 7 bandwagon but from consumers who just won't buy it because they do not like it. It is good to see Microsoft trying new things but this approach is just wrong and they should be focusing instead on taking the powerful style and usability that Windows 7 has (The Computer OS) and port that same intention and function to the phone.

This is just like the original xbox (which wasn't all that great) but it built a foundation. Microsoft is patient (and rich) enough that it can wait out years of losses. Plus, the refresh time on phones is pretty fast so when Microsoft does put out a really complete mobile os it will be picked up pretty qucickly.

One thing of note, though I'm sure the reviews said this, or maybe not? But these aren't 100% done builds yet. MS is calling them tech-previews so who knows how much is still left to add/tweak/change. I also expect quick updates that will add things in throughout 2011.

I dunno, I think the UI looks cool. I like the way MS is going about UI's, if no one has noticed its very minimal...sort of reminds me of Moblin.

I might be in the minority but I also like Windows Mobile 6.5.

I don't think all smart phone consumers are as demanding as we are (tech community)....like others have said though, we have to try it out before any final judgment. Hopefully its great because theres no way I'm buying an iPhone 4 and my HTC Dream is getting ancient :p

The carriers have no say about OS updates, it's all done through MS, this was said early on and a few times already. Any carrier OEM updates have to go through MS first and then out to the phone, not the other way around. Just search for info on WP7 update process it matches that of desktop windows more or less. This also leads me to believe that we'll be getting frequent updates not having to wait a year for something like WP8.

I have heard the same thing from Microsoft too, but I'm not buying it (yet). Sprint, at least, has made no intention of offering updates to any phone they sell without their approval. If they manage to get this deal ironed out with Sprint that would be nice, but they need to be very clear with consumers that they have this agreement with Sprint.

Most carriers are just as restrictive as Sprint. The only phone I know of that gets updates at their pleasure is the iPhone, but that is due to their tight contract with AT&T. Not to forget that even Apple has serious discussions with AT&T as they have released iPhone features that weren't allowed to work on AT&T until approval (like MMS and Tethering, at least)...

So I HIGHLY doubt Microsoft will be able to release anything they want at anytime they want. If they pulled that the carriers would just skip selling the phones period. It isn't like they have a shortage of smartphones to offer consumers and Microsoft has NO brand loyalty to tout to these carriers either...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!