Recommended Posts

Treyarch: "We are a PC developer"

"We are a PC developer. I've been running a dedicated PC team since the beginning of this project. We had one last project. We are making a true PC title here and it's a really important platform for our studio, and I'm also really thrilled that we can support the PC community as much as we can."

Awesome sauce.

The single player video looked like utter crap, IMO... like a mish-mash of MW2 and W@W. Will almost certainly be skipping this one, but I'll wait for reviews and user comments.

Flipping through this thread has to be one of the most rage inducing things I've read on the internet since browsing youtube video comments.

I can't believe how completely misguided people are on this installment.

First off, there is no nuke. There is no commando perk, that lunge was no farther than a typical lunge from Halo. Not to mention the fact that he's using the ballistic knife, which has an aiming arc to it, so it's not going to be as easy as the throwing knife in MW2. I cough up the hater anger over the sheep-guided "let's all hate the popular guy" bandwagon.

There are tactical insertions, but Treyarch has vigorously stated that they will allow users to use the ingame theater mode to report boosters or anyone jtagging their accounts, resulting in a ban.

Killstreaks only go up to 11 and you can't use a killstreak to get another killstreak, i.e. Killstreak chaining.

Most of the annoyance with MW2 was the common 5-11-25 nuke killstreak chain.

The RC car killstreak is low yes, but it's splash damage is no more dangerous than a standard cooked grenade. Not to mention it leaves the user completely defenseless while using it.

Wager matches look absolutely amazing and incredibly fun with the inclusion of the currency system, which allows for some of the best customization in an fps since Rainbow Six.

I'm sorry, but I can't stand people who criticize a game without doing their homework first.

There's more to the game than a youtube montage trailer.

tl:dr People love hating games they're bad at.

I agree, especially the 'tweaking' of the killstreaks will do wonders for the game and bring down the crazy pace when someone is on a roll.

Treyarch did a nice job with the playlist in World at War, proper separation between Hardcore and Softcore, hope they do that again and add stuff like Barebone to Hardcore - I'd love 'em for it (Y)

Frostbite is DICE's engine, and DICE is owned by EA. So, pardon the pun, but I'm pretty sure that's no dice.

I think Frostbite looks like crap.

Indeed and what's an even bigger problem is; it plays like crap. Doesn't have Call of Duty's "sharp" feeling nor will it ever.

The single player video looked like utter crap, IMO... like a mish-mash of MW2 and W@W. Will almost certainly be skipping this one, but I'll wait for reviews and user comments.

I am definitely not looking forward to this and like you, I will wait for reviews and comments. I hated SP in MW and MW2 because of all of the crap spawning BEHIND you after you cleared out an area

Indeed and what's an even bigger problem is; it plays like crap. Doesn't have Call of Duty's "sharp" feeling nor will it ever.

Yes. Totally. Yes.

It's fine for large battles involving tanks and choppers but for precise and responsive infantry combat it's a tad ######.

I agree, especially the 'tweaking' of the killstreaks will do wonders for the game and bring down the crazy pace when someone is on a roll.

Treyarch did a nice job with the playlist in World at War, proper separation between Hardcore and Softcore, hope they do that again and add stuff like Barebone to Hardcore - I'd love 'em for it (Y)

I believe also they'll have "true" barebones, which I think means no perks or killstreaks. Which will be great!

I believe also they'll have "true" barebones, which I think means no perks or killstreaks. Which will be great!

If this is true, I'll get Black Ops. They need to do something for those that don't have the hours and hours to spend leveling up their soldier. That's one thing I loved about BC2, you could just get into a game and have a somewhat decent game even if you weren't powering up the ranks. Just a shame DICE did crap all for fixing bugs - BC2, one of my most letdown games ever.

If this is true, I'll get Black Ops. They need to do something for those that don't have the hours and hours to spend leveling up their soldier. That's one thing I loved about BC2, you could just get into a game and have a somewhat decent game even if you weren't powering up the ranks. Just a shame DICE did crap all for fixing bugs - BC2, one of my most letdown games ever.

From what I hear, they're adding barebones, since it was a pretty big hit in MW2. (God knows how much I loved the gametype, going 74 and 17 on Karachi)

The currency system might help you a bit with the grinding in time. From what I understand, which I might be wrong, but I think you have to level your character to level x to gain access to a cache of weaponry in tier y.

As in, reach level 30 and you gain access to purchasing weaponry around that level, instead of getting one single weapon every so often.

I am definitely not looking forward to this and like you, I will wait for reviews and comments. I hated SP in MW and MW2 because of all of the crap spawning BEHIND you after you cleared out an area

I thought the singleplayer in MW2 was decent, but the original was pretty good. But I'm not buying another "decent" game with a nonconstant stream of cash.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This one baffles me...so they are creating a museum based around the Ship of Theseus? A museum is supposed to preserve things. It doesn't really work if the conversation goes, "I gazed upon Starry Night the other day, the colours were beautiful!" "Yeah...I didn't expect Godzilla to show up, though." Create a building devoted to displaying AI work, fine. The rainforest idea sounds interesting and I would consider visiting if they pay me a few bucks. But don't call it a museum...
    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!