DX11 Coming To Linux (But Not XP)


Recommended Posts

XP does NOT have 60% market share. It has only 48% market share, which is going down at the speed of light.

Wikipedia as a source for OS market share, not that good of a source. Most statistics point XP to be around 60%.

I always thought light was faster than that :unsure:...hopefully sound won't let me down like light just did

LOL

Wikipedia as a source for OS market share, not that good of a source. Most statistics point XP to be around 60%.

LOL

You do realize that Wiki article uses 8 (eight) different sources for it*s median value. of those EIGHT, ONE has XP at 60%.

so no. most stats do NO point xp at around 60%

Wikipedia as a source for OS market share, not that good of a source. Most statistics point XP to be around 60%

Yeh because Net Applications, which doesn't account for every website, is a better source? Wikipedia uses 8 different sources, including net applications, and takes an average.

Even then, the statistic isn't completely reliable. But to say "most statistics point XP to be around 60%" is wrong.

I suppose Microsoft should just start charging for every update they do considering that people want to hold onto an OS for nearly a decade and expect every new tidbit to come their way. If they just supported XP for life with free upgrade that business model would have bankrupted them years ago. Upgrade to 7 and quit the QQ.

As for DX getting open source I cant wait as I would rather use nix in embedded applications that use 3D anyway for the lower overhead.

The difference between 60 and 48% in this context is nothing significant and doesn't really change anything with this subject. Either way it's got close to 1/2 the market.

XP is still one of/the most used OS, you'd think that people would be used to that.

It doesn't really matter that it's 9 years old. What matters more is when the OS after that came out, which was Vista in 2006. Putting it that way between the newer OS and XP it's still only 4 years people. And people didn't want to move onto Vista...

Well, there's another nail in XP's coffin. Let it go, folks. Empty out that piggy bank and upgrade. There's no excuse anymore.

Have you guys read the developers post? DIRECTX 11 IS NOT COMING TO LINUX. This thread is totally wrong.

here's the link yet again:

http://zrusin.blogspot.com/2010/02/3d-apis.html

It doesn't really matter that it's 9 years old. What matters more is when the OS after that came out, which was Vista in 2006. Putting it that way between the newer OS and XP it's still only 4 years people. And people didn't want to move onto Vista...

People didn't want to move to Vista because of the ridiculous amount of FUD surrounding it, not because XP was some amazing OS.

Say what you want about Vista, but without it you wouldn't have 7.

The difference between 60 and 48% in this context is nothing significant and doesn't really change anything with this subject. Either way it's got close to 1/2 the market.

XP is still one of/the most used OS, you'd think that people would be used to that.

It doesn't really matter that it's 9 years old. What matters more is when the OS after that came out, which was Vista in 2006. Putting it that way between the newer OS and XP it's still only 4 years people. And people didn't want to move onto Vista...

and it's losing 1-2% every month, so in a week, it'll be 46%, in 5 weeks it'll be 44, 9 weeks, 44%....

that doesn't take into consideration possible and probably adoption acceleration as more and more computers get old. and more and more companies are no starting to make the switch. XP isn't going to be around for very much longer.

Also you touch on another topic there, but didn't realize you're lookgin at it the wrong way.

XP took 9 years to get it's marketshare. 7 crushed the sales numbers of XP.

Given that Windows 7 can run on computers with surprisingly low specifications, and that a computer capable of running 7 would be dirt cheap these days, over the coming year 7 should start eating rapidly into XP's marketshare.

The simple fact of the matter is this though:

If people choose to run Linux, they shouldn't expect Microsoft to cater to them. You can ballache all you like about how evil Microsoft are, but DX is their platform, and Linux users have no right to expect it to be ported, so if you want to use DX get a copy of Windows, otherwise stop crying about it.

And for XP users... Again, you are using an OS that is 9 years old, and you cannot expect Microsoft to support it forever. So stop ballaching about how all the new features are not being ported, and upgrade, or just continue to use XP and suck it up.

A very, very, very long time seeing as phoronix was totally wrong (big surprise) and dx11 is NOT coming to linux. this thread title is ridiculously misleading.

my bad :s

i meant for windows not *nix

It isn't a translation layer so it will still require vendors to port their applications over and recompile them for Linux rather than simply a straight running of Windows code on Linux. It is a good start but such translation layers are hardly new given that Mainsoft has made a business off such technologies for over a decade (Internet Explorer for UNIX being a show piece of what the technology can do).

Say what you want about Vista, but without it you wouldn't have 7.

I never once bashed Vista, now did I?

I never said XP was better than Vista and 7, now did I?

I'm just being neutral and saying that XP is still the most widely used OS.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!