DX11 Coming To Linux (But Not XP)


Recommended Posts

eh, i have xp on my macbook. Put it on a 30gb partition, the OS has a footprint of less then 1gb and it lets me run windows game and run troubleshooting software when i'm working on other peoples machines. Works great.

And i'm not expecting any new out of it, which would be ridiculous at this point. But it does have its uses still.

Well, there's another nail in XP's coffin. Let it go, folks. Empty out that piggy bank and upgrade. There's no excuse anymore.

There's no excuse to upgrade either. :p

Guysa. XP is dead. Give it up.

If you want to run it, feel free, but nothing new is coming your way.

*pokes it* still seems alive to me :whistle:

Direct X 12 comes to Windows 7 (eventually).

i get the feeling it won't.

and that it require WDDM2.0

or microsoft gonna release SP2 for 7 and include the backport

sorry vista no backport for you! , cause by the time windows 8 is out(late 2012) vista passed it mainsteam support(early 2012)/and already two release away

...

If people choose to run Linux, they shouldn't expect Microsoft to cater to them. You can ballache all you like about how evil Microsoft are, but DX is their platform, and Linux users have no right to expect it to be ported, so if you want to use DX get a copy of Windows, otherwise stop crying about it.

...

Do people actually expect that?

I don't get it, why is XP dead for the average user? So many people seem to state it but give no reason. Im an XP user with a lot of experience and qualifications in computing. I don't use my PC for gaming, I don't visit dodgy sites and I can read what is on my Taskbar without needing to see a graphical representation of it.

Win 7 is stable and robust but for me so is XP, Win 7 offers no more functionality when it comes to storage or cataloguing of files and folders, its pretty but then I just like to access a folder without a big fade in.

What am I missing that makes me seem so stupid when it comes to keeping XP? Im not being funny here, I wouldn't genuinely like to know what gets you all going so much?

What am I missing that makes me seem so stupid when it comes to keeping XP? Im not being funny here, I wouldn't genuinely like to know what gets you all going so much?

I've been wondering the same thing... Some people who have "upgraded" thinks that clearly the rest of the world needs to.

Win 7 is stable and robust but for me so is XP, Win 7 offers no more functionality when it comes to storage or cataloguing of files and folders, its pretty but then I just like to access a folder without a big fade in.

Err... yes it does, quite significantly so....

XP doesn't properly support SATA drives out of the box, you either have to make the BIOS emulate an IDE drive, or get 3rd party drivers.

It doesn't support WiFi either without patches (SP2), people forget just how old XP is and just how far computers have come since then (It doesn't make the best use of multi-core CPUs either)

Err... yes it does, quite significantly so....

not really, install windows desktop search and the indexing and cataloging will work fine in XP. It's the same tech.

XP doesn't properly support SATA drives out of the box, you either have to make the BIOS emulate an IDE drive, or get 3rd party drivers.

It doesn't support WiFi either without patches (SP2), people forget just how old XP is and just how far computers have come since then (It doesn't make the best use of multi-core CPUs either)

yes it does, it just doens't support raid, big difference. I've installed XP hundreds of times with different configs with SATA drivers with a normal SP2 cd a ridiculous amount of times. And big deal it doesn't support Wifi out of the box, where and why would you install XP with anything less then SP2 nowadays? You can't even buy it without at least SP2 nowadays.

Err... yes it does, quite significantly so....

Cool, so what does it do? Will it make dating and storage of my files more accurate? Again I don't mean it funny, if it will then Im on board but from the beta version i used it seemed to do pretty much the same file storage.

XP doesn't properly support SATA drives out of the box, you either have to make the BIOS emulate an IDE drive, or get 3rd party drivers.

It doesn't support WiFi either without patches (SP2), people forget just how old XP is and just how far computers have come since then (It doesn't make the best use of multi-core CPUs either)

SP3 is pretty much standard if your using XP, I have Sata drives and have no problem at all.

not really, install windows desktop search and the indexing and cataloging will work fine in XP. It's the same tech.

No it is not it may give similar functionality but it works vastly far more supior on windows 7 as it is intergrated at the core and heart of windows 7 and is again more robust .

and some information for anyone

Windows 7 is more secure then XP is on the on its greatest day windows 7 is far more robust under the hood to understand and make better use of resources on your system be it GPU CPU or RAM or I/O workings . Windows 7 provides far better multi-threading performance better multi-tasking experience ( even on older single core chips) Windows 7 can do everything XP can do but faster better optimized at the same job you name it Hell my mom uses windows 7 and loves it over XP and she is on a 1900+ athlon chip with 1.5gb of ram and She dont GAME .

My mom always had to call me on this or that on windows XP and how to do this or that and it was annoying so 2 weeks or less after i did a fresh install of XP with SP3 ( she uses XP long time before SP3) for her witch she called me some more and complained i installed windows 7 for her and she has yet to call me on anything windows related on how to do this or that or fix any issues. ( tho she did call me on Facebook) he he

No it is not it may give similar functionality but it works vastly far more supior on windows 7 as it is intergrated at the core and heart of windows 7 and is again more robust .

it is the same tech, it's just not built into the OS itself. That fact means it'll obviously work better in Wondows 7/Vista, but it's still the exact same tech.

Yet the network icon in the tray still won't operate correctly when I have a bridged connection...

Plenty of other little things that annoy me.

You can't scroll in an app that you aren't currently viewing. Like any background task such as word you can't hover over it and scroll while browsing a web page. How something like this isn't built into the OS already just baffles me, especially with snap, it's basic functionality that would compliment snap sooo nicely.

to those who are sticking with XP and wonder why people are trying to convince them to upgrade:

You are fighting a losing war. There is no chance that XP will remain in the world of computing in any meaningful way going forward. More and more software will not work with it no matter how much you wish it wasn't so. XP had a better run than it should have had due to FUD surrounding Vista. If you want to hold out then by all means hold out. Keep this in mind though; microsoft will not push back it's support time table again. And most importantly, web browsers will increasing no longer support XP. Corporations, right now, are waiting for windows 7 sp1 for their change over. When this happens i suspect you will see windows xp market share drop in half.

to those who are sticking with XP and wonder why people are trying to convince them to upgrade:

You are fighting a losing war. There is no chance that XP will remain in the world of computing in any meaningful way going forward. More and more software will not work with it no matter how much you wish it wasn't so. XP had a better run than it should have had due to FUD surrounding Vista. If you want to hold out then by all means hold out. Keep this in mind though; microsoft will not push back it's support time table again. And most importantly, web browsers will increasing no longer support XP. Corporations, right now, are waiting for windows 7 sp1 for their change over. When this happens i suspect you will see windows xp market share drop in half.

to those who on are windows 7 and can't lay off people who are still on XP

get over it.

I have a copy of 64-bit Win 7 around here, but can't bring myself to upgrade this machine. My graphics card wouldn't support DX11 anyway (8800 GTS 640MB), and if 8 is coming out in a year or so, why would most XP users just not wait it out?

BTW, I installed 7 on my laptop a couple months back, and outside of "oooooh shiny", color me underwhelmed.

Anyone who prefers xp over windows 7 is purposely finding reasons not to like it.

It's nearly impossible to reasonably say that xp is better.

No there not, people who are using XP have specific reasons to use XP or just don't see the point of upgrading because it doesn't really suit there needs or budget at the moment. No one is really arguing that XP is better then 7.

No there not, people who are using XP have specific reasons to use XP or just don't see the point of upgrading because it doesn't really suit there needs or budget at the moment.

Ok, that is fine, but then why do they **** and moan because they are being left out in the cold? Why do they constantly expect to be catered to by Microsoft?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!