Recommended Posts

What I think they should do

1. Do not copy Safari, Firefox, Chrome, Opera.

2. Do not use IE8's UI or Metro UI

3. Do something New and Original

it's probably a far cry but I think they need to move on up.

I would love it if they did something like this:

internet-explorer-9.png

And this:

ie9.png

Source: http://www.favbrowser.com/leaked-internet-explorer-9-screenshots/

Ugly IMO. Metro UI is nice on a phone...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/929600-ie9-ui/page/2/#findComment-593030670
Share on other sites

Metro is only for phone

They use it on the Desktop too... it's not just for phones =/

IE6, 7 & 8 were all designed to fit in with Windows Explorer, and have similar stylings to XP (IE6), Vista (IE7) and Seven's (IE8) Windows Explorer Windows, so I'd think I.E 9 would share a similar styling to IE.8, but maybe move the tabs or the address bar into the title bar to save space =)?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/929600-ie9-ui/page/2/#findComment-593030838
Share on other sites

Why are so many people having a crisis over Metro? It looks great on mobile, on a Desktop, not so much. It's like saying iOS should be used on a desktop, when it isn't designed for that.

IE9 won't change much in terms of UI, probably just small tweaks to fit it in with 7 more.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/929600-ie9-ui/page/2/#findComment-593034568
Share on other sites

Why are so many people having a crisis over Metro? It looks great on mobile, on a Desktop, not so much. It's like saying iOS should be used on a desktop, when it isn't designed for that.

IE9 won't change much in terms of UI, probably just small tweaks to fit it in with 7 more.

It does look great on a Desktop. Zune & Metrotwit are both a testament to that. There is nothing inherently mobile specific about Metro's design philosophy. Keep in mind Metro isn't a rigid design element like the Ribbon UI (or iOS) - it's a design philosophy, a set of guidelines for you to follow, and interpret into your own needs to create beautiful applications.

Metro is about simplicity, and focus' on beautiful typography and user content above all else. It's about clean, light and open design - letting content be the UI, and stripping away everything else. It's also about fast, smooth and natural animation/motion. All of those things work perfectly fine on the desktop and mobile, and they look amazing on both when done properly.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/929600-ie9-ui/page/2/#findComment-593034600
Share on other sites

And that's probbly what so many people have an issue with when it comes to metro. They see a UI designed for phones and think it's getting brought to desktops because that's what Apple would do. Apple designed iOS and it's components... making a unified, custom desinged envrioment. Microsoft on the other hand created a design concept and are giving people the ability to use it how it works best. Two entirly different things.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/929600-ie9-ui/page/2/#findComment-593034624
Share on other sites

Why are so many people having a crisis over Metro? It looks great on mobile, on a Desktop, not so much. It's like saying iOS should be used on a desktop, when it isn't designed for that.

IE9 won't change much in terms of UI, probably just small tweaks to fit it in with 7 more.

I don't agree. When done right, it looks amazing on a desktop. The Zune software looks great.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/929600-ie9-ui/page/2/#findComment-593034640
Share on other sites

I think IE9 will be just as bloated as IE8. I cant picture it being minimal at all, nor functional to use as a mainstream browser again.

First time I've ever seen ayone say IE8 is bloated and the 2nd point, you've not used the test copies of IE9 or been reading their blog. Its currently more functional than any browser available.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/929600-ie9-ui/page/2/#findComment-593035706
Share on other sites

Keep in mind Metro isn't a rigid design element like the Ribbon UI (or iOS) - it's a design philosophy, a set of guidelines for you to follow, and interpret into your own needs to create beautiful applications.

Could you please link to these guidelines? As far as I know, no such thing exists. The only thing that exists is the Zune software's UI, from which people have extrapolated a whole "Metro" design, despite the fact that it's used nowhere else, and has little to do with the actual Metro design found on the mobile devices.

As for MetroTwit, I don't see how it's the same as the Zune software.

155pbtv.jpg

metrotwit.gif

They have little in common apart from a lack of depth. Is that what Metro means? "Flat?" Whatever Microsoft considers "Metro" to be internally, I have serious doubts that it's the kind of ultra-vague philosophy that people here are claiming.

Anyway, the problem I have with the design is that it completely ignores the UX guidelines for Windows. It is radically different from them, and radically different from the Windows design itself. It's really inconsistent with Windows and looks completely out of place. If all of Windows looked that way, then that would be one thing, but to have a single OS component (IE) be so radically different from the rest of the system? It's absurd.

There is also no framework for it. To use it, you have to custom design everything. You have to draw everything manually, all the way from the window borders down to the individual UI controls. It's a lot of work trying to jury-rig the look into a framework that was not designed for it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/929600-ie9-ui/page/2/#findComment-593035742
Share on other sites

Could you please link to these guidelines? As far as I know, no such thing exists. The only thing that exists is the Zune software's UI, from which people have extrapolated a whole "Metro" design, despite the fact that it's used nowhere else, and has little to do with the actual Metro design found on the mobile devices.

As for MetroTwit, I don't see how it's the same as the Zune software.

They have little in common apart from a lack of depth. Is that what Metro means? "Flat?" Whatever Microsoft considers "Metro" to be internally, I have serious doubts that it's the kind of ultra-vague philosophy that people here are claiming.

Anyway, the problem I have with the design is that it completely ignores the UX guidelines for Windows. It is radically different from them, and radically different from the Windows design itself. It's really inconsistent with Windows and looks completely out of place. If all of Windows looked that way, then that would be one thing, but to have a single OS component (IE) be so radically different from the rest of the system? It's absurd.

There is also no framework for it. To use it, you have to custom design everything. You have to draw everything manually, all the way from the window borders down to the individual UI controls. It's a lot of work trying to jury-rig the look into a framework that was not designed for it.

For what it's worth, there is a UI Design and Interaction guide for Windows Phone. Whilst is is obviously WP7, and not Metro, the two are to a degree interchangable, and it lays out a lot of stuff including sizing, spaces, typography and so on. There's also the Metro Design Language document, which is designed primarily as an explanation and provenance for Metro, but also details quite well good usage and areas of Metro. It's something of an applicable design guide document.

Finally, frameworks do exist. There's the Microsoft relased Cosmopolitan theme for Silverlight, which isn't a massive effort to port across to WPF given the extreme commonality and XAML background. It's quite verbose in its inclusion of controls and elements.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/929600-ie9-ui/page/2/#findComment-593035768
Share on other sites

For what it's worth, there is a UI Design and Interaction guide for Windows Phone. Whilst is is obviously WP7, and not Metro, the two are to a degree interchangable, and it lays out a lot of stuff including sizing, spaces, typography and so on. There's also the Metro Design Language document, which is designed primarily as an explanation and provenance for Metro, but also details quite well good usage and areas of Metro. It's something of an applicable design guide document.

URL? I'm not so sure how interchangeable the two are. The Zune software is very different both in form and function from the WP7 interface (obviously a computer is not a phone). I'd like to see the actual guidelines for the Windows Metro design as used by Zune that he seemed to claim exists.

Finally, frameworks do exist. There's the Microsoft relased Cosmopolitan theme for Silverlight, which isn't a massive effort to port across to WPF given the extreme commonality and XAML background. It's quite verbose in its inclusion of controls and elements.

I was talking about the native world. Most software (including all of Windows and most other Microsoft software) is native code, and can't (and probably don't want to) use Silverlight or WPF.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/929600-ie9-ui/page/2/#findComment-593035814
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      480
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      67
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      56
    5. 5
      monterxz
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!